SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Digital Rights 'Sold Off' as European Parliament Jettisons Net Neutrality
Parliament's vote "a profound disillusion for all those who, throughout the years, battled to ensure net neutrality in Europe."
Oct 27, 2015
In a major setback for net neutrality, the European Parliament passed widely-maligned internet regulations without the amendments that rights groups said were crucial to protect free speech, democracy, and innovation online.
Wide loopholes in the rules allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to discriminate against networks, speed up or slow down Internet traffic, charge companies for faster loading times, and strip users of protections. The legislation passed 500-163.
"Today, Europe took a giant step away from its vision of becoming a world leader in the digital economy," said Anne Jellema, CEO of the digital rights group World Wide Web Foundation. "These weak and unclear net neutrality regulations threaten innovation and free speech. Now, European start-ups may have to compete on an uneven playing field against industry titans, while small civil society groups risk having their voices overwhelmed by well-funded giants."
The Paris-based advocacy organization La Quadrature Du Net described the vote as "a profound disillusion for all those who, throughout the years, battled to ensure net neutrality in Europe."
"Today [members of Parliament] had the chance to stand their ground against the Council and the Commission, but they only showed timid faces in front of threats to abandon the text or prolong the negotiations. By voting this incomplete and non-protective text, they sell off citizens' rights and liberties and hamper small and innovative companies in favor of big telecommunication companies," said La Quadrature legal and policy analysis coordinator Agnes de Cornulier. "They also give a bad signal on their weakness, thus endangering all future negotiations."
Following the vote, the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) will have nine months to develop guidelines for state-based agencies, like Ofcom in the United Kingdom, to implement the new rules.
Advocacy groups said those guidelines could help consumers and companies regain some of their power amid the rejection of wider net neutrality protections, even if it comes through future court rulings on those regulations.
"All is not lost," Jellema said. "The European Parliament is essentially tossing a hot potato to the Body of European Regulators, national regulators and the courts, who will have to decide how these spectacularly unclear rules will be implemented. The onus is now on these groups to heed the call of hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens and prevent a two-speed Internet."
De Cornulier added, "The task to mend the text's loopholes left by the MEPs now rests on governments deprived of transparency, at the risk of widening them even more, until Justice intervenes and long-lasting judiciary procedures set out an uncertain precedence."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
civil society groupsdemocracydigital rightseuropeeuropean parliamentfree speechjusticenet neutralityopen internettechnologytransparencyunited kingdom
In a major setback for net neutrality, the European Parliament passed widely-maligned internet regulations without the amendments that rights groups said were crucial to protect free speech, democracy, and innovation online.
Wide loopholes in the rules allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to discriminate against networks, speed up or slow down Internet traffic, charge companies for faster loading times, and strip users of protections. The legislation passed 500-163.
"Today, Europe took a giant step away from its vision of becoming a world leader in the digital economy," said Anne Jellema, CEO of the digital rights group World Wide Web Foundation. "These weak and unclear net neutrality regulations threaten innovation and free speech. Now, European start-ups may have to compete on an uneven playing field against industry titans, while small civil society groups risk having their voices overwhelmed by well-funded giants."
The Paris-based advocacy organization La Quadrature Du Net described the vote as "a profound disillusion for all those who, throughout the years, battled to ensure net neutrality in Europe."
"Today [members of Parliament] had the chance to stand their ground against the Council and the Commission, but they only showed timid faces in front of threats to abandon the text or prolong the negotiations. By voting this incomplete and non-protective text, they sell off citizens' rights and liberties and hamper small and innovative companies in favor of big telecommunication companies," said La Quadrature legal and policy analysis coordinator Agnes de Cornulier. "They also give a bad signal on their weakness, thus endangering all future negotiations."
Following the vote, the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) will have nine months to develop guidelines for state-based agencies, like Ofcom in the United Kingdom, to implement the new rules.
Advocacy groups said those guidelines could help consumers and companies regain some of their power amid the rejection of wider net neutrality protections, even if it comes through future court rulings on those regulations.
"All is not lost," Jellema said. "The European Parliament is essentially tossing a hot potato to the Body of European Regulators, national regulators and the courts, who will have to decide how these spectacularly unclear rules will be implemented. The onus is now on these groups to heed the call of hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens and prevent a two-speed Internet."
De Cornulier added, "The task to mend the text's loopholes left by the MEPs now rests on governments deprived of transparency, at the risk of widening them even more, until Justice intervenes and long-lasting judiciary procedures set out an uncertain precedence."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
In a major setback for net neutrality, the European Parliament passed widely-maligned internet regulations without the amendments that rights groups said were crucial to protect free speech, democracy, and innovation online.
Wide loopholes in the rules allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to discriminate against networks, speed up or slow down Internet traffic, charge companies for faster loading times, and strip users of protections. The legislation passed 500-163.
"Today, Europe took a giant step away from its vision of becoming a world leader in the digital economy," said Anne Jellema, CEO of the digital rights group World Wide Web Foundation. "These weak and unclear net neutrality regulations threaten innovation and free speech. Now, European start-ups may have to compete on an uneven playing field against industry titans, while small civil society groups risk having their voices overwhelmed by well-funded giants."
The Paris-based advocacy organization La Quadrature Du Net described the vote as "a profound disillusion for all those who, throughout the years, battled to ensure net neutrality in Europe."
"Today [members of Parliament] had the chance to stand their ground against the Council and the Commission, but they only showed timid faces in front of threats to abandon the text or prolong the negotiations. By voting this incomplete and non-protective text, they sell off citizens' rights and liberties and hamper small and innovative companies in favor of big telecommunication companies," said La Quadrature legal and policy analysis coordinator Agnes de Cornulier. "They also give a bad signal on their weakness, thus endangering all future negotiations."
Following the vote, the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) will have nine months to develop guidelines for state-based agencies, like Ofcom in the United Kingdom, to implement the new rules.
Advocacy groups said those guidelines could help consumers and companies regain some of their power amid the rejection of wider net neutrality protections, even if it comes through future court rulings on those regulations.
"All is not lost," Jellema said. "The European Parliament is essentially tossing a hot potato to the Body of European Regulators, national regulators and the courts, who will have to decide how these spectacularly unclear rules will be implemented. The onus is now on these groups to heed the call of hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens and prevent a two-speed Internet."
De Cornulier added, "The task to mend the text's loopholes left by the MEPs now rests on governments deprived of transparency, at the risk of widening them even more, until Justice intervenes and long-lasting judiciary procedures set out an uncertain precedence."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.