SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Solidarity protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline are growing around the country.
As Indigenous activists maintained resistance to a proposed oil pipeline in North Dakota this week, allied groups on Thursday sent an open letter to President Barack Obama asking him to urge the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to pull its permits for the project.
"After years of pipeline disasters--from the massive tar sands oil spill in Kalamazoo, Michigan in 2010, to the recent oil pipeline spills in the San Joaquin Valley and Ventura, CA--our organizations and our millions of members and supporters are concerned about the threat these projects pose to our safety, our health, and the environment," reads the letter (pdf), signed by groups such as the Indigenous Environmental Network, the Sierra Club, and 350.org.
The letter was published as a federal judge delayed a decision on allowing the construction to continue.
U.S. Judge James Boasberg said after a hearing in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday that he would decide by September 9 on whether to halt work on the pipeline amid a lawsuit filed against the corps by Standing Rock Sioux tribal leaders. Last week, pipeline developers agreed to pause construction until the decision is made.
"Whatever the final outcome in court, I believe we have already established an important principle--that is, tribes will be heard on important matters that affect our vital interests," Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II said Wednesday, according to the Bismarck Tribune.
If the $3.7 billion pipeline is built, it will transport 500,000 barrels of oil a day past the Standing Rock Sioux reservation in North Dakota and through several rivers, including the Mississippi and Missouri rivers, which supply water to millions of people. The pipeline would then traverse North Dakota, South Dakota, and Iowa before eventually stopping in Illinois.
"Everyone knows what is at stake, and we won't be sacrificed."
--Angela Bevans
Camps have sprung up around the contested area as the action against the pipeline stretches into its third week, and Amnesty International announced Wednesday that it had sent a delegation of human rights observers to the protest site. Opponents say the project would destroy sacred and culturally important lands and threaten their access to clean water.
Angela Bevans, an assistant attorney with a Sioux background, told the Guardian on Thursday that "[a]ny delay is a win for us. It will give Dakota Access pause and let people know that Standing Rock still needs assistance on this."
"We've suffered incarceration, massacre, and internment. This is just another chapter in the government allowing a private company to take something that doesn't belong to them just because they can," Bevans said. "It's not a matter of whether there will be a spill; it's when it will happen. Everyone knows what is at stake, and we won't be sacrificed. We are protecting the lifeblood of our people; these rivers are the arteries of Mother Earth."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As Indigenous activists maintained resistance to a proposed oil pipeline in North Dakota this week, allied groups on Thursday sent an open letter to President Barack Obama asking him to urge the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to pull its permits for the project.
"After years of pipeline disasters--from the massive tar sands oil spill in Kalamazoo, Michigan in 2010, to the recent oil pipeline spills in the San Joaquin Valley and Ventura, CA--our organizations and our millions of members and supporters are concerned about the threat these projects pose to our safety, our health, and the environment," reads the letter (pdf), signed by groups such as the Indigenous Environmental Network, the Sierra Club, and 350.org.
The letter was published as a federal judge delayed a decision on allowing the construction to continue.
U.S. Judge James Boasberg said after a hearing in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday that he would decide by September 9 on whether to halt work on the pipeline amid a lawsuit filed against the corps by Standing Rock Sioux tribal leaders. Last week, pipeline developers agreed to pause construction until the decision is made.
"Whatever the final outcome in court, I believe we have already established an important principle--that is, tribes will be heard on important matters that affect our vital interests," Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II said Wednesday, according to the Bismarck Tribune.
If the $3.7 billion pipeline is built, it will transport 500,000 barrels of oil a day past the Standing Rock Sioux reservation in North Dakota and through several rivers, including the Mississippi and Missouri rivers, which supply water to millions of people. The pipeline would then traverse North Dakota, South Dakota, and Iowa before eventually stopping in Illinois.
"Everyone knows what is at stake, and we won't be sacrificed."
--Angela Bevans
Camps have sprung up around the contested area as the action against the pipeline stretches into its third week, and Amnesty International announced Wednesday that it had sent a delegation of human rights observers to the protest site. Opponents say the project would destroy sacred and culturally important lands and threaten their access to clean water.
Angela Bevans, an assistant attorney with a Sioux background, told the Guardian on Thursday that "[a]ny delay is a win for us. It will give Dakota Access pause and let people know that Standing Rock still needs assistance on this."
"We've suffered incarceration, massacre, and internment. This is just another chapter in the government allowing a private company to take something that doesn't belong to them just because they can," Bevans said. "It's not a matter of whether there will be a spill; it's when it will happen. Everyone knows what is at stake, and we won't be sacrificed. We are protecting the lifeblood of our people; these rivers are the arteries of Mother Earth."
As Indigenous activists maintained resistance to a proposed oil pipeline in North Dakota this week, allied groups on Thursday sent an open letter to President Barack Obama asking him to urge the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to pull its permits for the project.
"After years of pipeline disasters--from the massive tar sands oil spill in Kalamazoo, Michigan in 2010, to the recent oil pipeline spills in the San Joaquin Valley and Ventura, CA--our organizations and our millions of members and supporters are concerned about the threat these projects pose to our safety, our health, and the environment," reads the letter (pdf), signed by groups such as the Indigenous Environmental Network, the Sierra Club, and 350.org.
The letter was published as a federal judge delayed a decision on allowing the construction to continue.
U.S. Judge James Boasberg said after a hearing in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday that he would decide by September 9 on whether to halt work on the pipeline amid a lawsuit filed against the corps by Standing Rock Sioux tribal leaders. Last week, pipeline developers agreed to pause construction until the decision is made.
"Whatever the final outcome in court, I believe we have already established an important principle--that is, tribes will be heard on important matters that affect our vital interests," Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II said Wednesday, according to the Bismarck Tribune.
If the $3.7 billion pipeline is built, it will transport 500,000 barrels of oil a day past the Standing Rock Sioux reservation in North Dakota and through several rivers, including the Mississippi and Missouri rivers, which supply water to millions of people. The pipeline would then traverse North Dakota, South Dakota, and Iowa before eventually stopping in Illinois.
"Everyone knows what is at stake, and we won't be sacrificed."
--Angela Bevans
Camps have sprung up around the contested area as the action against the pipeline stretches into its third week, and Amnesty International announced Wednesday that it had sent a delegation of human rights observers to the protest site. Opponents say the project would destroy sacred and culturally important lands and threaten their access to clean water.
Angela Bevans, an assistant attorney with a Sioux background, told the Guardian on Thursday that "[a]ny delay is a win for us. It will give Dakota Access pause and let people know that Standing Rock still needs assistance on this."
"We've suffered incarceration, massacre, and internment. This is just another chapter in the government allowing a private company to take something that doesn't belong to them just because they can," Bevans said. "It's not a matter of whether there will be a spill; it's when it will happen. Everyone knows what is at stake, and we won't be sacrificed. We are protecting the lifeblood of our people; these rivers are the arteries of Mother Earth."