Democratic presidential candidate South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg speaks to voters on November 26, 2019 in Denison, Iowa. (Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Buttigieg Confirms Status as 'Austerity Candidate' With Call for Democrats to Prioritize Reducing Deficit
"This is substantively disqualifying and politically insulting to Democrats—and any left of center person."
At a town hall in Nashua, New Hampshire Sunday, former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg drew criticism from progressives and economists when he told the audience he would prioritize reducing the deficit if he wins the presidency in November.
"It's not fashionable in progressive circles to talk too much about the debt," Buttigieg said. "I think the time has come for my party to get a lot more comfortable owning this issue."
In embracing the frequent Republican talking point, Buttigieg was "not-so-subtly letting his billionaire donors know he'll cut Social Security and Medicaid," tweeted actor Rob Delaney, a supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Medicare for All proponent.
Republicans frequently portray large deficits as a Democratic phenomenon and blame the party for spending too much taxpayer money on social welfare programs, but as Sahil Kapur of NBC News pointed out, the national debt has risen under Republican presidents who cut taxes for corporations and raised military spending, while it fell under the two most recent Democratic presidents.
"It's 'not fashionable in progressive circles' because progressives are rejecting the bogus arguments about debt and deficits that have been used to undermine the progressive agenda for decades," Stephanie Kelton, an economics professor at Stony Brook University and adviser to Sanders, told NBC.
On social media, other critics accused Buttigieg of "economic illiteracy" and of attempting to "curry favor with wealthy Wall Street types."
\u201cButtigieg is the austerity candidate https://t.co/5Fwf1sR9HH\u201d— ryan cooper (@ryan cooper) 1581271588
\u201cThis is substantively disqualifying and politically insulting to Democrats\u2014and any left of center person. And, as Buttigieg is not a stupid person, it seems utterly cynical too, but not \u201csmart cynical\u201d (FDR was cynical about the CIO) but *dumb* cynical!\u201d— Richard Yeselson (@Richard Yeselson) 1581283826
\u201cI honestly can\u2019t think of a worse platform for Democrats to run on. \n\nIt also betrays a deep economic illiteracy given how low interest rates are.\u201d— Matt O'Brien (@Matt O'Brien) 1581290019
\u201cLove how Buttigieg frames his billionaire donor suck up position on \u201cdeficits\u201d (e.g. opening up space to gut Medicare and social security) as edgy truth telling\u201d— Adam H. Johnson (@Adam H. Johnson) 1581272889
\u201cGive the Buttigieg campaign credit: They know exactly what the mega wealthy sociopaths who bankroll campaigns and report the news on TV want to hear https://t.co/hWEKHvQK8t\u201d— Andrew Perez (@Andrew Perez) 1581291777
\u201cIt would be great if a reporter would ask Buttigieg whether he is completely ignorant of the debates over deficit among progressives for the last dozen years or whether he is just saying this to curry favor with wealthy Wall Street types.\u201d— Dean Baker (@Dean Baker) 1581290074
"Concern for 'deficits' is a rightwing watchword," tweeted Adam Johnson of The Appeal. "It signals a candidate is willing to open up space for privatizing and gutting Medicare and Social Security."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
At a town hall in Nashua, New Hampshire Sunday, former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg drew criticism from progressives and economists when he told the audience he would prioritize reducing the deficit if he wins the presidency in November.
"It's not fashionable in progressive circles to talk too much about the debt," Buttigieg said. "I think the time has come for my party to get a lot more comfortable owning this issue."
In embracing the frequent Republican talking point, Buttigieg was "not-so-subtly letting his billionaire donors know he'll cut Social Security and Medicaid," tweeted actor Rob Delaney, a supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Medicare for All proponent.
Republicans frequently portray large deficits as a Democratic phenomenon and blame the party for spending too much taxpayer money on social welfare programs, but as Sahil Kapur of NBC News pointed out, the national debt has risen under Republican presidents who cut taxes for corporations and raised military spending, while it fell under the two most recent Democratic presidents.
"It's 'not fashionable in progressive circles' because progressives are rejecting the bogus arguments about debt and deficits that have been used to undermine the progressive agenda for decades," Stephanie Kelton, an economics professor at Stony Brook University and adviser to Sanders, told NBC.
On social media, other critics accused Buttigieg of "economic illiteracy" and of attempting to "curry favor with wealthy Wall Street types."
