Prosecution Against Alleged Stuxnet Leaker Reportedly Stalls Over US Foreign Policy Considerations
The Washington Post has reported that the leak prosecution of retired Marine General James E. "Hoss" Cartwright, who allegedly disclosed information on the Stuxnet cyber attack against Iran's nuclear program, has stalled. United States government officials are apparently concerned it may impact US-Israel relations or jeopardize a nuclear deal with Iran.
The Washington Post has reported that the leak prosecution of retired Marine General James E. "Hoss" Cartwright, who allegedly disclosed information on the Stuxnet cyber attack against Iran's nuclear program, has stalled. United States government officials are apparently concerned it may impact US-Israel relations or jeopardize a nuclear deal with Iran.
Cartwright, the former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been a known suspect since June 2013. FBI agents reportedly believe they have a strong case against him. However, Israel and the United States have refused to acknowledge the sabotage, which Cartwright allegedly revealed to New York Times reporter David Sanger.
The Post report stems from unnamed current and former US officials. It suggests that Israel may oppose the government's prosecution of Cartwright if it means information related to Stuxnet would have to be revealed in open court.
An attorney for Cartwright, Gregory B. Craig, who once served as White House counsel for President Barack Obama's administration, told the Post he "has had no contact with prosecutors for more than a year."
Unfortunately, the report lacks a number of specific details related to the prosecution. The Post was unable to find out whether the Justice Department will pursue a case against Cartwright. It mostly consists of comments from experts on how foreign policy and "national security" considerations may impact leak prosecutions.
While addressing how the prosecution likely stalled because of Israel or negotiations over an Iranian nuclear deal, it overlooks how that may not really be the case at all. Israel may benefit if Cartwright was prosecuted and desire a prosecution.
Journalist Marcy Wheeler astutely pointed out that the existence of Stuxnet was already known to the world prior to Cartwright's alleged leak. An anti-virus company in Belarus discovered it. The operation lost control of Stuxnet, and it "escaped."
Possibly, the Justice Department suspected Cartwright leaked details that pinned the blame on Israel for losing control of Stuxnet. Wheeler noted that prior to the Stuxnet leak investigation, the "House tried to legally mandate investigations into leaks that 'degrad[e] Israel's ability to defend itself.'"
"Have we gotten to the point where America's most fiercely guarded secrets -- the kind that could put a retired general in legal jeopardy -- concern not America, but Israel?" Wheeler asked.
If how Israel stands to benefit is considered in the political calculation the Justice Department might make, it seems far more likely that the prosecution has stalled until a nuclear deal is finalized.
There is a lot that is still unknown. What is publicly known is that Cartwright was considered to be "Obama's favorite general." He "impressed the White House with his intellect and expertise on the modern technology of national security, including on nuclear weapons, missile defense and cyber warfare."
Cartwright was a part of the culture of access journalism in Washington. He would talk to reporters regularly (perhaps, even to provide them with "authorized leaks").
It is possible Sanger knew details and managed to get Cartwright to confirm certain facts for his story on Stuxnet, which caused quite an uproar among Republican senators in 2012.
What evidence is there that the leak of information related to Stuxnet risked or impacted US national security?
There does not seem to be any proof the person who leaked this information deserves to be the subject of an aggressive prosecution and charged with violating the Espionage Act.
The National Security Agency recognizes that Iran learns from these acts of sabotage. They may potentially use these methods against the US or other countries. So, Stuxnet revelations force the US and Israel to consider how their covert operations are making the world less safe.
Finally, in the two-tiered system where decorated war generals like David Petraeus get sweetheart plea deals and former lower-level CIA officers like John Kiriakou or Jeffrey Sterling face prison time for unauthorized disclosures, Cartwright will more than likely escape prosecution. If this happens, it is the appropriate outcome.
The Justice Department should not serve the global security state by selectively and vindictively pursuing prosecutions. Talking to a reporter is not espionage and should not be treated as a serious crime.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Washington Post has reported that the leak prosecution of retired Marine General James E. "Hoss" Cartwright, who allegedly disclosed information on the Stuxnet cyber attack against Iran's nuclear program, has stalled. United States government officials are apparently concerned it may impact US-Israel relations or jeopardize a nuclear deal with Iran.
Cartwright, the former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been a known suspect since June 2013. FBI agents reportedly believe they have a strong case against him. However, Israel and the United States have refused to acknowledge the sabotage, which Cartwright allegedly revealed to New York Times reporter David Sanger.
The Post report stems from unnamed current and former US officials. It suggests that Israel may oppose the government's prosecution of Cartwright if it means information related to Stuxnet would have to be revealed in open court.
An attorney for Cartwright, Gregory B. Craig, who once served as White House counsel for President Barack Obama's administration, told the Post he "has had no contact with prosecutors for more than a year."
Unfortunately, the report lacks a number of specific details related to the prosecution. The Post was unable to find out whether the Justice Department will pursue a case against Cartwright. It mostly consists of comments from experts on how foreign policy and "national security" considerations may impact leak prosecutions.
While addressing how the prosecution likely stalled because of Israel or negotiations over an Iranian nuclear deal, it overlooks how that may not really be the case at all. Israel may benefit if Cartwright was prosecuted and desire a prosecution.
