SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In a four-month public comment period, 99 percent of the 65,000 Scots who responded expressed opposition to fracking. (Photo: Friends of the Earth Scotland/Flickr/cc)
After Overwhelming Public Opposition, Scotland Announces Fracking Ban
"We have so much wind and wave power that it is retrograde in the extreme to lend any support to the fracking industry."
Oct 03, 2017
Environmental groups from around the world applauded Scotland on Tuesday for its decision to ban fracking, following an overwhelming public outcry against the practice--and called for the United States and the rest of the United Kingdom to follow suit.
The Scottish government held a public comment period in recent months on fracking, attracting about 65,000 responses--the majority of which came from people in communities where the natural gas extraction would take place. An overwhelming 99 percent of Scots who participated were opposed to the practice.
"Banning fracking is a necessary step towards beating the worst effects of climate chaos, and the U.K. and the U.S. should follow Scotland's example."--Wenonah Hauter, Food & Water Watch
"Fracking will lead to an increase in pollution and the decimation of parts of the Scottish landscape and environment," wrote one respondent. "People will feel even more devalued as a result of having been ignored, communities wll be damaged by fracking wells and health will suffer as a result of noise, ground water contamination and probably indirect air pollution. Scotland can't afford to damage the health of its residents any more."
In addition to environmental concerns, many Scots said they weren't convinced of the potential economic benefits of fracking; the auditing firm KPMG found that it was likely to only increase the GDP by 0.1 percent. Others said relying on the risky method of energy production would signify a lack of innovation in the country.
"We should be moving to renewables. This is a backwards step," said a commenter.
Another added that the practice was "likely to be entirely detrimental as Scotland's international reputation as an innovator in design and engineering projects is undermined by our agreement to proceed with fracking...We have so much wind and wave power that it is retrograde in the extreme to lend any support to the fracking industry."
Food and Water Watch gave credit to the Scottish people for standing up to corporate entities that supported fracking. "Giant energy company Ineos, which invested heavily in its Scottish facility at Grangemouth, fought hard against this ban, even threatening to explore legal action against the government if it passed," said executive director Wenonah Hauter in a statement. "But people power prevailed, and it will continue to prevail. We can't let companies like ExxonMobil and Ineos stop the inevitable march towards clean energy. Bold and swift policy change is our only hope for addressing our climate goals. We applaud the Scottish government for doing what's right for people and the planet."
Scotland's decision leaves its neighbors, England and Wales, alone in their embrace of fracking.
"With all our nearest neighbours having banned or halted fracking, our government is increasingly out on a limb in pursuing it in England," said Rose Dickinson of Friends of the Earth.
Hauter also called on the U.K. as well as the U.S. to follow in Scotland's footsteps.
"Banning fracking is a necessary step towards beating the worst effects of climate chaos, and the U.K. and the U.S. should follow Scotland's example," she said. "In the U.S., we already have the means to start moving off of fracking swiftly--the Off Fossil Fuels For a Better Future Act, which would mandate a just transition to 100 percent clean renewable energy by 2035, starting with 80 percent within the next 10 years."
As in Scotland, public opinion in the UK and the US is not in fracking's favor, despite officials' insistence that the practice creates jobs and revenue. A poll by England's Business and Energy Department this summer found that only 16 percent of citizens support fracking, down from 21 percent last year.
In the U.S., opinions are more evenly split, but a 2016 Gallup poll found that 51 percent of Americans oppose fracking, while 36 percent support it.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Environmental groups from around the world applauded Scotland on Tuesday for its decision to ban fracking, following an overwhelming public outcry against the practice--and called for the United States and the rest of the United Kingdom to follow suit.
The Scottish government held a public comment period in recent months on fracking, attracting about 65,000 responses--the majority of which came from people in communities where the natural gas extraction would take place. An overwhelming 99 percent of Scots who participated were opposed to the practice.
"Banning fracking is a necessary step towards beating the worst effects of climate chaos, and the U.K. and the U.S. should follow Scotland's example."--Wenonah Hauter, Food & Water Watch
"Fracking will lead to an increase in pollution and the decimation of parts of the Scottish landscape and environment," wrote one respondent. "People will feel even more devalued as a result of having been ignored, communities wll be damaged by fracking wells and health will suffer as a result of noise, ground water contamination and probably indirect air pollution. Scotland can't afford to damage the health of its residents any more."
In addition to environmental concerns, many Scots said they weren't convinced of the potential economic benefits of fracking; the auditing firm KPMG found that it was likely to only increase the GDP by 0.1 percent. Others said relying on the risky method of energy production would signify a lack of innovation in the country.
"We should be moving to renewables. This is a backwards step," said a commenter.
Another added that the practice was "likely to be entirely detrimental as Scotland's international reputation as an innovator in design and engineering projects is undermined by our agreement to proceed with fracking...We have so much wind and wave power that it is retrograde in the extreme to lend any support to the fracking industry."
