For Immediate Release
Kirsten Stade (202) 265-7337
Political Manipulation of Science Rife During Nominee's Tenure
Fish & Wildlife Service Southeast Region Employees Saw Interference and Reprisal
WASHINGTON - President Obama’s nominee to lead the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service did not protect science from political interference or
scientists from retaliation, according to a survey of his employees
conducted by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).
Last week, the White House announced its intent to nominate Sam
Hamilton to head the Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS), which has been
the focus of intense criticism for allowing political officials to
improperly alter scientific findings.
For the past dozen years, Sam Hamilton has overseen the
10-state FWS Southeastern Region of the Fish & Wildlife Service,
home to endangered species ranging from the American crocodile to the
Florida panther. In 2005, PEER surveyed more than 1,400 FWS biologists,
ecologists and botanists working on Endangered Species Act and other
wildlife protection programs across the country. Those survey results
for scientists working within Hamilton’s region found that –
- Nearly half (49%) of FWS respondents cited cases where
“commercial interests have inappropriately induced the reversal or
withdrawal of scientific conclusions or decisions through political
- A similar percentage (46%) said they had been
“directed, for non-scientific reasons, to refrain from making . . .
findings that are protective of species”; and
- More than a
third (36%) feared “retaliation” for merely expressing “concerns about
the biological needs of species and habitats” and a similar number felt
they were “not allowed to do my job as a scientist”.
“Where was Sam Hamilton when all this was going on?” asked PEER
Executive Director Jeff Ruch noting that Hamilton did not inquire or
request any investigation into widespread complaints by his staff. “Why
would anyone expect Mr. Hamilton to protect scientists when he
previously has not?”
A prime example illustrating this concern is the manipulation of
science by Hamilton’s leadership team to green-light sprawl in
shrinking panther habitat. In 2005, the FWS Director under Bush, Steve
Williams, rebuked Hamilton’s region for making false assumptions
designed to inflate panther numbers and viability, in response to a
formal complaint by PEER and an FWS panther biologist. Hamilton took no
disciplinary action against any of his managers and several of the
scientific deficiencies persist today.
The White House announcement cited Hamilton’s record for “delivering
significant wildlife conservation” but his employees reflect a less
- More than two thirds (68%) did not feel the region was
“acting effectively to maintain or enhance species and their habitats,
so as to avoid possible listings under the Endangered Species Act” and
than one in four (24%) believed that Hamilton would “stand up for
scientific staff or supervisors who take controversial stands”.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The media landscape is changing fast
Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.
Change is coming. And we've got it covered.
Please donate to our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign today.
Please donate to our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign today.
One FWS supervisor succinctly summed up what Hamilton’s operation needs this way:
“More backbone, less dog-and-pony show…”
In the PEER national survey, Hamilton’s region ranked better than
some and worse than others on key issues. More than one in four (29%)
of all FWS ecological scientists participated in the survey.
“Hamilton’s record as a senior official does not offer much to brag
on,” Ruch added. “We hope the Senate, particularly its Democratic
members, look carefully into this record and interview employees.”
We want a more open and sharing world.
That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.
All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.
Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.
Please select a donation method:
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) is a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals. PEER's environmental work is solely directed by the needs of its members. As a consequence, we have the distinct honor of serving resource professionals who daily cast profiles in courage in cubicles across the country.