
Clockwise from top left: Roger Altman (Center for American Progress); Newt Gingrich (Gage Skidmore); John Podesta (Center for American Progress); Ed Feulner (Gage Skidmore)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Clockwise from top left: Roger Altman (Center for American Progress); Newt Gingrich (Gage Skidmore); John Podesta (Center for American Progress); Ed Feulner (Gage Skidmore)
When it comes to Hillary Clinton's and Donald Trump's election campaigns--and potential presidencies--who's actually in "the room where it happens?"
Watchdog group Public Citizen sheds light behind closed doors with its new report, out Thursday, entitled The Company They Keep: A Guide to the Presidential Candidates' Domestic Policy Advisers (pdf).
Arguing that "personnel choices provide a window into politicians' true views," the dossier provides basic information about 26 advisers to Clinton and Trump--13 people on each side.
The report reads:
This list is not comprehensive. In general, those included are people whose expertise focuses on policies as opposed to politics. That is, messaging gurus, pollsters and spinmeisters are not included. Some of those who have been dubbed policy advisers also are not included, simply because there is no evidence that they truly have the candidate's ear. For instance, a member of one of the candidates' economic teams said recently that he had never spoken to the candidate.
The potential roles of these individuals vary. Some are potential leaders of post-Election Day transition teams if their candidate wins; others may be candidates for prominent appointments, such as to cabinet-level positions; still others might be positioned to be influential advisers if their candidate wins, even if they are not likely to join the administration.
In each of these scenarios, these individuals' backgrounds and outlooks matter, both because of their potential to shape policies and because of what their proximity to the candidates says about the candidates themselves.
Among those whispering in Clinton's ears:
And in Trump's:
Notably, there are no women identified as close advisers on Trump's side.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
When it comes to Hillary Clinton's and Donald Trump's election campaigns--and potential presidencies--who's actually in "the room where it happens?"
Watchdog group Public Citizen sheds light behind closed doors with its new report, out Thursday, entitled The Company They Keep: A Guide to the Presidential Candidates' Domestic Policy Advisers (pdf).
Arguing that "personnel choices provide a window into politicians' true views," the dossier provides basic information about 26 advisers to Clinton and Trump--13 people on each side.
The report reads:
This list is not comprehensive. In general, those included are people whose expertise focuses on policies as opposed to politics. That is, messaging gurus, pollsters and spinmeisters are not included. Some of those who have been dubbed policy advisers also are not included, simply because there is no evidence that they truly have the candidate's ear. For instance, a member of one of the candidates' economic teams said recently that he had never spoken to the candidate.
The potential roles of these individuals vary. Some are potential leaders of post-Election Day transition teams if their candidate wins; others may be candidates for prominent appointments, such as to cabinet-level positions; still others might be positioned to be influential advisers if their candidate wins, even if they are not likely to join the administration.
In each of these scenarios, these individuals' backgrounds and outlooks matter, both because of their potential to shape policies and because of what their proximity to the candidates says about the candidates themselves.
Among those whispering in Clinton's ears:
And in Trump's:
Notably, there are no women identified as close advisers on Trump's side.
When it comes to Hillary Clinton's and Donald Trump's election campaigns--and potential presidencies--who's actually in "the room where it happens?"
Watchdog group Public Citizen sheds light behind closed doors with its new report, out Thursday, entitled The Company They Keep: A Guide to the Presidential Candidates' Domestic Policy Advisers (pdf).
Arguing that "personnel choices provide a window into politicians' true views," the dossier provides basic information about 26 advisers to Clinton and Trump--13 people on each side.
The report reads:
This list is not comprehensive. In general, those included are people whose expertise focuses on policies as opposed to politics. That is, messaging gurus, pollsters and spinmeisters are not included. Some of those who have been dubbed policy advisers also are not included, simply because there is no evidence that they truly have the candidate's ear. For instance, a member of one of the candidates' economic teams said recently that he had never spoken to the candidate.
The potential roles of these individuals vary. Some are potential leaders of post-Election Day transition teams if their candidate wins; others may be candidates for prominent appointments, such as to cabinet-level positions; still others might be positioned to be influential advisers if their candidate wins, even if they are not likely to join the administration.
In each of these scenarios, these individuals' backgrounds and outlooks matter, both because of their potential to shape policies and because of what their proximity to the candidates says about the candidates themselves.
Among those whispering in Clinton's ears:
And in Trump's:
Notably, there are no women identified as close advisers on Trump's side.