SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A woman walks past tents used by people who are homeless above Connecticut Avenue in Dupont Circle, Washington, D.C. on May 11, 2020. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Washington DC Council Approves 'Transformational' Budget Including Tax Increase on Wealthy
"Homelessness is a choice, and displacement is a choice, and poverty is a choice," said Councilmember Janeese Lewis George. "We have the wealth and the resources in our city to solve these issues."
Jul 21, 2021
Grassroots organizers in Washington, D.C. celebrated late Tuesday after local lawmakers voted in favor of raising taxes on the city's wealthiest residents in order to fund housing and childcare programs aimed at helping to pull thousands of homeless and low-income people out of poverty.
The D.C. Council voted 8-5 to raise income taxes for people who earn at least $250,000 per year, which proponents say will raise $100 million in revenue in the next fiscal year.
"Today's budget could truly be transformational in total."
--Erik Salmi, communications director for Councilmember Charles Allen
The vote was the first step toward adopting the measure as part of the city's 2022 budget; the final vote on the budget proposal will take place in August.
The tax increase proposal was authored by Councilmembers Brianne K. Nadeau, Janeese Lewis George, and Charles Allen, who want to use the revenue to fund subsidies to raise wages for child care workers, more than 1,200 permanent housing vouchers to help residents facing homelessness or housing insecurity, and monthly tax credits for low-income households.
The councilmembers and other advocates noted that the new revenue would help vulnerable residents including survivors of domestic violence and people who have been incarcerated to find safe housing.
"Homelessness is a choice, and displacement is a choice, and poverty is a choice," said Lewis George. "We have the wealth and the resources in our city to solve these issues."
The plan will also raise the city's tax credit for low-income families from 40% of the credits they receive on their federal taxes to 55% of the federal credit, which will be paid out in monthly installments instead of a lump sum, amounting to a "monthly basic income" for the city's poorest residents, said Erik Salmi, communications director for Allen.
"Today's budget could truly be transformational in total," Salmi said.
The tax increase will apply to just 5% of D.C. residents. Single people who earn between $250,000 and $500,000 per year will pay a marginal tax rate of 9.25%, up from 8.5%. People who make between $500,000 and $1 million will see their tax rate increase to 9.75% and those earning more than $1 million per year will pay a marginal rate of 10.75%.
According to Allen, Lewis George, and Nadeau, the wealthiest people in the city will have to pay between $375 and $6,500 more per year in taxes.
Stuart Karaffa, chair of the Metro D.C. Democratic Socialists of America, said Tuesday's vote represented a "sea change" in the city and among local policymakers.
\u201cThis vote strikes me as a sea change for the DC council. What was recently a conservative, neoliberal body where progressive ideals went to die just voted to improve the lives of thousands of working class DC residents - all by taxing the rich. Now what about that wealth tax...?\u201d— Stuart Karaffa (@Stuart Karaffa) 1626831994
Some members of the council who opposed the tax increase claimed that raising taxes for the rich would make the city less "attractive" to high earners and that a tax increase was inappropriate following an infusion of $2.3 billion in federal pandemic relief.
The measure's authors and advocates who fought for the tax increase countered that long-term funding--not a one-time federal grant--is needed to help lift the city's low-income residents out of poverty.
Councilmember Mary Cheh said that while the changes to the city's tax code might be "bearable" to some of the residents affected, it may cause "a hardship for another."
"Are you joking, Mary Cheh?" asked Sunrise Movement D.C. ahead of the vote. "A tax on high earners is not a hardship--they're already making more money than everyone else in D.C.!"
\u201cAt this point, if you're voting against this measure, you're just telling the people of DC that you don't care if childcare workers make a living wage or if people are forced to live or die on the street. @brookepintodc @marycheh @kenyanmcduffie @AnitaBondsDC @ChmnMendelson\u201d— Sunrise DC (@Sunrise DC) 1626806146
Amber Gruner, an organizer with the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute, denounced opponents of the tax increase for pushing "a capitalist scarcity narrative."
\u201c"Ending govt waste" & anti-tax rhetoric is a capitalist scarcity narrative: there isn't enough for everyone, so you have to look out for yourself first.\n\nVoters support raising taxes on the rich because they see through that lie.\n\nThere is enough for everyone. #taxtherich\u201d— Amber Gruner (@Amber Gruner) 1626624066
"There is enough for everyone," Gruner tweeted. "Tax the rich."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Grassroots organizers in Washington, D.C. celebrated late Tuesday after local lawmakers voted in favor of raising taxes on the city's wealthiest residents in order to fund housing and childcare programs aimed at helping to pull thousands of homeless and low-income people out of poverty.
The D.C. Council voted 8-5 to raise income taxes for people who earn at least $250,000 per year, which proponents say will raise $100 million in revenue in the next fiscal year.
"Today's budget could truly be transformational in total."
--Erik Salmi, communications director for Councilmember Charles Allen
The vote was the first step toward adopting the measure as part of the city's 2022 budget; the final vote on the budget proposal will take place in August.
The tax increase proposal was authored by Councilmembers Brianne K. Nadeau, Janeese Lewis George, and Charles Allen, who want to use the revenue to fund subsidies to raise wages for child care workers, more than 1,200 permanent housing vouchers to help residents facing homelessness or housing insecurity, and monthly tax credits for low-income households.
The councilmembers and other advocates noted that the new revenue would help vulnerable residents including survivors of domestic violence and people who have been incarcerated to find safe housing.
"Homelessness is a choice, and displacement is a choice, and poverty is a choice," said Lewis George. "We have the wealth and the resources in our city to solve these issues."
The plan will also raise the city's tax credit for low-income families from 40% of the credits they receive on their federal taxes to 55% of the federal credit, which will be paid out in monthly installments instead of a lump sum, amounting to a "monthly basic income" for the city's poorest residents, said Erik Salmi, communications director for Allen.
"Today's budget could truly be transformational in total," Salmi said.
The tax increase will apply to just 5% of D.C. residents. Single people who earn between $250,000 and $500,000 per year will pay a marginal tax rate of 9.25%, up from 8.5%. People who make between $500,000 and $1 million will see their tax rate increase to 9.75% and those earning more than $1 million per year will pay a marginal rate of 10.75%.
According to Allen, Lewis George, and Nadeau, the wealthiest people in the city will have to pay between $375 and $6,500 more per year in taxes.
Stuart Karaffa, chair of the Metro D.C. Democratic Socialists of America, said Tuesday's vote represented a "sea change" in the city and among local policymakers.
\u201cThis vote strikes me as a sea change for the DC council. What was recently a conservative, neoliberal body where progressive ideals went to die just voted to improve the lives of thousands of working class DC residents - all by taxing the rich. Now what about that wealth tax...?\u201d— Stuart Karaffa (@Stuart Karaffa) 1626831994
Some members of the council who opposed the tax increase claimed that raising taxes for the rich would make the city less "attractive" to high earners and that a tax increase was inappropriate following an infusion of $2.3 billion in federal pandemic relief.
The measure's authors and advocates who fought for the tax increase countered that long-term funding--not a one-time federal grant--is needed to help lift the city's low-income residents out of poverty.
Councilmember Mary Cheh said that while the changes to the city's tax code might be "bearable" to some of the residents affected, it may cause "a hardship for another."
"Are you joking, Mary Cheh?" asked Sunrise Movement D.C. ahead of the vote. "A tax on high earners is not a hardship--they're already making more money than everyone else in D.C.!"
\u201cAt this point, if you're voting against this measure, you're just telling the people of DC that you don't care if childcare workers make a living wage or if people are forced to live or die on the street. @brookepintodc @marycheh @kenyanmcduffie @AnitaBondsDC @ChmnMendelson\u201d— Sunrise DC (@Sunrise DC) 1626806146
Amber Gruner, an organizer with the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute, denounced opponents of the tax increase for pushing "a capitalist scarcity narrative."
\u201c"Ending govt waste" & anti-tax rhetoric is a capitalist scarcity narrative: there isn't enough for everyone, so you have to look out for yourself first.\n\nVoters support raising taxes on the rich because they see through that lie.\n\nThere is enough for everyone. #taxtherich\u201d— Amber Gruner (@Amber Gruner) 1626624066
"There is enough for everyone," Gruner tweeted. "Tax the rich."
