SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Buried in Comey Memo Report: Trump Asked FBI Chief to Jail Journalists
Comments 'cross a dangerous line,' said Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. 'But no president gets to jail journalists'
May 17, 2017
Press freedom advocates on Wednesday slammed President Donald Trump over revelations that he had asked former FBI director James Comey to consider putting journalists in jail--a startling detail that was buried inside Tuesday's bombshell New York Times report that Trump had asked Comey to drop his investigation against former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
"Alone in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump began the discussion by condemning leaks to the news media, saying that Mr. Comey should consider putting reporters in prison for publishing classified information, according to one of Mr. Comey's associates," Times reporter Michael Schmidt wrote.
The news quickly raised alarm bells.
"The comments attributed to President Trump cross a dangerous line," Bruce Brown, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said Wednesday. "But no president gets to jail journalists. Reporters are protected by judges and juries, by a congress that relies on them to stay informed, and by a Justice Department that for decades has honored the role of a free press by spurning prosecutions of journalists for publishing leaks of classified information."
Schmidt's revelations also follow the Washington Post separately reporting that part of the reason Trump abruptly fired Comey last week was that he believed the FBI was not doing enough to investigate the leaks coming out of his administration.
As the Guardian's Trevor Timm noted Wednesday, the president "was even insisting at one point that the FBI needed to go after leaks about non-classified information (which is not a crime by anyone's standards)."
The comments seem to reflect the Trump administration's leanings toward authoritarianism.
While the White House under former President Barack Obama became known for its aggressive prosecution of whistleblowers, officials never went after the outlets that published the information. Former Attorney General Eric Holder pledged in 2014 that he would not jail journalists for doing their jobs--but Trump's Attorney General Jeff Sessions refused to make a similar promise during his confirmation hearings.
Timm continued:
It's bad enough for press freedom that Trump is so determined to go after whistleblowers and sources within his administration who are attempting to get the truth to the American public. When their sources are investigated, journalists face the prospect of surveillance or subpoenas to testify and it can inhibit important investigative reporting. But directly prosecuting journalists is an unprecedented step that should send a chill down the spine of any American who values the first amendment--no matter their political persuasion.
And Peter Certo writes at OtherWords, "Was this an impulsive request? Not likely. In fact, the administration appears to have been laying the groundwork for this for some time." Certo notes the administration's antagonistic response to WikiLeaks once the organization published hacked CIA documents.
The revelations also come at an ironic time, as Trump hosted strongman Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Washington, D.C., while Erdogan's bodyguards attacked protesters outside the embassy. The Committee to Protect Journalists described Trump's meeting with the Turkish president as part of a "shameful trifecta" that followed meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.
Still, the Reporters Committee's Brown said, "[c]omments such as these, emerging in the way they did, only remind us that every day public servants are reaching out to reporters to ensure the public is aware of the risks today to rule of law in this country. The president's remarks should not intimidate the press but inspire it."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Press freedom advocates on Wednesday slammed President Donald Trump over revelations that he had asked former FBI director James Comey to consider putting journalists in jail--a startling detail that was buried inside Tuesday's bombshell New York Times report that Trump had asked Comey to drop his investigation against former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
"Alone in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump began the discussion by condemning leaks to the news media, saying that Mr. Comey should consider putting reporters in prison for publishing classified information, according to one of Mr. Comey's associates," Times reporter Michael Schmidt wrote.
The news quickly raised alarm bells.
"The comments attributed to President Trump cross a dangerous line," Bruce Brown, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said Wednesday. "But no president gets to jail journalists. Reporters are protected by judges and juries, by a congress that relies on them to stay informed, and by a Justice Department that for decades has honored the role of a free press by spurning prosecutions of journalists for publishing leaks of classified information."
Schmidt's revelations also follow the Washington Post separately reporting that part of the reason Trump abruptly fired Comey last week was that he believed the FBI was not doing enough to investigate the leaks coming out of his administration.
As the Guardian's Trevor Timm noted Wednesday, the president "was even insisting at one point that the FBI needed to go after leaks about non-classified information (which is not a crime by anyone's standards)."
The comments seem to reflect the Trump administration's leanings toward authoritarianism.
