Jan 17, 2017
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt) and his Democratic colleagues on the Senate Environment and Public Works committee dug into Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nominee Scott Pruitt on Wednesday, blasting his record of suing the very agency he's been selected to lead, and putting his fossil fuel industry ties front and center.
As Ben Jervey and Steve Horn reported for DeSmog Blog, the morning hearing unfolded in something of a pattern, with "Republican members complimenting the [Oklahoma] attorney general and lobbing him softball questions, and the Democrats grilling him on his stance on climate science, his ties to the fossil fuel industry, and his perspective on what role the EPA has in actually, well, protecting the environment."
"Ninety-seven percent of the scientists who wrote articles in peer-reviewed journals believe that human activity is the fundamental reason we are seeing climate change. Do you disagree with that?" Sanders asked Pruitt.
While Pruitt didn't deny that humans are at least partially contributing to global warming, he wouldn't be tied down on to what extent that is true. "I believe the ability to measure with precision the degree of human activity's impact on the climate is subject to more debate," he said.
Sanders pressed further, asking point-blank: "Why is the climate changing?" As Pruitt waffled, Sanders interjected, "I'm asking your personal opinion."
"My personal opinion is immaterial to the job I'm carrying out," Pruitt told the Senate committee.
Sanders scoffed in response. "You are going to be the head of the agency to protect the environment, and your personal feelings about whether climate change is caused by human activity and carbon emissions is immaterial?" he asked.
Sanders also briefly pressed Pruitt on why he didn't do more, or at least say more, regarding the sharp increase in earthquakes in Oklahoma caused by the oil and natural gas drilling industry.
Pruitt said only that he was "concerned" about the quakes, and Oklahoma's Corporation Commission is the primary body regulating that, not his office.
"If that's the kind of EPA administrator you will be," Sanders said, "you're not going to get my vote."
When it was her turn, Sen. Kristen Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) spoke passionately about how environmental regulations impact human health.
\u201c.@SenGillibrand \u2013 thank you for defending our right to a healthy future in #PollutingPruitt\u2019s hearing! https://t.co/Tq2pvk3551\u201d— Sierra Club (@Sierra Club) 1484774655
Meanwhile, several senators called out Pruitt's ties to the fossil fuels sector, with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) holding up a chart illustrating how Pruitt has benefited financially from entities including Devon Energy, Southern Company, Koch Industries, and ExxonMobil.
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) focused on a letter Pruitt's office sent to the EPA--one revealed by the New York Times to have been written almost entirely by Devon Energy. "A public office is about serving the public," Merkley said. "You used your office as a direct extension of an oil company rather than a direct extension of the public health of the people of Oklahoma."
And Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) "warned that Americans will view the EPA as 'every polluter's ally' unless [Pruitt] commits to completely recusing himself from ongoing litigation Oklahoma has taken against the EPA," as NBC News reported.
"Otherwise, honestly, people are going to think it's not just the fox guarding the hen house. It's the fox destroying the hen house," Markey said.
Pruitt would not do so.
\u201cPruitt won't give Sen. Markey clear answer on whether he would agree to recuse himself on legal matters he's brought against EPA as OK AG\u201d— Alex Cameron (@Alex Cameron) 1484757702
The hearing took place as major scientific agencies announced that 2016 was the hottest year on record, for the third year in a row.
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.