U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testifies before the House Appropriations Committee's Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill June 12, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Trump Accused of Burying Research Showing Trickle-Down Tax Cuts Just 'Snake Oil' Scam
"Big Brother in action—Treasury sends study contradicting Trump ideology down the memory hole."
As the Trump team struggles mightily to portray a tax plan that would disproportionately reward the wealthy--and Trump himself--as pro-working class, the Treasury Department has reportedly suppressed a government analysis that exposes as false President Donald Trump's central claim that workers, not rich corporate shareholders, would be the primary beneficiaries of a massive reduction in the corporate tax rate.
"It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
--Sen. Ron WydenThe Wall Street Journal's Richard Rubin first reported that the analysis--published in 2012 by the Office of Tax Analysis (OTA)--was deleted from the Treasury Department's website on Thursday.
The suppressed study (pdf) demonstrated that "workers pay 18 percent of the corporate tax while owners of capital pay 82 percent," Rubin noted, a breakdown that the Trump administration and the Republican Party has effectively reversed in selling their proposals to the American public.
OTA's conclusions were "in line with many economists' views and close to estimates from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) and Congressional Budget Office," Rubin adds. "The JCT, which will evaluate tax bills in Congress, estimates that capital bears 75 percent of the long-run corporate-tax burden, with labor paying the rest."
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has argued, against mountains of contrary evidence, that it is in fact workers who end up bearing the brunt of taxes on corporate profits, thus allowing him to paint a massive rate reduction--which Trump has proposed--as a boon for the working class.
As The Week's Jeff Spross observes, this is a common right-wing argument. But while conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation claim that corporate tax cuts lead to higher wages for workers, the last several decades of evidence indicate the opposite, Spross concludes.
"[W]henever a company gets a windfall," Spross writes, "the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
"Whenever a company gets a windfall, the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
--Jeff Spross, The Week
Many argued that the Treasury Department's removal of the OTA paper amounts to blatant suppression of contradictory evidence in the service of selling "snake oil" to the American public.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called Trump's tax plan a "scam" and denounced Treasury's efforts to hide opposing evidence in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.
"History has shown most of the pockets lined by corporate tax cuts are found in wealthy shareholder suits," Wyden concluded. "It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
Bruce Bartlett--who by his own admission helped create the GOP myth that tax cuts lead inevitably to economic growth in his role as policy advisor to former President Ronald Reagan--described Treasury's deletion of the OTA study as "Big Brother in action."
In a video published Friday, economist Robert Reich succinctly explained why the GOP's claim that "American corporations need a tax cut in order to be competitive" is just plain "rubbish."
Watch:
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the Trump team struggles mightily to portray a tax plan that would disproportionately reward the wealthy--and Trump himself--as pro-working class, the Treasury Department has reportedly suppressed a government analysis that exposes as false President Donald Trump's central claim that workers, not rich corporate shareholders, would be the primary beneficiaries of a massive reduction in the corporate tax rate.
"It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
--Sen. Ron WydenThe Wall Street Journal's Richard Rubin first reported that the analysis--published in 2012 by the Office of Tax Analysis (OTA)--was deleted from the Treasury Department's website on Thursday.
The suppressed study (pdf) demonstrated that "workers pay 18 percent of the corporate tax while owners of capital pay 82 percent," Rubin noted, a breakdown that the Trump administration and the Republican Party has effectively reversed in selling their proposals to the American public.
OTA's conclusions were "in line with many economists' views and close to estimates from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) and Congressional Budget Office," Rubin adds. "The JCT, which will evaluate tax bills in Congress, estimates that capital bears 75 percent of the long-run corporate-tax burden, with labor paying the rest."
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has argued, against mountains of contrary evidence, that it is in fact workers who end up bearing the brunt of taxes on corporate profits, thus allowing him to paint a massive rate reduction--which Trump has proposed--as a boon for the working class.
As The Week's Jeff Spross observes, this is a common right-wing argument. But while conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation claim that corporate tax cuts lead to higher wages for workers, the last several decades of evidence indicate the opposite, Spross concludes.
"[W]henever a company gets a windfall," Spross writes, "the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
"Whenever a company gets a windfall, the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
--Jeff Spross, The Week
Many argued that the Treasury Department's removal of the OTA paper amounts to blatant suppression of contradictory evidence in the service of selling "snake oil" to the American public.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called Trump's tax plan a "scam" and denounced Treasury's efforts to hide opposing evidence in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.
"History has shown most of the pockets lined by corporate tax cuts are found in wealthy shareholder suits," Wyden concluded. "It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
Bruce Bartlett--who by his own admission helped create the GOP myth that tax cuts lead inevitably to economic growth in his role as policy advisor to former President Ronald Reagan--described Treasury's deletion of the OTA study as "Big Brother in action."
In a video published Friday, economist Robert Reich succinctly explained why the GOP's claim that "American corporations need a tax cut in order to be competitive" is just plain "rubbish."
Watch:
As the Trump team struggles mightily to portray a tax plan that would disproportionately reward the wealthy--and Trump himself--as pro-working class, the Treasury Department has reportedly suppressed a government analysis that exposes as false President Donald Trump's central claim that workers, not rich corporate shareholders, would be the primary beneficiaries of a massive reduction in the corporate tax rate.
"It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
--Sen. Ron WydenThe Wall Street Journal's Richard Rubin first reported that the analysis--published in 2012 by the Office of Tax Analysis (OTA)--was deleted from the Treasury Department's website on Thursday.
The suppressed study (pdf) demonstrated that "workers pay 18 percent of the corporate tax while owners of capital pay 82 percent," Rubin noted, a breakdown that the Trump administration and the Republican Party has effectively reversed in selling their proposals to the American public.
OTA's conclusions were "in line with many economists' views and close to estimates from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) and Congressional Budget Office," Rubin adds. "The JCT, which will evaluate tax bills in Congress, estimates that capital bears 75 percent of the long-run corporate-tax burden, with labor paying the rest."
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has argued, against mountains of contrary evidence, that it is in fact workers who end up bearing the brunt of taxes on corporate profits, thus allowing him to paint a massive rate reduction--which Trump has proposed--as a boon for the working class.
As The Week's Jeff Spross observes, this is a common right-wing argument. But while conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation claim that corporate tax cuts lead to higher wages for workers, the last several decades of evidence indicate the opposite, Spross concludes.
"[W]henever a company gets a windfall," Spross writes, "the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
"Whenever a company gets a windfall, the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class."
--Jeff Spross, The Week
Many argued that the Treasury Department's removal of the OTA paper amounts to blatant suppression of contradictory evidence in the service of selling "snake oil" to the American public.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called Trump's tax plan a "scam" and denounced Treasury's efforts to hide opposing evidence in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.
"History has shown most of the pockets lined by corporate tax cuts are found in wealthy shareholder suits," Wyden concluded. "It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers."
Bruce Bartlett--who by his own admission helped create the GOP myth that tax cuts lead inevitably to economic growth in his role as policy advisor to former President Ronald Reagan--described Treasury's deletion of the OTA study as "Big Brother in action."
In a video published Friday, economist Robert Reich succinctly explained why the GOP's claim that "American corporations need a tax cut in order to be competitive" is just plain "rubbish."
Watch: