The bill passed Friday strips the women's health provider of its funding for contraception, pap smears, and testing for sexually-transmitted infections, unless it stops performing abortions. (Photo: Reuters)
Sep 18, 2015
An ideological and at times sorely misinformed debate--one catalyzed by the right-wing's latest "underhanded smear campaign" targeting women's health--gripped the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday, as the chamber approved two anti-choice bills, one of which strips Planned Parenthood of all its federal funding for one year.
The Republican-majority House passed both the Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2015 (roll call here), which cuts off federal funding to the critical healthcare provider for one year unless it stops providing abortions, and the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (roll call here), which would impose criminal penalties on doctors who do not try to save a fetus that "survives an abortion."
"It is unconscionable that politicians in Congress continue to play this game of keep-away with women's basic health care services. Without access to critical health care offered at Planned Parenthood clinics across the U.S., the lives and health of countless women will be at grave risk."
--Nancy Northup, Center for Reproductive Rights
The latter bill, wroteRH Reality Check's Teddy Wilson on Wednesday, represents "an idea that some Republican lawmakers seem happy to run with in order to confuse several very different ideas in the public's mind: infanticide, later abortion, abortion in general, and the services Planned Parenthood provides."
Both measures are opposed by women's health organizations, the White House (pdf), and a majority of the American public. President Barack Obama has vowed to veto the bills if they reach his desk, saying they would "disproportionately impact low-income individuals" and "likely have a chilling effect, reducing access to care," respectively.
In advance of the votes, Planned Parenthood circulated a memo urging lawmakers to vote against the bills. "The ultimate goal of anti-abortion extremists in Congress is to promote their political agenda of banning safe, legal abortion in this country," the memo read.
Attributed to Dana Singiser, Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) vice president for government relations and public policy, and Jacqueline Ayers, PPFA's legislative director, the memo (pdf) called the Defund Planned Parenthood bill "a politically motivated attempt to limit access to critical healthcare for millions of women, men and young people" that would "shatter the country's public health safety net and jeopardize women's health.
The Born-Alive Act, they said, "would interfere with the sacred doctor-patient relationship and substitute a physician's best judgment with that of a group of politicians."
Both Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America tracked the floor debate on social media.
\u201c.@RepLoisFrankel calls out the bill's purpose: punish PP for giving women the care they need to lead healthy lives.\u201d— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1442593082
\u201c.@USRepKCastor: Again & again, Republicans are putting radical special-interest agendas before running the govt #StandWithPP #FactsNotFraud\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1442587546
And following the votes, Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) president and CEO Nancy Northup declared: "It is unconscionable that politicians in Congress continue to play this game of keep-away with women's basic healthcare services. Without access to critical health care offered at Planned Parenthood clinics across the U.S., the lives and health of countless women will be at grave risk."
"We continue to stand with Planned Parenthood and high-quality reproductive health care providers against this underhanded smear campaign," Northup continued. "All women deserve access to high-quality, affordable health care services and we call upon Congress to reject any measures which validate these unfounded attacks."
Right-wing groups and legislators are at odds about the best way to implement their anti-choice agenda. The Washington Post explained some of the political considerations at play:
The bills were brought to the House floor amid an effort by a group of conservative members to tie Planned Parenthood funding to the approaching government funding deadline in order to create leverage with President Obama and congressional Democrats. But Obama has pledged to veto any measure targeting Planned Parenthood or abortion rights, and Senate Democrats would likely filibuster any such bill making a veto unnecessary.
The Senate took an August test vote on a Planned Parenthood defunding bill, which fell well short of the 60 votes necessary. Senators are expected to take a procedural vote Tuesday on a bill banning abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy in a related effort to demonstrate the political hurdles facing any bill restricting abortion rights.
Referencing that very bill, CRR's Northup said: "Rather than advancing policies that would actually benefit women and their families, politicians in Congress seem to be fixated on laws that violate women's rights and place their health at serious risk."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
barack obamacenter for reproductive rightsplanned parenthoodpublic healthreproductive rightsrepublican partyus congressus housewomen
An ideological and at times sorely misinformed debate--one catalyzed by the right-wing's latest "underhanded smear campaign" targeting women's health--gripped the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday, as the chamber approved two anti-choice bills, one of which strips Planned Parenthood of all its federal funding for one year.
The Republican-majority House passed both the Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2015 (roll call here), which cuts off federal funding to the critical healthcare provider for one year unless it stops providing abortions, and the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (roll call here), which would impose criminal penalties on doctors who do not try to save a fetus that "survives an abortion."
"It is unconscionable that politicians in Congress continue to play this game of keep-away with women's basic health care services. Without access to critical health care offered at Planned Parenthood clinics across the U.S., the lives and health of countless women will be at grave risk."
--Nancy Northup, Center for Reproductive Rights
The latter bill, wroteRH Reality Check's Teddy Wilson on Wednesday, represents "an idea that some Republican lawmakers seem happy to run with in order to confuse several very different ideas in the public's mind: infanticide, later abortion, abortion in general, and the services Planned Parenthood provides."
Both measures are opposed by women's health organizations, the White House (pdf), and a majority of the American public. President Barack Obama has vowed to veto the bills if they reach his desk, saying they would "disproportionately impact low-income individuals" and "likely have a chilling effect, reducing access to care," respectively.
In advance of the votes, Planned Parenthood circulated a memo urging lawmakers to vote against the bills. "The ultimate goal of anti-abortion extremists in Congress is to promote their political agenda of banning safe, legal abortion in this country," the memo read.
Attributed to Dana Singiser, Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) vice president for government relations and public policy, and Jacqueline Ayers, PPFA's legislative director, the memo (pdf) called the Defund Planned Parenthood bill "a politically motivated attempt to limit access to critical healthcare for millions of women, men and young people" that would "shatter the country's public health safety net and jeopardize women's health.
