SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A sign held at the March for Science in San Francisco, California, on April 22, 2017. (Photo: Matthew Roth/flickr/cc)
Consequences of Trump's 'Egregious' War on Science Mount as People and Planet Suffer
"With the president just denying the existence of science," the Trump administration has put right-wing ideology ahead both facts and public health
Jan 15, 2019
With the Trump administration regularly putting its right-wing ideology ahead of scientific data and the common good, scientists are taking stock of the tangible damage President Donald Trump has done to the environment and public health as a direct result of the War on Science, two years into his term.
Public health organizations and former government officials told the Guardian Wednesday about ways in which hostility toward science within numerous federal agencies have led to funding cuts for vital programs, dangerous regulatory rollbacks, and a severe lack of transparency on scientific facts from the government.
Former surgeon general Richard Carmona, who worked under the George W. Bush administration, characterized Trump's attack on facts and evidence as "egregious" and told the Guardian it comes "from the very top with the president just denying the existence of science, manipulating the system on behalf of special interests."
"The idea of there being political appointees who try to impose their political agenda in a way that is contrary to scientific evidence is not a new thing--but it has reached an entirely new level in the Trump administration." --Conservation ColoradoThe administration dismissed studies showing that healthier school lunch standards introduced by the Obama administration were effective in schools and could prevent nearly two million childhood obesity cases over the next decade, and instead rolled back the new standards in December.
Trump has also cut grants for comprehensive sex education programs, instead promoting abstinence-only education--which did nothing to reduce teen pregnancy rates under the Bush administration, according to a government report.
Sex education programs have been found to reduce teen pregnancy, increase contraceptive use, and reduce sexually transmitted infection rates, according to Planned Parenthood, after having been "rigorously tested by experts and vetted and analyzed."
"The administration is really not using science. The administration is really using ideology, and those are very different," Sara Flowers, vice president of education for the organization, told the Guardian.
Scientists also pointed to the rollback of a ban on the pesticide chlorpyrifos in 2017, which caused nearly 50 farm workers to become ill due to exposure shortly thereafter. The EPA is currently appealing a judge's order to reinstate the ban.
The newspaper's report comes days after the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists published its own list of the Trump administration and Republican Party's worst attacks on science over the past year.
The Bulletin highlighted Trump's refusal to accept data on Hurricane Maria's death toll in Puerto Rico, insisting that reports of at least 3,000 deaths due to the storm were "done by the Democrats in order to make me look as bad as possible"; the administration's opposition to global breastfeeding guidance and its ominous threats to several countries unless they also opposed the UN resolution; and the Health and Human Services's department erasure of transgender and intersex people.
The group concluded that 2018 was "a banner year in the war on science."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With the Trump administration regularly putting its right-wing ideology ahead of scientific data and the common good, scientists are taking stock of the tangible damage President Donald Trump has done to the environment and public health as a direct result of the War on Science, two years into his term.
Public health organizations and former government officials told the Guardian Wednesday about ways in which hostility toward science within numerous federal agencies have led to funding cuts for vital programs, dangerous regulatory rollbacks, and a severe lack of transparency on scientific facts from the government.
Former surgeon general Richard Carmona, who worked under the George W. Bush administration, characterized Trump's attack on facts and evidence as "egregious" and told the Guardian it comes "from the very top with the president just denying the existence of science, manipulating the system on behalf of special interests."
"The idea of there being political appointees who try to impose their political agenda in a way that is contrary to scientific evidence is not a new thing--but it has reached an entirely new level in the Trump administration." --Conservation ColoradoThe administration dismissed studies showing that healthier school lunch standards introduced by the Obama administration were effective in schools and could prevent nearly two million childhood obesity cases over the next decade, and instead rolled back the new standards in December.
Trump has also cut grants for comprehensive sex education programs, instead promoting abstinence-only education--which did nothing to reduce teen pregnancy rates under the Bush administration, according to a government report.
Sex education programs have been found to reduce teen pregnancy, increase contraceptive use, and reduce sexually transmitted infection rates, according to Planned Parenthood, after having been "rigorously tested by experts and vetted and analyzed."
"The administration is really not using science. The administration is really using ideology, and those are very different," Sara Flowers, vice president of education for the organization, told the Guardian.
Scientists also pointed to the rollback of a ban on the pesticide chlorpyrifos in 2017, which caused nearly 50 farm workers to become ill due to exposure shortly thereafter. The EPA is currently appealing a judge's order to reinstate the ban.
The newspaper's report comes days after the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists published its own list of the Trump administration and Republican Party's worst attacks on science over the past year.
The Bulletin highlighted Trump's refusal to accept data on Hurricane Maria's death toll in Puerto Rico, insisting that reports of at least 3,000 deaths due to the storm were "done by the Democrats in order to make me look as bad as possible"; the administration's opposition to global breastfeeding guidance and its ominous threats to several countries unless they also opposed the UN resolution; and the Health and Human Services's department erasure of transgender and intersex people.
The group concluded that 2018 was "a banner year in the war on science."
With the Trump administration regularly putting its right-wing ideology ahead of scientific data and the common good, scientists are taking stock of the tangible damage President Donald Trump has done to the environment and public health as a direct result of the War on Science, two years into his term.
Public health organizations and former government officials told the Guardian Wednesday about ways in which hostility toward science within numerous federal agencies have led to funding cuts for vital programs, dangerous regulatory rollbacks, and a severe lack of transparency on scientific facts from the government.
Former surgeon general Richard Carmona, who worked under the George W. Bush administration, characterized Trump's attack on facts and evidence as "egregious" and told the Guardian it comes "from the very top with the president just denying the existence of science, manipulating the system on behalf of special interests."
"The idea of there being political appointees who try to impose their political agenda in a way that is contrary to scientific evidence is not a new thing--but it has reached an entirely new level in the Trump administration." --Conservation ColoradoThe administration dismissed studies showing that healthier school lunch standards introduced by the Obama administration were effective in schools and could prevent nearly two million childhood obesity cases over the next decade, and instead rolled back the new standards in December.
Trump has also cut grants for comprehensive sex education programs, instead promoting abstinence-only education--which did nothing to reduce teen pregnancy rates under the Bush administration, according to a government report.
Sex education programs have been found to reduce teen pregnancy, increase contraceptive use, and reduce sexually transmitted infection rates, according to Planned Parenthood, after having been "rigorously tested by experts and vetted and analyzed."
"The administration is really not using science. The administration is really using ideology, and those are very different," Sara Flowers, vice president of education for the organization, told the Guardian.
Scientists also pointed to the rollback of a ban on the pesticide chlorpyrifos in 2017, which caused nearly 50 farm workers to become ill due to exposure shortly thereafter. The EPA is currently appealing a judge's order to reinstate the ban.
The newspaper's report comes days after the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists published its own list of the Trump administration and Republican Party's worst attacks on science over the past year.
The Bulletin highlighted Trump's refusal to accept data on Hurricane Maria's death toll in Puerto Rico, insisting that reports of at least 3,000 deaths due to the storm were "done by the Democrats in order to make me look as bad as possible"; the administration's opposition to global breastfeeding guidance and its ominous threats to several countries unless they also opposed the UN resolution; and the Health and Human Services's department erasure of transgender and intersex people.
The group concluded that 2018 was "a banner year in the war on science."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.