January, 19 2010, 04:49pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Elliott Negin,Media Director,enegin@ucsusa.org
Factcheck: Contrarians Attack IPCC Over Glacier Findings, But Glaciers are Still Melting
WASHINGTON
Climate contrarians are inflating the importance of an erroneous
reference to Himalayan glaciers in a 2007 U.N. Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) report to attack the scientific body and its
chairman, Rajendra Pachauri. The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS)
expects ideological bloggers, some members of Congress, and fossil-fuel
industry front groups to try to exploit this relatively small error in
the report to bolster conspiracy theories about the IPCC and climate
scientists.
The second of three 2007 IPCC reports included a statement that the
likelihood that Himalayan glaciers will disappear "by the year 2035 and
perhaps sooner is very high." It is not clear how this unsupported
assertion made it into the report, although it was openly challenged by
some researchers during the review and editing process. Rajendra
Pachauri, the IPCC chairman, said this week that the IPCC will
investigate the matter.
Each of the three IPCC 2007 reports was written by a different
working group. The reports, which covered climate science, the
consequences of climate change, and potential strategies for reducing
emissions and adapting to climate change, included discussions of
nearly every climate study available from the scientific literature at
the time. The working groups also issued shorter documents called
"summaries for policymakers" that highlighted their most solid
conclusions.
Regardless of how the statement remained in the full report after
the review process, it is important to put it into scientific and
political context, UCS experts said. The claim was part of the full
review of climate science and impacts provided in the dense, 3,000-page
report, but was not mentioned in its highly visible summaries for
policymakers. Presumably the working group did not consider the 2035
Himalayan glaciers claim to be reliable enough for its policymaker
summary. The statement in the summary was much less specific. "If
current warming rates are maintained," it stated, "Himalayan glaciers
could decay at very rapid rates."
Given the sprawling nature of the IPCC, it is not surprising to find
relatively minor errors. Such mistakes do not undermine the overall
conclusions of the organization's reports, which are subject to an
exhaustive review process. The IPCC reports reference as many as 20,000
documents and the writing and review process involved more than 2,500
expert scientific reviewers.
GLACIERS ARE RETREATING WORLDWIDE
What should not get lost in this manufactured controversy is the
fact that glaciers around the world are melting more rapidly than the
IPCC projected.
A 2005 global survey of 442 glaciers
from the World Glacier Monitoring Service found that only 26 were
advancing, 18 were stationary, and 398 were retreating. In other words,
90 percent of the world's glaciers are shrinking as the planet warms.
Because scientific understanding of how fast snow and ice is
responding to global warming is still developing, the IPCC left the
effect of melting glaciers and ice sheets out of its sea-level rise
projections in 2007 and only considered the effects that thermal
expansion has on the ocean.
New analyses indicate
that meltwater from ice on land could lead to a sea-level rise of 2.6
feet (0.8 meter) by the end of the century; and, although 6.6 feet (2.0
meters) is less likely, it is still physically possible.
Melting glaciers and the resulting sea-level rise are a threat to
coastal communities around the world. According to the U.S. Global
Change Research Program's 2009 review of climate impacts in the United States,
"Sea-level rise and storm surge place many U.S. coastal areas at
increasing risk of erosion and flooding, especially along the Atlantic
and Gulf Coasts, Pacific Islands, and parts of Alaska. Energy and
transportation infrastructure and other property in coastal areas are
very likely to be adversely affected."
Melting glaciers also will threaten drinking water supplies. An August 2008 Geophysical Research Letters study
that examined the impact of the melting Himalayan Naimona'nyi glacier
concluded, "If Naimona'nyi is characteristic of other glaciers in the
region, alpine glacier meltwater surpluses are likely to shrink much
faster than currently predicted with substantial consequences for
approximately half a billion people."
SCIENTISTS CORRECT THEMSELVES; CONTRARIANS DON'T
Scientists admit when they make mistakes and correct them. That's
one important way science moves forward. Climate contrarians often
cherry-pick minor points like this one then inflate their importance to
attack the broader science.
The rare times contrarians have proven scientists wrong, scientists have corrected the error and gone back to work.
When scientists prove contrarians wrong--which happens all the time in
and out of the scientific literature--contrarians tend to ignore them
and move on to other points.
