

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Jacki Lopez
(415) 436-9682, x 305
or jlopez@biologicaldiversity.org
The Center for Biological Diversity reached a settlement with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service yesterday that will compel the agency to
provide protection for scores of the world's most imperiled bird
species and come into compliance with the Endangered Species Act. The
Service has committed itself to publishing final listing determinations for
six species of foreign birds and proposed listings for an additional 25
species, in accordance with a negotiated timeline that terminates on
December 29, 2009.
The Center for Biological Diversity reached a settlement with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service yesterday that will compel the agency to
provide protection for scores of the world's most imperiled bird
species and come into compliance with the Endangered Species Act. The
Service has committed itself to publishing final listing determinations for
six species of foreign birds and proposed listings for an additional 25
species, in accordance with a negotiated timeline that terminates on
December 29, 2009.
The
Service originally received petitions to list more than 70 species of the
world's most imperiled birds - which inhabit locations
throughout the world, including Brazil,
Spain, India, Eastern Europe, and the Marquesas Islands - in 1980 and 1991. In
violation of the Endangered Species Act, the agency has spent the better
part of two decades making recycled petition findings that these species
continue to warrant listing, but that their listing is precluded due to
higher-priority listings. Any progress that has been made toward protecting
these species has been the result of Center lawsuits, negotiations, and
court findings that if the Service continues at such a pace, "many of
the species in question may very well be extinct by the time they are found
to warrant a listing."
So
the Center again notified the Service of its intention to file suit for
violations of the Endangered Species Act, and as a result of that notice
reached a settlement with the agency to bring it into compliance with the
Act.
"We
are encouraged that the new administration is showing signs of clearing up
its foreign listing program backlog and finally accepting its duty to list
these extremely rare birds under the Endangered Species Act," said
Center International Program staffer Jacki Lopez. "Listing foreign
species under the Act is an important step in spurring increased
international recognition of those species' urgent plights."
Endangered
Species Act listing provides substantial benefits to foreign species. It
authorizes the president to provide financial assistance for the
development and management of programs in foreign countries; and authorizes
the Fish and Wildlife Service to encourage conservation programs for
foreign endangered species and provide personnel and training for these
programs. Beyond these basic protections, the Act also implements the
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and
Fauna, a treaty designed to prevent species extinctions caused by
international trade.
The
Service itself acknowledges the benefits of listing foreign species to draw
worldwide attention to their plight, to make available U.S. expertise and U.S. funds, and to compel the
strict regulation of the import and export of protected species.
In
order to adhere to the negotiated timeline, the Fish and Wildlife Service
promises to publish final listing determinations for the Chatham petrel (Pterodroma axillaris), magenta petrel
(Pterodroma magentae), and
Cook's petrel (Pterodroma cookii),
in New Zealand; the Fiji petrel (Pterodroma
macgillivrayi) in Fiji; the Galapagos petrel (Pterodroma phaeopygia) in Ecuador; and
the Heinroth's shearwater (Puffinus
heinrothi) in Papua New Guinea.
The
Service will propose listings for the Junin flightless grebe (Podiceps taczanowskii), Junin rail (Laterallus tuerosi), Brazilian
merganser (Mergus octosetaceus),
Caucau guan (Crax alberti),
blue-billed curassow (Penelope perspicax),
gorgeted wood-quail (Odontophorus
strophium), southeastern rufous-vented groundcuckoo (Neomorphus geoffroyi dulcis),
Margaretta's hermit (Phaethornis malaris
margarettae), Esmeraldas woodstar (Chaetocerus berlepschi), royal cinclodes (Cinclodes aricomae), white-browed
tit-spinetail (Leptasthenura xenothorax),
black-hooded antwren (Formicivora
erythronotos), fringe-backed fire-eye (Pyriglena atra), brown-banded antpitta
(Grallaria milleri),
Kaempfer's tody-tyrant (Hemitriccus
kaempferi), ash-breasted tit-tyrant (Anairetes alpinus), Peruvian plantcutter (Phytotoma raimondii), and
cherry-throated tanager (Nemosia rourei)
in South America; the greater adjutant stork (Leptoptilos dubius), salmon-crested cockatoo (Cacatua moluccensis), and Eiao
Polynesian warbler (Acrocephalus cafier
aquilonis) in Southeast Asia; the Cantabrian capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus cantabricus) in
Spain; the Jerdon's courser (Rhinoptilus
bitorquatus) in India; the slender-billed curlew (Numenius tenuirostris) in Russia,
Europe, and North Africa; and the Marquesan imperial pigeon (Ducula galeata) in the South Pacific.