\u201cButtigieg is the austerity candidate https://t.co/5Fwf1sR9HH\u201d— ryan cooper (@ryan cooper) 1581271588
\u201cThis is substantively disqualifying and politically insulting to Democrats\u2014and any left of center person. And, as Buttigieg is not a stupid person, it seems utterly cynical too, but not \u201csmart cynical\u201d (FDR was cynical about the CIO) but *dumb* cynical!\u201d— Richard Yeselson (@Richard Yeselson) 1581283826
\u201cI honestly can\u2019t think of a worse platform for Democrats to run on. \n\nIt also betrays a deep economic illiteracy given how low interest rates are.\u201d— Matt O'Brien (@Matt O'Brien) 1581290019
\u201cLove how Buttigieg frames his billionaire donor suck up position on \u201cdeficits\u201d (e.g. opening up space to gut Medicare and social security) as edgy truth telling\u201d— Adam H. Johnson (@Adam H. Johnson) 1581272889
\u201cGive the Buttigieg campaign credit: They know exactly what the mega wealthy sociopaths who bankroll campaigns and report the news on TV want to hear https://t.co/hWEKHvQK8t\u201d— Andrew Perez (@Andrew Perez) 1581291777
\u201cIt would be great if a reporter would ask Buttigieg whether he is completely ignorant of the debates over deficit among progressives for the last dozen years or whether he is just saying this to curry favor with wealthy Wall Street types.\u201d— Dean Baker (@Dean Baker) 1581290074
"Concern for 'deficits' is a rightwing watchword," tweeted Adam Johnson of The Appeal. "It signals a candidate is willing to open up space for privatizing and gutting Medicare and Social Security."
At a town hall in Nashua, New Hampshire Sunday, former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg drew criticism from progressives and economists when he told the audience he would prioritize reducing the deficit if he wins the presidency in November.
"It's not fashionable in progressive circles to talk too much about the debt," Buttigieg said. "I think the time has come for my party to get a lot more comfortable owning this issue."
In embracing the frequent Republican talking point, Buttigieg was "not-so-subtly letting his billionaire donors know he'll cut Social Security and Medicaid," tweeted actor Rob Delaney, a supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Medicare for All proponent.
Republicans frequently portray large deficits as a Democratic phenomenon and blame the party for spending too much taxpayer money on social welfare programs, but as Sahil Kapur of NBC News pointed out, the national debt has risen under Republican presidents who cut taxes for corporations and raised military spending, while it fell under the two most recent Democratic presidents.
"It's 'not fashionable in progressive circles' because progressives are rejecting the bogus arguments about debt and deficits that have been used to undermine the progressive agenda for decades," Stephanie Kelton, an economics professor at Stony Brook University and adviser to Sanders, told NBC.
On social media, other critics accused Buttigieg of "economic illiteracy" and of attempting to "curry favor with wealthy Wall Street types."
\u201cButtigieg is the austerity candidate https://t.co/5Fwf1sR9HH\u201d— ryan cooper (@ryan cooper) 1581271588
\u201cThis is substantively disqualifying and politically insulting to Democrats\u2014and any left of center person. And, as Buttigieg is not a stupid person, it seems utterly cynical too, but not \u201csmart cynical\u201d (FDR was cynical about the CIO) but *dumb* cynical!\u201d— Richard Yeselson (@Richard Yeselson) 1581283826
\u201cI honestly can\u2019t think of a worse platform for Democrats to run on. \n\nIt also betrays a deep economic illiteracy given how low interest rates are.\u201d— Matt O'Brien (@Matt O'Brien) 1581290019
\u201cLove how Buttigieg frames his billionaire donor suck up position on \u201cdeficits\u201d (e.g. opening up space to gut Medicare and social security) as edgy truth telling\u201d— Adam H. Johnson (@Adam H. Johnson) 1581272889
\u201cGive the Buttigieg campaign credit: They know exactly what the mega wealthy sociopaths who bankroll campaigns and report the news on TV want to hear https://t.co/hWEKHvQK8t\u201d— Andrew Perez (@Andrew Perez) 1581291777
\u201cIt would be great if a reporter would ask Buttigieg whether he is completely ignorant of the debates over deficit among progressives for the last dozen years or whether he is just saying this to curry favor with wealthy Wall Street types.\u201d— Dean Baker (@Dean Baker) 1581290074
"Concern for 'deficits' is a rightwing watchword," tweeted Adam Johnson of The Appeal. "It signals a candidate is willing to open up space for privatizing and gutting Medicare and Social Security."