New reporting by the New York Times that border officials suggested using a "microwave weapon" to deter migrants prompted fierce outrage Wednesday. (Photo: Erik McGregor/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Aug 27, 2020
Reporting by the New York Times Wednesday that Customs and Border Protection officials floated in 2018 the idea of using a "heat ray"weapon to deter migrants at the border was seized upon by the president's critics as more evidence of the Trump administration's cruelty-driven immigration policies.
"It's unconscionable that this was even considered," the ACLU of Massachusetts said in a tweet responding to the Times reporting.
"The fact that top officials suggested using this torture device to deter immigrants shows the real motivation behind Trump's immigration policies: cruelty and racism," the group wrote.
According to the Times, the idea was suggested by CBP officials during a meeting with top Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials. The meeting came just 15 days ahead of the midterm elections, and the same day President Donald Trump said at an earlier meeting that "extreme action" was needed to block migrants' entry. From the Times:
Developed by the military as a crowd dispersal tool two decades ago, the Active Denial System had been largely abandoned amid doubts over its effectiveness and morality. Two former officials who attended the afternoon meeting at the Department of Homeland Security on Oct. 22, 2018, said the suggestion that the device be installed at the border shocked attendees, even if it would have satisfied the president.
Then-DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen--ousted last year by Trump for reportedly not being brutal enough in executing a crackdown on immigration--rejected the idea following the meeting, the Times reported, and a DHS spokesperson said Wednesday the weapon "was never considered."
The Times added:
Like the heat ray, many of the president's ideas--including the moat and shooting migrants in the legs--were thwarted by his own officials. Other policy proposals have been blocked by federal judges who have ruled that they violated existing laws, administrative rules or the Constitution.
But the administration's pursuit of radical changes to immigration policies, pushed by Stephen Miller, have not been for naught. "They have effectively shut down the asylum system at the border," Omar Jadwat, the director of the Immigrants' Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, told the newspaper.
The revelations in the new reporting sparked a flurry of critical responses on Twitter:
\u201cMake no mistake: torture & cruelty are guiding principles of this administration's immigration policies. Case in point: mtgs where they ideate on twisted tactics like a microwave heat ray & flesh-piercing spikes on the border wall. #SaveAsylum https://t.co/HVDk0U9H1L\u201d— ImmDef (@ImmDef) 1598482913
\u201cThe @DHSgov and @CBP officials who recommended torturing asylum seekers at the southern border with a "heat ray" should be fired immediately. \n\nhttps://t.co/IR6JgJzJC8\u201d— Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (@Northwest Immigrant Rights Project) 1598473654
\u201cTrump admin officials discussed deploying "a heat-ray designed by the military to make people\u2019s skin feel like it is burning" against people seeking asylum.\n\nIt's unconscionable, but unsurprising \u2014 President Trump has dehumanized and demonized immigrants.\nhttps://t.co/ubbETbcV0J\u201d— Congressional Hispanic Caucus (@Congressional Hispanic Caucus) 1598469307
\u201cHeat Rays.\n\nThey wanted to use Heat Rays.\n\nAgainst immigrants.\n\nThey wanted to use Heat Rays against immigrants.\n\nTrump and his goon squad of White Supremacists are acting like cartoon villains, but with real life weapons. #DontLookAway\n\nhttps://t.co/Q7XjOFKbPq\u201d— RAICES Action Fund (@RAICES Action Fund) 1598475575
"Maximum cruelty and maximum harm: That is how this administration operates. It is their policy and their platform," tweeted Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.).
"They even considered using a military weapon to burn the skin off refugees and asylum seekers," Jayapal continued. "It's horrifying, it's inhumane--and it cannot be our future."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Reporting by the New York Times Wednesday that Customs and Border Protection officials floated in 2018 the idea of using a "heat ray"weapon to deter migrants at the border was seized upon by the president's critics as more evidence of the Trump administration's cruelty-driven immigration policies.
"It's unconscionable that this was even considered," the ACLU of Massachusetts said in a tweet responding to the Times reporting.
"The fact that top officials suggested using this torture device to deter immigrants shows the real motivation behind Trump's immigration policies: cruelty and racism," the group wrote.
According to the Times, the idea was suggested by CBP officials during a meeting with top Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials. The meeting came just 15 days ahead of the midterm elections, and the same day President Donald Trump said at an earlier meeting that "extreme action" was needed to block migrants' entry. From the Times:
Developed by the military as a crowd dispersal tool two decades ago, the Active Denial System had been largely abandoned amid doubts over its effectiveness and morality. Two former officials who attended the afternoon meeting at the Department of Homeland Security on Oct. 22, 2018, said the suggestion that the device be installed at the border shocked attendees, even if it would have satisfied the president.
Then-DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen--ousted last year by Trump for reportedly not being brutal enough in executing a crackdown on immigration--rejected the idea following the meeting, the Times reported, and a DHS spokesperson said Wednesday the weapon "was never considered."
The Times added:
Like the heat ray, many of the president's ideas--including the moat and shooting migrants in the legs--were thwarted by his own officials. Other policy proposals have been blocked by federal judges who have ruled that they violated existing laws, administrative rules or the Constitution.
But the administration's pursuit of radical changes to immigration policies, pushed by Stephen Miller, have not been for naught. "They have effectively shut down the asylum system at the border," Omar Jadwat, the director of the Immigrants' Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, told the newspaper.
