U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testifies before the House Appropriations Committee's Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill June 12, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Trump Accused of Burying Research Showing Trickle-Down Tax Cuts Just 'Snake Oil' Scam
"Big Brother in action—Treasury sends study contradicting Trump ideology down the memory hole."
As the Trump team struggles mightily to portray a tax plan that would disproportionately reward the wealthy--and Trump himself--as pro-working class, the Treasury Department has reportedly suppressed a government analysis that exposes as false President Donald Trump's central claim that workers, not rich corporate shareholders, would be the primary beneficiaries of a massive reduction in the corporate tax rate.
"It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
--Sen. Ron WydenThe Wall Street Journal's Richard Rubin first reported that the analysis--published in 2012 by the Office of Tax Analysis (OTA)--was deleted from the Treasury Department's website on Thursday.
The suppressed study (pdf) demonstrated that "workers pay 18 percent of the corporate tax while owners of capital pay 82 percent," Rubin noted, a breakdown that the Trump administration and the Republican Party has effectively reversed in selling their proposals to the American public.
OTA's conclusions were "in line with many economists' views and close to estimates from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) and Congressional Budget Office," Rubin adds. "The JCT, which will evaluate tax bills in Congress, estimates that capital bears 75 percent of the long-run corporate-tax burden, with labor paying the rest."
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has argued, against mountains of contrary evidence, that it is in fact workers who end up bearing the brunt of taxes on corporate profits, thus allowing him to paint a massive rate reduction--which Trump has proposed--as a boon for the working class.
As The Week's Jeff Spross observes, this is a common right-wing argument. But while conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation claim that corporate tax cuts lead to higher wages for workers, the last several decades of evidence indicate the opposite, Spross concludes.
"[W]henever a company gets a windfall," Spross writes, "the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
"Whenever a company gets a windfall, the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
--Jeff Spross, The Week
Many argued that the Treasury Department's removal of the OTA paper amounts to blatant suppression of contradictory evidence in the service of selling "snake oil" to the American public.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called Trump's tax plan a "scam" and denounced Treasury's efforts to hide opposing evidence in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.
"History has shown most of the pockets lined by corporate tax cuts are found in wealthy shareholder suits," Wyden concluded. "It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
Bruce Bartlett--who by his own admission helped create the GOP myth that tax cuts lead inevitably to economic growth in his role as policy advisor to former President Ronald Reagan--described Treasury's deletion of the OTA study as "Big Brother in action."
In a video published Friday, economist Robert Reich succinctly explained why the GOP's claim that "American corporations need a tax cut in order to be competitive" is just plain "rubbish."
Watch:
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
As the Trump team struggles mightily to portray a tax plan that would disproportionately reward the wealthy--and Trump himself--as pro-working class, the Treasury Department has reportedly suppressed a government analysis that exposes as false President Donald Trump's central claim that workers, not rich corporate shareholders, would be the primary beneficiaries of a massive reduction in the corporate tax rate.
"It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
--Sen. Ron WydenThe Wall Street Journal's Richard Rubin first reported that the analysis--published in 2012 by the Office of Tax Analysis (OTA)--was deleted from the Treasury Department's website on Thursday.
The suppressed study (pdf) demonstrated that "workers pay 18 percent of the corporate tax while owners of capital pay 82 percent," Rubin noted, a breakdown that the Trump administration and the Republican Party has effectively reversed in selling their proposals to the American public.
OTA's conclusions were "in line with many economists' views and close to estimates from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) and Congressional Budget Office," Rubin adds. "The JCT, which will evaluate tax bills in Congress, estimates that capital bears 75 percent of the long-run corporate-tax burden, with labor paying the rest."
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has argued, against mountains of contrary evidence, that it is in fact workers who end up bearing the brunt of taxes on corporate profits, thus allowing him to paint a massive rate reduction--which Trump has proposed--as a boon for the working class.
As The Week's Jeff Spross observes, this is a common right-wing argument. But while conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation claim that corporate tax cuts lead to higher wages for workers, the last several decades of evidence indicate the opposite, Spross concludes.
"[W]henever a company gets a windfall," Spross writes, "the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
"Whenever a company gets a windfall, the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
--Jeff Spross, The Week
Many argued that the Treasury Department's removal of the OTA paper amounts to blatant suppression of contradictory evidence in the service of selling "snake oil" to the American public.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called Trump's tax plan a "scam" and denounced Treasury's efforts to hide opposing evidence in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.
"History has shown most of the pockets lined by corporate tax cuts are found in wealthy shareholder suits," Wyden concluded. "It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
Bruce Bartlett--who by his own admission helped create the GOP myth that tax cuts lead inevitably to economic growth in his role as policy advisor to former President Ronald Reagan--described Treasury's deletion of the OTA study as "Big Brother in action."
In a video published Friday, economist Robert Reich succinctly explained why the GOP's claim that "American corporations need a tax cut in order to be competitive" is just plain "rubbish."
Watch:
As the Trump team struggles mightily to portray a tax plan that would disproportionately reward the wealthy--and Trump himself--as pro-working class, the Treasury Department has reportedly suppressed a government analysis that exposes as false President Donald Trump's central claim that workers, not rich corporate shareholders, would be the primary beneficiaries of a massive reduction in the corporate tax rate.
"It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
--Sen. Ron WydenThe Wall Street Journal's Richard Rubin first reported that the analysis--published in 2012 by the Office of Tax Analysis (OTA)--was deleted from the Treasury Department's website on Thursday.
The suppressed study (pdf) demonstrated that "workers pay 18 percent of the corporate tax while owners of capital pay 82 percent," Rubin noted, a breakdown that the Trump administration and the Republican Party has effectively reversed in selling their proposals to the American public.
OTA's conclusions were "in line with many economists' views and close to estimates from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) and Congressional Budget Office," Rubin adds. "The JCT, which will evaluate tax bills in Congress, estimates that capital bears 75 percent of the long-run corporate-tax burden, with labor paying the rest."
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has argued, against mountains of contrary evidence, that it is in fact workers who end up bearing the brunt of taxes on corporate profits, thus allowing him to paint a massive rate reduction--which Trump has proposed--as a boon for the working class.
As The Week's Jeff Spross observes, this is a common right-wing argument. But while conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation claim that corporate tax cuts lead to higher wages for workers, the last several decades of evidence indicate the opposite, Spross concludes.
"[W]henever a company gets a windfall," Spross writes, "the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
"Whenever a company gets a windfall, the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
--Jeff Spross, The Week
Many argued that the Treasury Department's removal of the OTA paper amounts to blatant suppression of contradictory evidence in the service of selling "snake oil" to the American public.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called Trump's tax plan a "scam" and denounced Treasury's efforts to hide opposing evidence in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.
"History has shown most of the pockets lined by corporate tax cuts are found in wealthy shareholder suits," Wyden concluded. "It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
Bruce Bartlett--who by his own admission helped create the GOP myth that tax cuts lead inevitably to economic growth in his role as policy advisor to former President Ronald Reagan--described Treasury's deletion of the OTA study as "Big Brother in action."
In a video published Friday, economist Robert Reich succinctly explained why the GOP's claim that "American corporations need a tax cut in order to be competitive" is just plain "rubbish."
Watch: