Published on
by

About Time! FDA Will Begin Testing Foods for Toxic Weedkiller Residue

The agency has never tested for glyphosate, despite its status as the most heavily-used herbicide ever and a 'probable carcinogen'

"FDA officials dubbed the issue 'sensitive' and declined to provide details of the plans," according to Civil Eats, which broke the news. (Photo: Mike Mozart/cc/flickr)

"FDA officials dubbed the issue 'sensitive' and declined to provide details of the plans," according to Civil Eats, which broke the news. (Photo: Mike Mozart/cc/flickr)

Amid growing international concern over the health risks posed by Monsanto weedkiller glyphosate, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will reportedly begin testing for the herbicide this year.

After speaking with FDA officials, Civil Eats reported Wednesday that the agency will begin testing for residues of glyphosate in certain foods, marking the first time in FDA history that it has tested for the chemical, despite its status as the most heavily-used herbicide ever, and having been declared "probably carcinogenic to humans" by the World Health Organization (WHO).

"FDA officials dubbed the issue 'sensitive' and declined to provide details of the plans," according to Civil Eats, but FDA spokeswoman Lauren Sucher confirmed that the agency "is now considering assignments for Fiscal Year 2016 to measure glyphosate in soybeans, corn, milk, and eggs, among other potential foods."

As reporter Carey Gilliam notes, both soybeans and corn are "common ingredients in an array of food products and genetically engineered (or GMO) varieties are commonly sprayed with glyphosate," which is the key ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup spray.

There's something in the air...

Independent studies have found glyphosate residues in honey and soy products, as well as in breastmilk and infant formula samples.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The media landscape is changing fast

Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.

Change is coming. And we've got it covered.



Last year, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), WHO's research arm, published a groundbreaking report connecting glyphosate, among other insecticides, with various human cancers. The IARC concluded that "limited evidence" shows the herbicide can cause non-Hodgkins lymphoma in humans and cited additional "convincing evidence" that it can cause other forms of cancer in both rats and mice.

"In the wake of intense scrutiny, the Food and Drug Administration has finally committed to taking this basic step of testing our food for the most commonly used pesticide. It’s shocking that it’s taken so long, but we’re glad it’s finally going to happen," said Dr. Nathan Donley, a scientist with the Center for Biological Diversity, in a statement on Wednesday.

"More and more scientists are raising concerns about the effects of glyphosate on human health and the environment," Donley continued. "With about 1.7 billion pounds of this pesticide used each year worldwide, the FDA's data is badly needed to facilitate long-overdue conversations about how much of this chemical we should tolerate in our food."

Food industry transparency group U.S. Right to Know issued a statement Wednesday calling the FDA's plan a "good first step," but added that "testing must be thorough and widespread." The group's co-founder Gary Ruskin also advocated for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to "get on board," and increase glyphosate monitoring in its own pesticide testing program.

Only once, in 2011, has the USDA conducted a test for glyphosate and reportedly found residues in 271 of the 300 soybean samples.

"The alarm bell is ringing loud and clear," Donley declared. "The current cavalier use of glyphosate, and lax regulation, cannot remain in place. It's long past time to start reining in the out-of-control use of this dangerous pesticide in the United States and around the world."

We want a more open and sharing world.

That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.

All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.

Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.

Share This Article