SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The EU Court of Justice ruled Thursday that the bloc will not share data with the U.S. under the Privacy Shield agreement, citing intrusive surveillance laws in the United States. (Photo: iStock)
'A Victory for Us All': In Rebuke to US Mass Surveillance, EU Court Blocks Data Transfers by Web Corporations
"U.S. surveillance violates fundamental privacy rights and continues to be a massive financial liability for U.S. companies trying to compete in a global market."
Jul 16, 2020
A major ruling from the European Union's top court on Thursday curtailed U.S. authorities' power to surveil the personal data of Europeans and is being called a victory for privacy rights and a call for U.S. lawmakers to roll out sweeping surveillance reforms.
The E.U. Court of Justice invalidated a transatlantic data protection deal with the U.S., ruling that European data is not safe when shared with U.S. tech companies via the 2016 Privacy Shield agreement.
The court ruled that U.S. surveillance laws, including FISA and government watchlists, are too intrusive and don't meet E.U. standards for privacy rights.
Privacy advocates at European Digital Rights (EDRi) called the ruling "a victory for us all."
"Today's European Court of Justice ruling is a victory for privacy against mass surveillance," says Diego Naranjo, head of policy at EDRi. "This is a win both for Europeans, whose personal data will be better protected, and a call for U.S. authorities to reform the way intelligence service operate."
The decision upheld the use of Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), which are instruments used to export data from the E.U., but the court ordered the suspension of all data transfers to countries with privacy standards considered unacceptable in the bloc.
More than 5,000 companies have relied on Privacy Shield for the transatlantic transfer of data, and privacy advocates applauded a ruling which they say will apply pressure to U.S. lawmakers to urgently reform surveillance laws in the United States.
"This ruling makes clear that no international agreement can adequately protect people's privacy from the United States' current mass surveillance programs and practices," said Ashley Gorski, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project. "U.S. surveillance violates fundamental privacy rights and continues to be a massive financial liability for U.S. companies trying to compete in a global market. Unless Congress swiftly acts to enact comprehensive surveillance reforms, U.S. businesses will continue to pay the consequences."
The E.U. previously invalidated the Safe Harbor agreement in 2015 after Edward Snowden's disclosures about NSA surveillance programs raised international alarm over U.S. privacy laws. The Privacy Shield pact was put in place in 2016 to replace Safe Harbor.
Under the ruling, major companies which operate overseas, such as Facebook, will have to find alternate ways to access users' data that comply with E.U. standards.
"In the short term, hundreds of billions of dollars in digital trade" are now in "legal limbo," consumer advocacy group Public Citizen said.
Public Citizen expressed hope that the ruling will "force big tech companies to accept that privacy is a basic business requirement for transatlantic trade."
Max Schrems, whose case against Facebook Ireland sparked the ruling by the E.U. Court of Justice, said he was "happy about the judgment."
"It seems the Court has followed us in all aspects," said Schrems. "This is a total blow to the Irish DPC [Data Protection Commission] and Facebook. It is clear that the U.S. will have to seriously change their surveillance laws, if U.S. companies want to continue to play a major role on the EU market."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A major ruling from the European Union's top court on Thursday curtailed U.S. authorities' power to surveil the personal data of Europeans and is being called a victory for privacy rights and a call for U.S. lawmakers to roll out sweeping surveillance reforms.
The E.U. Court of Justice invalidated a transatlantic data protection deal with the U.S., ruling that European data is not safe when shared with U.S. tech companies via the 2016 Privacy Shield agreement.
The court ruled that U.S. surveillance laws, including FISA and government watchlists, are too intrusive and don't meet E.U. standards for privacy rights.
Privacy advocates at European Digital Rights (EDRi) called the ruling "a victory for us all."
"Today's European Court of Justice ruling is a victory for privacy against mass surveillance," says Diego Naranjo, head of policy at EDRi. "This is a win both for Europeans, whose personal data will be better protected, and a call for U.S. authorities to reform the way intelligence service operate."
The decision upheld the use of Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), which are instruments used to export data from the E.U., but the court ordered the suspension of all data transfers to countries with privacy standards considered unacceptable in the bloc.
