

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed the Financial CHOICE Act on Thursday afternoon in a move critics--who call it the #WrongChoiceAct--say puts the U.S. economy on a path towards the next large-scale financial meltdown.
"If it were to be passed by the Senate and become law, this bill would make future financial crises more likely and more damaging." --Josh Bivens, Economic Policy InstituteWith a final vote of 233 to 186, only one Republican joined with Democrats in voting "nay." The final roll call is here.
As the Washington Post notes, "Democrats and progressive groups, who argue banks need more oversight, not less, are preparing to use the issue to animate supporters still angry that Wall Street banks have not paid a bigger price for the financial crisis. Many have expressed particular concern over a provision that would curtail the powers of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and reduce its independence by having its director report to the president."
The bill now goes to the Senate and though its passage is anything but assured, critics of the Republican measure howled their disapproval and offered stark warnings to those members of congress who voted in its favor on Thursday.
Josh Bivens, research director at the Economic Policy Institute, called the passage a "terrible decision" by the House Republicans. "If it were to be passed by the Senate and become law, this bill would make future financial crises more likely and more damaging," Bivens said. "It would strip away protections against American households being swindled again by the worst actors in the financial sector."
According to Bivens, "It's hard to imagine a bill that could do more broad-based damage to the future economic security of America's working families."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed the Financial CHOICE Act on Thursday afternoon in a move critics--who call it the #WrongChoiceAct--say puts the U.S. economy on a path towards the next large-scale financial meltdown.
"If it were to be passed by the Senate and become law, this bill would make future financial crises more likely and more damaging." --Josh Bivens, Economic Policy InstituteWith a final vote of 233 to 186, only one Republican joined with Democrats in voting "nay." The final roll call is here.
As the Washington Post notes, "Democrats and progressive groups, who argue banks need more oversight, not less, are preparing to use the issue to animate supporters still angry that Wall Street banks have not paid a bigger price for the financial crisis. Many have expressed particular concern over a provision that would curtail the powers of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and reduce its independence by having its director report to the president."
The bill now goes to the Senate and though its passage is anything but assured, critics of the Republican measure howled their disapproval and offered stark warnings to those members of congress who voted in its favor on Thursday.
Josh Bivens, research director at the Economic Policy Institute, called the passage a "terrible decision" by the House Republicans. "If it were to be passed by the Senate and become law, this bill would make future financial crises more likely and more damaging," Bivens said. "It would strip away protections against American households being swindled again by the worst actors in the financial sector."
According to Bivens, "It's hard to imagine a bill that could do more broad-based damage to the future economic security of America's working families."
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed the Financial CHOICE Act on Thursday afternoon in a move critics--who call it the #WrongChoiceAct--say puts the U.S. economy on a path towards the next large-scale financial meltdown.
"If it were to be passed by the Senate and become law, this bill would make future financial crises more likely and more damaging." --Josh Bivens, Economic Policy InstituteWith a final vote of 233 to 186, only one Republican joined with Democrats in voting "nay." The final roll call is here.
As the Washington Post notes, "Democrats and progressive groups, who argue banks need more oversight, not less, are preparing to use the issue to animate supporters still angry that Wall Street banks have not paid a bigger price for the financial crisis. Many have expressed particular concern over a provision that would curtail the powers of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and reduce its independence by having its director report to the president."
The bill now goes to the Senate and though its passage is anything but assured, critics of the Republican measure howled their disapproval and offered stark warnings to those members of congress who voted in its favor on Thursday.
Josh Bivens, research director at the Economic Policy Institute, called the passage a "terrible decision" by the House Republicans. "If it were to be passed by the Senate and become law, this bill would make future financial crises more likely and more damaging," Bivens said. "It would strip away protections against American households being swindled again by the worst actors in the financial sector."
According to Bivens, "It's hard to imagine a bill that could do more broad-based damage to the future economic security of America's working families."