Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) listen as Michael Cohen, former attorney and fixer for President Donald Trump, testifies before the House Oversight Committee on Capitol Hill February 27, 2019. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla, Getty Images)
'A Network of Alternative Campaign Infrastructure': Progressives Dismiss DCCC Threats on Primary Challengers
"We reject the DCCC's attempt to hoard power"
As tensions escalate in an internal battle between the centrist and left wings of the Democratic Party, a group of progressives is making a move to begin a new left wing party apparatus.
A decision by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee late last month to blacklist vendors that support primary challengers over party incumbents drew a line in the sand against the potential progressive overthrow of the party's established order.
In response to the new policy, 14 progressive groups Thursday announced the launch of the DCCC Blacklist--a collective of left wing vendors that are bucking the Democratic campaign arm's directive.
"If we want to fight for a Green New Deal, Medicare for All, free college, getting corporate money out of politics, and an end to mass incarceration and deportation then we need to help build a network of alternative campaign infrastructure to support progressive primary challengers from this DCCC sabotage," said Waleed Shahid, communications director for the progressive group Justice Democrats, one of the groups behind the new vendor list.
As Common Dreams reported Thursday, reconciliation attempts over the vendor policy stalled out this week. Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), the chair of the DCCC, told Politico Wednesday that she had no intention of backing down in her decision.
"We've got a policy that the caucus supports, the leadership supports, and it plays the long game," said Bustos.
That prompted a response from Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
"It is not playing games for the Democratic Party to be inclusive of all its members perspectives," said Jayapal.
The divisions over the policy appear to have deepened to the point that there's not likely a way out for both sides. In a statement about the creation of the new vendor list, Indivisible's Maria Urbina said that intentional or not, the policy on vendors would serve to keep the party less diverse.
"We reject the DCCC's attempt to hoard power, which will only serve to keep that talent pool--and Congress itself--disproportionately white and male," said Urbina.
Thursday's announcement of a shadow vendor group would seem to imply that the split in the party is reaching beyond rhetoric and into the realm of material reality--a secondary, progressive party apparatus, if created, will pose a credible threat to the party establishment as it is currently constituted.
"As a loyal Democrat and proud progressive, I believe that we don't just need more Democrats in Congress--we also need better Democrats in Congress," said Rebecca Katz, founder of New Deal Strategies. "I won't hesitate to work with progressive candidates challenging incumbent Democrats who are out of touch with their constituents."
"If that means getting blacklisted by the DCCC," Katz added, "then so be it."
Sean McElwee, a Democratic activist whose company Data for Progress is a founding member of the project, said in a statement that he relished the opportunity to fight against the entrenched interests of the party in the 2019-2020 cycle.
"This cycle, progressives made our intentions clear: we would work to unseat anti-choice, anti-LGBT bigots like Dan Lipinski and Henry Cuellar," said McElwee. "The DCCC made a choice: to stand with bigots instead of the progressive future of the party. They will fail."
Marisa Franco, the founder of Latinx advocacy group Mijente, said in a statement that the new list was part of a movement to reshape the party and, hopefully, the country.
"The Democratic Party is at a crossroads and establishment party politics are not going to successfully lead us into the future," said Franco. "We need new voices and bold ideas from people who represent the diversity of the country and are willing to lead the new American majority that is built by movements for social justice."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As tensions escalate in an internal battle between the centrist and left wings of the Democratic Party, a group of progressives is making a move to begin a new left wing party apparatus.
A decision by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee late last month to blacklist vendors that support primary challengers over party incumbents drew a line in the sand against the potential progressive overthrow of the party's established order.
In response to the new policy, 14 progressive groups Thursday announced the launch of the DCCC Blacklist--a collective of left wing vendors that are bucking the Democratic campaign arm's directive.
"If we want to fight for a Green New Deal, Medicare for All, free college, getting corporate money out of politics, and an end to mass incarceration and deportation then we need to help build a network of alternative campaign infrastructure to support progressive primary challengers from this DCCC sabotage," said Waleed Shahid, communications director for the progressive group Justice Democrats, one of the groups behind the new vendor list.
As Common Dreams reported Thursday, reconciliation attempts over the vendor policy stalled out this week. Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), the chair of the DCCC, told Politico Wednesday that she had no intention of backing down in her decision.
"We've got a policy that the caucus supports, the leadership supports, and it plays the long game," said Bustos.
That prompted a response from Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
"It is not playing games for the Democratic Party to be inclusive of all its members perspectives," said Jayapal.
The divisions over the policy appear to have deepened to the point that there's not likely a way out for both sides. In a statement about the creation of the new vendor list, Indivisible's Maria Urbina said that intentional or not, the policy on vendors would serve to keep the party less diverse.
