South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, speaks to guests during a campaign stop at Cronk's restaurant on November 26, 2019 in Denison, Iowa. (Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Nov 28, 2019
The Democratic presidential campaign of South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg on Thursday launched a new ad in Iowa attacking the idea of tuition-free public college, sparking backlash from progressives who called Buttigieg's argument against the proposal "disingenuous" and reactionary.
"I believe we should move to make college affordable for everybody. There are some voices saying, 'Well that doesn't count unless you go even further, unless it's free even for the kids of millionaires,'" Buttigieg says in the 30-second spot, a clear shot at Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who are both campaigning on making public colleges and universities tuition-free.
"But I only want to make promises that we can keep," Buttigieg says in the ad, which aired Thursday evening in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. "Look, what I'm proposing is plenty bold. I mean these are big ideas. We can gather the majority to drive those big ideas through without turning off half the country before we even get into office."
\u201cNew Pete ad in Iowa taking aim at Warren and Bernie over college affordability/debt (but not by name), arguing they\u2019d alienate half the country by insisting it be \u201cfree even for the kids of millionaires\u201d. H/t @McCormickJohn \n\u201d— Alex Thompson (@Alex Thompson) 1574991562
Unlike Sanders and Warren's plans, which would make public colleges and universities tuition-free for all, Buttigieg's proposal (pdf) would make public college education tuition-free only for households earning up to $100,000 per year.
\u201cButtigieg thinks that if your combined household income is more than $100k/yr you can be lumped in rhetorically with billionaires and should be cut out of the free public college pool\u201d— Ryan Grim (@Ryan Grim) 1575056791
Progressives were quick to respond that Buttigieg's argument against tuition-free public college and in favor of means-testing could just as easily apply to other publicly funded goods and programs like K-12 education, Social Security, Medicare, and libraries.
"This logic leads directly to President Pete agreeing to further Medicare and Social Security means testing in order to keep taxes low," said Crooked Media's Brian Beutler.
Other critics echoed Beutler:
\u201cthis is such a disingenuous attack that can be used for literally any universal program\u201d— b-boy bouiebaisse (@b-boy bouiebaisse) 1574992267
Faiz Shakir, Sanders' campaign manager, said "to have an advanced society that lifts the working class, you need universal benefits paid for through progressive taxation."
"Why does Pete dislike Social Security, Medicare, public parks, libraries, fire stations, etc.?" Shakir added.
Current Affairs editor Sparky Abraham, the author of an April article that addressed common attacks on free public college, also slammed Buttigieg's new ad.
"This is a nonsensical and dishonest line for a lot of reasons, but especially notice what the result is: burdens land on poor people to prove they're poor, and colleges don't lose market share or profit to public competitors," said Abraham. "This is pure profit protection at your expense."
In a series of tweets late Thursday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called Buttigieg's attack on tuition-free public college "a GOP talking point used to dismantle public systems" and said "it's sad to see a Dem candidate adopt it."
"Universal public systems are designed to benefit EVERYBODY! Everyone contributes and everyone enjoys. We don't ban the rich from public schools, firefighters, or libraries because they are public goods," said the New York Democrat. "Universal systems that benefit everyone are stronger because everyone's invested!"
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Democratic presidential campaign of South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg on Thursday launched a new ad in Iowa attacking the idea of tuition-free public college, sparking backlash from progressives who called Buttigieg's argument against the proposal "disingenuous" and reactionary.
"I believe we should move to make college affordable for everybody. There are some voices saying, 'Well that doesn't count unless you go even further, unless it's free even for the kids of millionaires,'" Buttigieg says in the 30-second spot, a clear shot at Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who are both campaigning on making public colleges and universities tuition-free.
"But I only want to make promises that we can keep," Buttigieg says in the ad, which aired Thursday evening in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. "Look, what I'm proposing is plenty bold. I mean these are big ideas. We can gather the majority to drive those big ideas through without turning off half the country before we even get into office."
\u201cNew Pete ad in Iowa taking aim at Warren and Bernie over college affordability/debt (but not by name), arguing they\u2019d alienate half the country by insisting it be \u201cfree even for the kids of millionaires\u201d. H/t @McCormickJohn \n\u201d— Alex Thompson (@Alex Thompson) 1574991562
Unlike Sanders and Warren's plans, which would make public colleges and universities tuition-free for all, Buttigieg's proposal (pdf) would make public college education tuition-free only for households earning up to $100,000 per year.
\u201cButtigieg thinks that if your combined household income is more than $100k/yr you can be lumped in rhetorically with billionaires and should be cut out of the free public college pool\u201d— Ryan Grim (@Ryan Grim) 1575056791
Progressives were quick to respond that Buttigieg's argument against tuition-free public college and in favor of means-testing could just as easily apply to other publicly funded goods and programs like K-12 education, Social Security, Medicare, and libraries.
