A "Do Not Enter" sign is on display due to floodwaters near the Tidal Basin in Washington, D.C. on March 23, 2023.
Federal Court Says Climate Case Against Big Oil Can Stay Local
"It's time for these companies to give up their losing arguments to escape the courtroom and instead prepare to explain their well-documented history of lying about the dangers of fossil fuels to members of a jury."
Yet another federal appeals court on Tuesday delivered a blow to Big Oil's efforts to evade responsibility for the climate emergency, ruling that the District of Columbia's consumer protection lawsuit against fossil fuel giants can proceed in D.C. Superior Court.
As dozens of U.S. communities and states have sought to make polluters pay through climate liability suits in recent years, companies have attempted to move the cases from local to federal courts, where they are far more likely to be dismissed.
This ruling stems from a case first filed in the local court by D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb's predecessor, Karl Racine, in 2020. He accused profit-hungry BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell of violating the district's Consumer Protection Procedures Acts with decades of campaigns to "deceive and mislead the public about the threat of global warming and the damaging nature of their fossil fuel products."
Judge Neomi Rao—an appointee of former President Donald Trump, a fossil fuel industry ally—wrote for the panel Tuesday that "the district brought suit exclusively under the D.C. Code, and the companies have provided no basis for federal jurisdiction."
"The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
With its unanimous ruling, the D.C. Circuit is now the eighth federal appeals court to reject industry arguments—joining the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 8th, 9th, and 10th circuits, according to the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which tracks such cases.
"Judges from across the ideological spectrum have once again unanimously rejected Big Oil's desperate arguments to avoid facing the evidence of their climate lies in local courts," CCI president Richard Wiles said in response to the decision.
"It's time for these companies to give up their losing arguments to escape the courtroom and instead prepare to explain their well-documented history of lying about the dangers of fossil fuels to members of a jury," he added. "The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
Throughout this year, the right-wing U.S. Supreme has repeatedly refused to aid the fossil fuel industry's attempts to shift cases to federal court. Meanwhile, the lawsuits have continued to mount, with officials from Oregon's Multnomah County and California filing suits against oil and gas companies in June and September, respectively.
In an end-of-year roundup released Tuesday, CCI details other highlights, including the U.S. Department of Justice backing communities suing fossil fuel companies, "growing calls for DOJ action from Congress," and new research revealing that "industry scientists predicted the climate crisis with eerie accuracy as early as the 1980s."
"Polling shows that a majority of voters across the political spectrum continue to support holding polluters accountable and making them pay their fair share of climate damages," the group noted. "As we enter 2024, climate accountability is reaching an unprecedented level of momentum."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Yet another federal appeals court on Tuesday delivered a blow to Big Oil's efforts to evade responsibility for the climate emergency, ruling that the District of Columbia's consumer protection lawsuit against fossil fuel giants can proceed in D.C. Superior Court.
As dozens of U.S. communities and states have sought to make polluters pay through climate liability suits in recent years, companies have attempted to move the cases from local to federal courts, where they are far more likely to be dismissed.
This ruling stems from a case first filed in the local court by D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb's predecessor, Karl Racine, in 2020. He accused profit-hungry BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell of violating the district's Consumer Protection Procedures Acts with decades of campaigns to "deceive and mislead the public about the threat of global warming and the damaging nature of their fossil fuel products."
Judge Neomi Rao—an appointee of former President Donald Trump, a fossil fuel industry ally—wrote for the panel Tuesday that "the district brought suit exclusively under the D.C. Code, and the companies have provided no basis for federal jurisdiction."
"The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
With its unanimous ruling, the D.C. Circuit is now the eighth federal appeals court to reject industry arguments—joining the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 8th, 9th, and 10th circuits, according to the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which tracks such cases.
"Judges from across the ideological spectrum have once again unanimously rejected Big Oil's desperate arguments to avoid facing the evidence of their climate lies in local courts," CCI president Richard Wiles said in response to the decision.