The Born-Alive Act, they said, "would interfere with the sacred doctor-patient relationship and substitute a physician's best judgment with that of a group of politicians."
Both Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America tracked the floor debate on social media.
\u201c.@RepLoisFrankel calls out the bill's purpose: punish PP for giving women the care they need to lead healthy lives.\u201d— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1442593082
\u201c.@USRepKCastor: Again & again, Republicans are putting radical special-interest agendas before running the govt #StandWithPP #FactsNotFraud\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1442587546
And following the votes, Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) president and CEO Nancy Northup declared: "It is unconscionable that politicians in Congress continue to play this game of keep-away with women's basic healthcare services. Without access to critical health care offered at Planned Parenthood clinics across the U.S., the lives and health of countless women will be at grave risk."
"We continue to stand with Planned Parenthood and high-quality reproductive health care providers against this underhanded smear campaign," Northup continued. "All women deserve access to high-quality, affordable health care services and we call upon Congress to reject any measures which validate these unfounded attacks."
Right-wing groups and legislators are at odds about the best way to implement their anti-choice agenda. The Washington Post explained some of the political considerations at play:
The bills were brought to the House floor amid an effort by a group of conservative members to tie Planned Parenthood funding to the approaching government funding deadline in order to create leverage with President Obama and congressional Democrats. But Obama has pledged to veto any measure targeting Planned Parenthood or abortion rights, and Senate Democrats would likely filibuster any such bill making a veto unnecessary.
The Senate took an August test vote on a Planned Parenthood defunding bill, which fell well short of the 60 votes necessary. Senators are expected to take a procedural vote Tuesday on a bill banning abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy in a related effort to demonstrate the political hurdles facing any bill restricting abortion rights.
Referencing that very bill, CRR's Northup said: "Rather than advancing policies that would actually benefit women and their families, politicians in Congress seem to be fixated on laws that violate women's rights and place their health at serious risk."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
An ideological and at times sorely misinformed debate--one catalyzed by the right-wing's latest "underhanded smear campaign" targeting women's health--gripped the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday, as the chamber approved two anti-choice bills, one of which strips Planned Parenthood of all its federal funding for one year.
The Republican-majority House passed both the Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2015 (roll call here), which cuts off federal funding to the critical healthcare provider for one year unless it stops providing abortions, and the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (roll call here), which would impose criminal penalties on doctors who do not try to save a fetus that "survives an abortion."
"It is unconscionable that politicians in Congress continue to play this game of keep-away with women's basic health care services. Without access to critical health care offered at Planned Parenthood clinics across the U.S., the lives and health of countless women will be at grave risk."
--Nancy Northup, Center for Reproductive Rights
The latter bill, wroteRH Reality Check's Teddy Wilson on Wednesday, represents "an idea that some Republican lawmakers seem happy to run with in order to confuse several very different ideas in the public's mind: infanticide, later abortion, abortion in general, and the services Planned Parenthood provides."
Both measures are opposed by women's health organizations, the White House (pdf), and a majority of the American public. President Barack Obama has vowed to veto the bills if they reach his desk, saying they would "disproportionately impact low-income individuals" and "likely have a chilling effect, reducing access to care," respectively.
In advance of the votes, Planned Parenthood circulated a memo urging lawmakers to vote against the bills. "The ultimate goal of anti-abortion extremists in Congress is to promote their political agenda of banning safe, legal abortion in this country," the memo read.
Attributed to Dana Singiser, Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) vice president for government relations and public policy, and Jacqueline Ayers, PPFA's legislative director, the memo (pdf) called the Defund Planned Parenthood bill "a politically motivated attempt to limit access to critical healthcare for millions of women, men and young people" that would "shatter the country's public health safety net and jeopardize women's health.
The Born-Alive Act, they said, "would interfere with the sacred doctor-patient relationship and substitute a physician's best judgment with that of a group of politicians."
Both Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America tracked the floor debate on social media.
\u201c.@RepLoisFrankel calls out the bill's purpose: punish PP for giving women the care they need to lead healthy lives.\u201d— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1442593082
\u201c.@USRepKCastor: Again & again, Republicans are putting radical special-interest agendas before running the govt #StandWithPP #FactsNotFraud\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1442587546
And following the votes, Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) president and CEO Nancy Northup declared: "It is unconscionable that politicians in Congress continue to play this game of keep-away with women's basic healthcare services. Without access to critical health care offered at Planned Parenthood clinics across the U.S., the lives and health of countless women will be at grave risk."
"We continue to stand with Planned Parenthood and high-quality reproductive health care providers against this underhanded smear campaign," Northup continued. "All women deserve access to high-quality, affordable health care services and we call upon Congress to reject any measures which validate these unfounded attacks."
Right-wing groups and legislators are at odds about the best way to implement their anti-choice agenda. The Washington Post explained some of the political considerations at play:
The bills were brought to the House floor amid an effort by a group of conservative members to tie Planned Parenthood funding to the approaching government funding deadline in order to create leverage with President Obama and congressional Democrats. But Obama has pledged to veto any measure targeting Planned Parenthood or abortion rights, and Senate Democrats would likely filibuster any such bill making a veto unnecessary.
The Senate took an August test vote on a Planned Parenthood defunding bill, which fell well short of the 60 votes necessary. Senators are expected to take a procedural vote Tuesday on a bill banning abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy in a related effort to demonstrate the political hurdles facing any bill restricting abortion rights.
Referencing that very bill, CRR's Northup said: "Rather than advancing policies that would actually benefit women and their families, politicians in Congress seem to be fixated on laws that violate women's rights and place their health at serious risk."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.