SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Clockwise from top left: Roger Altman (Center for American Progress); Newt Gingrich (Gage Skidmore); John Podesta (Center for American Progress); Ed Feulner (Gage Skidmore)
When it comes to Hillary Clinton's and Donald Trump's election campaigns--and potential presidencies--who's actually in "the room where it happens?"
Watchdog group Public Citizen sheds light behind closed doors with its new report, out Thursday, entitled The Company They Keep: A Guide to the Presidential Candidates' Domestic Policy Advisers (pdf).
Arguing that "personnel choices provide a window into politicians' true views," the dossier provides basic information about 26 advisers to Clinton and Trump--13 people on each side.
The report reads:
This list is not comprehensive. In general, those included are people whose expertise focuses on policies as opposed to politics. That is, messaging gurus, pollsters and spinmeisters are not included. Some of those who have been dubbed policy advisers also are not included, simply because there is no evidence that they truly have the candidate's ear. For instance, a member of one of the candidates' economic teams said recently that he had never spoken to the candidate.
The potential roles of these individuals vary. Some are potential leaders of post-Election Day transition teams if their candidate wins; others may be candidates for prominent appointments, such as to cabinet-level positions; still others might be positioned to be influential advisers if their candidate wins, even if they are not likely to join the administration.
In each of these scenarios, these individuals' backgrounds and outlooks matter, both because of their potential to shape policies and because of what their proximity to the candidates says about the candidates themselves.
Among those whispering in Clinton's ears:
And in Trump's:
Notably, there are no women identified as close advisers on Trump's side.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
When it comes to Hillary Clinton's and Donald Trump's election campaigns--and potential presidencies--who's actually in "the room where it happens?"
Watchdog group Public Citizen sheds light behind closed doors with its new report, out Thursday, entitled The Company They Keep: A Guide to the Presidential Candidates' Domestic Policy Advisers (pdf).
Arguing that "personnel choices provide a window into politicians' true views," the dossier provides basic information about 26 advisers to Clinton and Trump--13 people on each side.
The report reads:
This list is not comprehensive. In general, those included are people whose expertise focuses on policies as opposed to politics. That is, messaging gurus, pollsters and spinmeisters are not included. Some of those who have been dubbed policy advisers also are not included, simply because there is no evidence that they truly have the candidate's ear. For instance, a member of one of the candidates' economic teams said recently that he had never spoken to the candidate.
The potential roles of these individuals vary. Some are potential leaders of post-Election Day transition teams if their candidate wins; others may be candidates for prominent appointments, such as to cabinet-level positions; still others might be positioned to be influential advisers if their candidate wins, even if they are not likely to join the administration.
In each of these scenarios, these individuals' backgrounds and outlooks matter, both because of their potential to shape policies and because of what their proximity to the candidates says about the candidates themselves.
Among those whispering in Clinton's ears:
And in Trump's:
Notably, there are no women identified as close advisers on Trump's side.
When it comes to Hillary Clinton's and Donald Trump's election campaigns--and potential presidencies--who's actually in "the room where it happens?"
Watchdog group Public Citizen sheds light behind closed doors with its new report, out Thursday, entitled The Company They Keep: A Guide to the Presidential Candidates' Domestic Policy Advisers (pdf).
Arguing that "personnel choices provide a window into politicians' true views," the dossier provides basic information about 26 advisers to Clinton and Trump--13 people on each side.
The report reads:
This list is not comprehensive. In general, those included are people whose expertise focuses on policies as opposed to politics. That is, messaging gurus, pollsters and spinmeisters are not included. Some of those who have been dubbed policy advisers also are not included, simply because there is no evidence that they truly have the candidate's ear. For instance, a member of one of the candidates' economic teams said recently that he had never spoken to the candidate.
The potential roles of these individuals vary. Some are potential leaders of post-Election Day transition teams if their candidate wins; others may be candidates for prominent appointments, such as to cabinet-level positions; still others might be positioned to be influential advisers if their candidate wins, even if they are not likely to join the administration.
In each of these scenarios, these individuals' backgrounds and outlooks matter, both because of their potential to shape policies and because of what their proximity to the candidates says about the candidates themselves.
Among those whispering in Clinton's ears:
And in Trump's:
Notably, there are no women identified as close advisers on Trump's side.