SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Abortion rights advocates gather in front of a courthouse in Amarillo, Texas on March 15, 2023.
(Photo: Moises Avila/AFP via Getty Images)
Trump-Appointed Appeals Court Judges Allow Abortion Pill Limits to Take Effect
Right-wing Judges Kurt Engelhardt and Andrew Oldham upheld the part of a Texas judge's ruling that halted the recent FDA decision allowing mifepristone to be distributed by mail.
Apr 13, 2023
Two Trump appointees on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision late Wednesday allowing parts of a Texas judge's widely denounced abortion pill ruling to take effect, a move that will restrict access to mifepristone as the case proceeds.
Judges Kurt Engelhardt and Andrew Oldham temporarily blocked the part of the Texas judge's ruling that would have invalidated the Food and Drug Administration's 2000 approval of mifepristone.
But the Trump appointees, whose nominations were vocally opposed by rights groups, said the Texas judge's order to suspend later agency actions that expanded access to the safe medication—including a 2021 decision allowing mifepristone to be distributed by mail—can take effect.
The two appeals court judges also halted 2016 changes that allowed the pills to be prescribed at up to 10 weeks of pregnancy instead of seven weeks. The judges argued the anti-abortion groups that sued the FDA last year brought a timely-enough challenge to the agency's later policy changes.
Catharina Haynes, a George W. Bush appointee and a member of the three-judge appeals court panel that issued the late Wednesday decision, dissented from the ruling, saying she would have paused U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk's order in full.
The Biden Justice Department is widely expected to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ended the constitutional right to abortion last year. Democratic-led states, including California and Washington, have been stockpiling mifepristone in preparation for court rulings that limit access.
In 2020, more than half of all abortions in the U.S. were medication abortions, which are typically carried out using mifepristone in combination with misoprostol—though misoprostol can be used alone.
The appeals court panel's decision came after hundreds of Democratic lawmakers and reproductive rights groups filed amicus briefs warning that, if upheld, Kacsmaryk's order would have "perilous consequences" that "reach far beyond mifepristone."
"Providers and patients rely on the availability of thousands of FDA-approved drugs to treat or manage a range of medical conditions, including asthma, HIV, infertility, heart disease, diabetes, and more," 240 members of Congress wrote in their brief to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a separate brief, the Center for Reproductive Rights and more than 100 other organizations argued that Kacsmaryk—also a Trump appointee—penned an order rooted in "debunked data" and packed with "anti-abortion rhetoric rather than scientific terminology."
"If the decision...takes effect, people even in states where abortion remains legal or protected will be denied access to mifepristone, imperiling access to abortion and jeopardizing the health of persons unable to timely obtain care," the groups wrote. "Neither science nor law supports this result."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Two Trump appointees on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision late Wednesday allowing parts of a Texas judge's widely denounced abortion pill ruling to take effect, a move that will restrict access to mifepristone as the case proceeds.
Judges Kurt Engelhardt and Andrew Oldham temporarily blocked the part of the Texas judge's ruling that would have invalidated the Food and Drug Administration's 2000 approval of mifepristone.
But the Trump appointees, whose nominations were vocally opposed by rights groups, said the Texas judge's order to suspend later agency actions that expanded access to the safe medication—including a 2021 decision allowing mifepristone to be distributed by mail—can take effect.
The two appeals court judges also halted 2016 changes that allowed the pills to be prescribed at up to 10 weeks of pregnancy instead of seven weeks. The judges argued the anti-abortion groups that sued the FDA last year brought a timely-enough challenge to the agency's later policy changes.
Catharina Haynes, a George W. Bush appointee and a member of the three-judge appeals court panel that issued the late Wednesday decision, dissented from the ruling, saying she would have paused U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk's order in full.
The Biden Justice Department is widely expected to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ended the constitutional right to abortion last year. Democratic-led states, including California and Washington, have been stockpiling mifepristone in preparation for court rulings that limit access.
In 2020, more than half of all abortions in the U.S. were medication abortions, which are typically carried out using mifepristone in combination with misoprostol—though misoprostol can be used alone.
The appeals court panel's decision came after hundreds of Democratic lawmakers and reproductive rights groups filed amicus briefs warning that, if upheld, Kacsmaryk's order would have "perilous consequences" that "reach far beyond mifepristone."
"Providers and patients rely on the availability of thousands of FDA-approved drugs to treat or manage a range of medical conditions, including asthma, HIV, infertility, heart disease, diabetes, and more," 240 members of Congress wrote in their brief to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a separate brief, the Center for Reproductive Rights and more than 100 other organizations argued that Kacsmaryk—also a Trump appointee—penned an order rooted in "debunked data" and packed with "anti-abortion rhetoric rather than scientific terminology."
"If the decision...takes effect, people even in states where abortion remains legal or protected will be denied access to mifepristone, imperiling access to abortion and jeopardizing the health of persons unable to timely obtain care," the groups wrote. "Neither science nor law supports this result."
Two Trump appointees on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision late Wednesday allowing parts of a Texas judge's widely denounced abortion pill ruling to take effect, a move that will restrict access to mifepristone as the case proceeds.
Judges Kurt Engelhardt and Andrew Oldham temporarily blocked the part of the Texas judge's ruling that would have invalidated the Food and Drug Administration's 2000 approval of mifepristone.
But the Trump appointees, whose nominations were vocally opposed by rights groups, said the Texas judge's order to suspend later agency actions that expanded access to the safe medication—including a 2021 decision allowing mifepristone to be distributed by mail—can take effect.
The two appeals court judges also halted 2016 changes that allowed the pills to be prescribed at up to 10 weeks of pregnancy instead of seven weeks. The judges argued the anti-abortion groups that sued the FDA last year brought a timely-enough challenge to the agency's later policy changes.
Catharina Haynes, a George W. Bush appointee and a member of the three-judge appeals court panel that issued the late Wednesday decision, dissented from the ruling, saying she would have paused U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk's order in full.
The Biden Justice Department is widely expected to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ended the constitutional right to abortion last year. Democratic-led states, including California and Washington, have been stockpiling mifepristone in preparation for court rulings that limit access.
In 2020, more than half of all abortions in the U.S. were medication abortions, which are typically carried out using mifepristone in combination with misoprostol—though misoprostol can be used alone.
The appeals court panel's decision came after hundreds of Democratic lawmakers and reproductive rights groups filed amicus briefs warning that, if upheld, Kacsmaryk's order would have "perilous consequences" that "reach far beyond mifepristone."
"Providers and patients rely on the availability of thousands of FDA-approved drugs to treat or manage a range of medical conditions, including asthma, HIV, infertility, heart disease, diabetes, and more," 240 members of Congress wrote in their brief to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a separate brief, the Center for Reproductive Rights and more than 100 other organizations argued that Kacsmaryk—also a Trump appointee—penned an order rooted in "debunked data" and packed with "anti-abortion rhetoric rather than scientific terminology."
"If the decision...takes effect, people even in states where abortion remains legal or protected will be denied access to mifepristone, imperiling access to abortion and jeopardizing the health of persons unable to timely obtain care," the groups wrote. "Neither science nor law supports this result."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.