A person with diabetes looks at NovoRapid (Canada) and NovoLog (U.S.), a replacement insulin drug at his house on January 16, 2020 in Eveleth, Minnesota. (Photo: Kerem Yucel/AFP via Getty Images)
Oct 18, 2022
New research unveiled Monday estimates that around 1.3 million U.S. adults with diabetes either skipped entire insulin doses, took less than needed, or put off purchases of the medicine over the past year due to its high cost, a striking indictment of a healthcare system that allows profit-seeking pharmaceutical companies to drive up prices at will.
"We have allowed pharmaceutical companies to set the agenda, and that is coming at the cost to our patients."
The authors of the new study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, analyzed data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey, examining a sample representative of 1.4 million U.S. adults with type 1 diabetes and 5.8 million with type 2 diabetes.
The results indicate that 16.5% of all adult insulin users across the U.S. rationed insulin in some way in the past year, with rationing more common among those with type 1 diabetes than type 2.
"Universal access to insulin, without cost barriers, is urgently needed," Adam Gaffney, an ICU doctor at the Cambridge Health Alliance and the lead author of the study, toldNBC News. "We have allowed pharmaceutical companies to set the agenda, and that is coming at the cost to our patients."
Gaffney, an outspoken advocate of Medicare for All, said he has personally "cared for patients who have life-threatening complications of diabetes because they couldn't afford this life-saving drug."
\u201cBREAKING: We found 1,300,000 Americans with diabetes ration insulin due to cost.\n \nThose without insurance had the highest rates of rationing at 30%.\n\nThis isn\u2019t some awful phenomenon. This is a policy failure.\nhttps://t.co/SG5ntSDApe\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1666041754
The high price of insulin has long been a scandal in the U.S., where the list costs of the cheap-to-produce medicine are often up to 10 times higher than in other countries.
"People who need insulin shouldn't have to break the bank just to survive, but in the U.S. they often do."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has famously led caravans of people with diabetes into neighboring Canada to spotlight the shocking price of insulin in the U.S., which does little to regulate the pharmaceutical industry's price-setting power.
One recent report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) described insulin access in the U.S. as "a privilege that many cannot afford," noting that "soaring medicine prices and inadequate health insurance coverage can result in unaffordable out-of-pocket costs that undermine the right to health, drive people into financial distress and debt, and disproportionately impact people who are socially and economically marginalized, reinforcing existing forms of structural discrimination."
The new study, co-authored by David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler, echoed those findings, pointing out that people without health insurance "had the highest rate of rationing... followed by those with private insurance." People on Medicaid and Medicare reported the lowest rate of insulin rationing.
"Several factors likely underlie our findings," the authors note. "Insulin prices in the United States are far higher than in other nations. Moreover, pharmaceutical firms have increased insulin prices year upon year, even for products that remain unchanged."
According to public data spotlighted by HRW, Eli Lilly has hiked the list price of the commonly used insulin product Humalog by an inflation-adjusted 680% since it started selling the drug in 1996.
Gaffney, Himmelstein, and Woolhandler note that the recently enacted Inflation Reduction Act includes a provision limiting insulin copays to $35 per month for those on Medicare, a change that "may improve insulin access for seniors, who experienced substantial rationing in our study."
But they lament that Senate Republicans stripped out an insulin copay cap for those with private insurance.
"Further reform," the trio writes, "could improve access to insulin for all Americans."
In July, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that the state would soon move to produce its own insulin in an effort to provide a lower-cost alternative to Big Pharma's products.
At the national level, HRW has called on Congress to "consider legislation to provide insulin to all insulin-dependent individuals in the country free-of-cost."
"People who need insulin shouldn't have to break the bank just to survive," said Matt McConnell, economic justice and rights researcher at HRW, "but in the U.S. they often do."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
New research unveiled Monday estimates that around 1.3 million U.S. adults with diabetes either skipped entire insulin doses, took less than needed, or put off purchases of the medicine over the past year due to its high cost, a striking indictment of a healthcare system that allows profit-seeking pharmaceutical companies to drive up prices at will.
"We have allowed pharmaceutical companies to set the agenda, and that is coming at the cost to our patients."
The authors of the new study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, analyzed data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey, examining a sample representative of 1.4 million U.S. adults with type 1 diabetes and 5.8 million with type 2 diabetes.
The results indicate that 16.5% of all adult insulin users across the U.S. rationed insulin in some way in the past year, with rationing more common among those with type 1 diabetes than type 2.
"Universal access to insulin, without cost barriers, is urgently needed," Adam Gaffney, an ICU doctor at the Cambridge Health Alliance and the lead author of the study, toldNBC News. "We have allowed pharmaceutical companies to set the agenda, and that is coming at the cost to our patients."
Gaffney, an outspoken advocate of Medicare for All, said he has personally "cared for patients who have life-threatening complications of diabetes because they couldn't afford this life-saving drug."
\u201cBREAKING: We found 1,300,000 Americans with diabetes ration insulin due to cost.\n \nThose without insurance had the highest rates of rationing at 30%.\n\nThis isn\u2019t some awful phenomenon. This is a policy failure.\nhttps://t.co/SG5ntSDApe\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1666041754
The high price of insulin has long been a scandal in the U.S., where the list costs of the cheap-to-produce medicine are often up to 10 times higher than in other countries.