"It's time for these companies to give up their losing arguments to escape the courtroom and instead prepare to explain their well-documented history of lying about the dangers of fossil fuels to members of a jury," he added. "The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
Throughout this year, the right-wing U.S. Supreme has repeatedly refused to aid the fossil fuel industry's attempts to shift cases to federal court. Meanwhile, the lawsuits have continued to mount, with officials from Oregon's Multnomah County and California filing suits against oil and gas companies in June and September, respectively.
In an end-of-year roundup released Tuesday, CCI details other highlights, including the U.S. Department of Justice backing communities suing fossil fuel companies, "growing calls for DOJ action from Congress," and new research revealing that "industry scientists predicted the climate crisis with eerie accuracy as early as the 1980s."
"Polling shows that a majority of voters across the political spectrum continue to support holding polluters accountable and making them pay their fair share of climate damages," the group noted. "As we enter 2024, climate accountability is reaching an unprecedented level of momentum."
- Puerto Rican Towns File RICO Suit Accusing Big Oil of Colluding on Climate Denial ›
- 'Climate Homicide': Experts Say Big Oil Should Be Held Criminally Liable for Disaster Deaths ›
- US Supreme Court's Blow to Big Oil 'Should Open the Floodgates for More Lawsuits' ›
- 'A Watershed Moment': California Sues Big Oil Over Decades of Climate Destruction ›
- Supreme Court Rejects Bid by API, Exxon, and Koch to Kill Climate Case ›
Yet another federal appeals court on Tuesday delivered a blow to Big Oil's efforts to evade responsibility for the climate emergency, ruling that the District of Columbia's consumer protection lawsuit against fossil fuel giants can proceed in D.C. Superior Court.
As dozens of U.S. communities and states have sought to make polluters pay through climate liability suits in recent years, companies have attempted to move the cases from local to federal courts, where they are far more likely to be dismissed.
This ruling stems from a case first filed in the local court by D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb's predecessor, Karl Racine, in 2020. He accused profit-hungry BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell of violating the district's Consumer Protection Procedures Acts with decades of campaigns to "deceive and mislead the public about the threat of global warming and the damaging nature of their fossil fuel products."
Judge Neomi Rao—an appointee of former President Donald Trump, a fossil fuel industry ally—wrote for the panel Tuesday that "the district brought suit exclusively under the D.C. Code, and the companies have provided no basis for federal jurisdiction."
"The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
With its unanimous ruling, the D.C. Circuit is now the eighth federal appeals court to reject industry arguments—joining the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 8th, 9th, and 10th circuits, according to the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which tracks such cases.
"Judges from across the ideological spectrum have once again unanimously rejected Big Oil's desperate arguments to avoid facing the evidence of their climate lies in local courts," CCI president Richard Wiles said in response to the decision.
"It's time for these companies to give up their losing arguments to escape the courtroom and instead prepare to explain their well-documented history of lying about the dangers of fossil fuels to members of a jury," he added. "The people of D.C. deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable."
Throughout this year, the right-wing U.S. Supreme has repeatedly refused to aid the fossil fuel industry's attempts to shift cases to federal court. Meanwhile, the lawsuits have continued to mount, with officials from Oregon's Multnomah County and California filing suits against oil and gas companies in June and September, respectively.
In an end-of-year roundup released Tuesday, CCI details other highlights, including the U.S. Department of Justice backing communities suing fossil fuel companies, "growing calls for DOJ action from Congress," and new research revealing that "industry scientists predicted the climate crisis with eerie accuracy as early as the 1980s."
"Polling shows that a majority of voters across the political spectrum continue to support holding polluters accountable and making them pay their fair share of climate damages," the group noted. "As we enter 2024, climate accountability is reaching an unprecedented level of momentum."
- Puerto Rican Towns File RICO Suit Accusing Big Oil of Colluding on Climate Denial ›
- 'Climate Homicide': Experts Say Big Oil Should Be Held Criminally Liable for Disaster Deaths ›
- US Supreme Court's Blow to Big Oil 'Should Open the Floodgates for More Lawsuits' ›
- 'A Watershed Moment': California Sues Big Oil Over Decades of Climate Destruction ›
- Supreme Court Rejects Bid by API, Exxon, and Koch to Kill Climate Case ›