SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Pushing Carbon Tax and Fracking Ban, Sanders Lays Down Gauntlet on Climate
"I hope that Secretary Clinton would join me if we are serious about climate change, about imposing a tax on carbon on the fossil fuel industry and making massive investments in energy efficiency and sustainable energy. And by the way... I hope you’ll join me in ending fracking in the United States of America."
Mar 10, 2016
While debating in Miami--the U.S. city arguably most threatened by rising sea levels caused by the warming of the planet--Wednesday night, presidential candidate Bernie Sanders challenged Democratic rival Hillary Clinton to strengthen her positions on climate change by joining him in a call for a tax on carbon and a total ban on fracking nationwide.
During the latter part of the debate, when asked by a CNN moderator to discuss his position on climate, Sanders said, "Let's be clear. You're looking at the senator who introduced the most comprehensive climate change legislation in the history of the United States Senate."
He then added, "Now, I hope that Secretary Clinton would join me if we are serious about climate change, about imposing a tax on carbon on the fossil fuel industry and making massive investments in energy efficiency and sustainable energy. And by the way, while we are on the subject of energy, I hope you'll join me in ending fracking in the United States of America."
Watch:
The moderators did not give Clinton a chance to directly respond to Sanders' challenge on those points. Still, members of the climate movement expressed concern about the positions Clinton continues to hold when it comes to climate change--including specific answers she gave Wednesday night.
When asked about the issue, Clinton defended President Obama's record on climate--even though scientists and climate experts have slammed his "all-of-the-above" energy approach--and said she would do everything she could to continue those policies while also pushing for Republicans to finally stop denying the existence of the problem and join the fight. "We need to implement all of the president's executive actions and quickly move to make a bridge from coal to natural gas to clean energy," Clinton said. "That is the way we will keep the lights on while we are transitioning to a clean energy future. And when I talk about resilience, I think that is an area we can get Republican support on."
In response, however, climate advocacy group 350 Action spokesperson Jamie Henn voiced skepticism about Clinton's stance.
"Hillary Clinton still needs to convince climate voters that she's willing to stand up to the fossil fuel industry," said Henn following the debate. "I cringed when I heard her mention natural gas as a bridge fuel. Scientists are now clear that natural gas is a bridge to nowhere and that we must move directly and swiftly to 100% renewable energy. Clinton is coming out stronger on climate, but her ties to the fossil fuel industry are still a major cause for concern."
Despite those reservations, 350 Action said Wednesday's debate was a testament to how far grassroots activists have moved both candidates on climate change. The group believes that as the primary contest with Sanders has gone on, Clinton has endorsed increasingly progressive stances on climate change, such as coming out against the Keystone XL pipeline and limiting fossil fuel development on public lands. Meanwhile, Sanders has adopted even stronger rhetoric, incorporating the language of the "keep it in the ground" movement which, led by students and a vast coalition of climate activists in the U.S and around the world, is calling on millions of people to rise up and take on the fossil fuel industry.
"We've seen a huge shift over the last year," said Henn. "Democrats have gone from an 'all of the above' strategy on climate to all out opposition to the fossil fuel industry. That's a sign of the growing strength of our movement and the growing realization that the true test of climate leadership is keeping fossil fuels in the ground."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
While debating in Miami--the U.S. city arguably most threatened by rising sea levels caused by the warming of the planet--Wednesday night, presidential candidate Bernie Sanders challenged Democratic rival Hillary Clinton to strengthen her positions on climate change by joining him in a call for a tax on carbon and a total ban on fracking nationwide.
During the latter part of the debate, when asked by a CNN moderator to discuss his position on climate, Sanders said, "Let's be clear. You're looking at the senator who introduced the most comprehensive climate change legislation in the history of the United States Senate."
He then added, "Now, I hope that Secretary Clinton would join me if we are serious about climate change, about imposing a tax on carbon on the fossil fuel industry and making massive investments in energy efficiency and sustainable energy. And by the way, while we are on the subject of energy, I hope you'll join me in ending fracking in the United States of America."
Watch:
The moderators did not give Clinton a chance to directly respond to Sanders' challenge on those points. Still, members of the climate movement expressed concern about the positions Clinton continues to hold when it comes to climate change--including specific answers she gave Wednesday night.
