A crop duster sprays pesticides on fields near Pullman in Whitman County, Washington. (Photo: Wolfgang Kaehler/Avalon/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Jun 09, 2022
More than 400 advocacy groups on Thursday urged the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization to cancel its partnership with an industry lobby group representing the world's largest manufacturers of toxic pesticides.
"Use of hazardous pesticides is inconsistent with the rights protected by the United Nations."
As the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Council prepares to convene next week, the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) published a letter asserting that the U.N. agency's agreement with CropLife International--whose members include multinational pesticide giants BASF, Bayer, Corteva, FMC, and Syngtenta--"is incompatible with FAO's obligations to uphold human rights."
The letter's signers--who include 10 other global networks acting on behalf of 430 civil society, Indigenous, and other advocacy groups from 69 countries--assert that "use of hazardous pesticides is inconsistent with the rights protected by the United Nations."
These include the rights to "health; clean, healthy, and sustainable environment; safe working conditions; adequate food; safe and clean water and sanitation; a dignified life; and rights of Indigenous peoples, women, children, workers, peasants, and other people working in rural areas."
\u201c\ud83d\udce2\u203c\ufe0f\ud83c\udf0f430 civil society and Indigenous peoples groups from 69 countries told the @FAO Council to end its partnership w/ @CropLifeIntl. Member States must heed these calls to address concerns over human rights & pesticide industry influence in the UN! Stop the #ToxicAlliance!\ud83d\udc47\u201d— Simone Adler (@Simone Adler) 1654791904
In a briefing to FAO member states, groups that signed the letter note that CropLife companies make 35% of their sales from highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs), which "pose the highest levels of risk to health and the environment and are behind some of the most egregious poisoning cases and environmental destruction."
According to the paper, 385 million farm workers--44% of the global total--are poisoned around the world annually by HHPs.
"These pesticide and GM seed manufacturers exert enormous pressure on governments that enact policies to protect against pesticide harms, and they particularly target the export of their products to countries in the Global South," Simone Adler, the organizing co-director and campaign co-coordinator at Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), said in a statement.
"We cannot allow the U.N. agency mandated to support farmers and agricultural systems aligning with the industry that aims to influence national policy and causes such egregious pesticide poisoning and environmental devastation," they added.
The letter's signatories urge FAO to promote agroecology, an "approach that offers viable and sustainable proposals for generating ecologically based food and farming systems without the use of toxic pesticides."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
rights & justiceindigenousunited nationspesticidesagriculturefoodpesticide action networkcorporate power
More than 400 advocacy groups on Thursday urged the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization to cancel its partnership with an industry lobby group representing the world's largest manufacturers of toxic pesticides.
"Use of hazardous pesticides is inconsistent with the rights protected by the United Nations."
As the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Council prepares to convene next week, the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) published a letter asserting that the U.N. agency's agreement with CropLife International--whose members include multinational pesticide giants BASF, Bayer, Corteva, FMC, and Syngtenta--"is incompatible with FAO's obligations to uphold human rights."
The letter's signers--who include 10 other global networks acting on behalf of 430 civil society, Indigenous, and other advocacy groups from 69 countries--assert that "use of hazardous pesticides is inconsistent with the rights protected by the United Nations."
These include the rights to "health; clean, healthy, and sustainable environment; safe working conditions; adequate food; safe and clean water and sanitation; a dignified life; and rights of Indigenous peoples, women, children, workers, peasants, and other people working in rural areas."
\u201c\ud83d\udce2\u203c\ufe0f\ud83c\udf0f430 civil society and Indigenous peoples groups from 69 countries told the @FAO Council to end its partnership w/ @CropLifeIntl. Member States must heed these calls to address concerns over human rights & pesticide industry influence in the UN! Stop the #ToxicAlliance!\ud83d\udc47\u201d— Simone Adler (@Simone Adler) 1654791904
In a briefing to FAO member states, groups that signed the letter note that CropLife companies make 35% of their sales from highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs), which "pose the highest levels of risk to health and the environment and are behind some of the most egregious poisoning cases and environmental destruction."
According to the paper, 385 million farm workers--44% of the global total--are poisoned around the world annually by HHPs.
"These pesticide and GM seed manufacturers exert enormous pressure on governments that enact policies to protect against pesticide harms, and they particularly target the export of their products to countries in the Global South," Simone Adler, the organizing co-director and campaign co-coordinator at Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), said in a statement.
"We cannot allow the U.N. agency mandated to support farmers and agricultural systems aligning with the industry that aims to influence national policy and causes such egregious pesticide poisoning and environmental devastation," they added.
The letter's signatories urge FAO to promote agroecology, an "approach that offers viable and sustainable proposals for generating ecologically based food and farming systems without the use of toxic pesticides."
More than 400 advocacy groups on Thursday urged the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization to cancel its partnership with an industry lobby group representing the world's largest manufacturers of toxic pesticides.
"Use of hazardous pesticides is inconsistent with the rights protected by the United Nations."
As the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Council prepares to convene next week, the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) published a letter asserting that the U.N. agency's agreement with CropLife International--whose members include multinational pesticide giants BASF, Bayer, Corteva, FMC, and Syngtenta--"is incompatible with FAO's obligations to uphold human rights."
The letter's signers--who include 10 other global networks acting on behalf of 430 civil society, Indigenous, and other advocacy groups from 69 countries--assert that "use of hazardous pesticides is inconsistent with the rights protected by the United Nations."
These include the rights to "health; clean, healthy, and sustainable environment; safe working conditions; adequate food; safe and clean water and sanitation; a dignified life; and rights of Indigenous peoples, women, children, workers, peasants, and other people working in rural areas."
\u201c\ud83d\udce2\u203c\ufe0f\ud83c\udf0f430 civil society and Indigenous peoples groups from 69 countries told the @FAO Council to end its partnership w/ @CropLifeIntl. Member States must heed these calls to address concerns over human rights & pesticide industry influence in the UN! Stop the #ToxicAlliance!\ud83d\udc47\u201d— Simone Adler (@Simone Adler) 1654791904
In a briefing to FAO member states, groups that signed the letter note that CropLife companies make 35% of their sales from highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs), which "pose the highest levels of risk to health and the environment and are behind some of the most egregious poisoning cases and environmental destruction."
According to the paper, 385 million farm workers--44% of the global total--are poisoned around the world annually by HHPs.
"These pesticide and GM seed manufacturers exert enormous pressure on governments that enact policies to protect against pesticide harms, and they particularly target the export of their products to countries in the Global South," Simone Adler, the organizing co-director and campaign co-coordinator at Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), said in a statement.
"We cannot allow the U.N. agency mandated to support farmers and agricultural systems aligning with the industry that aims to influence national policy and causes such egregious pesticide poisoning and environmental devastation," they added.
The letter's signatories urge FAO to promote agroecology, an "approach that offers viable and sustainable proposals for generating ecologically based food and farming systems without the use of toxic pesticides."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.