October, 14 2009, 01:50pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Kathleen Sutcliffe
Earth Justice
(202) 667-4500, ext 235;
ksutcliffe@earthjustice.org
Heather Pilatic
Pesticide Action Network
heather@panna.org
Barb Howe
Farmworker Justice
(202) 293-5420, ext.307
bhowe@farmworkerjustice.org
Farm Workers and Allies Ask Gov't to Protect Kids From Toxic Pesticide Drift
Petition to EPA includes immediate no-spray buffer zones around homes, schools, day care centers for most toxic pesticides
LINDSAY, Calif.
Luis Medellin and his three little sisters - aged 5, 9 and 12 - live in
the middle of an orange grove in this small Central Valley town. During
the growing season, Luis and his sisters are awakened several times a
week by the sickly smell of nighttime pesticide spraying. What follows
is worse: searing headaches, nausea, vomiting.
But if a coalition of farm worker, public health, and children's
advocates are successful, Luis and his little sisters may one day be
able to sleep through the night without these toxic disruptions.
The public interest law firms Earthjustice and Farmworker Justice filed a petition today
(PDF) asking the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to set safety
standards protecting children who grow up near farms from the harmful
effects of pesticide 'drift'
- the toxic spray or vapor that travels from treated fields. The groups
are also asking the agency to immediately adopt no-spray buffer zones
around homes, schools, parks and daycare centers for the most dangerous
and drift-prone pesticides.
The petition was filed on behalf of farm worker groups United Farm
Workers, Oregon-based Pineros y Campesinos Unidos del Noroeste,
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, and the Farm Labor
Organizing Committee, AFL-CIO as well as Physicians for Social
Responsibility, Washington-based Sea Mar Community Health Center,
Pesticide Action Network, and the million-plus member MomsRising.Org
The Medellin family's story is not unique. From apple orchards in
Washington to potato fields in Florida, poisonous pesticide 'clouds'
plague the people who live nearby - posing a particular risk to the
young children of the nation's farm workers, many of whom live in
industry housing at the field's edge.
"When farm workers come home after a long day in the fields and
orchards, they're faced with yet another worry - the poisons that are
settling in their homes, their lawns, their children's bodies," said
Erik Nicholson, National Vice President of United Farm Workers. "We
can't let another growing season go by. EPA needs to put an end to this
today."
In 1996, Congress required EPA to set standards by 2006 to protect
children from pesticides. Three years have passed since that deadline,
and EPA's job is only partially complete. The agency has made some
progress - banning the use of some pesticides in the home and on lawns.
But the agency has failed to protect children from these same
pesticides when they drift from treated fields into nearby yards,
homes, schools, parks and daycare centers.
"In farming communities throughout the country, children have been
abandoned by federal pesticide protections," said Earthjustice attorney
Janette Brimmer. "We're asking EPA to finish the job it started so
children who live, go to school, or play near farms and orchards are
kept safe from poisonous pesticides."
EPA has acknowledged the risk of pesticide drift, but still chose to go
ahead with a double-standard: protecting urban and suburban areas,
while leaving the children of farm workers and other rural kids
vulnerable.
"We traditionally think of farms as healthy places," said MomsRising.org
President Joan Blades. "But children and families across the country
are being poisoned by pesticides that travel from the fields into their
houses and bedrooms, causing serious and long-lasting damage to their
health. We already have standards barring the use of such pesticides
for homes and lawns to protect children. But all children deserve such
protection. You shouldn't have to live in the suburbs to be safe from
deadly pesticides."
"It's time the EPA put an end to this double-standard for farm
workers. EPA's policies must protect farm workers and their children
from unnecessary poisoning," said Farmworker Justice attorney Virginia
Ruiz.
"It's outrageous that our own government isn't protecting our children
from being poisoned by pesticides drifting on their homes and schools,"
said Julie Montgomery, Project Director and Attorney with California
Rural Legal Assistance Foundation. "How can parents possibly protect
their children from these dangers on their own?"
Pesticide poisoning reports and scientific studies show that pesticides are ending up in the air and in people's bodies at unsafe levels. Among a host of examples: recent air monitoring
(PDF) conducted near the Southwoods Elementary School in Hastings,
Florida, detected pesticides in every sample, sometimes at levels that
may pose serious health risks to young children.
"Children are especially vulnerable to pesticide exposures both because
their smaller bodies cannot break down toxins as well as adults, and
because their developmental processes are prone to being derailed --
even by very low-level exposure," explains Dr. Margaret Reeves, Senior
Scientist for Pesticide Action Network. "The particular pesticides
we're finding in our drift catching and biomonitoring results are some
of the worst: chlorpyrifos, diazinon, endosulfan...these are associated
with serious short- and long-term health effects. They are also
entirely unnecessary."
One of the pesticides identified as being so dangerous that the groups
have asked EPA to adopt immediate no-spray buffer zone is chlorpyrifos
- initially developed as a nerve toxin by the Nazis. The short term
effects of exposure to chlorpyrifos have been likened to a
chemically-induced flu: chest tightness, blurred vision, headaches,
coughing and wheezing, weakness, nausea and vomiting, coma, seizures,
and even death.
A copy of the petition is available here: https://www.earthjustice.org/library/legal_docs/petition-pesticides-in-the-air-kids-at-risk.pdf (PDF)
A fact sheet with background information on today's petition is available here: https://www.earthjustice.org/library/factsheets/pesticides_kid_factsheet.pdf (PDF)
A fact sheet detailing the specific health risks linked to pesticide exposure is available here: https://www.panna.org/node/2392
A background piece on the science behind pesticide drift is available here: https://www.panna.org/drift/science
The four-page results of Hastings, FL drift-catcher results are available here: https://www.panna.org/files/hastingsFLSum20080923.pdf (PDF)
Also available for interviews:
Janette Brimmer, Attorney, Earthjustice, (206) 343-7340, ext. 29, jbrimmer@earthjustice.org
Patti Goldman, Vice President of Litigation, Earthjustice, (206) 343-7340, ext. 32, pgoldman@earthjustice.org
Dr. Margaret Reeves, Senior Scientist, Pesticide Action Network, cell: 415.593.4351, mreeves@panna.org
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and Brasília's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular