To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
National security adviser John Bolton, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence before the start of a joint news conference in the Rose Garden at the White House June 7, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
After President Donald Trump's national security adviser John Bolton openly threatened Venezuela's elected government on Twitter and White House officials continued to warn that U.S. military intervention remains "on the table," Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) on Sunday acknowledged the ongoing political and economic crises in Venezuela but argued that American military action must be entirely ruled out as a possible solution.
"We must rule out military action in Venezuela."
--Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)
"We must rule out military action in Venezuela," Omar wrote. "We have to wonder, if Trump and [Secretary of State Mike] Pompeo are so worried about human rights and democracy in Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua, why do they actively support horrible regimes in Brazil, Guatemala, and Honduras?"
"Of course there is suffering in Venezuela and I strongly stand with the people," the Minnesota congresswoman continued. "There [are] many ways we can assist that I would support but will always caution us against intervention."
\u201cWe must rule out military action in Venezuela. \n\nWe have to wonder, if Trump and Pompeo are so worried about human rights and democracy in Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua, why do they actively support horrible regimes in Brazil, Guatemala, and Honduras? https://t.co/MDhJAjyjYY\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1548637208
\u201cOf course there is suffering in Venezuela and I strongly stand with the people. There many ways we can assist, that I would support but will always caution us against intervention.\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1548637208
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, echoed Omar's opposition to military action on Sunday, declaring, "The administration should be helping to de-escalate tensions and encouraging a peaceful resolution to this conflict, not fueling more violence, chaos, and instability in the region."
"U.S. military intervention in Venezuela is not the answer here."
--Rep. Pramila Jayapal
"U.S. military intervention in Venezuela is not the answer here," Jayapal added.
While Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) openly criticized the record and policies of the Maduro government last week, he also took a firm stand against U.S. intervention by the Trump administration.
"The United States has a long history of inappropriately intervening in Latin American countries," said the senator. "We must not go down that road again."
Omar and Jayapal's clear stand on Sunday against U.S. military intervention came just hours after Bolton--who played a central role in orchestrating what has been denounced as an attempted coup d'etat--took to Twitter to warn Venezuela's government of a "significant response" if American diplomats, members of the Venezuelan National Assembly, or U.S.-backed opposition leader and self-declared "Interim President" Juan Guaido are intimidated or attacked.
"Any violence and intimidation against U.S. diplomatic personnel, Venezuela's democratic leader, Juan Guiado [sic], or the National Assembly itself would represent a grave assault on the rule of law and will be met with a significant response," Bolton warned in a tweet on Sunday.
Bolton also claimed, without citing any evidence, that Cuba has "control" over Venezuela's armed forces. Experts have said links between Cuba and Venezuela, which are allies, are frequently overblown.
\u201cCuba\u2019s support and control over Maduro\u2019s security and paramilitary forces are well known. 1/2\u201d— John Bolton (@John Bolton) 1548608530
\u201cAny violence and intimidation against U.S. diplomatic personnel, Venezuela\u2019s democratic leader, Juan Guiado, or the National Assembly itself would represent a grave assault on the rule of law and will be met with a significant response. 2/2\u201d— John Bolton (@John Bolton) 1548608551
As the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, Bolton, Pompeo, and Vice President Mike Pence were all key players in talks with the Venezuelan opposition that culminated in Guaido's decision last week to declare himself "interim president." According to the Journal, Pence called Guaido to pledge U.S. support for the move. Immediately after Guaido's announcement, Trump recognized him as Venezuela's rightful leader and declared Maduro's government illegitimate.
Prompting horror and dismay, Pompeo announced on Friday that notorious neoconservative Elliot Abrams is joining the Trump administration as U.S. special envoy for Venezuela.
"Welcome back to the fight," Bolton declared.
Further fueling concerns that the Trump administration is considering military action, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) toldAxios on Sunday that the president is "really hawkish" on Venezuela and has openly floated the possibility of military intervention.
"What do you think about using military force?" Trump reportedly asked Graham as recently as a few weeks ago.
The Trump administration's quick recognition of Guaido was quickly met with alarm by progressive anti-war advocates and commentators, who denounced the move as the beginnings of a coup and warned that U.S. intervention in Venezuela's internal affairs will only make the country's economic and political crises worse.
