September, 09 2008, 02:22pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Serena Ingre, 202/289-2378 or 703/296-0702 (cell)
New Report: Green Investment Will Yield Two Million New Jobs in Two Years
Report Outlines Rapid Recovery Economic Program That Moves America Toward a Clean Energy Future
WASHINGTON
As America confronts the current energy crisis, a new report
released today by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and
partner labor and environmental groups shows that the U.S. can create
two million jobs by investing in clean energy technologies that will
strengthen the economy and fight global warming. The report finds that
investing in clean energy would create four times as many jobs as
spending the same amount of money within the oil industry.
"This
new report shows that investing in clean energy is a win-win solution.
Shifting to clean energy will put more people to work, provide
consumers relief at the pump, help reduce global warming pollution and
revitalize our economy at a time when many Americans are hurting," said
Frances Beinecke, President of NRDC.
"Green Recovery - A Program to Create Good Jobs and Start Building a Low-Carbon Economy"
analyzes the potential for a two year $100 billion green investment
program - which would be comparable to the size of the April 2008
federal stimulus package dedicated to consumer rebates - to be an
engine for job creation in the U.S. This type of investment is a
component of a broader clean energy strategy to create a low-carbon
economy and reduce global warming pollutions.
The
program could be paid for with proceeds from auctions of carbon permits
under a global warming cap-and-trade program that will drive private
investments into clean energy and raise public revenue through carbon
permit auctions. A cap-and-trade program will enable America to reduce
global warming pollution to the levels science indicates are needed to
avoid the worst effects of global warming.
The
package is illustrative of the potential for clean energy - and
specifically green infrastructure investments - to create new jobs and
strengthen the economy. The specific package would invest in six green
infrastructure priorities: retrofitting buildings to improve energy
efficiency, expanding mass transit and freight rail, constructing
"smart" electrical grid transmission systems, wind power, solar power,
and next-generation biofuels.
The
report also shows that the vast majority of the two million jobs gained
from this initial $100 billion investment in clean energy would be in
the same areas of employment that people already work in today, in
every region and state of the country; for example: constructing wind
farms creates jobs for sheet metal workers, machinists and truck
drivers, among many others. Increasing the energy efficiency of
buildings through retrofitting requires roofers, insulators and
building inspectors. Expanding mass transit systems employs civil
engineers, electricians, and dispatchers.
In
addition to creating two million jobs nationwide over two years, a $100
billion initial investment in our clean energy future would:
- Create
nearly four times more jobs than spending the same amount of money
within the oil industry and 300,000 more jobs than a similar amount of
spending directed toward household consumption. - Create
roughly triple the number of good jobs - paying at least $16 dollars an
hour - as spending the same amount of money within the oil industry. - Bolster
employment especially in construction and manufacturing. Construction
employment has fallen from 8 million to 7.2 million over the past two
years due to the housing bubble collapse. The Green Recovery program
can, at the least, bring back these lost 800,000 construction jobs.
The report proposes that the $100 billion of initial investments fund:
- $50 billion for tax credits.
This would assist private businesses and homeowners to finance both
commercial and residential building retrofits, as well as investments
in renewable-energy systems. - $46 billion in direct government spending.
This would support public building retrofits, the expansion of mass
transit, freight rail and smart electrical-grid systems, and new
investments in renewable energy. - $4 billion for federal loan guarantees. This would underwrite private credit that is extended to finance building retrofits and investments in renewable energy.
The
report was written by the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI)
at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, under commission by the
Center for American Progress (CAP) and released by NRDC and a coalition
of labor and environmental groups. The authors of the report are Robert
Pollin, Heidi Garrett-Peltier, James Heintz, and Helen Scharber of
PERI. For the complete report findings go to
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/09/pdf/green_recovery.pdf
For the 34 state fact sheets go to: https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/09/green_recovery.html
NRDC works to safeguard the earth--its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. We combine the power of more than three million members and online activists with the expertise of some 700 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates across the globe to ensure the rights of all people to the air, the water, and the wild.
(212) 727-2700LATEST NEWS
Mike Johnson Touts $901 Billion Military Budget Plan After Gutting Medicaid, SNAP
"At such a time, bipartisan agreement to provide additional funds to the Pentagon would deliver a cruel message to the American public," advocacy groups warned.
Dec 08, 2025
Republican congressional leaders unveiled a sprawling military policy bill late Sunday that would authorize $901 billion in US military spending for the coming fiscal year, just months after GOP lawmakers and President Donald Trump pushed through the largest-ever cuts to Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who aggressively pushed cuts to Medicaid by peddling false claims of large-scale fraud, touted the 3,086-page National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) as legislation that would "ensure our military forces remain the most lethal in the world."
The bill, a compromise between House and Senate versions of the annual legislation, would authorize $8 billion more in US military spending than Trump asked for in his 2026 budget request.
If passed, the 2026 NDAA would pump billions of dollars more into the Pentagon, a cesspool of the kinds of waste, fraud, and abuse that Johnson and other Republicans claim to be targeting when they cut safety net programs, stripping health insurance and food aid from millions. The Pentagon has never passed an independent audit and continues to have "significant fraud exposure," the Government Accountability Office said earlier this year.
"The surge in Pentagon spending stands in sharp contrast to the drastic cuts in healthcare and food assistance programs imposed by the reconciliation package."
Final passage of the NDAA would push total military spending authorized by Congress this year above $1 trillion, including the $150 billion in Pentagon funds included in the Trump-GOP budget law enacted over the summer.
Last month, as Common Dreams reported, a coalition of watchdog and anti-war groups implored Congress not to approve any funding above the originally requested $892.6 billion, warning that additional money for the Pentagon would enable the Trump administration's lawless use of the military in US streets and overseas.
The groups also noted that "the surge in Pentagon spending stands in sharp contrast to the drastic cuts in healthcare and food assistance programs imposed by the reconciliation package."
"At such a time," they wrote in a letter to lawmakers, "bipartisan agreement to provide additional funds to the Pentagon would deliver a cruel message to the American public, one out of step with Democratic messaging over healthcare, reconciliation, and the shutdown."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular