February, 12 2009, 10:47am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
AIUSA media office,Email:,media@aiusa.org,Phone: 202-544-0200 x302
Pakistani Government Must Not Leave Swat Valley Residents "At the Mercy of the Taliban," Urges Amnesty International
Taliban Has Killed Scores of Government Workers, Destroyed More Than 170 Schools in Swat Region of Pakistan
WASHINGTON
The Pakistani government
should act immediately to protect hundreds of thousands of people from
insurgents in the Swat valley and elsewhere in the country, Amnesty International
said today. According to official estimates, over the past year more than
1,200 people have been killed and an estimated 200,000 - 500,000 have
been displaced from the Swat valley as a result of fighting between Pakistani
Taliban groups and the military.
"The Pakistani Taliban have shown their
contempt for the lives and rights of the people of the Swat valley, while
Pakistani military forces have often violated the human rights and disregarded
the safety of the people that they are ostensibly trying to protect,"
said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International's Asia-Pacific director.
Since 2007, a local armed group ideologically
affiliated with Afghanistan's Taliban movement has managed to take effective
control of nearly 80 percent of the Swat valley territory, once a tourist
destination only 100 miles from Islamabad.
In Swat, the Pakistani Taliban have committed
serious human rights abuses, including the unlawful killing of scores of
government workers, as well as those whom they view as violating their
edicts. The Taliban have publicly whipped men for shaving their beards,
destroyed shops for selling music and forcibly prohibited women from leaving
their houses unless escorted by a male relative.
The main square of Mingora, the area's largest
city, has been locally dubbed Khooni Chowk, or "bloody square", in reference
to the more than two dozen bodies the Pakistani Taliban have publicly displayed
there.
There are an estimated 3,000 Taliban insurgents
located in the Swat Valley. They often endanger civilians by seeking shelter
in villages, knowing that this might provoke military reaction.
"For the past five years, the government's
response to the rise of insurgents in Swat and the tribal areas has vacillated
between launching often indiscriminate and disproportionate military operations
that mostly harm civilians and abandoning Pakistani citizens to abusive
insurgent groups," added Zarifi.
Up to 15,000 government troops are deployed
in Swat seeking insurgents. They have used helicopter gunships and heavy
artillery in their operations, often in an indiscriminate way, harming
civilians as they do so. Fear of government military operations, rather
than the Taliban, has been cited by tens of thousands of people who have
fled the area.
"The Pakistani government needs to implement
a strategy that focuses on respecting the rights and the well-being of
its citizens and refrains from heavy-handed military operations which put
civilians at risk. The government should also ensure it does not leave
its citizens at the mercy of the Taliban," said Zarifi.
Amnesty International condemned the Pakistani
Taliban's campaign against education, especially for girls. Over the past
18 months, the Taliban have destroyed more than 170 schools in Swat, including
more than 100 girls' schools. These attacks have disrupted the education
of more than 50,000 pupils, from primary to college level, according to
official estimates.
Amnesty International urged the government
to take protective measures to guarantee that pupils of both genders, including
those who have fled their homes, have access to education when schools
reopen on March 1. If the government cannot protect schools in the area,
it should ensure that displaced children have access to alternate means
of receiving an education, Amnesty International said.
"By disrupting education, the Taliban are
threatening the rights of another generation of Pakistanis," said Zarifi.
"The Pakistan government must ensure the people fleeing the conflict have
adequate access to their basic needs such food, health care, and education,
and that local and international humanitarian agencies are able to safely
provide assistance to them."
Background:
Swat is a settled area distinct from neighboring
tribal areas on the Afghan border normally home to around 1.5 million people.
Over the past two years, radical cleric Maulana Fazlullah and his
followers have increasingly established control over the region, imposing
a de-facto administration. The group has consolidated its control by setting
up a parallel justice system with over 70 "courts" to administer "speedy
and easy justice." In practice, these courts met out punishments that
amount to cruel, degrading, or inhumane treatment.
The Pakistani Taliban have used their nightly
FM radio broadcasts to announce "wanted" lists of local politicians and
government workers to appear before their courts, or face the consequences,
and have recently threatened to kill all lawyers and judges if they failed
to stop working with the state judicial system. Half or more of Swat's
800 police officials, too afraid to remain on duty, have either taken leave
of absence or deserted their ranks.
In May 2007, a peace plan between the government
and the insurgents in Swat, which purportedly allowed the militants to
regroup, broke down. Since then, the government has not articulated any
clear policy about how it intends to protect the rights of the residents
of the Swat valley.
Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning
grassroots activist organization with more than 2.2 million supporters,
activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human
rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates
and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice,
freedom, truth and dignity are denied.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
Watched by Millions, 'People's State of the Union' Counters Unhinged Trump
"We live in a country where we have one reality for everyday people and another for the rich and the well-connected and the well-protected," said Rep. Summer Lee.
Feb 25, 2026
As President Donald Trump prepared to deliver his State of the Union address on Tuesday to applause from sycophantic Republicans, dozens of Democratic lawmakers, progressive advocates, and people impacted by White House policies gathered on the National Mall to present an alternative assessment of the country's trajectory.
"We live in a country where we have one reality for everyday people and another for the rich and the well-connected and the well-protected," said Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), preempting Trump's claim of a "golden age of America" despite rising costs, deepening inequality, and staggering corruption.
While many Democratic lawmakers opted to attend Trump's speech, saying they did not want the president to deliver his remarks to a House of Representatives full of Republicans, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told the crowd gathered blocks from the US Capitol that "these are not normal times, and Democrats have to stop behaving normally."
Watch the full counter-rally, which organizers said millions watched online:
Among those who joined Democratic lawmakers at the People's State of the Union were Epstein survivors and people harmed by the Trump administration's lawless assault on immigrants, assault on the social safety net, and other policies.
Rep. Greg Casar, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said during his remarks at Tuesday's rally that "I’m not in the Capitol building tonight because I have a pretty good idea of what's going to happen."
"For an hour or two or three or four, a man who's made $4 billion off of being president is going to lecture you, the American people, about how good you have it," said Casar. "A man who is building himself a golden ballroom is going to tell you that if you're struggling to get by, that's your fault, because he's killing it."
"Everyone but Donald Trump's rich friends knows that it's a disaster," Casar added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Disgusting': Republicans Applaud as Trump Brags About Taking Food Aid From Millions
"His Big Ugly Bill ripped food away from hungry moms, kids, and seniors to fund tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans," said one House Democrat.
Feb 25, 2026
US President Donald Trump received a standing ovation from Republican lawmakers and administration officials Tuesday night when he bragged during his State of the Union address about taking nutrition assistance from millions, which he euphemistically characterized as lifting people off food stamps.
"In one year, we have lifted 2.4 million Americans—a record—off of food stamps," Trump said during his nearly two-hour speech.
The Republican reconciliation package that Trump signed into law last summer included $187 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) over a 10-year period, the largest cuts to the program in US history.
Trump: "In one year, we have lifted 2.4 million Americans -- a record -- off of food stamps" (In other words, Republicans cut food stamps) pic.twitter.com/19EoNEUmPF
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 25, 2026
The Republican law includes reductions in federal nutrition funding for states—which administer SNAP—as well as expanded work requirements, which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated would strip nutrition benefits from "roughly 2.4 million people in an average month" over the next decade.
As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities noted in a recent analysis, changes enacted by the Trump-GOP law mean that "for the first time in the 50-year history of the modern SNAP program, the federal government will no longer ensure that the lowest-income people, including children, older adults, veterans, and people with disabilities, in every state have access to the food assistance they need because states that refuse to pay the cost share could see the program end."
Shortly after Trump signed the Republican megabill into law, his administration canceled an annual US Department of Agriculture survey aimed at measuring food insecurity, undercutting efforts to track the impact of the unprecedented SNAP cuts. The USDA's final reports estimated that nearly 48 million people in the US faced food insecurity in 2024—including nearly one in five households with children.
"Trump says he 'lifted' millions off food stamps," Rep. Brittany Pettersen (D-Colo.) wrote in response to the president's State of the Union remarks. "But what he really means is his Big Ugly Bill ripped food away from hungry moms, kids, and seniors to fund tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. The lies are blatant and disgusting."
Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.) denounced her Republican colleagues for their celebratory response to Trump's boast.
"They're applauding ripping food out of people’s mouths to fund their tax cuts for billionaires," McBride wrote on social media.
USDA data released ahead of Trump's speech shows that around 696,000 fewer people received SNAP benefits in November 2025 compared to the previous month.
Katie Bergh, a senior policy analyst on the food assistance team at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, noted that "people haven’t been dropping off SNAP because they no longer need help."
"Economic conditions haven’t improved and groceries haven’t gotten more affordable," Bergh added. "They're losing basic food assistance because of policy choices. Allowing this trend to continue is also a policy choice."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Congress Urged to Require Warrants in Reauthorization of Key Spy Power
"FISA 702 has been abused in shocking ways," said one campaigner. "If Congress genuinely cares about surveillance abuse, weaponization, and 'lawfare,' it needs to rein in this warrantless surveillance power."