More than 5,000 companies have relied on Privacy Shield for the transatlantic transfer of data, and privacy advocates applauded a ruling which they say will apply pressure to U.S. lawmakers to urgently reform surveillance laws in the United States.
"This ruling makes clear that no international agreement can adequately protect people's privacy from the United States' current mass surveillance programs and practices," said Ashley Gorski, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project. "U.S. surveillance violates fundamental privacy rights and continues to be a massive financial liability for U.S. companies trying to compete in a global market. Unless Congress swiftly acts to enact comprehensive surveillance reforms, U.S. businesses will continue to pay the consequences."
The E.U. previously invalidated the Safe Harbor agreement in 2015 after Edward Snowden's disclosures about NSA surveillance programs raised international alarm over U.S. privacy laws. The Privacy Shield pact was put in place in 2016 to replace Safe Harbor.
Under the ruling, major companies which operate overseas, such as Facebook, will have to find alternate ways to access users' data that comply with E.U. standards.
"In the short term, hundreds of billions of dollars in digital trade" are now in "legal limbo," consumer advocacy group Public Citizen said.
Public Citizen expressed hope that the ruling will "force big tech companies to accept that privacy is a basic business requirement for transatlantic trade."
Max Schrems, whose case against Facebook Ireland sparked the ruling by the E.U. Court of Justice, said he was "happy about the judgment."
"It seems the Court has followed us in all aspects," said Schrems. "This is a total blow to the Irish DPC [Data Protection Commission] and Facebook. It is clear that the U.S. will have to seriously change their surveillance laws, if U.S. companies want to continue to play a major role on the EU market."
A major ruling from the European Union's top court on Thursday curtailed U.S. authorities' power to surveil the personal data of Europeans and is being called a victory for privacy rights and a call for U.S. lawmakers to roll out sweeping surveillance reforms.
The E.U. Court of Justice invalidated a transatlantic data protection deal with the U.S., ruling that European data is not safe when shared with U.S. tech companies via the 2016 Privacy Shield agreement.
The court ruled that U.S. surveillance laws, including FISA and government watchlists, are too intrusive and don't meet E.U. standards for privacy rights.
Privacy advocates at European Digital Rights (EDRi) called the ruling "a victory for us all."
"Today's European Court of Justice ruling is a victory for privacy against mass surveillance," says Diego Naranjo, head of policy at EDRi. "This is a win both for Europeans, whose personal data will be better protected, and a call for U.S. authorities to reform the way intelligence service operate."
The decision upheld the use of Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), which are instruments used to export data from the E.U., but the court ordered the suspension of all data transfers to countries with privacy standards considered unacceptable in the bloc.
More than 5,000 companies have relied on Privacy Shield for the transatlantic transfer of data, and privacy advocates applauded a ruling which they say will apply pressure to U.S. lawmakers to urgently reform surveillance laws in the United States.
"This ruling makes clear that no international agreement can adequately protect people's privacy from the United States' current mass surveillance programs and practices," said Ashley Gorski, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project. "U.S. surveillance violates fundamental privacy rights and continues to be a massive financial liability for U.S. companies trying to compete in a global market. Unless Congress swiftly acts to enact comprehensive surveillance reforms, U.S. businesses will continue to pay the consequences."
The E.U. previously invalidated the Safe Harbor agreement in 2015 after Edward Snowden's disclosures about NSA surveillance programs raised international alarm over U.S. privacy laws. The Privacy Shield pact was put in place in 2016 to replace Safe Harbor.
Under the ruling, major companies which operate overseas, such as Facebook, will have to find alternate ways to access users' data that comply with E.U. standards.
"In the short term, hundreds of billions of dollars in digital trade" are now in "legal limbo," consumer advocacy group Public Citizen said.
Public Citizen expressed hope that the ruling will "force big tech companies to accept that privacy is a basic business requirement for transatlantic trade."
Max Schrems, whose case against Facebook Ireland sparked the ruling by the E.U. Court of Justice, said he was "happy about the judgment."
"It seems the Court has followed us in all aspects," said Schrems. "This is a total blow to the Irish DPC [Data Protection Commission] and Facebook. It is clear that the U.S. will have to seriously change their surveillance laws, if U.S. companies want to continue to play a major role on the EU market."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.