Learn
more about these species and the
Center's campaign to save them.
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252"He’s a clear and present danger to America and the world," wrote one critic. "We’ve got to do whatever we legally can to remove him from office."
US President Donald Trump's flurry of increasingly deranged late-night social media posts over the weekend—combined with his continued violent belligerence overseas—prompted fresh calls on Monday for congressional Democrats to immediately force an impeachment vote.
Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) introduced 13 articles of impeachment against Trump last week, accusing the president of usurping congressional war powers by waging unauthorized assaults on Iran and other nations, illegally deploying National Guard troops in US cities, unlawfully detaining and deporting citizens and immigrants on the basis of their political views, lawlessly dismantling worker- and consumer-protection agencies, and other offenses.
In a statement on Monday, constitutional attorney John Bonifaz applauded Larson for introducing the impeachment articles but said that "we need the congressman to now take the next step and force an immediate floor vote on these articles at this critical hour for our nation."
"And, Democratic leaders in the Congress should stop standing in the way of such a vote," said Bonifaz, co-founder and president of Free Speech for People (FSFP). The group's petition urging the US House to impeach Trump a third time has received more than a million signatures, but the Democratic leadership has so far shown no willingness to push ahead with another impeachment process—which would require some Republican support to be successful.
"Momentum is on the side of action," FSFP said Monday, warning that "further delay only emboldens the president."
Bruce Fein, a constitutional scholar who served in the Reagan Justice Department, said Monday that the "impeachment of President Donald Trump is urgent."
"How can any decent person indulge Mr. Trump’s Hitler-like declaration that ‘a whole civilization will die tonight’ with our tax dollars-paid weapons?" asked Fein, referring to the US president's genocidal threat against Iran last week.
By one count, more than 85 Democrats in the Republican-controlled US House have called for Trump's removal via the impeachment process or the 25th Amendment in recent days. Last week, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said he would introduce legislation to establish a commission tasked with removing the president if he is deemed unfit to serve.
“This is plainly out of the realm of normal politics," said Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, urging the White House physician to immediately evaluate Trump's cognitive fitness. "When the president of the United States threatens to extinguish a civilization on social media, rants about combat missions with children at the Easter Egg Roll, and drops profane tirades on Easter morning, we have indisputably entered the realm of profound medical difficulty and concern."
Growing calls for Trump's impeachment and removal came after the president launched into an unhinged social media tirade late Sunday, hours after high-level talks with Iran ended without an agreement to halt the war that the US president and his Israeli counterpart started in late February.
Trump is having a mental health episode right now. He’s been posting on social media all night. He posted at:
9:49pm (Ai Jesus photo)
9:50pm (Trump tower on moon)
10:10pm (dumb meme)
10:32pm (news clip)
10:53pm (news clip)
12:43am (announcing Hormuz blockade)
2:35am (article…
— Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) April 13, 2026
Trump said Sunday that he would impose a naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz—an illegal act of war—and is reportedly considering a resumption of aerial strikes on Iran.
After the talks concluded, Trump posted a lengthy attack on Pope Leo XIV, a vocal critic of the war on Iran. The president then posted an artificial intelligence-generated image depicting himself as a Jesus-like figure.
"Beyond mentally unstable," Rep. Yassamin Ansar (D-Ariz.) wrote in response to Trump's post.
Robert Reich, the former US labor secretary, wrote in a blog post on Monday that "the president of the United States is stark-raving mad."
"He’s a clear and present danger to America and the world. The American public is beginning to see it," Reich continued. "We’ve got to do whatever we legally can to remove him from office. The 25th Amendment would be useful if Trump’s Cabinet and key advisers had any integrity, but they don’t. They’re ambitious, unprincipled traitors. Which leaves impeachment."
"The message of the Gospel is very clear: ‘Blessed are the peacemakers.'"
Pope Leo XIV on Monday said he would not back off his criticism of President Donald Trump's war of choice in Iran after the president targeted him with an unhinged late-night social media rant.
In a Sunday Truth Social post, Trump accused Pope Leo of being "WEAK on Crime, and terrible for Foreign Policy," even though dealing with crime and running US foreign policy are not part of the pope's job description.
"Leo should get his act together as Pope, use Common Sense, stop catering to the Radical Left, and focus on being a Great Pope, not a Politician," Trump wrote at the conclusion of his long tirade. "It’s hurting him very badly and, more importantly, it’s hurting the Catholic Church!"
A short time later, Trump posted an artificial intelligence-generated image that depicted him as a Christ-like figure.

