

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Noah Greenwald, (503) 484-7495
The Center for Biological Diversity today
filed petitions to protect four mountaintop species, from Hawaii to New
Hampshire, that are threatened by climate change, including the 'I'iwi,
a Hawaiian songbird; the white-tailed
ptarmigan, a grouse-like bird of the Rocky Mountains; https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/birds/Bicknells_thrush/pdfs/
The Center for Biological Diversity today
filed petitions to protect four mountaintop species, from Hawaii to New
Hampshire, that are threatened by climate change, including the 'I'iwi,
a Hawaiian songbird; the white-tailed
ptarmigan, a grouse-like bird of the Rocky Mountains; Bicknell's
thrush, a northeastern U.S. songbird; and the San
Bernardino flying squirrel of Southern California. All four are limited to
high-elevation mountaintops, where a shifting climate threatens to eliminate
their habitat.
"Climate change will have disproportionate impacts on
species that live at high elevations," said Noah Greenwald, endangered
species program director at the Center. "These four species are literally
going to be pushed off the top of the mountain."
Mountaintop species are particularly vulnerable to climate
change because as the climate warms, they have nowhere to go. The 'I'iwi was once
widespread throughout the Hawaiian Islands, but is now restricted to
high-elevation areas on the Big Island and Maui
because of the spread of avian pox and malaria by mosquitoes, which are already
moving uphill with a warming climate. Bicknell's thrush is jeopardized by
the loss of its native high-elevation forests due to warming, as well as acid
rain damage to red spruce. With its extensive adaptations to cold, snowy
climates, the ptarmigan is threatened by warmer winter temperatures and forests
that will creep uphill and eliminate its alpine habitat. Finally, the San Bernardino flying
squirrel is thought to have already disappeared from one of the two mountain
ranges where it lives; the remaining isolated population is threatened by the
upward movement of its forest habitat and increasing drought that threatens its
food supply.
"The plight of these four species shows that global
warming is causing widespread harm, here and now, across the United States," said Shaye
Wolf, a Center biologist. "If we don't rapidly reduce greenhouse
gas pollution, scientists predict that one third of the world's species
will be condemned to extinction by 2050."
Changes in climate are already apparent in many mountainous
areas. Studies from the western U.S.,
for example, have documented reduced snowpack and earlier spring runoff. These
changes will mean less and warmer water in the summer months in many areas with
impacts to both people and wildlife. The Center's scientific petitions
request that all four species be protected under the Endangered Species Act.
Background on the species
'I'iwi: With its fiery-red body, quick black
wings and long, curved, salmon-colored bill, the 'I'iwi -- or
scarlet Hawaiian honeycreeper -- is one of the most recognizable birds of
Hawaii. Although it was once widespread across the islands, this iconic bird is
now in danger of immediate or near-term extinction across the whole western
portion of its habitat. The spread of avian malaria and avian pox has limited its
range to high-elevation areas where it's too cool for mosquitoes to
deliver the diseases. As climate change pushes colder temperatures farther and
farther upslope, the bird will have fewer and fewer high-mountain refuges
-- and will eventually run out of room altogether.
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/birds/iiwi/index.html
Bicknell's thrush:
The drab brown coloration of the
Bicknell's thrush hides a highly unusual songbird with an extremely
limited geographic range. It breeds only at higher elevations in the
northeast United States and eastern Canada and winters on a handful of
islands in
the Caribbean, primarily the Dominican
Republic. Males outnumber females 3 to 1,
and most females mate with multiple males, who then share in the job of
provisioning for nestlings. This uncommon domestic arrangement helps
ensure
reproductive success for a species that has chosen to live in an often
harsh
environment marked by late springs, cold and fog. As the climate warms,
the
range of hardwoods appears to be rapidly moving up in elevation,
supplanting
the coniferous trees the thrush depends on for nesting. With increased
temperatures, new predators, competitors, and diseases are likely to
move up
into the thrush's habitat as well, further stressing a species that is
being squeezed out of its mountain home.