"We reject the DCCC's attempt to hoard power, which will only serve to keep that talent pool--and Congress itself--disproportionately white and male," said Urbina.
Thursday's announcement of a shadow vendor group would seem to imply that the split in the party is reaching beyond rhetoric and into the realm of material reality--a secondary, progressive party apparatus, if created, will pose a credible threat to the party establishment as it is currently constituted.
"As a loyal Democrat and proud progressive, I believe that we don't just need more Democrats in Congress--we also need better Democrats in Congress," said Rebecca Katz, founder of New Deal Strategies. "I won't hesitate to work with progressive candidates challenging incumbent Democrats who are out of touch with their constituents."
"If that means getting blacklisted by the DCCC," Katz added, "then so be it."
Sean McElwee, a Democratic activist whose company Data for Progress is a founding member of the project, said in a statement that he relished the opportunity to fight against the entrenched interests of the party in the 2019-2020 cycle.
"This cycle, progressives made our intentions clear: we would work to unseat anti-choice, anti-LGBT bigots like Dan Lipinski and Henry Cuellar," said McElwee. "The DCCC made a choice: to stand with bigots instead of the progressive future of the party. They will fail."
Marisa Franco, the founder of Latinx advocacy group Mijente, said in a statement that the new list was part of a movement to reshape the party and, hopefully, the country.
"The Democratic Party is at a crossroads and establishment party politics are not going to successfully lead us into the future," said Franco. "We need new voices and bold ideas from people who represent the diversity of the country and are willing to lead the new American majority that is built by movements for social justice."
As tensions escalate in an internal battle between the centrist and left wings of the Democratic Party, a group of progressives is making a move to begin a new left wing party apparatus.
A decision by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee late last month to blacklist vendors that support primary challengers over party incumbents drew a line in the sand against the potential progressive overthrow of the party's established order.
In response to the new policy, 14 progressive groups Thursday announced the launch of the DCCC Blacklist--a collective of left wing vendors that are bucking the Democratic campaign arm's directive.
"If we want to fight for a Green New Deal, Medicare for All, free college, getting corporate money out of politics, and an end to mass incarceration and deportation then we need to help build a network of alternative campaign infrastructure to support progressive primary challengers from this DCCC sabotage," said Waleed Shahid, communications director for the progressive group Justice Democrats, one of the groups behind the new vendor list.
As Common Dreams reported Thursday, reconciliation attempts over the vendor policy stalled out this week. Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), the chair of the DCCC, told Politico Wednesday that she had no intention of backing down in her decision.
"We've got a policy that the caucus supports, the leadership supports, and it plays the long game," said Bustos.
That prompted a response from Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
"It is not playing games for the Democratic Party to be inclusive of all its members perspectives," said Jayapal.
The divisions over the policy appear to have deepened to the point that there's not likely a way out for both sides. In a statement about the creation of the new vendor list, Indivisible's Maria Urbina said that intentional or not, the policy on vendors would serve to keep the party less diverse.
"We reject the DCCC's attempt to hoard power, which will only serve to keep that talent pool--and Congress itself--disproportionately white and male," said Urbina.
Thursday's announcement of a shadow vendor group would seem to imply that the split in the party is reaching beyond rhetoric and into the realm of material reality--a secondary, progressive party apparatus, if created, will pose a credible threat to the party establishment as it is currently constituted.
"As a loyal Democrat and proud progressive, I believe that we don't just need more Democrats in Congress--we also need better Democrats in Congress," said Rebecca Katz, founder of New Deal Strategies. "I won't hesitate to work with progressive candidates challenging incumbent Democrats who are out of touch with their constituents."
"If that means getting blacklisted by the DCCC," Katz added, "then so be it."
Sean McElwee, a Democratic activist whose company Data for Progress is a founding member of the project, said in a statement that he relished the opportunity to fight against the entrenched interests of the party in the 2019-2020 cycle.
"This cycle, progressives made our intentions clear: we would work to unseat anti-choice, anti-LGBT bigots like Dan Lipinski and Henry Cuellar," said McElwee. "The DCCC made a choice: to stand with bigots instead of the progressive future of the party. They will fail."
Marisa Franco, the founder of Latinx advocacy group Mijente, said in a statement that the new list was part of a movement to reshape the party and, hopefully, the country.
"The Democratic Party is at a crossroads and establishment party politics are not going to successfully lead us into the future," said Franco. "We need new voices and bold ideas from people who represent the diversity of the country and are willing to lead the new American majority that is built by movements for social justice."