SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) heads to his office from the floor of the Senate on December 20, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
'Move, Mitch, Get Out the Way': McConnell and McCarthy Under Fire for Obstructing $2,000 Relief Checks
"If you don't see that in your bank account, you have Mitch McConnell to thank."
Dec 22, 2020
With President Donald Trump and the two top Democrats in Congress now behind the push for $2,000 direct payments, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy on Wednesday faced growing pressure from lawmakers and activists who characterized the Republicans as the two chief obstacles remaining in the way of significantly larger relief checks.
"Hey, Senator McConnell. The ball's in your court," tweeted Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.), a leader in the progressive push for larger direct payments that began months ago. "Schumer, Pelosi, and Trump all want us to pass a $2,000 direct payment for working-class Americans who are facing more economic desperation than at any time since the Great Depression. Leader McConnell, let the Senate vote!"
"The McConnell Senate now has no excuse for refusing $2,000 checks to workers making incredible sacrifices during the holiday season amid a pandemic that President Trump and his allies bungled from the beginning."
--Jeremy Funk, Accountable.US
Just 24 hours after the House and Senate approved a roughly $900 billion relief package that would extend soon-to-expire unemployment benefits and send $600 payments to many Americans, Trump on Tuesday night released a video address in which he slammed the legislation as a "disgrace" and suggested he might not sign it if lawmakers don't increase the size of the checks to $2,000, among other changes.
If Trump refuses to sign the relief legislation, which was paired with a sprawling omnibus spending package, the government will shut down on December 29 and 14 million people could lose unemployment benefits.
Many Democratic lawmakers and the party's leadership quickly seized upon Trump's demand for larger relief checks, vowing to request unanimous consent this week to boost the direct payments and slamming their Republican counterparts for persistently opposing robust relief for the increasingly desperate U.S. public. Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) late Tuesday unveiled a one-page amendment that would hike the $600 payments currently in the relief bill to $2,000.
"I'm 100% on board with $2,000 survival checks for struggling families," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) tweeted Wednesday. "House and Senate Dems are united on this. What do you say, Senate Majority Leader McConnell? Does your caucus have the heart to give the American people the relief they've needed for months?"
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) added that Democrats are "ready to pass $2,000 survival payments."
"Senate Majority Leader, are you?" Lee asked.
In a Dear Colleague letter on Wednesday, Pelosi wrote that moving ahead with the unanimous consent request "requires the agreement" of McCarthy.
"If the president truly wants to join us in $2,000 payments, he should call upon Leader McCarthy to agree to our unanimous consent request," Pelosi added. "We are scheduled to go in for a pro forma session tomorrow at 9:00 am. We are awaiting word from Leader Hoyer as to whether Leader McCarthy will agree to or reject our unanimous consent request."
Neither McCarthy nor McConnell have commented publicly on Trump's demand for $2,000 checks.
Even if McCarthy agrees to the Democrats' unanimous consent request, it is highly unlikely that the request will ultimately be granted, given that any single lawmaker can block the effort. Outside progressives are urging Pelosi to call members of the House back to Washington, D.C. for a floor vote on the $2,000 payments if the unanimous consent request fails.
Should the measure clear the House, it would face an uphill battle in the Republican-controlled Senate--a reality that further highlights the stakes of the Senate runoffs in Georgia. As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, Democratic Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock have both endorsed $2,000 checks.
"If you don't see that in your bank account," tweeted Natalie Montelongo, executive director of People First Future, "you have Mitch McConnell to thank."
Jeremy Funk, spokesperson for watchdog group Accountable.US, said in a statement Wednesday that "McConnell and his fellow Senate obstructionists found plenty of money for tax goodies for corporations and the richest among us in the latest stimulus bill." Among the giveaways, as the New York Times reported, is a provision that tax experts are describing as "a $200 billion giveaway to the rich."
