SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A "Do Not Enter" sign is on display due to floodwaters near the Tidal Basin in Washington, D.C. on March 23, 2023.
(Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Federal Court Says Climate Case Against Big Oil Can Stay Local
"It's time for these companies to give up their losing arguments to escape the courtroom and instead prepare to explain their well-documented history of lying about the dangers of fossil fuels to members of a jury."
Dec 19, 2023
Yet another federal appeals court on Tuesday delivered a blow to Big Oil's efforts to evade responsibility for the climate emergency, ruling that the District of Columbia's consumer protection lawsuit against fossil fuel giants can proceed in D.C. Superior Court.
As dozens of U.S. communities and states have sought to make polluters pay through climate liability suits in recent years, companies have attempted to move the cases from local to federal courts, where they are far more likely to be dismissed.
This ruling stems from a case first filed in the local court by D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb's predecessor, Karl Racine, in 2020. He accused profit-hungry BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell of violating the district's Consumer Protection Procedures Acts with decades of campaigns to "deceive and mislead the public about the threat of global warming and the damaging nature of their fossil fuel products."
Judge Neomi Rao—an appointee of former President Donald Trump, a fossil fuel industry ally—wrote for the panel Tuesday that "the district brought suit exclusively under the D.C. Code, and the companies have provided no basis for federal jurisdiction."
"The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
With its unanimous ruling, the D.C. Circuit is now the eighth federal appeals court to reject industry arguments—joining the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 8th, 9th, and 10th circuits, according to the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which tracks such cases.
"Judges from across the ideological spectrum have once again unanimously rejected Big Oil's desperate arguments to avoid facing the evidence of their climate lies in local courts," CCI president Richard Wiles said in response to the decision.
"It's time for these companies to give up their losing arguments to escape the courtroom and instead prepare to explain their well-documented history of lying about the dangers of fossil fuels to members of a jury," he added. "The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
Throughout this year, the right-wing U.S. Supreme has repeatedly refused to aid the fossil fuel industry's attempts to shift cases to federal court. Meanwhile, the lawsuits have continued to mount, with officials from Oregon's Multnomah County and California filing suits against oil and gas companies in June and September, respectively.
In an end-of-year roundup released Tuesday, CCI details other highlights, including the U.S. Department of Justice backing communities suing fossil fuel companies, "growing calls for DOJ action from Congress," and new research revealing that "industry scientists predicted the climate crisis with eerie accuracy as early as the 1980s."
"Polling shows that a majority of voters across the political spectrum continue to support holding polluters accountable and making them pay their fair share of climate damages," the group noted. "As we enter 2024, climate accountability is reaching an unprecedented level of momentum."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
big oilbpcenter for climate integritychevronexxonmobilfossil fuelsshellwashington dcclimate emergency
Yet another federal appeals court on Tuesday delivered a blow to Big Oil's efforts to evade responsibility for the climate emergency, ruling that the District of Columbia's consumer protection lawsuit against fossil fuel giants can proceed in D.C. Superior Court.
As dozens of U.S. communities and states have sought to make polluters pay through climate liability suits in recent years, companies have attempted to move the cases from local to federal courts, where they are far more likely to be dismissed.
This ruling stems from a case first filed in the local court by D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb's predecessor, Karl Racine, in 2020. He accused profit-hungry BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell of violating the district's Consumer Protection Procedures Acts with decades of campaigns to "deceive and mislead the public about the threat of global warming and the damaging nature of their fossil fuel products."
Judge Neomi Rao—an appointee of former President Donald Trump, a fossil fuel industry ally—wrote for the panel Tuesday that "the district brought suit exclusively under the D.C. Code, and the companies have provided no basis for federal jurisdiction."
"The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
With its unanimous ruling, the D.C. Circuit is now the eighth federal appeals court to reject industry arguments—joining the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 8th, 9th, and 10th circuits, according to the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which tracks such cases.
"Judges from across the ideological spectrum have once again unanimously rejected Big Oil's desperate arguments to avoid facing the evidence of their climate lies in local courts," CCI president Richard Wiles said in response to the decision.