Pope Leo in recent weeks has been openly critical of the US war in Iran, taking particular issue with US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claiming that the conflict was being waged in the name of Jesus Christ.
“This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war,” the pope said during a Palm Sunday sermon last month. “He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them.”
According to a Monday report from the Associated Press, the pope remained defiant in the face of criticism from the president.
"The message of the Gospel is very clear: ‘Blessed are the peacemakers,'" he said. "I will not shy away from announcing the message of the Gospel and inviting all people to look for ways of building bridges of peace and reconciliation, and looking for ways to avoid war any time that’s possible."
Leo added that he is "not afraid of the Trump administration or of speaking out loudly about the message of the Gospel," and insisted that "I will continue to speak out strongly against war, seeking to promote peace, promoting dialogue and multilateralism among states to find solutions to problems."
Trump's attack on the pope drew a rebuke from Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who said it was reflective of a presidency circling the drain.
" Donald Trump is flailing," Kelly wrote in a social media post. "His war in Iran has led to the death and injury of American servicemembers and the death of Iranian children. He will attack anyone or anything to try to protect himself, even the Church that millions of Americans find faith and comfort in every day."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal suggested that Trump's anti-pope rant was more evidence that he is mentally unwell and should be removed from office.
"The deranged and disgusting post from Trump attacking Pope Leo should certainly help him appeal to the more than 50 million Americans who identify as Catholics," she wrote. "Perhaps this will convince JD Vance to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office?"
Archbishop Paul Coakley, president of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, said he was "disheartened" that Trump "chose to write such disparaging words about the Holy Father."
"Pope Leo is not his rival; nor is the pope a politician," Coakley added. "He is the vicar of Christ who speaks from the truth of the Gospel and for the care of souls."
The Rev. James Martin said he doubted Pope Leo "will lose any sleep over" Trump's rant, but added "the rest of us should" because "it is unhinged, uncharitable, and unchristian."
"Zero lessons earned," said Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.
Iran's foreign minister said Sunday that the Trump administration's representatives derailed marathon talks in Pakistan's capital with maximalist demands, just as the two sides were "inches away" from a preliminary agreement to end the six-week conflict.
"In intensive talks at the highest level in 47 years, Iran engaged with US in good faith to end war," Abbas Araghchi wrote on social media. "But when just inches away from 'Islamabad [Memorandum of Understanding],' we encountered maximalism, shifting goalposts, and blockade. Zero lessons earned. Good will begets good will. Enmity begets enmity."
The failed weekend talks marked the second time since February that US negotiators have been accused of sabotaging formal negotiations despite participants believing a deal was within reach. Oman's foreign minister, who mediated previous talks, said hours before the US and Israel started bombing Iran on February 28 that "we have already achieved quite a substantial progress in the direction of a deal."
The Trump administration's negotiating team, which consisted principally of Vice President JD Vance and special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, reportedly set down numerous "red lines" during the Islamabad talks this past weekend, including demanding that Iran end all uranium enrichment—which Iran has a right to conduct under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons—and dismantle its major nuclear energy facilities.
"We just could not get to a situation where the Iranians were willing to accept our terms," Vance told reporters on Sunday. "I think that we were quite flexible."
US President Donald Trump claimed on social media that "the meeting went well, most points were agreed to, but the only point that really mattered, NUCLEAR, was not."
Iran's top negotiator, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, wrote following the talks that "due to the experiences of the two previous wars, we have no trust in the opposing side."
After the single day of talks faltered, Trump announced a naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz, an illegal act of war that critics warned could plunge the two sides into a deeper conflict.
"It is concerning that Vance already suggests that the US has put forward a final and best offer, suggesting that the US is still trying to dictate terms rather than negotiate a better future," said Ryan Costello, policy director at the National Iranian American Council. "We urge President Trump to walk back his blockade threat and for the US and Iran to reengage and consider implementing practical steps where there is agreement to lower tensions and build on this fragile pause to the war."
The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that Trump and his advisers "are looking at resuming limited military strikes in Iran" on top of the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which the president said is set to begin at 10 am ET.
"Trump could also resume a full-fledged bombing campaign," the Journal noted—though unnamed officials said that option was "less likely."
US Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said in an interview on Sunday that American lawmakers "need to do whatever we can to get [Trump] out" of office, calling the president's war on Iran "illegal," "a war crime," "immoral," and disastrous for the American public.
"Impeachment, invoke the 25th Amendment, push for him to resign, whatever it is," Jayapal told MS NOW. "This is so grave of a situation."