Because climate contrarians cannot account for the overwhelming
evidence that heat-trapping emissions from human activity are driving
global warming, they have resorted to conspiracy theories and attacks
on scientists to try to explain away reality. Climate contrarians
likely will use this small error to try to undermine confidence in the
IPCC and climate science generally. They also will use it to attack
Pachauri personally. It is incumbent upon journalists to resist giving
these attacks more credence than they deserve and avoid confusing the
public about the real threat of global warming.
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.
LATEST NEWS
200 Private Jet Owners Burned as Much CO2 as 40,000 Brits
The planes tracked by a new Guardian report belong to celebrities, billionaires, CEOs, and their families, among them the Murdoch family, Taylor Swift, and the Rolling Stones.
Nov 21, 2023
The private jets of just 200 rich and famous individuals or groups released around 415,518 metric tons of climate-heating carbon dioxide between January 2022 and September 22, 2023, The Guardian revealed Tuesday.
That's equal to the emissions burned by nearly 40,000 British residents in all aspects of their lives, the newspaper calculated.
The planes tracked by the outlet belong to celebrities, billionaires, CEOs, and their families, among them the Murdoch family, Taylor Swift, and the Rolling Stones. All told, the high-flyers made a total of 44,739 trips during the study period for a combined 11 years in the air.
"Pollution for wasteful luxury has to be the first to go, we need a ban on private jets."
Notable emitters included the Blavatnik family, the Murdoch family, and Eric Schmidt, whose flights during the 21-month study period released more than 7,500 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. The Sawiris family emitted around 7,500 metric tons, and Lorenzo Fertitta more than 5,000.
The Rolling Stones' Boeing 767 wide-body aircraft released around 5,046 metric tons of carbon dioxide, which is equal to 1,763 economy flights from London to New York. The 39 jets owned by 30 Russian oligarchs released 30,701 metric tons of carbon dioxide.
For comparison, average per capita emissions were 14.44 metric tons in the U.S. for 2022, 13.52 metric tons in Russia in 2021, and 5.2 metric tons in the U.K. the same year.
Taylor Swift was the only celebrity or billionaire in the report whose team responded to a request for comment.
"Before the tour kicked off in March of 2023, Taylor bought more than double the carbon credits needed to offset all tour travel," a spokesperson for the pop star told The Guardian.
Swift appears to have responded to public pressure to reduce private jet use. Her plane averaged 19 flights a month between January and August 2022, when she received criticism after sustainability firm Yard named her the celebrity who used her plane the most. After that point, the plane's average monthly flights dropped to two.
The Guardian's investigation was based on private aircraft registrations compiled by TheAirTraffic Database and flight records from OpenSky. Reporters calculated flight emissions based on model information found in the ADSBExchange Aircraft database and Planespotters.net and emissions per hour per model found in the Conklin & De Decker's CO2 calculator and the Eurocontrol emission calculator.
The report was released the day after an Oxfam study found that the world's richest 1% emitted the same amount as its poorest two-thirds. Given their high carbon footprint and luxury status, private jets have emerged as a rallying point for the climate justice movement.
"It's hugely unfair that rich people can wreck the climate this way, in just one flight polluting more than driving a car 23,000 kilometers," Greenpeace E.U. transport campaigner Thomas Gelin said in March. "Pollution for wasteful luxury has to be the first to go, we need a ban on private jets."
In the U.S., a group of climate campaigners is mobilizing to stop the expansion of Massachusetts' Hanscom Field, the largest private jet field in New England. An October report found that flights from that field between January 1, 2022, and July 15, 2023, released a total of 106,676 tons of carbon emissions.
"While plenty of business is no doubt discussed over golf at Aberdeen, Scotland, or at bird hunting reserves in Argentina (destinations we also documented), this is probably the least defensible form of luxury travel on a warming planet when a Zoom call would often do," Chuck Collins, who co-authored the Hanscom report, wrote for Fortune on November 14.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Israel-Hamas Hostage Deal Reportedly in 'Final Stages'
The leader of Hamas and Israel's prime minister both confirmed progress on a potential agreement to pause fighting and release hostages.
Nov 21, 2023
This is a developing story... Check back for possible updates...
Israel and Hamas are reportedly on the verge of a deal that would involve the release of hostages and a pause in bombing that has killed more than 13,000 people in Gaza and intensified the strip's humanitarian crisis.
An unnamed source briefed on the talks toldReuters on Tuesday that negotiations are in the "final stages" and a deal is "closer than it has ever been" since October 7, when a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel killed around 1,200 people.
The Qatar-mediated deal, according to Reuters, "envisages the release of around 50 civilian hostages by Hamas and of female and minor-aged Palestinian detainees from Israeli custody, as well as a multi-day pause in fighting."
Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh confirmed Tuesday that a "deal on a truce" with Israel is "close." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that "we are making progress" on a hostage agreement and hopes "there will be good news soon."
Netanyahu rejected a similar proposal earlier this month.
News of a potential deal comes after six weeks of Israeli bombing that has leveled much of the Gaza Strip, destroying homes and other civilian infrastructure, killing thousands of children, and displacing more than a million people. Additionally, Israel's siege has prevented adequate humanitarian aid from reaching desperate Gazans, leaving virtually the entire population at risk of starvation and forcing hospitals in the northern part of the strip to shut down.
A spokesperson for Gaza's Health Ministry toldAl Jazeera on Tuesday that the occupancy rate in northern Gaza's hospitals has reached 190%, overrun with victims of Israeli airstrikes.
Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), said in a speech Tuesday that "the people of Gaza are not safe anywhere: not at home, not under the U.N. flag, not in a hospital, not in the north, and not in the south."
"More than 900,000 people are sheltering in UNRWA installations, including in the north," said Lazzarini. "The conditions in these shelters are indescribable. They are massively overcrowded and shockingly unsanitary. On average, 150 people share a single toilet and 700 people share a single shower when available. These are breeding grounds for despair and disease."
A negotiated multi-day pause could allow additional humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, but it's unlikely that will be enough to alleviate emergency conditions in the Gaza Strip.
"We need an immediate humanitarian cease-fire," Lazzarini said. "We need respect for international humanitarian law so civilians are protected, and humanitarian organizations can work unhindered. We need a meaningful supply of humanitarian aid and commercial goods flowing into Gaza. The siege must be lifted."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Fires, Floods, and All-Time Record Heat Batter Brazil
The heat index—which combines air temperature and humidity—hit an astounding 58.5ºC (137ºF), the highest index ever recorded, in Rio de Janeiro on Tuesday.
Nov 21, 2023
Amid a stifling heatwave this week Brazil is experiencing its highest temperatures ever recorded—a milestone that comes alongside global trends and fresh scientific data showing the world is far from meeting stated ambitions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to curb the climate emergency.
According to the National Institute of Meteorology, temperatures in the southeastern city of Araçuaà hit 44.8ºC (112.6ºF) on Sunday, breaking the previous record set in 2005.
It was so hot over the weekend that international pop star Taylor Swift was forced to reschedule concerts nationwide.
Meanwhile, the heat index—which combines air temperature and humidity—hit an astounding 58.5ºC (137ºF), the highest index ever recorded, Tuesday morning in the country's second-most populous city of Rio de Janeiro.
The extreme heat is having a severe and negative impact on people's ability to work and live comfortably and putting a crush on the nation's power grid. As the Associated Pressreports:
Brazilians turned to fans, air conditioners and dehumidifiers to cool down, with utilities reporting record energy demand. Power outages were reported in Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
Amid the high heat, wildfires are burning widely in the Pantanal biome, the world’s biggest tropical wetlands spanning parts of Mato Grosso and Mato Grosso do Sul states. The fires have ravaged an area about the size of Cyprus, or more than 947,000 hectares (about 3,600 square miles), according to the Environmental Satellite Applications Laboratory of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
The wildfires are arriving earlier in some places and with much more intensity. With summer not even at its height, fears are growing of what's to come:
"The Pantanal is a region that's used to fires," biologist Gustavo Figueiroa, head of the environmental group SOS Pantanal, toldAl-Jazeera on Monday. "Normally, it regenerates naturally. But this many fires isn't normal."
Attributed in part to the El Niño effect, the historic temperatures in South America's largest country mirror the trend happening worldwide, with 2023 on track to be the hottest in 125,000 years, the result of burning fossil fuels and release of other heat-trapping gasses since the Industrial Revolution.
In addition to the heatwave and fires, heavy rains and damaging storms have brought severe flooding to other regions of the country, some resulting in the death of local residents and tens of thousands displaced.
Despite global efforts to reduce emissions and transition away from coal, oil, and gas, the latest figures from the United Nations in its 2023 Emissions Gap Report, released Monday, show that humanity is expanding its use of fossil fuels instead.
"The report shows that the emissions gap is more like an emissions canyon," U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said in a statement. "A canyon littered with broken promises, broken lives, and broken records. All of this is a failure of leadership, a betrayal of the vulnerable, and a massive missed opportunity."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular