From left, Greg Jacob, former counsel to Vice President Mike Pence, and former federal judge J. Michael Luttig testify during the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol hearing in the Cannon House Office Building in Washington, D.C. on Thursday, June 16, 2022. (Photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)
'Certifiably Crazy': Jan. 6 Panel Highlights How Team Trump Pushed Pence to Overturn Election
Had Pence obeyed Trump, said a retired federal judge, "America would immediately have been plunged into what would have been tantamount to a revolution within a paralyzing constitutional crisis."
Thursday's public hearing of the House January 6 committee focused largely on former President Donald Trump's futile attempt to convince Mike Pence, his vice president, to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
"There was no basis in the Constitution or laws of the United States at all, for the theory espoused by Mr. Eastman."
"In today's hearing, we learned details about how Trump pressured Vice President Mike Pence to engage in a criminal conspiracy to steal the 2020 election," Lisa Gilbert, executive vice president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen and co-chair of the Not Above the Law, said in a statement. "In firsthand testimony from the former counsel of the vice president, we heard how far Trump and his allies would go to stop the peaceful transfer of power, including by inciting violence."
"We saw how far they'd go to snuff out our vote," Gilbert added, "even with full understanding of the illegal and unconstitutional nature of their scheme."
A memo by right-wing attorney John Eastman--who, according to testimony from Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), sought a preemptive presidential pardon for his actions--featured prominently during the third session of the committee.
When questioned about Eastman's belief that Pence had the power to reject the vote of state electors, retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig said that "there was no basis in the Constitution or laws of the United States at all, for the theory espoused by Mr. Eastman."
Luttig--who said he "would have laid my body across the road before I would have let the vice president overturn the 2020 election"--condemned Eastman's argument as "constitutional mischief."
Had Pence obeyed Trump, Luttig added, "America would immediately have been plunged into what would have been tantamount to a revolution within a paralyzing constitutional crisis."
Greg Jacobs, Pence's former general counsel, testified that "the vice president's first instinct when he heard this theory was that there was no way that our framers... would ever have put one person... in a role to have decisive impact on the outcome of the election."
When asked how Pence responded to another attempt by Eastman--this one after the deadly January 6 insurrection--to get him to postpone certification of the election, Jacob said the former vice president called the notion "rubber room stuff."
When asked to explain the term, Jacob replied, "certifiably crazy."
Former White House lawyer Eric Herschmann testified that he asked Eastman "are you out of your effin' mind" when he heard his theory, adding that "you're completely crazy."
"Mike Pence said no," committee Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) noted during the proceedings. "He resisted the pressure. He knew it was illegal. He knew it was wrong. We were fortunate for Mr. Pence's courage. On January 6, our democracy came dangerously close to catastrophe."
"That courage put him in tremendous danger," Thompson continued. "When Mike Pence made it clear that he wouldn't give in to Donald Trump's scheme, Donald Trump turned the mob on him--a mob that was chanting 'hang Mike Pence,' a mob that had built a hangman's gallows just outside the Capitol."
Christina Harvey, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said that "after today's hearing, it's apparent how close we came to even greater bloodshed and the brink of autocracy."
"For almost three hours, the January 6 committee provided a chilling look at President Trump's criminal campaign to pressure Vice President Pence into overturning the 2020 election," she added. "He pressured, badgered, and ultimately threatened Pence via tweet in a desperate attempt to stop the electoral count and overturn the will of voters."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Thursday's public hearing of the House January 6 committee focused largely on former President Donald Trump's futile attempt to convince Mike Pence, his vice president, to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
"There was no basis in the Constitution or laws of the United States at all, for the theory espoused by Mr. Eastman."
"In today's hearing, we learned details about how Trump pressured Vice President Mike Pence to engage in a criminal conspiracy to steal the 2020 election," Lisa Gilbert, executive vice president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen and co-chair of the Not Above the Law, said in a statement. "In firsthand testimony from the former counsel of the vice president, we heard how far Trump and his allies would go to stop the peaceful transfer of power, including by inciting violence."
"We saw how far they'd go to snuff out our vote," Gilbert added, "even with full understanding of the illegal and unconstitutional nature of their scheme."
A memo by right-wing attorney John Eastman--who, according to testimony from Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), sought a preemptive presidential pardon for his actions--featured prominently during the third session of the committee.
When questioned about Eastman's belief that Pence had the power to reject the vote of state electors, retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig said that "there was no basis in the Constitution or laws of the United States at all, for the theory espoused by Mr. Eastman."
Luttig--who said he "would have laid my body across the road before I would have let the vice president overturn the 2020 election"--condemned Eastman's argument as "constitutional mischief."
Had Pence obeyed Trump, Luttig added, "America would immediately have been plunged into what would have been tantamount to a revolution within a paralyzing constitutional crisis."
Greg Jacobs, Pence's former general counsel, testified that "the vice president's first instinct when he heard this theory was that there was no way that our framers... would ever have put one person... in a role to have decisive impact on the outcome of the election."
When asked how Pence responded to another attempt by Eastman--this one after the deadly January 6 insurrection--to get him to postpone certification of the election, Jacob said the former vice president called the notion "rubber room stuff."
When asked to explain the term, Jacob replied, "certifiably crazy."
Former White House lawyer Eric Herschmann testified that he asked Eastman "are you out of your effin' mind" when he heard his theory, adding that "you're completely crazy."
"Mike Pence said no," committee Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) noted during the proceedings. "He resisted the pressure. He knew it was illegal. He knew it was wrong. We were fortunate for Mr. Pence's courage. On January 6, our democracy came dangerously close to catastrophe."
"That courage put him in tremendous danger," Thompson continued. "When Mike Pence made it clear that he wouldn't give in to Donald Trump's scheme, Donald Trump turned the mob on him--a mob that was chanting 'hang Mike Pence,' a mob that had built a hangman's gallows just outside the Capitol."
Christina Harvey, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said that "after today's hearing, it's apparent how close we came to even greater bloodshed and the brink of autocracy."
"For almost three hours, the January 6 committee provided a chilling look at President Trump's criminal campaign to pressure Vice President Pence into overturning the 2020 election," she added. "He pressured, badgered, and ultimately threatened Pence via tweet in a desperate attempt to stop the electoral count and overturn the will of voters."
Thursday's public hearing of the House January 6 committee focused largely on former President Donald Trump's futile attempt to convince Mike Pence, his vice president, to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
"There was no basis in the Constitution or laws of the United States at all, for the theory espoused by Mr. Eastman."
"In today's hearing, we learned details about how Trump pressured Vice President Mike Pence to engage in a criminal conspiracy to steal the 2020 election," Lisa Gilbert, executive vice president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen and co-chair of the Not Above the Law, said in a statement. "In firsthand testimony from the former counsel of the vice president, we heard how far Trump and his allies would go to stop the peaceful transfer of power, including by inciting violence."
"We saw how far they'd go to snuff out our vote," Gilbert added, "even with full understanding of the illegal and unconstitutional nature of their scheme."
A memo by right-wing attorney John Eastman--who, according to testimony from Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), sought a preemptive presidential pardon for his actions--featured prominently during the third session of the committee.
When questioned about Eastman's belief that Pence had the power to reject the vote of state electors, retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig said that "there was no basis in the Constitution or laws of the United States at all, for the theory espoused by Mr. Eastman."
Luttig--who said he "would have laid my body across the road before I would have let the vice president overturn the 2020 election"--condemned Eastman's argument as "constitutional mischief."
Had Pence obeyed Trump, Luttig added, "America would immediately have been plunged into what would have been tantamount to a revolution within a paralyzing constitutional crisis."
Greg Jacobs, Pence's former general counsel, testified that "the vice president's first instinct when he heard this theory was that there was no way that our framers... would ever have put one person... in a role to have decisive impact on the outcome of the election."
When asked how Pence responded to another attempt by Eastman--this one after the deadly January 6 insurrection--to get him to postpone certification of the election, Jacob said the former vice president called the notion "rubber room stuff."
When asked to explain the term, Jacob replied, "certifiably crazy."
Former White House lawyer Eric Herschmann testified that he asked Eastman "are you out of your effin' mind" when he heard his theory, adding that "you're completely crazy."
"Mike Pence said no," committee Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) noted during the proceedings. "He resisted the pressure. He knew it was illegal. He knew it was wrong. We were fortunate for Mr. Pence's courage. On January 6, our democracy came dangerously close to catastrophe."
"That courage put him in tremendous danger," Thompson continued. "When Mike Pence made it clear that he wouldn't give in to Donald Trump's scheme, Donald Trump turned the mob on him--a mob that was chanting 'hang Mike Pence,' a mob that had built a hangman's gallows just outside the Capitol."
Christina Harvey, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said that "after today's hearing, it's apparent how close we came to even greater bloodshed and the brink of autocracy."
"For almost three hours, the January 6 committee provided a chilling look at President Trump's criminal campaign to pressure Vice President Pence into overturning the 2020 election," she added. "He pressured, badgered, and ultimately threatened Pence via tweet in a desperate attempt to stop the electoral count and overturn the will of voters."