While the White House under former President Barack Obama became known for its aggressive prosecution of whistleblowers, officials never went after the outlets that published the information. Former Attorney General Eric Holder pledged in 2014 that he would not jail journalists for doing their jobs--but Trump's Attorney General Jeff Sessions refused to make a similar promise during his confirmation hearings.
Timm continued:
It's bad enough for press freedom that Trump is so determined to go after whistleblowers and sources within his administration who are attempting to get the truth to the American public. When their sources are investigated, journalists face the prospect of surveillance or subpoenas to testify and it can inhibit important investigative reporting. But directly prosecuting journalists is an unprecedented step that should send a chill down the spine of any American who values the first amendment--no matter their political persuasion.
And Peter Certo writes at OtherWords, "Was this an impulsive request? Not likely. In fact, the administration appears to have been laying the groundwork for this for some time." Certo notes the administration's antagonistic response to WikiLeaks once the organization published hacked CIA documents.
The revelations also come at an ironic time, as Trump hosted strongman Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Washington, D.C., while Erdogan's bodyguards attacked protesters outside the embassy. The Committee to Protect Journalists described Trump's meeting with the Turkish president as part of a "shameful trifecta" that followed meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.
Still, the Reporters Committee's Brown said, "[c]omments such as these, emerging in the way they did, only remind us that every day public servants are reaching out to reporters to ensure the public is aware of the risks today to rule of law in this country. The president's remarks should not intimidate the press but inspire it."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Press freedom advocates on Wednesday slammed President Donald Trump over revelations that he had asked former FBI director James Comey to consider putting journalists in jail--a startling detail that was buried inside Tuesday's bombshell New York Times report that Trump had asked Comey to drop his investigation against former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
"Alone in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump began the discussion by condemning leaks to the news media, saying that Mr. Comey should consider putting reporters in prison for publishing classified information, according to one of Mr. Comey's associates," Times reporter Michael Schmidt wrote.
The news quickly raised alarm bells.
"The comments attributed to President Trump cross a dangerous line," Bruce Brown, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said Wednesday. "But no president gets to jail journalists. Reporters are protected by judges and juries, by a congress that relies on them to stay informed, and by a Justice Department that for decades has honored the role of a free press by spurning prosecutions of journalists for publishing leaks of classified information."
Schmidt's revelations also follow the Washington Post separately reporting that part of the reason Trump abruptly fired Comey last week was that he believed the FBI was not doing enough to investigate the leaks coming out of his administration.
As the Guardian's Trevor Timm noted Wednesday, the president "was even insisting at one point that the FBI needed to go after leaks about non-classified information (which is not a crime by anyone's standards)."
The comments seem to reflect the Trump administration's leanings toward authoritarianism.
While the White House under former President Barack Obama became known for its aggressive prosecution of whistleblowers, officials never went after the outlets that published the information. Former Attorney General Eric Holder pledged in 2014 that he would not jail journalists for doing their jobs--but Trump's Attorney General Jeff Sessions refused to make a similar promise during his confirmation hearings.
Timm continued:
It's bad enough for press freedom that Trump is so determined to go after whistleblowers and sources within his administration who are attempting to get the truth to the American public. When their sources are investigated, journalists face the prospect of surveillance or subpoenas to testify and it can inhibit important investigative reporting. But directly prosecuting journalists is an unprecedented step that should send a chill down the spine of any American who values the first amendment--no matter their political persuasion.
And Peter Certo writes at OtherWords, "Was this an impulsive request? Not likely. In fact, the administration appears to have been laying the groundwork for this for some time." Certo notes the administration's antagonistic response to WikiLeaks once the organization published hacked CIA documents.
The revelations also come at an ironic time, as Trump hosted strongman Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Washington, D.C., while Erdogan's bodyguards attacked protesters outside the embassy. The Committee to Protect Journalists described Trump's meeting with the Turkish president as part of a "shameful trifecta" that followed meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.
Still, the Reporters Committee's Brown said, "[c]omments such as these, emerging in the way they did, only remind us that every day public servants are reaching out to reporters to ensure the public is aware of the risks today to rule of law in this country. The president's remarks should not intimidate the press but inspire it."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.