SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Tuesday announced that Republicans would obstruct anyone President Barack Obama nominates to fill the vacancy in the Supreme Court. (Photo: AP)
Advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday urged Republicans in the U.S. Senate to reverse their decision to blockade President Barack Obama's nomination to the Supreme Court, calling it "an outrageous pledge to desert their constitutional duty."
#DoYourJob Tweets |
"Keeping a vacancy empty on the highest court in the land for nearly two full court terms is unprecedented, extraordinarily reckless, and shows a blatant disrespect of the rule of law, the third branch of government and the American people," said Stephen Spaulding, senior policy counsel and legal director at the grassroots group Common Cause.
The coalition delivered more than 1.3 million signatures, collected by progressive action groups and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), pressuring Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee to "put country before party" and give fair consideration to the nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. The groups, which included the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Color of Change, and Demand Progress, as well as Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Al Franken (D-Minn.) called attention to the action on Twitter with the hashtag #DoYourJob.
The action comes in response to all 11 Republicans on the committee deciding in a closed-door meeting to deny hearings or a vote on any nomination to the court in 2016. Scalia's death has left the nation's highest court evenly split between liberals and conservatives and prompted a debate over whether Obama should appoint a nominee while still in office or wait for the next administration to make a decision.
"This is not governance, it's obstinance," said Wade Henderson, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. "For the Senate Republicans to refuse to even meet with a Supreme Court nominee is playground politics at its worst."
"To refuse to act on a nomination of this magnitude is a failure to govern," Henderson said. "We urge these senators to take a step back and consider what legacy of governance they want to leave for our country."
As Common Dreams previously reported, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared on the Senate floor Tuesday, "Presidents have a right to nominate just as the Senate has its constitutional right to provide or withhold consent. In this case, the Senate will withhold it. The Senate will appropriately revisit the matter after the American people finish making in November the decision they've already started making today."
In an televised interview on Wednesday, Obama dismissed those remarks and reiterated his intention to appoint a nominee, stating, "I understand that this is an important issue for [Republicans'] constituencies.... But that's how our democracy is supposed to work."
"I'm going to do my job. I'm going to nominate somebody and let the American people decide whether they're qualified."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday urged Republicans in the U.S. Senate to reverse their decision to blockade President Barack Obama's nomination to the Supreme Court, calling it "an outrageous pledge to desert their constitutional duty."
#DoYourJob Tweets |
"Keeping a vacancy empty on the highest court in the land for nearly two full court terms is unprecedented, extraordinarily reckless, and shows a blatant disrespect of the rule of law, the third branch of government and the American people," said Stephen Spaulding, senior policy counsel and legal director at the grassroots group Common Cause.
The coalition delivered more than 1.3 million signatures, collected by progressive action groups and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), pressuring Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee to "put country before party" and give fair consideration to the nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. The groups, which included the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Color of Change, and Demand Progress, as well as Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Al Franken (D-Minn.) called attention to the action on Twitter with the hashtag #DoYourJob.
The action comes in response to all 11 Republicans on the committee deciding in a closed-door meeting to deny hearings or a vote on any nomination to the court in 2016. Scalia's death has left the nation's highest court evenly split between liberals and conservatives and prompted a debate over whether Obama should appoint a nominee while still in office or wait for the next administration to make a decision.
"This is not governance, it's obstinance," said Wade Henderson, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. "For the Senate Republicans to refuse to even meet with a Supreme Court nominee is playground politics at its worst."
"To refuse to act on a nomination of this magnitude is a failure to govern," Henderson said. "We urge these senators to take a step back and consider what legacy of governance they want to leave for our country."
As Common Dreams previously reported, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared on the Senate floor Tuesday, "Presidents have a right to nominate just as the Senate has its constitutional right to provide or withhold consent. In this case, the Senate will withhold it. The Senate will appropriately revisit the matter after the American people finish making in November the decision they've already started making today."
In an televised interview on Wednesday, Obama dismissed those remarks and reiterated his intention to appoint a nominee, stating, "I understand that this is an important issue for [Republicans'] constituencies.... But that's how our democracy is supposed to work."
"I'm going to do my job. I'm going to nominate somebody and let the American people decide whether they're qualified."
Advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday urged Republicans in the U.S. Senate to reverse their decision to blockade President Barack Obama's nomination to the Supreme Court, calling it "an outrageous pledge to desert their constitutional duty."
#DoYourJob Tweets |
"Keeping a vacancy empty on the highest court in the land for nearly two full court terms is unprecedented, extraordinarily reckless, and shows a blatant disrespect of the rule of law, the third branch of government and the American people," said Stephen Spaulding, senior policy counsel and legal director at the grassroots group Common Cause.
The coalition delivered more than 1.3 million signatures, collected by progressive action groups and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), pressuring Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee to "put country before party" and give fair consideration to the nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. The groups, which included the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Color of Change, and Demand Progress, as well as Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Al Franken (D-Minn.) called attention to the action on Twitter with the hashtag #DoYourJob.
The action comes in response to all 11 Republicans on the committee deciding in a closed-door meeting to deny hearings or a vote on any nomination to the court in 2016. Scalia's death has left the nation's highest court evenly split between liberals and conservatives and prompted a debate over whether Obama should appoint a nominee while still in office or wait for the next administration to make a decision.
"This is not governance, it's obstinance," said Wade Henderson, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. "For the Senate Republicans to refuse to even meet with a Supreme Court nominee is playground politics at its worst."
"To refuse to act on a nomination of this magnitude is a failure to govern," Henderson said. "We urge these senators to take a step back and consider what legacy of governance they want to leave for our country."
As Common Dreams previously reported, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared on the Senate floor Tuesday, "Presidents have a right to nominate just as the Senate has its constitutional right to provide or withhold consent. In this case, the Senate will withhold it. The Senate will appropriately revisit the matter after the American people finish making in November the decision they've already started making today."
In an televised interview on Wednesday, Obama dismissed those remarks and reiterated his intention to appoint a nominee, stating, "I understand that this is an important issue for [Republicans'] constituencies.... But that's how our democracy is supposed to work."
"I'm going to do my job. I'm going to nominate somebody and let the American people decide whether they're qualified."