"The U.S. and its allies must cease encouraging violence by pushing for violent, extralegal regime change," over 70 academics and Latin America experts wrote in an open letter published by Common Dreams last week. "If the Trump administration and its allies continue to pursue their reckless course in Venezuela, the most likely result will be bloodshed, chaos, and instability."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
After President Donald Trump's national security adviser John Bolton openly threatened Venezuela's elected government on Twitter and White House officials continued to warn that U.S. military intervention remains "on the table," Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) on Sunday acknowledged the ongoing political and economic crises in Venezuela but argued that American military action must be entirely ruled out as a possible solution.
"We must rule out military action in Venezuela."
--Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)
"We must rule out military action in Venezuela," Omar wrote. "We have to wonder, if Trump and [Secretary of State Mike] Pompeo are so worried about human rights and democracy in Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua, why do they actively support horrible regimes in Brazil, Guatemala, and Honduras?"
"Of course there is suffering in Venezuela and I strongly stand with the people," the Minnesota congresswoman continued. "There [are] many ways we can assist that I would support but will always caution us against intervention."
\u201cWe must rule out military action in Venezuela. \n\nWe have to wonder, if Trump and Pompeo are so worried about human rights and democracy in Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua, why do they actively support horrible regimes in Brazil, Guatemala, and Honduras? https://t.co/MDhJAjyjYY\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1548637208
\u201cOf course there is suffering in Venezuela and I strongly stand with the people. There many ways we can assist, that I would support but will always caution us against intervention.\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1548637208
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, echoed Omar's opposition to military action on Sunday, declaring, "The administration should be helping to de-escalate tensions and encouraging a peaceful resolution to this conflict, not fueling more violence, chaos, and instability in the region."
"U.S. military intervention in Venezuela is not the answer here."
--Rep. Pramila Jayapal
"U.S. military intervention in Venezuela is not the answer here," Jayapal added.
While Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) openly criticized the record and policies of the Maduro government last week, he also took a firm stand against U.S. intervention by the Trump administration.
"The United States has a long history of inappropriately intervening in Latin American countries," said the senator. "We must not go down that road again."
Omar and Jayapal's clear stand on Sunday against U.S. military intervention came just hours after Bolton--who played a central role in orchestrating what has been denounced as an attempted coup d'etat--took to Twitter to warn Venezuela's government of a "significant response" if American diplomats, members of the Venezuelan National Assembly, or U.S.-backed opposition leader and self-declared "Interim President" Juan Guaido are intimidated or attacked.
"Any violence and intimidation against U.S. diplomatic personnel, Venezuela's democratic leader, Juan Guiado [sic], or the National Assembly itself would represent a grave assault on the rule of law and will be met with a significant response," Bolton warned in a tweet on Sunday.
Bolton also claimed, without citing any evidence, that Cuba has "control" over Venezuela's armed forces. Experts have said links between Cuba and Venezuela, which are allies, are frequently overblown.
\u201cCuba\u2019s support and control over Maduro\u2019s security and paramilitary forces are well known. 1/2\u201d— John Bolton (@John Bolton) 1548608530
\u201cAny violence and intimidation against U.S. diplomatic personnel, Venezuela\u2019s democratic leader, Juan Guiado, or the National Assembly itself would represent a grave assault on the rule of law and will be met with a significant response. 2/2\u201d— John Bolton (@John Bolton) 1548608551
As the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, Bolton, Pompeo, and Vice President Mike Pence were all key players in talks with the Venezuelan opposition that culminated in Guaido's decision last week to declare himself "interim president." According to the Journal, Pence called Guaido to pledge U.S. support for the move. Immediately after Guaido's announcement, Trump recognized him as Venezuela's rightful leader and declared Maduro's government illegitimate.
Prompting horror and dismay, Pompeo announced on Friday that notorious neoconservative Elliot Abrams is joining the Trump administration as U.S. special envoy for Venezuela.
"Welcome back to the fight," Bolton declared.
Further fueling concerns that the Trump administration is considering military action, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) toldAxios on Sunday that the president is "really hawkish" on Venezuela and has openly floated the possibility of military intervention.
"What do you think about using military force?" Trump reportedly asked Graham as recently as a few weeks ago.
The Trump administration's quick recognition of Guaido was quickly met with alarm by progressive anti-war advocates and commentators, who denounced the move as the beginnings of a coup and warned that U.S. intervention in Venezuela's internal affairs will only make the country's economic and political crises worse.
"The U.S. and its allies must cease encouraging violence by pushing for violent, extralegal regime change," over 70 academics and Latin America experts wrote in an open letter published by Common Dreams last week. "If the Trump administration and its allies continue to pursue their reckless course in Venezuela, the most likely result will be bloodshed, chaos, and instability."
