

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
An internal Pentagon report made public on Wednesday revealed that the U.S. Department of Defense has been using unarmed drones to conduct surveillance missions over American soil since 2006.
The Pentagon inspector general report, entitled "Evaluation of DoD Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Support to Civil Authorities," obtained by USA Today through a Freedom of Information Act request, said that "less than 20" such missions occurred between 2006 and 2015, though they anticipate many more in the years to come.
"More than ten years of war in the combat zones of Iraq and Afghanistan have taught a generation of Airmen valuable lessons about the use of Remotely Piloted Airdfta (RPA) and other [Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)] assets," the analysis states.
"As the nation winds down these wars," it continues, "and USAF RPA and ISR assets become available to support other combatant command (COCOM) or U.S. agencies, the appetite to use them in the domestic environment to collect airborne imagery continues to grow, as does Congressional and media interest in their employment."
Moreover, "multiple" military units that operate drones expressed interest in having more opportunities to fly them on domestic missions as "opportunities for UAS realistic training and use have decreased."
The review concludes that all missions were conducted within "full compliance" of the law.
The trouble is, as even the Pentagon analysis notes, at the time there were no standardized, federal statues that "specifically address the employment of the capability provided by a DoD UAS if requested by domestic civil authorities."
Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), told USA Today that domestic laws often lag behind technological capabilities. "Sometimes, new technology changes so rapidly that existing law no longer fit what people think are appropriate," Stanley said. "It's important to remember that the American people do find this to be a very, very sensitive topic."
USA Today reports that "Shortly before the inspector general report was completed a year ago, the Pentagon issued a new policy governing the use of spy drones. It requires the defense secretary to approve all domestic spy drone operations. It says that unless permitted by law and approved by the secretary, drones 'may not conduct surveillance on U.S. persons.' It also bans the use of armed drones over the United States for anything other than training and testing."
National Security Agency whistleblower Thomas Drake questioned on Twitter whether these revelations mean that there is "new meaning to 'rare & lawful' Posse Comitatus?" referring to a U.S. federal law that limits the powers of the federal government in using military personnel to enforce domestic policies in the U.S..
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An internal Pentagon report made public on Wednesday revealed that the U.S. Department of Defense has been using unarmed drones to conduct surveillance missions over American soil since 2006.
The Pentagon inspector general report, entitled "Evaluation of DoD Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Support to Civil Authorities," obtained by USA Today through a Freedom of Information Act request, said that "less than 20" such missions occurred between 2006 and 2015, though they anticipate many more in the years to come.
"More than ten years of war in the combat zones of Iraq and Afghanistan have taught a generation of Airmen valuable lessons about the use of Remotely Piloted Airdfta (RPA) and other [Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)] assets," the analysis states.
"As the nation winds down these wars," it continues, "and USAF RPA and ISR assets become available to support other combatant command (COCOM) or U.S. agencies, the appetite to use them in the domestic environment to collect airborne imagery continues to grow, as does Congressional and media interest in their employment."
Moreover, "multiple" military units that operate drones expressed interest in having more opportunities to fly them on domestic missions as "opportunities for UAS realistic training and use have decreased."
The review concludes that all missions were conducted within "full compliance" of the law.
The trouble is, as even the Pentagon analysis notes, at the time there were no standardized, federal statues that "specifically address the employment of the capability provided by a DoD UAS if requested by domestic civil authorities."
Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), told USA Today that domestic laws often lag behind technological capabilities. "Sometimes, new technology changes so rapidly that existing law no longer fit what people think are appropriate," Stanley said. "It's important to remember that the American people do find this to be a very, very sensitive topic."
USA Today reports that "Shortly before the inspector general report was completed a year ago, the Pentagon issued a new policy governing the use of spy drones. It requires the defense secretary to approve all domestic spy drone operations. It says that unless permitted by law and approved by the secretary, drones 'may not conduct surveillance on U.S. persons.' It also bans the use of armed drones over the United States for anything other than training and testing."
National Security Agency whistleblower Thomas Drake questioned on Twitter whether these revelations mean that there is "new meaning to 'rare & lawful' Posse Comitatus?" referring to a U.S. federal law that limits the powers of the federal government in using military personnel to enforce domestic policies in the U.S..
An internal Pentagon report made public on Wednesday revealed that the U.S. Department of Defense has been using unarmed drones to conduct surveillance missions over American soil since 2006.
The Pentagon inspector general report, entitled "Evaluation of DoD Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Support to Civil Authorities," obtained by USA Today through a Freedom of Information Act request, said that "less than 20" such missions occurred between 2006 and 2015, though they anticipate many more in the years to come.
"More than ten years of war in the combat zones of Iraq and Afghanistan have taught a generation of Airmen valuable lessons about the use of Remotely Piloted Airdfta (RPA) and other [Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)] assets," the analysis states.
"As the nation winds down these wars," it continues, "and USAF RPA and ISR assets become available to support other combatant command (COCOM) or U.S. agencies, the appetite to use them in the domestic environment to collect airborne imagery continues to grow, as does Congressional and media interest in their employment."
Moreover, "multiple" military units that operate drones expressed interest in having more opportunities to fly them on domestic missions as "opportunities for UAS realistic training and use have decreased."
The review concludes that all missions were conducted within "full compliance" of the law.
The trouble is, as even the Pentagon analysis notes, at the time there were no standardized, federal statues that "specifically address the employment of the capability provided by a DoD UAS if requested by domestic civil authorities."
Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), told USA Today that domestic laws often lag behind technological capabilities. "Sometimes, new technology changes so rapidly that existing law no longer fit what people think are appropriate," Stanley said. "It's important to remember that the American people do find this to be a very, very sensitive topic."
USA Today reports that "Shortly before the inspector general report was completed a year ago, the Pentagon issued a new policy governing the use of spy drones. It requires the defense secretary to approve all domestic spy drone operations. It says that unless permitted by law and approved by the secretary, drones 'may not conduct surveillance on U.S. persons.' It also bans the use of armed drones over the United States for anything other than training and testing."
National Security Agency whistleblower Thomas Drake questioned on Twitter whether these revelations mean that there is "new meaning to 'rare & lawful' Posse Comitatus?" referring to a U.S. federal law that limits the powers of the federal government in using military personnel to enforce domestic policies in the U.S..