Aug 31, 2018
Hitting back against recent attacks on her intellect and preparedness to serve her congressional district in the U.S. House (mostly from older men), Democratic candidate for New York's 14th district Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez described those questioning her abilities as "lazy" and denounced suggestions that young women like her are politically naive as nothing but a "stereotype."
She tweeted Friday:
\u201cIt\u2019s lazy to assert that young women are \u201cintellectual lightweights.\u201d It\u2019s an easy stereotype.\n\nLet \u2018em do it: I was underestimated before my primary, and I\u2019m underestimated after.\n\nFor all those who don\u2019t fit the mold: stay focused, do the work, and as Gillum says, #BringItHome.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1535729605
Ocasio-Cortez's tweet followed a number of columns in which political journalists have picked apart her statements on Medicare for All, the U.S. immigration system, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and other political issues.
Glenn Kessler at the Washington Postattacked her for using "sweeping rhetoric" regarding the realities faced by the American middle class and accused her of "not understanding policy nuances" after she stated that the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled in favor of the ACA because it found monthly premiums to be akin to a tax; the court had in fact ruled that the individual mandate was comparable to a tax.
At the Daily Beast, Matt Lewis dismissed the candidate as the "telegenic it girl of the left," and addressing her, wrote, "You have the potential for a very bright future. Don't blow it. Take your time. Avoid overexposure. Bone up on the issues."
As Laura McGann at Voxnoted on Friday, politicians like House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) have hardly been subjected to the same scrutiny after lying to the American public about the benefits the Republican tax law has held for middle class families, and other falsehoods.
Paul Ryan's been fact-checked for years and he's still considered an ideas man. PolitiFact has collected some of Ryan's "pants on fire" claims, like:
* "We've got dozens of counties around America that have zero insurers left."
* "We got to a point that our Air Force pilots were going to museums to find spare parts over the last eight years" under President Obama.
* "Because of Obamacare, Medicare is going broke."
* Obama "has doubled the size of government since he took office."
No one saw these statements and said Ryan is unfit to serve in Congress. No one told him to go put training wheels back on. No one told him he wasn't ready for primetime.
His legacy as a smart policy thinker is secure.
As McGann wrote, although many politicians make misstatements, nefariously or mistakenly, "no one demands those politicians go back to school, or shut their mouth for a few years until they're more seasoned."
"The standard in Washington allows politicians to say things that are untrue without harming their reputation as a serious policy thinker and political operator," she continued.
In addition to displaying sexist and ageist biases, some of the recent criticism of Ocasio-Cortez's statements has been blatantly incorrect. Earlier this month, as Common Dreams reported, CNN anchor Jake Tapper scolded the candidate as well as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) for asserting that a study by the Koch brothers-funded Mercatus Center revealed that Medicare for All would cost less in total healthcare expenditures than the current for-profit system does, over the next decade.
Not grasping the difference between total healthcare expenditures and costs to the U.S. government, Tapper and his fact-checking team aired and then defended a segment alleging that Ocasio-Cortez was mistaken before correcting it three days later.
Meanwhile, those criticizing Ocasio-Cortez for her political inexperience appear content to ignore how her meteoric rise to national prominence, beating out a 10-term congressman who had been presumed as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) successor, was able to happen. Rather than spending years establishing herself as a policy wonk, as her critics suggest, Ocasio-Cortez connected with voters in her district who had previously been ignored by their representatives, finding out what issues mattered to them, truthfully conveying that she had experienced the same struggles, and pledging to fight alongside other progressives for reforms that are well within reach of the U.S. government.
\u201c\u201cWorking through direct contact with fellow citizens has been the basis of the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez campaign.\u201d\n\n- @ALDIANews, telling it like it is\n\nhttps://t.co/Im5pM4c06I\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1533323856
Meanwhile, although Ocasio-Cortez dismissed criticism of her political knowledge and pledged to continue working for her constituents, other defenders showed less diplomacy toward her detractors.
\u201c"Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez can't hang with intellectual heavyweights in Congress," says political party that elevated Sarah Palin, Chuck Grassley, Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain, Mike Huckabee and Donald Trump\n\nhttps://t.co/6Tvm1LPOrf\u201d— Brandon Friedman (@Brandon Friedman) 1535720329
\u201cIntellectual heavyweights? Who? The ship of state is manned by ignorant racist fools (for the most part) led by Captain Trump, a commanding officer worthy of mutiny. All \u2018intellect\u2019 has been pretty much voted out of the government. That\u2019s our brain drain.\n https://t.co/Va2FmSMbVU\u201d— Larry Charles (@Larry Charles) 1535729809
\u201cNot only is this treatment of Ocasio-Cortez sexist, but it's absurd on the face of it. The #1 myth about Washington is that these people are smart. Some are. Many are very, very, very stupid people, both elected officials and their staff.\n\nhttps://t.co/1ShmLgmeqn\u201d— Erik Loomis (@Erik Loomis) 1535726570
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.