Food and Water Watch gave credit to the Scottish people for standing up to corporate entities that supported fracking. "Giant energy company Ineos, which invested heavily in its Scottish facility at Grangemouth, fought hard against this ban, even threatening to explore legal action against the government if it passed," said executive director Wenonah Hauter in a statement. "But people power prevailed, and it will continue to prevail. We can't let companies like ExxonMobil and Ineos stop the inevitable march towards clean energy. Bold and swift policy change is our only hope for addressing our climate goals. We applaud the Scottish government for doing what's right for people and the planet."
Scotland's decision leaves its neighbors, England and Wales, alone in their embrace of fracking.
"With all our nearest neighbours having banned or halted fracking, our government is increasingly out on a limb in pursuing it in England," said Rose Dickinson of Friends of the Earth.
Hauter also called on the U.K. as well as the U.S. to follow in Scotland's footsteps.
"Banning fracking is a necessary step towards beating the worst effects of climate chaos, and the U.K. and the U.S. should follow Scotland's example," she said. "In the U.S., we already have the means to start moving off of fracking swiftly--the Off Fossil Fuels For a Better Future Act, which would mandate a just transition to 100 percent clean renewable energy by 2035, starting with 80 percent within the next 10 years."
As in Scotland, public opinion in the UK and the US is not in fracking's favor, despite officials' insistence that the practice creates jobs and revenue. A poll by England's Business and Energy Department this summer found that only 16 percent of citizens support fracking, down from 21 percent last year.
In the U.S., opinions are more evenly split, but a 2016 Gallup poll found that 51 percent of Americans oppose fracking, while 36 percent support it.
Environmental groups from around the world applauded Scotland on Tuesday for its decision to ban fracking, following an overwhelming public outcry against the practice--and called for the United States and the rest of the United Kingdom to follow suit.
The Scottish government held a public comment period in recent months on fracking, attracting about 65,000 responses--the majority of which came from people in communities where the natural gas extraction would take place. An overwhelming 99 percent of Scots who participated were opposed to the practice.
"Banning fracking is a necessary step towards beating the worst effects of climate chaos, and the U.K. and the U.S. should follow Scotland's example."--Wenonah Hauter, Food & Water Watch
"Fracking will lead to an increase in pollution and the decimation of parts of the Scottish landscape and environment," wrote one respondent. "People will feel even more devalued as a result of having been ignored, communities wll be damaged by fracking wells and health will suffer as a result of noise, ground water contamination and probably indirect air pollution. Scotland can't afford to damage the health of its residents any more."
In addition to environmental concerns, many Scots said they weren't convinced of the potential economic benefits of fracking; the auditing firm KPMG found that it was likely to only increase the GDP by 0.1 percent. Others said relying on the risky method of energy production would signify a lack of innovation in the country.
"We should be moving to renewables. This is a backwards step," said a commenter.
Another added that the practice was "likely to be entirely detrimental as Scotland's international reputation as an innovator in design and engineering projects is undermined by our agreement to proceed with fracking...We have so much wind and wave power that it is retrograde in the extreme to lend any support to the fracking industry."
Food and Water Watch gave credit to the Scottish people for standing up to corporate entities that supported fracking. "Giant energy company Ineos, which invested heavily in its Scottish facility at Grangemouth, fought hard against this ban, even threatening to explore legal action against the government if it passed," said executive director Wenonah Hauter in a statement. "But people power prevailed, and it will continue to prevail. We can't let companies like ExxonMobil and Ineos stop the inevitable march towards clean energy. Bold and swift policy change is our only hope for addressing our climate goals. We applaud the Scottish government for doing what's right for people and the planet."
Scotland's decision leaves its neighbors, England and Wales, alone in their embrace of fracking.
"With all our nearest neighbours having banned or halted fracking, our government is increasingly out on a limb in pursuing it in England," said Rose Dickinson of Friends of the Earth.
Hauter also called on the U.K. as well as the U.S. to follow in Scotland's footsteps.
"Banning fracking is a necessary step towards beating the worst effects of climate chaos, and the U.K. and the U.S. should follow Scotland's example," she said. "In the U.S., we already have the means to start moving off of fracking swiftly--the Off Fossil Fuels For a Better Future Act, which would mandate a just transition to 100 percent clean renewable energy by 2035, starting with 80 percent within the next 10 years."
As in Scotland, public opinion in the UK and the US is not in fracking's favor, despite officials' insistence that the practice creates jobs and revenue. A poll by England's Business and Energy Department this summer found that only 16 percent of citizens support fracking, down from 21 percent last year.
In the U.S., opinions are more evenly split, but a 2016 Gallup poll found that 51 percent of Americans oppose fracking, while 36 percent support it.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.