The revelations in the new reporting sparked a flurry of critical responses on Twitter:
\u201cMake no mistake: torture & cruelty are guiding principles of this administration's immigration policies. Case in point: mtgs where they ideate on twisted tactics like a microwave heat ray & flesh-piercing spikes on the border wall. #SaveAsylum https://t.co/HVDk0U9H1L\u201d— ImmDef (@ImmDef) 1598482913
\u201cThe @DHSgov and @CBP officials who recommended torturing asylum seekers at the southern border with a "heat ray" should be fired immediately. \n\nhttps://t.co/IR6JgJzJC8\u201d— Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (@Northwest Immigrant Rights Project) 1598473654
\u201cTrump admin officials discussed deploying "a heat-ray designed by the military to make people\u2019s skin feel like it is burning" against people seeking asylum.\n\nIt's unconscionable, but unsurprising \u2014 President Trump has dehumanized and demonized immigrants.\nhttps://t.co/ubbETbcV0J\u201d— Congressional Hispanic Caucus (@Congressional Hispanic Caucus) 1598469307
\u201cHeat Rays.\n\nThey wanted to use Heat Rays.\n\nAgainst immigrants.\n\nThey wanted to use Heat Rays against immigrants.\n\nTrump and his goon squad of White Supremacists are acting like cartoon villains, but with real life weapons. #DontLookAway\n\nhttps://t.co/Q7XjOFKbPq\u201d— RAICES Action Fund (@RAICES Action Fund) 1598475575
"Maximum cruelty and maximum harm: That is how this administration operates. It is their policy and their platform," tweeted Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.).
"They even considered using a military weapon to burn the skin off refugees and asylum seekers," Jayapal continued. "It's horrifying, it's inhumane--and it cannot be our future."
Reporting by the New York Times Wednesday that Customs and Border Protection officials floated in 2018 the idea of using a "heat ray"weapon to deter migrants at the border was seized upon by the president's critics as more evidence of the Trump administration's cruelty-driven immigration policies.
"It's unconscionable that this was even considered," the ACLU of Massachusetts said in a tweet responding to the Times reporting.
"The fact that top officials suggested using this torture device to deter immigrants shows the real motivation behind Trump's immigration policies: cruelty and racism," the group wrote.
According to the Times, the idea was suggested by CBP officials during a meeting with top Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials. The meeting came just 15 days ahead of the midterm elections, and the same day President Donald Trump said at an earlier meeting that "extreme action" was needed to block migrants' entry. From the Times:
Developed by the military as a crowd dispersal tool two decades ago, the Active Denial System had been largely abandoned amid doubts over its effectiveness and morality. Two former officials who attended the afternoon meeting at the Department of Homeland Security on Oct. 22, 2018, said the suggestion that the device be installed at the border shocked attendees, even if it would have satisfied the president.
Then-DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen--ousted last year by Trump for reportedly not being brutal enough in executing a crackdown on immigration--rejected the idea following the meeting, the Times reported, and a DHS spokesperson said Wednesday the weapon "was never considered."
The Times added:
Like the heat ray, many of the president's ideas--including the moat and shooting migrants in the legs--were thwarted by his own officials. Other policy proposals have been blocked by federal judges who have ruled that they violated existing laws, administrative rules or the Constitution.
But the administration's pursuit of radical changes to immigration policies, pushed by Stephen Miller, have not been for naught. "They have effectively shut down the asylum system at the border," Omar Jadwat, the director of the Immigrants' Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, told the newspaper.
The revelations in the new reporting sparked a flurry of critical responses on Twitter:
\u201cMake no mistake: torture & cruelty are guiding principles of this administration's immigration policies. Case in point: mtgs where they ideate on twisted tactics like a microwave heat ray & flesh-piercing spikes on the border wall. #SaveAsylum https://t.co/HVDk0U9H1L\u201d— ImmDef (@ImmDef) 1598482913
\u201cThe @DHSgov and @CBP officials who recommended torturing asylum seekers at the southern border with a "heat ray" should be fired immediately. \n\nhttps://t.co/IR6JgJzJC8\u201d— Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (@Northwest Immigrant Rights Project) 1598473654
\u201cTrump admin officials discussed deploying "a heat-ray designed by the military to make people\u2019s skin feel like it is burning" against people seeking asylum.\n\nIt's unconscionable, but unsurprising \u2014 President Trump has dehumanized and demonized immigrants.\nhttps://t.co/ubbETbcV0J\u201d— Congressional Hispanic Caucus (@Congressional Hispanic Caucus) 1598469307
\u201cHeat Rays.\n\nThey wanted to use Heat Rays.\n\nAgainst immigrants.\n\nThey wanted to use Heat Rays against immigrants.\n\nTrump and his goon squad of White Supremacists are acting like cartoon villains, but with real life weapons. #DontLookAway\n\nhttps://t.co/Q7XjOFKbPq\u201d— RAICES Action Fund (@RAICES Action Fund) 1598475575
"Maximum cruelty and maximum harm: That is how this administration operates. It is their policy and their platform," tweeted Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.).
"They even considered using a military weapon to burn the skin off refugees and asylum seekers," Jayapal continued. "It's horrifying, it's inhumane--and it cannot be our future."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.