Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

"Three companies have vast power over our economy and our democracy. Facebook, Amazon, and Google," read Warren's ads, which were eventually restored. (Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)

With Blocked Ads Proving Her Point, Warren Says Facebook Shouldn't Have Power to Decide What Is and Isn't Allowed for 'Robust Debate'

"Curious why I think FB has too much power? Let's start with their ability to shut down a debate over whether FB has too much power."

Jake Johnson

In a move Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) described as a perfect example of why her plan to break up tech giants is necessary, Facebook late Monday took down ads from Warren's presidential campaign that promoted the proposal and denounced tech corporations—including Facebook itself—for exploiting users' private information for profit.

"You shouldn't have to contact Facebook's publicists in order for them to decide to 'allow robust debate' about Facebook. They shouldn't have that much power."
—Sen. Elizabeth Warren

Though the ads were later restored, Warren said the episode demonstrates the need for a "social media marketplace that isn't dominated by a single censor"—a point that was echoed by critics of big tech's monopoly power.

"Curious why I think FB has too much power? Let's start with their ability to shut down a debate over whether FB has too much power," the Massachusetts senator wrote, using the hashtag #BreakUpBigTech.

The Facebook ad by Warren's 2020 presidential campaign boosted her newly released plan to "break up big tech" by highlighting how concentration of power in the hands of just three corporate behemoths—Facebook, Amazon, and Google—has affected the U.S. economy and democracy itself.

"Three companies have vast power over our economy and our democracy. Facebook, Amazon, and Google," read the ad. "We all use them. But in their rise to power, they've bulldozed competition, used our private information for profit, and tilted the playing field in their favor."

"It has been policy for Facebook not to allow political debates about Facebook on Facebook."
—Matt Stoller, Open Markets Institute

"It's time to break up these big companies so they don't have so much power over everyone else," Warren's ad continued. "I've got a plan to protect consumers and competition."

On Monday evening, the ad was briefly replaced with the following message: "This ad was taken down because it goes against Facebook's advertising policies."

After the move sparked immediate backlash, Facebook issued a statement claiming the ads were pulled because "they violated our policies against use of our corporate logo."

"In the interest of allowing robust debate," the statement continued, "we are restoring the ads."

As Open Markets Institute fellow Matt Stoller pointed out, Facebook's policy barring the use of its corporate logo originated a decade ago in response to a group titled "Facebook Users Against the New Terms of Service."

Following the group's formation, Stoller noted, Facebook instituted a ban on the use of the company name or logo in ads and group titles.

"In other words, it has been policy for Facebook not to allow political debates about Facebook on Facebook," Stoller concluded. "Facebook has been autocratic since the roll-out of Beacon in 2007. Barring users from organizing on Facebook about Facebook was an important part of Zuckerberg's control of his platform's politics."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

... We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

'Reckless Misuse of Resources': House Approves $778 Billion Military Budget

"There was no CBO score needed. No concern about the deficit. No mention of inflation," said Rep. Jamaal Bowman.

Jake Johnson ·


Senate Dems Help Torpedo Resolution That Would Have Blocked $650 Million Arms Sale to Saudi Arabia

"My simple question is, why in the world would the United States reward a regime that has caused such pain in Yemen with more weapons," Sanders asked after the vote. "The answer is we should not."

Brett Wilkins ·


Amnesty Scorecard Finds Twitter Failing to Protect Women From Online Abuse

"As our world has become increasingly dependent on digital spaces during the Covid-19 pandemic, it's critical that Twitter meet this moment with demonstrated commitment to improving the online experiences of all users, regardless of their identity."

Jessica Corbett ·


Filibuster Reform for Debt Ceiling Fight But Not Voting Rights or Reproductive Freedom?

"If our senators are willing to suspend the filibuster to protect our economy, they should be willing to suspend it to protect our democracy and our freedom to vote."

Jessica Corbett ·


As Senate Holds Guantánamo Hearing, Biden Urged to 'Finally End This Chapter of Injustice'

"Guantánamo is a centerpiece of the forever wars. It is a shameful symbol of racial injustice, torture, and violations of the Constitution and international law."

Brett Wilkins ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo