The Progressive

NewsWire

A project of Common Dreams

For Immediate Release
Contact:

Moira Vahey, Free Press, (202) 265-1490, x 31

Public Interest and Civil Rights Groups Speak Out Against Unfounded Attacks on Mark Lloyd

More than 50 organizations call on the FCC and Congress to support the work of the FCC diversity officer and to correct the record on localism and diversity policies

WASHINGTON

On Wednesday, more than 50 civil rights, public interest and
grassroots organizations sent a letter to the Federal Communications
Commission and congressional leaders supporting Mark Lloyd, the
associate general counsel and chief diversity officer of the FCC, and
the agency's longstanding mission to promote localism, diversity and
competition in the media.

In recent weeks, Mr. Lloyd has been unfairly attacked on cable TV
and radio talk shows with false and misleading information about his
role and responsibilities at the FCC. A respected scholar and public
servant, Lloyd was hired by the agency to expand media opportunities
for women, people of color, small businesses, and those living in rural
areas.

The full text of the letter and a list of signatories is below:

September 16, 2009

To: FCC Commissioners and Congressional Leaders

We, the undersigned, ask you to speak out against the falsehoods and
misinformation that are threatening to derail important work by
Congress and the Federal Communications Commission on media and
technology policies that would benefit all Americans.

In recent weeks, Mark Lloyd, the associate general counsel and chief
diversity officer of the FCC, has come under attack by prominent cable
TV and radio hosts, and even by some members of Congress, who have made
false and misleading claims about his work at the agency.

Mr. Lloyd is a respected historian, an experienced civil rights
leader, and a dedicated public servant. He was hired by the FCC to
"collaborate on the policies and legal framework necessary to expand
opportunities for women, minorities, and small businesses to
participate in the communications marketplace." His important work
should not be hindered by lies and innuendo.

As the leading media policymakers in Washington, we ask you to speak
out against these unfounded attacks, stand publicly behind Mr. Lloyd,
and make clear your commitment to carrying out the core mandate of the
FCC -- as enshrined in the Communications Act of 1934 -- to promote
localism, diversity and competition in the media.

Let us be clear as to what "localism" actually means. Broadcasters
get hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of subsidies in exchange for
a basic commitment to serve the public interest. Broadcasters are
expected to be responsive to their local communities. Localism has been
a cornerstone of broadcast regulation as long as there has been
broadcast regulation. It has nothing to do with censorship or
interference with local programming decisions. Localism is simply about
public service, not about any political viewpoint. Local public service
programming and political talk radio, whether liberal or conservative,
are not mutually exclusive.

Likewise, as the Supreme Court has recognized, "Safeguarding the
public's right to receive a diversity of views and information over the
airwaves is ... an integral component of the FCC's mission." Diversity
of media ownership is a crucial issue, and the agency must address the
fact that women and people of color are vastly underrepresented among
media owners using the public airwaves.

But diversity is also about closing the digital divide: People of
color, the poor, and rural Americans are far less likely to have
high-speed Internet access at home or share in the benefits of
broadband. Diversity is about creating opportunities and broadening
participation; it should go without saying, but it has absolutely
nothing to do with censorship.

The third tenet of the FCC's mission is competition. Those using
their media megaphones to slander and distort the views of Mr. Lloyd
and others may not want competition. But the FCC's job, in its own
words, is "to strengthen the diverse and robust marketplace of ideas
that is essential to our democracy." The overriding goal must be more
speech, not less -- more radio stations, more cable channels and more
Web sites.

At the core of President Obama's media and technology agenda is a
commitment to "diversity in the ownership of broadcast media" and a
pledge to "promote the development of new media outlets for expression
of diverse viewpoints." Now is the time to further that agenda, not to
retreat from it.

We ask you, as leaders on these key media issues, to draw a line in
the sand now, speak out against the unfounded attacks, and redouble
your efforts to enact a policy agenda that will strengthen our economy,
our society and our democracy.

Sincerely,

Josh Silver

Free Press

Wade Henderson

Leadership Conference on Civil Rights

Winnie Stachelberg

Center for American Progress

James Rucker
ColorOfChange.org

Stephanie Jones
National Urban League Policy Institute

Brent Wilkes
League of United Latin American Citizens

Larry Cohen

Communications Workers of America

Alex Nogales

National Hispanic Media Coalition

Bernie Lunzer
The Newspaper Guild
Communications Workers of America

Kimberly Marcus
Rainbow PUSH Coalition's Public Policy Institute

Malkia Cyril

Center for Media Justice

Andrew Schwartzman

Media Access Project

John Kosinski

Writers Guild of America West

Sandy Close
New America Media

Amalia Deloney

Media Action Grassroots Network

Angelo Falcon

National Institute for Latino Policy

Michael Calabrese
New America Foundation

Gigi Sohn

Public Knowledge

Rinku Sen

Applied Research Center

John Clark

National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians
Communications Workers of America

Graciela Sanchez
Esperanza Peace and Justice Center

Mimi Pickering

Appalshop

Steven Renderos
Main Street Project

Hal Ponder

American Federation of Musicians

Tracy Rosenberg

Media Alliance

Terry O'Neill
National Organization for Women

Roger Hickey

Campaign for America's Future

Andrea Quijada

New Mexico Media Literacy Project

Jonathan Lawson

Reclaim the Media

DeAnne Cuellar
Texas Media Empowerment Project

Chris Rabb

Afro-Netizen

Loris Ann Taylor

Lisa Fager
Bediako
Industry Ears

O. Ricardo Pimentel

National Association of Hispanic Journalists

Todd Wolfson

Media Mobilizing Project

Erica Williams
Campus Progress

Gary Flowers

Black Leadership Forum

Eva Paterson
Equal Justice Society

Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr
Hip Hop Caucus

Cheryl Contee

Jack and Jill Politics

Dr. E. Faye Williams
National Congress of Black Women

Emily Sheketoff

American Library Association

Ari Rabin-Havt

Media Matters Action Network

Kathryn Galan

National Association of Latino Independent Producers

Roberto Lovato

Presente

Joshua Breitbart

People's Production House

Karen Bond

National Black Coalition for Media Justice

Tracy Van Slyke
Media Consortium

Shireen Mitchell

Digital Sisters, Inc

Media and Technology Task Force

National Council of Women's Organizations

Ariel Dougherty

Media Equity Collaborative

Free Press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. We believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse and independent ownership of media platforms, and journalism that holds leaders accountable and tells people what's actually happening in their communities.

(202) 265-1490