When asked about the issue, Clinton defended President Obama's record on climate--even though scientists and climate experts have slammed his "all-of-the-above" energy approach--and said she would do everything she could to continue those policies while also pushing for Republicans to finally stop denying the existence of the problem and join the fight. "We need to implement all of the president's executive actions and quickly move to make a bridge from coal to natural gas to clean energy," Clinton said. "That is the way we will keep the lights on while we are transitioning to a clean energy future. And when I talk about resilience, I think that is an area we can get Republican support on."
In response, however, climate advocacy group 350 Action spokesperson Jamie Henn voiced skepticism about Clinton's stance.
"Hillary Clinton still needs to convince climate voters that she's willing to stand up to the fossil fuel industry," said Henn following the debate. "I cringed when I heard her mention natural gas as a bridge fuel. Scientists are now clear that natural gas is a bridge to nowhere and that we must move directly and swiftly to 100% renewable energy. Clinton is coming out stronger on climate, but her ties to the fossil fuel industry are still a major cause for concern."
Despite those reservations, 350 Action said Wednesday's debate was a testament to how far grassroots activists have moved both candidates on climate change. The group believes that as the primary contest with Sanders has gone on, Clinton has endorsed increasingly progressive stances on climate change, such as coming out against the Keystone XL pipeline and limiting fossil fuel development on public lands. Meanwhile, Sanders has adopted even stronger rhetoric, incorporating the language of the "keep it in the ground" movement which, led by students and a vast coalition of climate activists in the U.S and around the world, is calling on millions of people to rise up and take on the fossil fuel industry.
"We've seen a huge shift over the last year," said Henn. "Democrats have gone from an 'all of the above' strategy on climate to all out opposition to the fossil fuel industry. That's a sign of the growing strength of our movement and the growing realization that the true test of climate leadership is keeping fossil fuels in the ground."
While debating in Miami--the U.S. city arguably most threatened by rising sea levels caused by the warming of the planet--Wednesday night, presidential candidate Bernie Sanders challenged Democratic rival Hillary Clinton to strengthen her positions on climate change by joining him in a call for a tax on carbon and a total ban on fracking nationwide.
During the latter part of the debate, when asked by a CNN moderator to discuss his position on climate, Sanders said, "Let's be clear. You're looking at the senator who introduced the most comprehensive climate change legislation in the history of the United States Senate."
He then added, "Now, I hope that Secretary Clinton would join me if we are serious about climate change, about imposing a tax on carbon on the fossil fuel industry and making massive investments in energy efficiency and sustainable energy. And by the way, while we are on the subject of energy, I hope you'll join me in ending fracking in the United States of America."
Watch:
The moderators did not give Clinton a chance to directly respond to Sanders' challenge on those points. Still, members of the climate movement expressed concern about the positions Clinton continues to hold when it comes to climate change--including specific answers she gave Wednesday night.
When asked about the issue, Clinton defended President Obama's record on climate--even though scientists and climate experts have slammed his "all-of-the-above" energy approach--and said she would do everything she could to continue those policies while also pushing for Republicans to finally stop denying the existence of the problem and join the fight. "We need to implement all of the president's executive actions and quickly move to make a bridge from coal to natural gas to clean energy," Clinton said. "That is the way we will keep the lights on while we are transitioning to a clean energy future. And when I talk about resilience, I think that is an area we can get Republican support on."
In response, however, climate advocacy group 350 Action spokesperson Jamie Henn voiced skepticism about Clinton's stance.
"Hillary Clinton still needs to convince climate voters that she's willing to stand up to the fossil fuel industry," said Henn following the debate. "I cringed when I heard her mention natural gas as a bridge fuel. Scientists are now clear that natural gas is a bridge to nowhere and that we must move directly and swiftly to 100% renewable energy. Clinton is coming out stronger on climate, but her ties to the fossil fuel industry are still a major cause for concern."
Despite those reservations, 350 Action said Wednesday's debate was a testament to how far grassroots activists have moved both candidates on climate change. The group believes that as the primary contest with Sanders has gone on, Clinton has endorsed increasingly progressive stances on climate change, such as coming out against the Keystone XL pipeline and limiting fossil fuel development on public lands. Meanwhile, Sanders has adopted even stronger rhetoric, incorporating the language of the "keep it in the ground" movement which, led by students and a vast coalition of climate activists in the U.S and around the world, is calling on millions of people to rise up and take on the fossil fuel industry.
"We've seen a huge shift over the last year," said Henn. "Democrats have gone from an 'all of the above' strategy on climate to all out opposition to the fossil fuel industry. That's a sign of the growing strength of our movement and the growing realization that the true test of climate leadership is keeping fossil fuels in the ground."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.