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/birds/Bicknells_thrush/index.html
https://www.fws.gov/northeast/climatechange/stories/bicknellsthrush.html
White-tailed ptarmigan: The smallest bird in the grouse
family, the white-tailed ptarmigan is also one of the few animals that lives on
alpine mountaintops throughout its entire life. Every part of this ptarmigan is
adapted to help it thrive in a frigid climate, from its feathered,
snowshoe-like talons to its seasonally changing plumage to its remarkable
metabolic ability to gain body mass throughout harsh winters. But as the
climate warms, these same adaptations could spell the bird's doom. The
ptarmigan's range is severely limited by its sole dependence on alpine
habitat, which is shrinking as hotter temperatures sneak up the mountainsides,
threatening to push the tree line -- and the ptarmigan -- to
ever-higher elevations, until there's no more room to rise.
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/birds/white-tailed_ptarmigan/index.html
San Bernardino flying squirrel: A subspecies of the northern flying
squirrel, the San Bernardino
flying squirrel is distinguished by the parachute-like panels of skin that
stretch from wrist to ankle, allowing it to glide for 300 feet or more between
trees. The flying squirrel lives year-round in high-elevation conifer forests
of Southern California, and like the spotted
owl, appears to thrive in mature forests with big trees, large snags, and
plenty of downed logs that foster the growth of the truffle fungi they eat. The
San Bernardino flying squirrel is thought to
have disappeared from the San Jacinto Mountains in the past few decades, and the remaining
population, which is isolated to the upper-elevation forests of the San Bernardino Mountains, faces numerous threats. With
climate change, the squirrels' forest habitat is moving upslope as
temperatures warm; drought threatens its truffle fungus food, which depends on
wet, cool conditions. Forest-management practices that remove canopy cover,
snags and downed logs are degrading the squirrel's habitat, and
ever-increasing urban development is encroaching on its mountain home.
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/mammals/San_Bernardino_flying_squirrel/index.html
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252The fashion industry has thrived for decades while "failing to ensure that the right of garment workers to unionize and collectively bargain is respected."
With clothing companies that will be offering discounted Black Friday deals this week relying heavily on the labor of tens of millions underpaid and overworked garment workers across the Global South, two reports by the human rights group Amnesty International make the case that ensuring these employees are afforded the right to organize their workplaces is key to ending worker exploitation across the fashion industry.
The organization interviewed 64 garment workers in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, India, and Pakistan from 2023-24, including 12 union organizers and labor rights activists, for its report titled Stitched Up, about the denial of freedom of association for workers in the four countries.
Two-thirds of the workers Amnesty interviewed were women, reflecting the fact that the garment workforce is mainly female, and many described the long hours, poverty wages, and abusive working conditions that the industry is known for.
But beyond that, the workers told Amnesty about the "climate of fear" they work in, with all but two of the 13 workers in Bangladesh reporting they had faced threats of retaliation at work if they joined or tried to form a union.
More than two dozen union organizers in the four countries described harassment, dismissal, and threats that they and their colleagues had faced for organizing their workplace.
“When workers raise their voices, they are ignored. When they try to organize, they are threatened and sacked. And finally, when workers protest, they are beaten, shot at, and arrested,” said a labor rights activist identified as Taufiq in Bangladesh.
The report notes that "restrictions on the right of workers to organize into trade unions and collectively speak out against human rights abuses at work are a violation of the fundamental right to freedom of association and collective bargaining," which are affirmed by the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as well as the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
Agnès Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, said that "an unholy alliance of fashion brands, factory owners, and the governments of Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka is propping up an industry known for its endemic human rights abuses" and allowing mistreatment of workers to continue while barring employees from working together to fight for better conditions and pay.