"The McConnell Senate now has no excuse for refusing $2,000 checks to workers making incredible sacrifices during the holiday season amid a pandemic that President Trump and his allies bungled from the beginning," said Funk. "The rich and powerful are already poised to have a very merry holiday season thanks to McConnell's stimulus handouts. The least he can do is support a less-than-insulting bit of additional help for the tens of millions out of work in the Trump recession. They're the ones who really need a Christmas bonus."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With President Donald Trump and the two top Democrats in Congress now behind the push for $2,000 direct payments, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy on Wednesday faced growing pressure from lawmakers and activists who characterized the Republicans as the two chief obstacles remaining in the way of significantly larger relief checks.
"Hey, Senator McConnell. The ball's in your court," tweeted Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.), a leader in the progressive push for larger direct payments that began months ago. "Schumer, Pelosi, and Trump all want us to pass a $2,000 direct payment for working-class Americans who are facing more economic desperation than at any time since the Great Depression. Leader McConnell, let the Senate vote!"
"The McConnell Senate now has no excuse for refusing $2,000 checks to workers making incredible sacrifices during the holiday season amid a pandemic that President Trump and his allies bungled from the beginning."
--Jeremy Funk, Accountable.US
Just 24 hours after the House and Senate approved a roughly $900 billion relief package that would extend soon-to-expire unemployment benefits and send $600 payments to many Americans, Trump on Tuesday night released a video address in which he slammed the legislation as a "disgrace" and suggested he might not sign it if lawmakers don't increase the size of the checks to $2,000, among other changes.
If Trump refuses to sign the relief legislation, which was paired with a sprawling omnibus spending package, the government will shut down on December 29 and 14 million people could lose unemployment benefits.
Many Democratic lawmakers and the party's leadership quickly seized upon Trump's demand for larger relief checks, vowing to request unanimous consent this week to boost the direct payments and slamming their Republican counterparts for persistently opposing robust relief for the increasingly desperate U.S. public. Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) late Tuesday unveiled a one-page amendment that would hike the $600 payments currently in the relief bill to $2,000.
"I'm 100% on board with $2,000 survival checks for struggling families," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) tweeted Wednesday. "House and Senate Dems are united on this. What do you say, Senate Majority Leader McConnell? Does your caucus have the heart to give the American people the relief they've needed for months?"
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) added that Democrats are "ready to pass $2,000 survival payments."
"Senate Majority Leader, are you?" Lee asked.
In a Dear Colleague letter on Wednesday, Pelosi wrote that moving ahead with the unanimous consent request "requires the agreement" of McCarthy.
"If the president truly wants to join us in $2,000 payments, he should call upon Leader McCarthy to agree to our unanimous consent request," Pelosi added. "We are scheduled to go in for a pro forma session tomorrow at 9:00 am. We are awaiting word from Leader Hoyer as to whether Leader McCarthy will agree to or reject our unanimous consent request."
Neither McCarthy nor McConnell have commented publicly on Trump's demand for $2,000 checks.
Even if McCarthy agrees to the Democrats' unanimous consent request, it is highly unlikely that the request will ultimately be granted, given that any single lawmaker can block the effort. Outside progressives are urging Pelosi to call members of the House back to Washington, D.C. for a floor vote on the $2,000 payments if the unanimous consent request fails.
Should the measure clear the House, it would face an uphill battle in the Republican-controlled Senate--a reality that further highlights the stakes of the Senate runoffs in Georgia. As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, Democratic Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock have both endorsed $2,000 checks.
"If you don't see that in your bank account," tweeted Natalie Montelongo, executive director of People First Future, "you have Mitch McConnell to thank."
Jeremy Funk, spokesperson for watchdog group Accountable.US, said in a statement Wednesday that "McConnell and his fellow Senate obstructionists found plenty of money for tax goodies for corporations and the richest among us in the latest stimulus bill." Among the giveaways, as the New York Times reported, is a provision that tax experts are describing as "a $200 billion giveaway to the rich."
"The McConnell Senate now has no excuse for refusing $2,000 checks to workers making incredible sacrifices during the holiday season amid a pandemic that President Trump and his allies bungled from the beginning," said Funk. "The rich and powerful are already poised to have a very merry holiday season thanks to McConnell's stimulus handouts. The least he can do is support a less-than-insulting bit of additional help for the tens of millions out of work in the Trump recession. They're the ones who really need a Christmas bonus."