"People who need insulin shouldn't have to break the bank just to survive, but in the U.S. they often do."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has famously led caravans of people with diabetes into neighboring Canada to spotlight the shocking price of insulin in the U.S., which does little to regulate the pharmaceutical industry's price-setting power.
One recent report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) described insulin access in the U.S. as "a privilege that many cannot afford," noting that "soaring medicine prices and inadequate health insurance coverage can result in unaffordable out-of-pocket costs that undermine the right to health, drive people into financial distress and debt, and disproportionately impact people who are socially and economically marginalized, reinforcing existing forms of structural discrimination."
The new study, co-authored by David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler, echoed those findings, pointing out that people without health insurance "had the highest rate of rationing... followed by those with private insurance." People on Medicaid and Medicare reported the lowest rate of insulin rationing.
"Several factors likely underlie our findings," the authors note. "Insulin prices in the United States are far higher than in other nations. Moreover, pharmaceutical firms have increased insulin prices year upon year, even for products that remain unchanged."
According to public data spotlighted by HRW, Eli Lilly has hiked the list price of the commonly used insulin product Humalog by an inflation-adjusted 680% since it started selling the drug in 1996.
Gaffney, Himmelstein, and Woolhandler note that the recently enacted Inflation Reduction Act includes a provision limiting insulin copays to $35 per month for those on Medicare, a change that "may improve insulin access for seniors, who experienced substantial rationing in our study."
But they lament that Senate Republicans stripped out an insulin copay cap for those with private insurance.
"Further reform," the trio writes, "could improve access to insulin for all Americans."
In July, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that the state would soon move to produce its own insulin in an effort to provide a lower-cost alternative to Big Pharma's products.
At the national level, HRW has called on Congress to "consider legislation to provide insulin to all insulin-dependent individuals in the country free-of-cost."
"People who need insulin shouldn't have to break the bank just to survive," said Matt McConnell, economic justice and rights researcher at HRW, "but in the U.S. they often do."
New research unveiled Monday estimates that around 1.3 million U.S. adults with diabetes either skipped entire insulin doses, took less than needed, or put off purchases of the medicine over the past year due to its high cost, a striking indictment of a healthcare system that allows profit-seeking pharmaceutical companies to drive up prices at will.
"We have allowed pharmaceutical companies to set the agenda, and that is coming at the cost to our patients."
The authors of the new study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, analyzed data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey, examining a sample representative of 1.4 million U.S. adults with type 1 diabetes and 5.8 million with type 2 diabetes.
The results indicate that 16.5% of all adult insulin users across the U.S. rationed insulin in some way in the past year, with rationing more common among those with type 1 diabetes than type 2.
"Universal access to insulin, without cost barriers, is urgently needed," Adam Gaffney, an ICU doctor at the Cambridge Health Alliance and the lead author of the study, toldNBC News. "We have allowed pharmaceutical companies to set the agenda, and that is coming at the cost to our patients."
Gaffney, an outspoken advocate of Medicare for All, said he has personally "cared for patients who have life-threatening complications of diabetes because they couldn't afford this life-saving drug."
\u201cBREAKING: We found 1,300,000 Americans with diabetes ration insulin due to cost.\n \nThose without insurance had the highest rates of rationing at 30%.\n\nThis isn\u2019t some awful phenomenon. This is a policy failure.\nhttps://t.co/SG5ntSDApe\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1666041754
The high price of insulin has long been a scandal in the U.S., where the list costs of the cheap-to-produce medicine are often up to 10 times higher than in other countries.
"People who need insulin shouldn't have to break the bank just to survive, but in the U.S. they often do."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has famously led caravans of people with diabetes into neighboring Canada to spotlight the shocking price of insulin in the U.S., which does little to regulate the pharmaceutical industry's price-setting power.
One recent report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) described insulin access in the U.S. as "a privilege that many cannot afford," noting that "soaring medicine prices and inadequate health insurance coverage can result in unaffordable out-of-pocket costs that undermine the right to health, drive people into financial distress and debt, and disproportionately impact people who are socially and economically marginalized, reinforcing existing forms of structural discrimination."
The new study, co-authored by David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler, echoed those findings, pointing out that people without health insurance "had the highest rate of rationing... followed by those with private insurance." People on Medicaid and Medicare reported the lowest rate of insulin rationing.
"Several factors likely underlie our findings," the authors note. "Insulin prices in the United States are far higher than in other nations. Moreover, pharmaceutical firms have increased insulin prices year upon year, even for products that remain unchanged."
According to public data spotlighted by HRW, Eli Lilly has hiked the list price of the commonly used insulin product Humalog by an inflation-adjusted 680% since it started selling the drug in 1996.
Gaffney, Himmelstein, and Woolhandler note that the recently enacted Inflation Reduction Act includes a provision limiting insulin copays to $35 per month for those on Medicare, a change that "may improve insulin access for seniors, who experienced substantial rationing in our study."
But they lament that Senate Republicans stripped out an insulin copay cap for those with private insurance.
"Further reform," the trio writes, "could improve access to insulin for all Americans."
In July, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that the state would soon move to produce its own insulin in an effort to provide a lower-cost alternative to Big Pharma's products.
At the national level, HRW has called on Congress to "consider legislation to provide insulin to all insulin-dependent individuals in the country free-of-cost."
"People who need insulin shouldn't have to break the bank just to survive," said Matt McConnell, economic justice and rights researcher at HRW, "but in the U.S. they often do."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.