SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A police officer watches voters, election officials, and poll watchers at the Captain Samuel Douglass Academy polling station in Brookline, New Hampshire on November 3, 2020. (Photo: Joseph Prezioso/AFP via Getty Images)
'This Is Disturbing': Trump DOJ Claims Armed Feds Are Allowed to Inspect State Vote-Counting Locations
Vowing not to be intimidated by the possibility of armed federal agents showing up at ballot-counting sites, Pennsylvania's attorney general said: "Nothing is going to stop the counting of these legal ballots."
Nov 04, 2020
As ongoing vote tabulation in several key battleground states continues to slowly narrow President Donald Trump's path to reelection, the New York Times reported late Wednesday that the Justice Department has told federal prosecutors that U.S. law permits armed federal agents to enter ballot-counting locations to investigate alleged "fraud," heightening fears of possible intimidation efforts by the Trump administration.
News of the Justice Department's early Wednesday email came after Trump spent much of that day lying about vote-counting procedures and peddling baseless claims of suspicious activity as he watched his slim leads in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania vanish.
"State officials have authority over anyone trying to enter locations where ballots are being counted. Anything else is a radical reinterpretation of the law. States can handle elections, and we will ensure the people decide the outcome."
--Maura Healey, Massachusetts Attorney General
The Times noted that the Justice Department's email, authored by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue, "created the specter of the federal government intimidating local election officials or otherwise intervening in vote tallying amid calls by President Trump to end the tabulating in states where he was trailing in the presidential race."
While U.S. law bars the stationing of armed officials "at any place where a general or special election is held," Donoghue claimed in his email that the statute "does not prevent armed federal law enforcement persons from responding to, investigat[ing], or prevent[ing] federal crimes at closed polling places or at other locations where votes are being counted."
State officials and civil rights advocates were quick to denounce the Justice Department's interpretation of the law as both false and dangerous while also suggesting the post-Election Day email may have been aimed at mollifying the president, who falsely declared victory early Wednesday morning with millions of ballots left to count.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, decried the "scare tactics from DOJ," noting on Twitter that "federal armed agents can't interfere in vote count, enter polling places, or take ballots."
"Let's be clear: this is posturing," said Gupta, who served as acting head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division under President Barack Obama. "You can imagine Trump calling [Attorney General William] Barr at midnight freaking out after Fox called Arizona saying do something for me, and Barr willingly obliging. Time for a new DOJ."
As the Times pointed out, Barr "spent the months leading up to Election Day echoing the president's dark warnings, claiming without evidence that the wave of mail-in ballots would lead to an unprecedented amount of voter fraud. He cited one example of 1,700 falsified ballots that the Washington Post found to be false. A department spokeswoman blamed an inaccurate memo from an aide."
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, the top law enforcement official of a key state that remains up for grabs, told MSNBC late Wednesday that he is aware of the Justice Department's email and prepared to deal with its potential consequences.
"It is yet another one of the issues we planned for," said Shapiro. "Nothing is going to stop the counting of these legal ballots in Pennsylvania."
If armed federal officials show up at Pennsylvania vote-counting locations, Shapiro said, "what happens is what has been happening since the polls closed: a strict adherence to state law."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As ongoing vote tabulation in several key battleground states continues to slowly narrow President Donald Trump's path to reelection, the New York Times reported late Wednesday that the Justice Department has told federal prosecutors that U.S. law permits armed federal agents to enter ballot-counting locations to investigate alleged "fraud," heightening fears of possible intimidation efforts by the Trump administration.
News of the Justice Department's early Wednesday email came after Trump spent much of that day lying about vote-counting procedures and peddling baseless claims of suspicious activity as he watched his slim leads in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania vanish.
"State officials have authority over anyone trying to enter locations where ballots are being counted. Anything else is a radical reinterpretation of the law. States can handle elections, and we will ensure the people decide the outcome."
--Maura Healey, Massachusetts Attorney General
The Times noted that the Justice Department's email, authored by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue, "created the specter of the federal government intimidating local election officials or otherwise intervening in vote tallying amid calls by President Trump to end the tabulating in states where he was trailing in the presidential race."