With President Donald Trump and the two top Democrats in Congress now behind the push for $2,000 direct payments, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy on Wednesday faced growing pressure from lawmakers and activists who characterized the Republicans as the two chief obstacles remaining in the way of significantly larger relief checks.
"Hey, Senator McConnell. The ball's in your court," tweeted Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.), a leader in the progressive push for larger direct payments that began months ago. "Schumer, Pelosi, and Trump all want us to pass a $2,000 direct payment for working-class Americans who are facing more economic desperation than at any time since the Great Depression. Leader McConnell, let the Senate vote!"
"The McConnell Senate now has no excuse for refusing $2,000 checks to workers making incredible sacrifices during the holiday season amid a pandemic that President Trump and his allies bungled from the beginning."
--Jeremy Funk, Accountable.US
Just 24 hours after the House and Senate approved a roughly $900 billion relief package that would extend soon-to-expire unemployment benefits and send $600 payments to many Americans, Trump on Tuesday night released a video address in which he slammed the legislation as a "disgrace" and suggested he might not sign it if lawmakers don't increase the size of the checks to $2,000, among other changes.
If Trump refuses to sign the relief legislation, which was paired with a sprawling omnibus spending package, the government will shut down on December 29 and 14 million people could lose unemployment benefits.
Many Democratic lawmakers and the party's leadership quickly seized upon Trump's demand for larger relief checks, vowing to request unanimous consent this week to boost the direct payments and slamming their Republican counterparts for persistently opposing robust relief for the increasingly desperate U.S. public. Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) late Tuesday unveiled a one-page amendment that would hike the $600 payments currently in the relief bill to $2,000.
"I'm 100% on board with $2,000 survival checks for struggling families," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) tweeted Wednesday. "House and Senate Dems are united on this. What do you say, Senate Majority Leader McConnell? Does your caucus have the heart to give the American people the relief they've needed for months?"
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) added that Democrats are "ready to pass $2,000 survival payments."
"Senate Majority Leader, are you?" Lee asked.
In a Dear Colleague letter on Wednesday, Pelosi wrote that moving ahead with the unanimous consent request "requires the agreement" of McCarthy.
"If the president truly wants to join us in $2,000 payments, he should call upon Leader McCarthy to agree to our unanimous consent request," Pelosi added. "We are scheduled to go in for a pro forma session tomorrow at 9:00 am. We are awaiting word from Leader Hoyer as to whether Leader McCarthy will agree to or reject our unanimous consent request."
Neither McCarthy nor McConnell have commented publicly on Trump's demand for $2,000 checks.
Even if McCarthy agrees to the Democrats' unanimous consent request, it is highly unlikely that the request will ultimately be granted, given that any single lawmaker can block the effort. Outside progressives are urging Pelosi to call members of the House back to Washington, D.C. for a floor vote on the $2,000 payments if the unanimous consent request fails.
Should the measure clear the House, it would face an uphill battle in the Republican-controlled Senate--a reality that further highlights the stakes of the Senate runoffs in Georgia. As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, Democratic Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock have both endorsed $2,000 checks.
"If you don't see that in your bank account," tweeted Natalie Montelongo, executive director of People First Future, "you have Mitch McConnell to thank."
Jeremy Funk, spokesperson for watchdog group Accountable.US, said in a statement Wednesday that "McConnell and his fellow Senate obstructionists found plenty of money for tax goodies for corporations and the richest among us in the latest stimulus bill." Among the giveaways, as the New York Times reported, is a provision that tax experts are describing as "a $200 billion giveaway to the rich."
"The McConnell Senate now has no excuse for refusing $2,000 checks to workers making incredible sacrifices during the holiday season amid a pandemic that President Trump and his allies bungled from the beginning," said Funk. "The rich and powerful are already poised to have a very merry holiday season thanks to McConnell's stimulus handouts. The least he can do is support a less-than-insulting bit of additional help for the tens of millions out of work in the Trump recession. They're the ones who really need a Christmas bonus."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.