After President Donald Trump's national security adviser John Bolton openly threatened Venezuela's elected government on Twitter and White House officials continued to warn that U.S. military intervention remains "on the table," Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) on Sunday acknowledged the ongoing political and economic crises in Venezuela but argued that American military action must be entirely ruled out as a possible solution.
"We must rule out military action in Venezuela."
--Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)
"We must rule out military action in Venezuela," Omar wrote. "We have to wonder, if Trump and [Secretary of State Mike] Pompeo are so worried about human rights and democracy in Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua, why do they actively support horrible regimes in Brazil, Guatemala, and Honduras?"
"Of course there is suffering in Venezuela and I strongly stand with the people," the Minnesota congresswoman continued. "There [are] many ways we can assist that I would support but will always caution us against intervention."
\u201cWe must rule out military action in Venezuela. \n\nWe have to wonder, if Trump and Pompeo are so worried about human rights and democracy in Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua, why do they actively support horrible regimes in Brazil, Guatemala, and Honduras? https://t.co/MDhJAjyjYY\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1548637208
\u201cOf course there is suffering in Venezuela and I strongly stand with the people. There many ways we can assist, that I would support but will always caution us against intervention.\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1548637208
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, echoed Omar's opposition to military action on Sunday, declaring, "The administration should be helping to de-escalate tensions and encouraging a peaceful resolution to this conflict, not fueling more violence, chaos, and instability in the region."
"U.S. military intervention in Venezuela is not the answer here."
--Rep. Pramila Jayapal
"U.S. military intervention in Venezuela is not the answer here," Jayapal added.
While Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) openly criticized the record and policies of the Maduro government last week, he also took a firm stand against U.S. intervention by the Trump administration.
"The United States has a long history of inappropriately intervening in Latin American countries," said the senator. "We must not go down that road again."
Omar and Jayapal's clear stand on Sunday against U.S. military intervention came just hours after Bolton--who played a central role in orchestrating what has been denounced as an attempted coup d'etat--took to Twitter to warn Venezuela's government of a "significant response" if American diplomats, members of the Venezuelan National Assembly, or U.S.-backed opposition leader and self-declared "Interim President" Juan Guaido are intimidated or attacked.
"Any violence and intimidation against U.S. diplomatic personnel, Venezuela's democratic leader, Juan Guiado [sic], or the National Assembly itself would represent a grave assault on the rule of law and will be met with a significant response," Bolton warned in a tweet on Sunday.
Bolton also claimed, without citing any evidence, that Cuba has "control" over Venezuela's armed forces. Experts have said links between Cuba and Venezuela, which are allies, are frequently overblown.
\u201cCuba\u2019s support and control over Maduro\u2019s security and paramilitary forces are well known. 1/2\u201d— John Bolton (@John Bolton) 1548608530
\u201cAny violence and intimidation against U.S. diplomatic personnel, Venezuela\u2019s democratic leader, Juan Guiado, or the National Assembly itself would represent a grave assault on the rule of law and will be met with a significant response. 2/2\u201d— John Bolton (@John Bolton) 1548608551
As the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, Bolton, Pompeo, and Vice President Mike Pence were all key players in talks with the Venezuelan opposition that culminated in Guaido's decision last week to declare himself "interim president." According to the Journal, Pence called Guaido to pledge U.S. support for the move. Immediately after Guaido's announcement, Trump recognized him as Venezuela's rightful leader and declared Maduro's government illegitimate.
Prompting horror and dismay, Pompeo announced on Friday that notorious neoconservative Elliot Abrams is joining the Trump administration as U.S. special envoy for Venezuela.
"Welcome back to the fight," Bolton declared.
Further fueling concerns that the Trump administration is considering military action, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) toldAxios on Sunday that the president is "really hawkish" on Venezuela and has openly floated the possibility of military intervention.
"What do you think about using military force?" Trump reportedly asked Graham as recently as a few weeks ago.
The Trump administration's quick recognition of Guaido was quickly met with alarm by progressive anti-war advocates and commentators, who denounced the move as the beginnings of a coup and warned that U.S. intervention in Venezuela's internal affairs will only make the country's economic and political crises worse.
"The U.S. and its allies must cease encouraging violence by pushing for violent, extralegal regime change," over 70 academics and Latin America experts wrote in an open letter published by Common Dreams last week. "If the Trump administration and its allies continue to pursue their reckless course in Venezuela, the most likely result will be bloodshed, chaos, and instability."