

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) holds her weekly press conference at the U.S. Capitol on August 25, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers on Monday urged the top Democrat and Republican in the House of Representatives to "swiftly bring legislation to prohibit members of Congress from owning or trading stock" to the floor.
"This common-sense, bipartisan legislation is unfortunately necessary in light of recent misconduct."
The call came in a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)--who has faced criticism for defending her husband's trades and existing rules--and Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who is reportedly considering enacting a ban on lawmakers trading if the GOP wins control of the chamber in this year's midterms.
Pointing to proposals such as the Ban Conflicted Trading Act or the TRUST in Congress Act, the letter states that "this common-sense, bipartisan legislation is unfortunately necessary in light of recent misconduct, and is supported by Americans across the political spectrum."
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said that signing the letter--spearheaded by Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine)--was "a no-brainer."
While the 2012 STOCK Act was intended to address concerns about stock trading by federal lawmakers, a recent investigation found it has been violated hundreds of times since 2020, the letter highlights, declaring that "it's clear the current rules are not working."
Noting three cases involving senators from both parties, the letter continues:
While those senators apparently did not violate the letter of the law, as the Department of Justice has closed its investigations of these trades, that outcome demonstrates how shamefully narrow the current law is. The law prohibits only those stock trades that members of Congress make or direct because of their nonpublic knowledge. But it can be nearly impossible to determine what counts as "nonpublic knowledge" or how personally involved members are in their stock trades.
Instead, Congress should close these loopholes by simply banning members from owning or trading individual stocks while in office. In addition to ensuring that members' access to information doesn't advantage them over the public when trading stocks, as the STOCK Act sought, this would end the potential corruption of lawmakers pursuing policy outcomes that benefit their portfolios.
"There is no reason that members of Congress need to be allowed to trade stocks when we should be focused on doing our jobs and serving our constituents," the letter asserts. "Perhaps this means some of our colleagues will miss out on lucrative investment opportunities. We don't care. We came to Congress to serve our country, not turn a quick buck."
There is broad public support for such a ban. As the letter notes, a poll from earlier this month that revealed 76% of voters--including 70% of Democrats, 78% of Republicans, and 80% of Independents--believe members of Congress and their spouses have an unfair advantage and should not be allowed to trade stocks while in office.
Related Content

Democrats and Republicans in both chambers of Congress have introduced bills to address concerns about trading by lawmakers and their families.
"We view the emergence of multiple bipartisan bills on this issue as a sign of broad rank-and-file support for it across Congress," the lawmakers wrote to Pelosi and McCarthy. "Good-faith differences of opinion between members on the details of this legislation can be resolved through an amendment process."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers on Monday urged the top Democrat and Republican in the House of Representatives to "swiftly bring legislation to prohibit members of Congress from owning or trading stock" to the floor.
"This common-sense, bipartisan legislation is unfortunately necessary in light of recent misconduct."
The call came in a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)--who has faced criticism for defending her husband's trades and existing rules--and Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who is reportedly considering enacting a ban on lawmakers trading if the GOP wins control of the chamber in this year's midterms.
Pointing to proposals such as the Ban Conflicted Trading Act or the TRUST in Congress Act, the letter states that "this common-sense, bipartisan legislation is unfortunately necessary in light of recent misconduct, and is supported by Americans across the political spectrum."
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said that signing the letter--spearheaded by Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine)--was "a no-brainer."
While the 2012 STOCK Act was intended to address concerns about stock trading by federal lawmakers, a recent investigation found it has been violated hundreds of times since 2020, the letter highlights, declaring that "it's clear the current rules are not working."
Noting three cases involving senators from both parties, the letter continues:
While those senators apparently did not violate the letter of the law, as the Department of Justice has closed its investigations of these trades, that outcome demonstrates how shamefully narrow the current law is. The law prohibits only those stock trades that members of Congress make or direct because of their nonpublic knowledge. But it can be nearly impossible to determine what counts as "nonpublic knowledge" or how personally involved members are in their stock trades.
Instead, Congress should close these loopholes by simply banning members from owning or trading individual stocks while in office. In addition to ensuring that members' access to information doesn't advantage them over the public when trading stocks, as the STOCK Act sought, this would end the potential corruption of lawmakers pursuing policy outcomes that benefit their portfolios.
"There is no reason that members of Congress need to be allowed to trade stocks when we should be focused on doing our jobs and serving our constituents," the letter asserts. "Perhaps this means some of our colleagues will miss out on lucrative investment opportunities. We don't care. We came to Congress to serve our country, not turn a quick buck."
There is broad public support for such a ban. As the letter notes, a poll from earlier this month that revealed 76% of voters--including 70% of Democrats, 78% of Republicans, and 80% of Independents--believe members of Congress and their spouses have an unfair advantage and should not be allowed to trade stocks while in office.
Related Content