Grassroots organizers in Washington, D.C. celebrated late Tuesday after local lawmakers voted in favor of raising taxes on the city's wealthiest residents in order to fund housing and childcare programs aimed at helping to pull thousands of homeless and low-income people out of poverty.
The D.C. Council voted 8-5 to raise income taxes for people who earn at least $250,000 per year, which proponents say will raise $100 million in revenue in the next fiscal year.
"Today's budget could truly be transformational in total."
--Erik Salmi, communications director for Councilmember Charles Allen
The vote was the first step toward adopting the measure as part of the city's 2022 budget; the final vote on the budget proposal will take place in August.
The tax increase proposal was authored by Councilmembers Brianne K. Nadeau, Janeese Lewis George, and Charles Allen, who want to use the revenue to fund subsidies to raise wages for child care workers, more than 1,200 permanent housing vouchers to help residents facing homelessness or housing insecurity, and monthly tax credits for low-income households.
The councilmembers and other advocates noted that the new revenue would help vulnerable residents including survivors of domestic violence and people who have been incarcerated to find safe housing.
"Homelessness is a choice, and displacement is a choice, and poverty is a choice," said Lewis George. "We have the wealth and the resources in our city to solve these issues."
The plan will also raise the city's tax credit for low-income families from 40% of the credits they receive on their federal taxes to 55% of the federal credit, which will be paid out in monthly installments instead of a lump sum, amounting to a "monthly basic income" for the city's poorest residents, said Erik Salmi, communications director for Allen.
"Today's budget could truly be transformational in total," Salmi said.
The tax increase will apply to just 5% of D.C. residents. Single people who earn between $250,000 and $500,000 per year will pay a marginal tax rate of 9.25%, up from 8.5%. People who make between $500,000 and $1 million will see their tax rate increase to 9.75% and those earning more than $1 million per year will pay a marginal rate of 10.75%.
According to Allen, Lewis George, and Nadeau, the wealthiest people in the city will have to pay between $375 and $6,500 more per year in taxes.
Stuart Karaffa, chair of the Metro D.C. Democratic Socialists of America, said Tuesday's vote represented a "sea change" in the city and among local policymakers.
\u201cThis vote strikes me as a sea change for the DC council. What was recently a conservative, neoliberal body where progressive ideals went to die just voted to improve the lives of thousands of working class DC residents - all by taxing the rich. Now what about that wealth tax...?\u201d— Stuart Karaffa (@Stuart Karaffa) 1626831994
Some members of the council who opposed the tax increase claimed that raising taxes for the rich would make the city less "attractive" to high earners and that a tax increase was inappropriate following an infusion of $2.3 billion in federal pandemic relief.
The measure's authors and advocates who fought for the tax increase countered that long-term funding--not a one-time federal grant--is needed to help lift the city's low-income residents out of poverty.
Councilmember Mary Cheh said that while the changes to the city's tax code might be "bearable" to some of the residents affected, it may cause "a hardship for another."
"Are you joking, Mary Cheh?" asked Sunrise Movement D.C. ahead of the vote. "A tax on high earners is not a hardship--they're already making more money than everyone else in D.C.!"
\u201cAt this point, if you're voting against this measure, you're just telling the people of DC that you don't care if childcare workers make a living wage or if people are forced to live or die on the street. @brookepintodc @marycheh @kenyanmcduffie @AnitaBondsDC @ChmnMendelson\u201d— Sunrise DC (@Sunrise DC) 1626806146
Amber Gruner, an organizer with the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute, denounced opponents of the tax increase for pushing "a capitalist scarcity narrative."
\u201c"Ending govt waste" & anti-tax rhetoric is a capitalist scarcity narrative: there isn't enough for everyone, so you have to look out for yourself first.\n\nVoters support raising taxes on the rich because they see through that lie.\n\nThere is enough for everyone. #taxtherich\u201d— Amber Gruner (@Amber Gruner) 1626624066
"There is enough for everyone," Gruner tweeted. "Tax the rich."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.