"This logic leads directly to President Pete agreeing to further Medicare and Social Security means testing in order to keep taxes low," said Crooked Media's Brian Beutler.
Other critics echoed Beutler:
\u201cthis is such a disingenuous attack that can be used for literally any universal program\u201d— b-boy bouiebaisse (@b-boy bouiebaisse) 1574992267
Faiz Shakir, Sanders' campaign manager, said "to have an advanced society that lifts the working class, you need universal benefits paid for through progressive taxation."
"Why does Pete dislike Social Security, Medicare, public parks, libraries, fire stations, etc.?" Shakir added.
Current Affairs editor Sparky Abraham, the author of an April article that addressed common attacks on free public college, also slammed Buttigieg's new ad.
"This is a nonsensical and dishonest line for a lot of reasons, but especially notice what the result is: burdens land on poor people to prove they're poor, and colleges don't lose market share or profit to public competitors," said Abraham. "This is pure profit protection at your expense."
In a series of tweets late Thursday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called Buttigieg's attack on tuition-free public college "a GOP talking point used to dismantle public systems" and said "it's sad to see a Dem candidate adopt it."
"Universal public systems are designed to benefit EVERYBODY! Everyone contributes and everyone enjoys. We don't ban the rich from public schools, firefighters, or libraries because they are public goods," said the New York Democrat. "Universal systems that benefit everyone are stronger because everyone's invested!"
The Democratic presidential campaign of South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg on Thursday launched a new ad in Iowa attacking the idea of tuition-free public college, sparking backlash from progressives who called Buttigieg's argument against the proposal "disingenuous" and reactionary.
"I believe we should move to make college affordable for everybody. There are some voices saying, 'Well that doesn't count unless you go even further, unless it's free even for the kids of millionaires,'" Buttigieg says in the 30-second spot, a clear shot at Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who are both campaigning on making public colleges and universities tuition-free.
"But I only want to make promises that we can keep," Buttigieg says in the ad, which aired Thursday evening in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. "Look, what I'm proposing is plenty bold. I mean these are big ideas. We can gather the majority to drive those big ideas through without turning off half the country before we even get into office."
\u201cNew Pete ad in Iowa taking aim at Warren and Bernie over college affordability/debt (but not by name), arguing they\u2019d alienate half the country by insisting it be \u201cfree even for the kids of millionaires\u201d. H/t @McCormickJohn \n\u201d— Alex Thompson (@Alex Thompson) 1574991562
Unlike Sanders and Warren's plans, which would make public colleges and universities tuition-free for all, Buttigieg's proposal (pdf) would make public college education tuition-free only for households earning up to $100,000 per year.
\u201cButtigieg thinks that if your combined household income is more than $100k/yr you can be lumped in rhetorically with billionaires and should be cut out of the free public college pool\u201d— Ryan Grim (@Ryan Grim) 1575056791
Progressives were quick to respond that Buttigieg's argument against tuition-free public college and in favor of means-testing could just as easily apply to other publicly funded goods and programs like K-12 education, Social Security, Medicare, and libraries.
"This logic leads directly to President Pete agreeing to further Medicare and Social Security means testing in order to keep taxes low," said Crooked Media's Brian Beutler.
Other critics echoed Beutler:
\u201cthis is such a disingenuous attack that can be used for literally any universal program\u201d— b-boy bouiebaisse (@b-boy bouiebaisse) 1574992267
Faiz Shakir, Sanders' campaign manager, said "to have an advanced society that lifts the working class, you need universal benefits paid for through progressive taxation."
"Why does Pete dislike Social Security, Medicare, public parks, libraries, fire stations, etc.?" Shakir added.
Current Affairs editor Sparky Abraham, the author of an April article that addressed common attacks on free public college, also slammed Buttigieg's new ad.
"This is a nonsensical and dishonest line for a lot of reasons, but especially notice what the result is: burdens land on poor people to prove they're poor, and colleges don't lose market share or profit to public competitors," said Abraham. "This is pure profit protection at your expense."
In a series of tweets late Thursday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called Buttigieg's attack on tuition-free public college "a GOP talking point used to dismantle public systems" and said "it's sad to see a Dem candidate adopt it."
"Universal public systems are designed to benefit EVERYBODY! Everyone contributes and everyone enjoys. We don't ban the rich from public schools, firefighters, or libraries because they are public goods," said the New York Democrat. "Universal systems that benefit everyone are stronger because everyone's invested!"
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.