"By failing to ensure that the right of garment workers to unionize and collectively bargain is respected, the industry has thrived for decades on the exploitation of a grossly underpaid, overworked, and mostly female workforce,” said Callamard.
The governments of the four countries have failed to provide a living wage to garment workers—instead competing to attract the investment of clothing companies by setting the lowest wages possible. Almost all of the workers interviewed by Amnesty said their wages did not cover their families' living costs.
Many of the workers also reported that they were hired with "informal" work contracts, with no formal mechanisms for reporting workplace abuses, including violence and sexual harassment.
“I was touched physically and abused verbally. No one in management would listen to my complaints then I asked other women to organize. I was threatened with dismissal many times,” Sumaayaa, a worker and organizer from Lahore, Pakistan, told Amnesty.
The governments in question have done nothing to counter such precarious working arrangements, with officials establishing "Special Economic Zones" (SEZ) in Bangladesh and "Free Trade Zones" in Sri Lanka—areas where administrative measures place "often insurmountable barriers against union communication and access to workers."
Instead of affording workers the right to freedom of association in SEZ's, officials in Bangladesh encourage workers to form "welfare associations or committees, which have limited ability to collectively organize."
Alongside Stitched Up, Amnesty released the companion report Abandoned by Fashion: The Urgent Need for Fashion Brands to Champion Workers’ Rights, which details top brands' responses to an international survey on the rights of garment workers to organize their workplaces.
All of the fashion brands and retailers surveyed, including Adidas, ASOS, Shein, PVH, and Marks and Spencer, had "codes of conduct for suppliers, human rights policies, or principles, which affirmed the company’s commitment to workers’ right to freedom of association."
But the survey revealed "a limited commitment to implementing these policies at the factory level, especially in proactively promoting union organizing and ensuring human rights commitments and the ability of workers to exercise this right were reflected in their choice of sourcing location."
Amnesty found very few independent trade unions operating within the companies' supply chains in the four countries.
Adidas reported that 9.5% of its suppliers in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan have unions. H&M works with 145 factories in Bangladesh, 29 of which had trade unions. Of 31 factories in Bangladesh, none had unions, and eight out of 93 facilities in India had them.
In the case of the clothing company Next, just 23 of the 167 apparel factories the company works with in Bangladesh had independent unions, while 134 had less empowered "committees."
"These findings provide a very stark indication of the low levels of unionization within the supply chains of major fashion companies in South Asia," reads the report. "They reveal the impact of the failures of the governments of Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka to protect and promote garment workers’ rights in relation to the right to freedom of association. Our research shows how all four states have effectively denied this right to garment workers, including by creating disproportionate or arbitrary barriers to registration, unionization, and strike action, and by failing in their responsibility to protect workers, union members, and officials from corporate abuse including discrimination, harassment, and dismissal."
Amnesty International made a number of recommendations to fashion companies, including:
“The need of the hour is to build a human rights-respecting sourcing strategy for the global garment industry," she said. "Freedom of association is key to tackling the abuse of workers’ rights. It must be protected, advanced, and championed.”
West Virginia's governor initially announced that both members of his state's National Guard "passed away from their injuries," but he then said that "we are now receiving conflicting reports" about their condition.
This is a developing story… Please check back for updates…
Two National Guard members and one suspect were shot on Wednesday afternoon near the White House in Washington, DC.
Vito Maggiolo, the public information officer for the District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Medical Service Department, confirmed that first responders transported all three people from the scene to the hospital, and unnamed law enforcement officials told multiple media outlets that the Guard members were in critical condition.
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey wrote on the social media platform X that "it is with great sorrow that we can confirm both members of the West Virginia National Guard who were shot earlier today in Washington, DC have passed away from their injuries." However, he then said that "we are now receiving conflicting reports about the condition of our two Guard members."
Multiple agencies responded to the shooting on 17th Street, between I and H Streets—which briefly grounded flights at Reagan National Airport and put the White House on lockdown. President Donald Trump is in Florida, and Vice President JD Vance is in Texas.
