SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The revelations underscore criticisms that trade agreements like the TTIP constitute a "race to the bottom" for environmental, public health, and labor standards.
Newly released documents show that, in back-room talks, European officials assured ExxonMobil that the pending US-EU trade agreement would force the removal of regulatory "obstacles" worldwide, thus opening even more countries to the fossil fuel empire's exploitation.
The Guardian obtained heavily redacted documents about an October 2013 meeting and reported on Tuesday. The documents reveal that then-trade commissioner Karel de Gucht met with two officials from ExxonMobil's EU and U.S. divisions to discuss the benefits of the TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).
As the Guardian notes, the meeting was held at a time when countries in South America and Africa were "tightening regulations on fossil fuel companies for the first time in a decade, despite ExxonMobil's ambitions to open up shale gas fracking wells in North Africa, Asia, and South America."
A briefing paper summarizing the key points of the meeting reportedly stated: "TTIP is perhaps more relevant as setting a precedent vis-a-vis third countries than governing trade and investment bilaterally...We think that this third-country element is in the interest of the energy sector, especially globally active companies like Shell or ExxonMobil. After all, companies like Shell or ExxonMobil face the same trade barriers when doing business in Africa, in Russia, or in South America."
Or, as Guardian reporter Arthur Neslen phrased it, the commission effectively told the oil giant "that once the trade deal was in place, other countries outside it would be progressively forced to adopt the same measures, making it easier for companies such as ExxonMobil to expand into their markets."
The revelations underscore criticisms that trade agreements like the TTIP constitute a "race to the bottom" for environmental, public health, and labor standards. They come a day after Greenpeace activists set up a blockade outside of negotiations in Brussels to call attention to the environmental threats posed by the corporate-friendly deal.
"What the Commission calls barriers to trade are in fact the safeguards that keep toxic pesticides out of our food or dangerous pollutants out of the air we breathe," said Greenpeace TTIP campaigner Susan Jehoram Cohen on Monday. The negotiators, Cohen added, "want to weaken these safeguards to maximize corporate profits, whatever the costs for society and the environment."
Indeed, Tuesday's revelations are not the first to expose the collusion between European trade negotiators and the fossil fuel industry. Other documents released in November showed officials asking industry leaders for "concrete input" on the text for the TTIP's energy chapter.
After the latest report, Nick Dearden, director of the UK-based social justice group Global Justice Now, expressed resounding dismay at the TTIP text and negotiation process, tweeting: "Can this deal get any worse?"
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Newly released documents show that, in back-room talks, European officials assured ExxonMobil that the pending US-EU trade agreement would force the removal of regulatory "obstacles" worldwide, thus opening even more countries to the fossil fuel empire's exploitation.
The Guardian obtained heavily redacted documents about an October 2013 meeting and reported on Tuesday. The documents reveal that then-trade commissioner Karel de Gucht met with two officials from ExxonMobil's EU and U.S. divisions to discuss the benefits of the TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).
As the Guardian notes, the meeting was held at a time when countries in South America and Africa were "tightening regulations on fossil fuel companies for the first time in a decade, despite ExxonMobil's ambitions to open up shale gas fracking wells in North Africa, Asia, and South America."
A briefing paper summarizing the key points of the meeting reportedly stated: "TTIP is perhaps more relevant as setting a precedent vis-a-vis third countries than governing trade and investment bilaterally...We think that this third-country element is in the interest of the energy sector, especially globally active companies like Shell or ExxonMobil. After all, companies like Shell or ExxonMobil face the same trade barriers when doing business in Africa, in Russia, or in South America."
Or, as Guardian reporter Arthur Neslen phrased it, the commission effectively told the oil giant "that once the trade deal was in place, other countries outside it would be progressively forced to adopt the same measures, making it easier for companies such as ExxonMobil to expand into their markets."
The revelations underscore criticisms that trade agreements like the TTIP constitute a "race to the bottom" for environmental, public health, and labor standards. They come a day after Greenpeace activists set up a blockade outside of negotiations in Brussels to call attention to the environmental threats posed by the corporate-friendly deal.
"What the Commission calls barriers to trade are in fact the safeguards that keep toxic pesticides out of our food or dangerous pollutants out of the air we breathe," said Greenpeace TTIP campaigner Susan Jehoram Cohen on Monday. The negotiators, Cohen added, "want to weaken these safeguards to maximize corporate profits, whatever the costs for society and the environment."
Indeed, Tuesday's revelations are not the first to expose the collusion between European trade negotiators and the fossil fuel industry. Other documents released in November showed officials asking industry leaders for "concrete input" on the text for the TTIP's energy chapter.
After the latest report, Nick Dearden, director of the UK-based social justice group Global Justice Now, expressed resounding dismay at the TTIP text and negotiation process, tweeting: "Can this deal get any worse?"
Newly released documents show that, in back-room talks, European officials assured ExxonMobil that the pending US-EU trade agreement would force the removal of regulatory "obstacles" worldwide, thus opening even more countries to the fossil fuel empire's exploitation.
The Guardian obtained heavily redacted documents about an October 2013 meeting and reported on Tuesday. The documents reveal that then-trade commissioner Karel de Gucht met with two officials from ExxonMobil's EU and U.S. divisions to discuss the benefits of the TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).
As the Guardian notes, the meeting was held at a time when countries in South America and Africa were "tightening regulations on fossil fuel companies for the first time in a decade, despite ExxonMobil's ambitions to open up shale gas fracking wells in North Africa, Asia, and South America."
A briefing paper summarizing the key points of the meeting reportedly stated: "TTIP is perhaps more relevant as setting a precedent vis-a-vis third countries than governing trade and investment bilaterally...We think that this third-country element is in the interest of the energy sector, especially globally active companies like Shell or ExxonMobil. After all, companies like Shell or ExxonMobil face the same trade barriers when doing business in Africa, in Russia, or in South America."
Or, as Guardian reporter Arthur Neslen phrased it, the commission effectively told the oil giant "that once the trade deal was in place, other countries outside it would be progressively forced to adopt the same measures, making it easier for companies such as ExxonMobil to expand into their markets."
The revelations underscore criticisms that trade agreements like the TTIP constitute a "race to the bottom" for environmental, public health, and labor standards. They come a day after Greenpeace activists set up a blockade outside of negotiations in Brussels to call attention to the environmental threats posed by the corporate-friendly deal.
"What the Commission calls barriers to trade are in fact the safeguards that keep toxic pesticides out of our food or dangerous pollutants out of the air we breathe," said Greenpeace TTIP campaigner Susan Jehoram Cohen on Monday. The negotiators, Cohen added, "want to weaken these safeguards to maximize corporate profits, whatever the costs for society and the environment."
Indeed, Tuesday's revelations are not the first to expose the collusion between European trade negotiators and the fossil fuel industry. Other documents released in November showed officials asking industry leaders for "concrete input" on the text for the TTIP's energy chapter.
After the latest report, Nick Dearden, director of the UK-based social justice group Global Justice Now, expressed resounding dismay at the TTIP text and negotiation process, tweeting: "Can this deal get any worse?"