"It's time for these companies to give up their losing arguments to escape the courtroom and instead prepare to explain their well-documented history of lying about the dangers of fossil fuels to members of a jury," he added. "The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
Throughout this year, the right-wing U.S. Supreme has repeatedly refused to aid the fossil fuel industry's attempts to shift cases to federal court. Meanwhile, the lawsuits have continued to mount, with officials from Oregon's Multnomah County and California filing suits against oil and gas companies in June and September, respectively.
In an end-of-year roundup released Tuesday, CCI details other highlights, including the U.S. Department of Justice backing communities suing fossil fuel companies, "growing calls for DOJ action from Congress," and new research revealing that "industry scientists predicted the climate crisis with eerie accuracy as early as the 1980s."
"Polling shows that a majority of voters across the political spectrum continue to support holding polluters accountable and making them pay their fair share of climate damages," the group noted. "As we enter 2024, climate accountability is reaching an unprecedented level of momentum."
From Your Site Articles
- Puerto Rican Towns File RICO Suit Accusing Big Oil of Colluding on Climate Denial ›
- 'Climate Homicide': Experts Say Big Oil Should Be Held Criminally Liable for Disaster Deaths ›
- US Supreme Court's Blow to Big Oil 'Should Open the Floodgates for More Lawsuits' ›
- 'A Watershed Moment': California Sues Big Oil Over Decades of Climate Destruction ›
- Supreme Court Rejects Bid by API, Exxon, and Koch to Kill Climate Case ›
Yet another federal appeals court on Tuesday delivered a blow to Big Oil's efforts to evade responsibility for the climate emergency, ruling that the District of Columbia's consumer protection lawsuit against fossil fuel giants can proceed in D.C. Superior Court.
As dozens of U.S. communities and states have sought to make polluters pay through climate liability suits in recent years, companies have attempted to move the cases from local to federal courts, where they are far more likely to be dismissed.
This ruling stems from a case first filed in the local court by D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb's predecessor, Karl Racine, in 2020. He accused profit-hungry BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell of violating the district's Consumer Protection Procedures Acts with decades of campaigns to "deceive and mislead the public about the threat of global warming and the damaging nature of their fossil fuel products."
Judge Neomi Rao—an appointee of former President Donald Trump, a fossil fuel industry ally—wrote for the panel Tuesday that "the district brought suit exclusively under the D.C. Code, and the companies have provided no basis for federal jurisdiction."
"The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
With its unanimous ruling, the D.C. Circuit is now the eighth federal appeals court to reject industry arguments—joining the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 8th, 9th, and 10th circuits, according to the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which tracks such cases.
"Judges from across the ideological spectrum have once again unanimously rejected Big Oil's desperate arguments to avoid facing the evidence of their climate lies in local courts," CCI president Richard Wiles said in response to the decision.
"It's time for these companies to give up their losing arguments to escape the courtroom and instead prepare to explain their well-documented history of lying about the dangers of fossil fuels to members of a jury," he added. "The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
Throughout this year, the right-wing U.S. Supreme has repeatedly refused to aid the fossil fuel industry's attempts to shift cases to federal court. Meanwhile, the lawsuits have continued to mount, with officials from Oregon's Multnomah County and California filing suits against oil and gas companies in June and September, respectively.
In an end-of-year roundup released Tuesday, CCI details other highlights, including the U.S. Department of Justice backing communities suing fossil fuel companies, "growing calls for DOJ action from Congress," and new research revealing that "industry scientists predicted the climate crisis with eerie accuracy as early as the 1980s."
"Polling shows that a majority of voters across the political spectrum continue to support holding polluters accountable and making them pay their fair share of climate damages," the group noted. "As we enter 2024, climate accountability is reaching an unprecedented level of momentum."
From Your Site Articles
- Puerto Rican Towns File RICO Suit Accusing Big Oil of Colluding on Climate Denial ›
- 'Climate Homicide': Experts Say Big Oil Should Be Held Criminally Liable for Disaster Deaths ›
- US Supreme Court's Blow to Big Oil 'Should Open the Floodgates for More Lawsuits' ›
- 'A Watershed Moment': California Sues Big Oil Over Decades of Climate Destruction ›
- Supreme Court Rejects Bid by API, Exxon, and Koch to Kill Climate Case ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.