Democrats and Republicans in both chambers of Congress have introduced bills to address concerns about trading by lawmakers and their families.
"We view the emergence of multiple bipartisan bills on this issue as a sign of broad rank-and-file support for it across Congress," the lawmakers wrote to Pelosi and McCarthy. "Good-faith differences of opinion between members on the details of this legislation can be resolved through an amendment process."
A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers on Monday urged the top Democrat and Republican in the House of Representatives to "swiftly bring legislation to prohibit members of Congress from owning or trading stock" to the floor.
"This common-sense, bipartisan legislation is unfortunately necessary in light of recent misconduct."
The call came in a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)--who has faced criticism for defending her husband's trades and existing rules--and Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who is reportedly considering enacting a ban on lawmakers trading if the GOP wins control of the chamber in this year's midterms.
Pointing to proposals such as the Ban Conflicted Trading Act or the TRUST in Congress Act, the letter states that "this common-sense, bipartisan legislation is unfortunately necessary in light of recent misconduct, and is supported by Americans across the political spectrum."
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said that signing the letter--spearheaded by Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine)--was "a no-brainer."
While the 2012 STOCK Act was intended to address concerns about stock trading by federal lawmakers, a recent investigation found it has been violated hundreds of times since 2020, the letter highlights, declaring that "it's clear the current rules are not working."
Noting three cases involving senators from both parties, the letter continues:
While those senators apparently did not violate the letter of the law, as the Department of Justice has closed its investigations of these trades, that outcome demonstrates how shamefully narrow the current law is. The law prohibits only those stock trades that members of Congress make or direct because of their nonpublic knowledge. But it can be nearly impossible to determine what counts as "nonpublic knowledge" or how personally involved members are in their stock trades.
Instead, Congress should close these loopholes by simply banning members from owning or trading individual stocks while in office. In addition to ensuring that members' access to information doesn't advantage them over the public when trading stocks, as the STOCK Act sought, this would end the potential corruption of lawmakers pursuing policy outcomes that benefit their portfolios.
"There is no reason that members of Congress need to be allowed to trade stocks when we should be focused on doing our jobs and serving our constituents," the letter asserts. "Perhaps this means some of our colleagues will miss out on lucrative investment opportunities. We don't care. We came to Congress to serve our country, not turn a quick buck."
There is broad public support for such a ban. As the letter notes, a poll from earlier this month that revealed 76% of voters--including 70% of Democrats, 78% of Republicans, and 80% of Independents--believe members of Congress and their spouses have an unfair advantage and should not be allowed to trade stocks while in office.
Related Content

Democrats and Republicans in both chambers of Congress have introduced bills to address concerns about trading by lawmakers and their families.
"We view the emergence of multiple bipartisan bills on this issue as a sign of broad rank-and-file support for it across Congress," the lawmakers wrote to Pelosi and McCarthy. "Good-faith differences of opinion between members on the details of this legislation can be resolved through an amendment process."