While U.S. law bars the stationing of armed officials "at any place where a general or special election is held," Donoghue claimed in his email that the statute "does not prevent armed federal law enforcement persons from responding to, investigat[ing], or prevent[ing] federal crimes at closed polling places or at other locations where votes are being counted."
State officials and civil rights advocates were quick to denounce the Justice Department's interpretation of the law as both false and dangerous while also suggesting the post-Election Day email may have been aimed at mollifying the president, who falsely declared victory early Wednesday morning with millions of ballots left to count.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, decried the "scare tactics from DOJ," noting on Twitter that "federal armed agents can't interfere in vote count, enter polling places, or take ballots."
"Let's be clear: this is posturing," said Gupta, who served as acting head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division under President Barack Obama. "You can imagine Trump calling [Attorney General William] Barr at midnight freaking out after Fox called Arizona saying do something for me, and Barr willingly obliging. Time for a new DOJ."
As the Times pointed out, Barr "spent the months leading up to Election Day echoing the president's dark warnings, claiming without evidence that the wave of mail-in ballots would lead to an unprecedented amount of voter fraud. He cited one example of 1,700 falsified ballots that the Washington Post found to be false. A department spokeswoman blamed an inaccurate memo from an aide."
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, the top law enforcement official of a key state that remains up for grabs, told MSNBC late Wednesday that he is aware of the Justice Department's email and prepared to deal with its potential consequences.
"It is yet another one of the issues we planned for," said Shapiro. "Nothing is going to stop the counting of these legal ballots in Pennsylvania."
If armed federal officials show up at Pennsylvania vote-counting locations, Shapiro said, "what happens is what has been happening since the polls closed: a strict adherence to state law."
As ongoing vote tabulation in several key battleground states continues to slowly narrow President Donald Trump's path to reelection, the New York Times reported late Wednesday that the Justice Department has told federal prosecutors that U.S. law permits armed federal agents to enter ballot-counting locations to investigate alleged "fraud," heightening fears of possible intimidation efforts by the Trump administration.
News of the Justice Department's early Wednesday email came after Trump spent much of that day lying about vote-counting procedures and peddling baseless claims of suspicious activity as he watched his slim leads in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania vanish.
"State officials have authority over anyone trying to enter locations where ballots are being counted. Anything else is a radical reinterpretation of the law. States can handle elections, and we will ensure the people decide the outcome."
--Maura Healey, Massachusetts Attorney General
The Times noted that the Justice Department's email, authored by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue, "created the specter of the federal government intimidating local election officials or otherwise intervening in vote tallying amid calls by President Trump to end the tabulating in states where he was trailing in the presidential race."
While U.S. law bars the stationing of armed officials "at any place where a general or special election is held," Donoghue claimed in his email that the statute "does not prevent armed federal law enforcement persons from responding to, investigat[ing], or prevent[ing] federal crimes at closed polling places or at other locations where votes are being counted."
State officials and civil rights advocates were quick to denounce the Justice Department's interpretation of the law as both false and dangerous while also suggesting the post-Election Day email may have been aimed at mollifying the president, who falsely declared victory early Wednesday morning with millions of ballots left to count.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, decried the "scare tactics from DOJ," noting on Twitter that "federal armed agents can't interfere in vote count, enter polling places, or take ballots."
"Let's be clear: this is posturing," said Gupta, who served as acting head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division under President Barack Obama. "You can imagine Trump calling [Attorney General William] Barr at midnight freaking out after Fox called Arizona saying do something for me, and Barr willingly obliging. Time for a new DOJ."
As the Times pointed out, Barr "spent the months leading up to Election Day echoing the president's dark warnings, claiming without evidence that the wave of mail-in ballots would lead to an unprecedented amount of voter fraud. He cited one example of 1,700 falsified ballots that the Washington Post found to be false. A department spokeswoman blamed an inaccurate memo from an aide."
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, the top law enforcement official of a key state that remains up for grabs, told MSNBC late Wednesday that he is aware of the Justice Department's email and prepared to deal with its potential consequences.
"It is yet another one of the issues we planned for," said Shapiro. "Nothing is going to stop the counting of these legal ballots in Pennsylvania."
If armed federal officials show up at Pennsylvania vote-counting locations, Shapiro said, "what happens is what has been happening since the polls closed: a strict adherence to state law."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.