Trump said on his Truth Social platform that "the animal that shot the two National Guardsmen, with both being critically wounded, and now in two separate hospitals, is also severely wounded, but regardless, will pay a very steep price. God bless our Great National Guard, and all of our Military and Law Enforcement. These are truly Great People. I, as President of the United States, and everyone associated with the Office of the Presidency, am with you!"
According to the Washington Post, US Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi said the shooting had "no known direction of interest towards the White House other than the location at this time," and agency members at the scene did not fire shots.
ABC News noted that "the National Guard was deployed to the nation's capital as part of President Trump's federal takeover of the city in August. According to the most recent update, there are 2,188 Guard personnel assigned to DC."
US District Judge Jia Cobb, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, ruled last week that the deployment in DC is illegal and must come to an end, but she gave the Trump administration until December 11 to file an appeal.
"I've spoken to dozens of people held inside ICE detention centers in Arizona and this tracks," said Democratic Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari.
The libertarian Cato Institute this week further undermined the Trump administration's claims that it is targeting "the worst of the worst" with its violent immigration operations in communities across the United States by publishing data about the criminal histories—or lack thereof—of immigrants who have been arrested and booked into detention.
David J. Bier, the institute's director of immigration studies, previously reported in June that 65% of people taken by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had no convictions, and 93% had no violent convictions.
Monday evening, Bier shared a new nonpublic dataset leaked to Cato. Of the 44,882 people booked into ICE custody from when the fiscal year began on October 1 through November 15, 73% had no criminal convictions. For that share, around two-thirds also had no pending charges.
The data also show that most of those recently booked into ICE detention with criminal convictions had faced immigration, traffic, or vice charges. Just 5% had a violent conviction, and 3% had a property conviction.
"Other data sources support the conclusions from the number of ICE book-ins," Bier wrote, citing information on agency arrests from January to late July—or the first six months of President Donald Trump's second term—that the Deportation Data Project acquired via a public records request.
The data show that as of January 1, just before former President Joe Biden left office, 149 immigrants without charges or convictions were arrested by ICE. That number surged by 1,500% under Trump: It peaked at 4,072 in June and ultimately was 2,386 by the end of July—when 67% of all arrestees had no criminal convictions, and 39% had neither convictions nor charges.
Bier also pointed to publicly available data about current detainees on ICE's website, emphasizing that the number of people in detention with no convictions or pending charges “increased a staggering 2,370% since January from fewer than 1,000 to over 21,000."
In addition to publishing an article on Cato's site, Bier detailed the findings on the social media platform X, where various critics of the administration's immigration crackdown weighed in. Among them was Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), who said: "These are the facts. I've spoken to dozens of people held inside ICE detention centers in Arizona and this tracks."
US Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) declared: "This is the scandal. Trump isn't targeting dangerous people. He's targeting peaceful immigrants. Almost exclusively."
The US Department of Homeland Security, which includes ICE, also jumped in, as did DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin. Responding to Murphy, McLaughlin said in part: "This is so dumb it hurts my soul. This is a made-up pie chart with no legitimate data behind it—just propaganda to undermine the brave work of DHS law enforcement and fool Americans."
Bier and others then took aim at McLaughlin, with the Cato director offering the raw data and challenging her to "just admit you don't care whether the people you're arresting are threats to others or not."
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said that "DHS's spokeswoman lies AGAIN," calling out her post as "either a knowing lie or an egregious mistake."
"The data David J. Bier published was distributed to multiple congressional staffers and is just a more detailed breakdown of data, which is publicly available on ICE's own website," he stressed.
Journalist Jose Olivares noted that this is "not the first time Tricia McLaughlin has said that ICE's own data is 'propaganda.' Months ago, she slammed me and my colleague at the Guardian on PBS... even though we used ICE's own data for our reporting."