Feb 24, 2026
Privacy advocates are backing a bipartisan bill introduced in the US Senate this week that's intended to protect Americans from warrantless government surveillance.
Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) unveiled the Security and Freedom Enhancement (SAFE) Act on Monday, in the wake of Politico reporting that President Donald Trump's White House "is quietly pushing for a key spy authority to be extended as is into 2027, according to five people granted anonymity to discuss the private talks."
There have long been arguments on Capitol Hill and beyond over Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which empowers the federal government to surveil electronic communications without a warrant. The law only allows for targeting foreigners outside the United States to acquire foreign intelligence information, but Americans' data is also collected.
Despite such arguments, Congress reauthorized Section 702 nearly two years ago, under then-President Joe Biden. That decision is set to expire on April 20, setting up a new battle over the spying power—hence the bill's introduction this week.
Under Durbin and Lee's proposal, the authority would be extended another two years, but government agencies must obtain a FISA Title I order or a warrant before accessing Americans' communications. As the pair noted in a statement, it also "closes the 'data broker loophole' that intelligence and law enforcement agencies use to buy their way around the Fourth Amendment" to the US Constitution, which bars unreasonable searches and seizures and details requirements for issuing warrants.
"Section 702 is a valuable tool to help keep our nation safe," said Durbin. "However, it's being used to conduct thousands of warrantless searches of Americans' private communications. That's unacceptable. Our bipartisan SAFE Act is a commonsense solution to continue protecting our country from foreign threats—while safeguarding Americans' civil liberties and privacy."
In a Tuesday statement welcoming the legislation, Demand Progress senior policy adviser Hajar Hammado highlighted that "right now, the government can freely troll through your private emails and texts swept up in 702 collections and this power has been abused to spy on everyday Americans, journalists, and even members of Congress."
"No government, whether it's run by Donald Trump and Stephen Miller or Joe Biden, should be able to do this," argued Hammado. According to Politico, Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security adviser, "is a leading advocate" for extending Section 702.
Hammado stressed that "the SAFE Act is a bipartisan solution to this problem, and all members of Congress should not support reauthorization without these critical reforms. We thank Sens. Lee and Durbin for their leadership on this bill and for modeling how Republicans and Democrats can come together to stop oppressive government overreach."
Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Center for Democracy & Technology's Security & Surveillance project, also endorsed the bill in a Tuesday statement.
"FISA 702 has been abused in shocking ways," said Laperruque. "The FBI has misused it to snoop on protesters, lawmakers, journalists, judges, and campaign donors. If Congress genuinely cares about surveillance abuse, weaponization, and 'lawfare,' it needs to rein in this warrantless surveillance power."
"The SAFE Act includes bold FISA reforms, creates strong guardrails against surveillance misconduct, and has been meticulously crafted to protect national security," he continued. "With less than 10 weeks until FISA 702 expires, Congress should take up reform legislation quickly. Kicking the can on FISA would be a dereliction of duty."
A CDT-led coalition of privacy advocates across the political spectrum recently identified these as the four key issues to address in FISA reform. The SAFE Act effectively takes on all of them. With just SEVEN weeks until FISA 702 expires, we hope Congress will quickly take up this vital bill.
[image or embed]
— Jake Laperruque (@jakelaperruque.bsky.social) February 24, 2026 at 12:22 PM
Republicans have a narrow majority in both chambers of Congress but, due to Senate rules, generally need some Democratic support to send legislation to Trump's desk. However, the GOP could also run into trouble on this issue in the House of Representatives. As Politico pointed out last week:
Ultimately, there's no easy path to pass a clean extension in the House. One of the people with knowledge of the discussions said GOP leaders are "going to have a problem" trying to unite Republicans behind a special "rule" allowing for an up-or-down floor vote on a clean extension, which are typically party-line affairs.
But Republicans also believe that with Trump in office, a number of Democrats who previously supported leaving Section 702 intact will now support putting more fetters on intelligence agencies—making the alternative route, a two-thirds-majority bipartisan vote under suspension of the rules, all but impossible.
The latest Section 702 fight comes as Trump is under fire for his rising authoritarianism, from invasions of US cities targeting immigrants to his sweeping assault on First Amendment rights, including reported federal watch lists to track and categorize US citizens—especially activists and protesters—as "domestic terrorists."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


