"The taxpayer costs of these two deals is high, both in absolute terms and on a per-job basis, contrary to Amazon's artful spin. Together, we believe they exceed $4.6 billion," said Greg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First. (Photo: Street Easy)
'It Keeps Getting Uglier': As True Costs of HQ2 Scam Emerge, Public Housing and School Offices Getting the Boot to Make Room for Amazon
"The fact that massive public subsidies are helping eliminate affordable housing units is just the latest reason this bad deal needs to be torn up and thrown away."
After learning that New York taxpayers will be forced to finance a helipad for Jeff Bezos, the richest man in the world, it's possible many believed Amazon's sweetheart headquarters deal with the Empire State couldn't get any worse.
"Nothing short of scandalous: trading affordable housing for giveaways to the world's richest man."
--Daniel Altschuler, Make the Road Action
But as additional details of the agreement continue to pour in--and as experts estimate its true cost to taxpayers--critics are warning that it the deal is looking increasingly awful for ordinary New Yorkers.
As Politico reported on Thursday, the site where Amazon will build offices for its new headquarters in Long Island City was previously reserved for nearly 1,500 public housing units for needy families--but not anymore.
"Most--if not all--of that intended housing is now off the table," Politico noted.
News that the public housing plan could be scrapped entirely to make room for Amazon offices sparked immediate outrage on social media and among New York lawmakers.
"The fact that massive public subsidies are helping eliminate affordable housing units is just the latest reason this bad deal needs to be torn up and thrown away," Democratic state Sen. Michael Gianaris, who represents Long Island City, declared in a statement.
"It just keeps getting worse," said journalist Sarah Jaffe.
That's not all. In addition to killing plans for a major public housing development, Amazon's Long Island City headquarters will also reportedly displace over 1,000 New York City public school workers to carve out space for the trillion-dollar tech behemoth.
Citing an anonymous school official, Vice News reported on Thursday that "more than 1,000 New York City public school employees will lose their offices to accommodate Amazon's new secondary headquarters in Queens."
"The taxpayer costs of these two deals is high, both in absolute terms and on a per-job basis, contrary to Amazon's artful spin."
--Greg LeRoy, Good Jobs FirstAs Common Dreams reported, Amazon on Tuesday officially announced its decision to split its second headquarters (HQ2) between Long Island City, New York and Crystal City, Virginia.
Since the company's announcement, details of the behind-closed-doors deals the governments of New York and Virginia cut with Amazon have sparked outrage on social media and protests on the ground, with local communities denouncing the lavish taxpayer-funded gifts and expressing alarm that Amazon's arrival could further drive up housing prices while exacerbating sky-high inequality.
While Amazon claimed that it will receive $2.1 billion in total taxpayer "incentives" from both Long Island City and Crystal City combined, a new analysis by Good Jobs First found that the actual cost to taxpayers will be at least $4.6 billion, and likely much higher.
"The taxpayer costs of these two deals is high, both in absolute terms and on a per-job basis, contrary to Amazon's artful spin," Greg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First, said in a statement. "Together, we believe they exceed $4.6 billion and the cost per job in New York is at least $112,000, not the $48,000 the company used in a selective and incomplete press release calculation."
"It is very odd that Amazon's own press release includes information about its economic development incentives," LeRoy added. "Such information normally comes only from governors or mayors. It suggests Amazon is trying hard to control the narrative about the cost-benefit numerator, i.e., to minimize the perceived subsidy costs while maximizing the benefits."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
After learning that New York taxpayers will be forced to finance a helipad for Jeff Bezos, the richest man in the world, it's possible many believed Amazon's sweetheart headquarters deal with the Empire State couldn't get any worse.
"Nothing short of scandalous: trading affordable housing for giveaways to the world's richest man."
--Daniel Altschuler, Make the Road Action
But as additional details of the agreement continue to pour in--and as experts estimate its true cost to taxpayers--critics are warning that it the deal is looking increasingly awful for ordinary New Yorkers.
As Politico reported on Thursday, the site where Amazon will build offices for its new headquarters in Long Island City was previously reserved for nearly 1,500 public housing units for needy families--but not anymore.
"Most--if not all--of that intended housing is now off the table," Politico noted.
News that the public housing plan could be scrapped entirely to make room for Amazon offices sparked immediate outrage on social media and among New York lawmakers.
"The fact that massive public subsidies are helping eliminate affordable housing units is just the latest reason this bad deal needs to be torn up and thrown away," Democratic state Sen. Michael Gianaris, who represents Long Island City, declared in a statement.
"It just keeps getting worse," said journalist Sarah Jaffe.
That's not all. In addition to killing plans for a major public housing development, Amazon's Long Island City headquarters will also reportedly displace over 1,000 New York City public school workers to carve out space for the trillion-dollar tech behemoth.
Citing an anonymous school official, Vice News reported on Thursday that "more than 1,000 New York City public school employees will lose their offices to accommodate Amazon's new secondary headquarters in Queens."
"The taxpayer costs of these two deals is high, both in absolute terms and on a per-job basis, contrary to Amazon's artful spin."
--Greg LeRoy, Good Jobs FirstAs Common Dreams reported, Amazon on Tuesday officially announced its decision to split its second headquarters (HQ2) between Long Island City, New York and Crystal City, Virginia.
Since the company's announcement, details of the behind-closed-doors deals the governments of New York and Virginia cut with Amazon have sparked outrage on social media and protests on the ground, with local communities denouncing the lavish taxpayer-funded gifts and expressing alarm that Amazon's arrival could further drive up housing prices while exacerbating sky-high inequality.
While Amazon claimed that it will receive $2.1 billion in total taxpayer "incentives" from both Long Island City and Crystal City combined, a new analysis by Good Jobs First found that the actual cost to taxpayers will be at least $4.6 billion, and likely much higher.
"The taxpayer costs of these two deals is high, both in absolute terms and on a per-job basis, contrary to Amazon's artful spin," Greg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First, said in a statement. "Together, we believe they exceed $4.6 billion and the cost per job in New York is at least $112,000, not the $48,000 the company used in a selective and incomplete press release calculation."
"It is very odd that Amazon's own press release includes information about its economic development incentives," LeRoy added. "Such information normally comes only from governors or mayors. It suggests Amazon is trying hard to control the narrative about the cost-benefit numerator, i.e., to minimize the perceived subsidy costs while maximizing the benefits."
After learning that New York taxpayers will be forced to finance a helipad for Jeff Bezos, the richest man in the world, it's possible many believed Amazon's sweetheart headquarters deal with the Empire State couldn't get any worse.
"Nothing short of scandalous: trading affordable housing for giveaways to the world's richest man."
--Daniel Altschuler, Make the Road Action
But as additional details of the agreement continue to pour in--and as experts estimate its true cost to taxpayers--critics are warning that it the deal is looking increasingly awful for ordinary New Yorkers.
As Politico reported on Thursday, the site where Amazon will build offices for its new headquarters in Long Island City was previously reserved for nearly 1,500 public housing units for needy families--but not anymore.
"Most--if not all--of that intended housing is now off the table," Politico noted.
News that the public housing plan could be scrapped entirely to make room for Amazon offices sparked immediate outrage on social media and among New York lawmakers.
"The fact that massive public subsidies are helping eliminate affordable housing units is just the latest reason this bad deal needs to be torn up and thrown away," Democratic state Sen. Michael Gianaris, who represents Long Island City, declared in a statement.
"It just keeps getting worse," said journalist Sarah Jaffe.
That's not all. In addition to killing plans for a major public housing development, Amazon's Long Island City headquarters will also reportedly displace over 1,000 New York City public school workers to carve out space for the trillion-dollar tech behemoth.
Citing an anonymous school official, Vice News reported on Thursday that "more than 1,000 New York City public school employees will lose their offices to accommodate Amazon's new secondary headquarters in Queens."
"The taxpayer costs of these two deals is high, both in absolute terms and on a per-job basis, contrary to Amazon's artful spin."
--Greg LeRoy, Good Jobs FirstAs Common Dreams reported, Amazon on Tuesday officially announced its decision to split its second headquarters (HQ2) between Long Island City, New York and Crystal City, Virginia.
Since the company's announcement, details of the behind-closed-doors deals the governments of New York and Virginia cut with Amazon have sparked outrage on social media and protests on the ground, with local communities denouncing the lavish taxpayer-funded gifts and expressing alarm that Amazon's arrival could further drive up housing prices while exacerbating sky-high inequality.
While Amazon claimed that it will receive $2.1 billion in total taxpayer "incentives" from both Long Island City and Crystal City combined, a new analysis by Good Jobs First found that the actual cost to taxpayers will be at least $4.6 billion, and likely much higher.
"The taxpayer costs of these two deals is high, both in absolute terms and on a per-job basis, contrary to Amazon's artful spin," Greg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First, said in a statement. "Together, we believe they exceed $4.6 billion and the cost per job in New York is at least $112,000, not the $48,000 the company used in a selective and incomplete press release calculation."
"It is very odd that Amazon's own press release includes information about its economic development incentives," LeRoy added. "Such information normally comes only from governors or mayors. It suggests Amazon is trying hard to control the narrative about the cost-benefit numerator, i.e., to minimize the perceived subsidy costs while maximizing the benefits."