Journalist Marcy Wheeler astutely pointed out that the existence of Stuxnet was already known to the world prior to Cartwright's alleged leak. An anti-virus company in Belarus discovered it. The operation lost control of Stuxnet, and it "escaped."
Possibly, the Justice Department suspected Cartwright leaked details that pinned the blame on Israel for losing control of Stuxnet. Wheeler noted that prior to the Stuxnet leak investigation, the "House tried to legally mandate investigations into leaks that 'degrad[e] Israel's ability to defend itself.'"
"Have we gotten to the point where America's most fiercely guarded secrets -- the kind that could put a retired general in legal jeopardy -- concern not America, but Israel?" Wheeler asked.
If how Israel stands to benefit is considered in the political calculation the Justice Department might make, it seems far more likely that the prosecution has stalled until a nuclear deal is finalized.
There is a lot that is still unknown. What is publicly known is that Cartwright was considered to be "Obama's favorite general." He "impressed the White House with his intellect and expertise on the modern technology of national security, including on nuclear weapons, missile defense and cyber warfare."
Cartwright was a part of the culture of access journalism in Washington. He would talk to reporters regularly (perhaps, even to provide them with "authorized leaks").
It is possible Sanger knew details and managed to get Cartwright to confirm certain facts for his story on Stuxnet, which caused quite an uproar among Republican senators in 2012.
What evidence is there that the leak of information related to Stuxnet risked or impacted US national security?
There does not seem to be any proof the person who leaked this information deserves to be the subject of an aggressive prosecution and charged with violating the Espionage Act.
The National Security Agency recognizes that Iran learns from these acts of sabotage. They may potentially use these methods against the US or other countries. So, Stuxnet revelations force the US and Israel to consider how their covert operations are making the world less safe.
Finally, in the two-tiered system where decorated war generals like David Petraeus get sweetheart plea deals and former lower-level CIA officers like John Kiriakou or Jeffrey Sterling face prison time for unauthorized disclosures, Cartwright will more than likely escape prosecution. If this happens, it is the appropriate outcome.
The Justice Department should not serve the global security state by selectively and vindictively pursuing prosecutions. Talking to a reporter is not espionage and should not be treated as a serious crime.
The Washington Post has reported that the leak prosecution of retired Marine General James E. "Hoss" Cartwright, who allegedly disclosed information on the Stuxnet cyber attack against Iran's nuclear program, has stalled. United States government officials are apparently concerned it may impact US-Israel relations or jeopardize a nuclear deal with Iran.
Cartwright, the former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been a known suspect since June 2013. FBI agents reportedly believe they have a strong case against him. However, Israel and the United States have refused to acknowledge the sabotage, which Cartwright allegedly revealed to New York Times reporter David Sanger.
The Post report stems from unnamed current and former US officials. It suggests that Israel may oppose the government's prosecution of Cartwright if it means information related to Stuxnet would have to be revealed in open court.
An attorney for Cartwright, Gregory B. Craig, who once served as White House counsel for President Barack Obama's administration, told the Post he "has had no contact with prosecutors for more than a year."
Unfortunately, the report lacks a number of specific details related to the prosecution. The Post was unable to find out whether the Justice Department will pursue a case against Cartwright. It mostly consists of comments from experts on how foreign policy and "national security" considerations may impact leak prosecutions.
While addressing how the prosecution likely stalled because of Israel or negotiations over an Iranian nuclear deal, it overlooks how that may not really be the case at all. Israel may benefit if Cartwright was prosecuted and desire a prosecution.
Journalist Marcy Wheeler astutely pointed out that the existence of Stuxnet was already known to the world prior to Cartwright's alleged leak. An anti-virus company in Belarus discovered it. The operation lost control of Stuxnet, and it "escaped."
Possibly, the Justice Department suspected Cartwright leaked details that pinned the blame on Israel for losing control of Stuxnet. Wheeler noted that prior to the Stuxnet leak investigation, the "House tried to legally mandate investigations into leaks that 'degrad[e] Israel's ability to defend itself.'"
"Have we gotten to the point where America's most fiercely guarded secrets -- the kind that could put a retired general in legal jeopardy -- concern not America, but Israel?" Wheeler asked.
If how Israel stands to benefit is considered in the political calculation the Justice Department might make, it seems far more likely that the prosecution has stalled until a nuclear deal is finalized.
There is a lot that is still unknown. What is publicly known is that Cartwright was considered to be "Obama's favorite general." He "impressed the White House with his intellect and expertise on the modern technology of national security, including on nuclear weapons, missile defense and cyber warfare."
Cartwright was a part of the culture of access journalism in Washington. He would talk to reporters regularly (perhaps, even to provide them with "authorized leaks").
It is possible Sanger knew details and managed to get Cartwright to confirm certain facts for his story on Stuxnet, which caused quite an uproar among Republican senators in 2012.
What evidence is there that the leak of information related to Stuxnet risked or impacted US national security?
There does not seem to be any proof the person who leaked this information deserves to be the subject of an aggressive prosecution and charged with violating the Espionage Act.
The National Security Agency recognizes that Iran learns from these acts of sabotage. They may potentially use these methods against the US or other countries. So, Stuxnet revelations force the US and Israel to consider how their covert operations are making the world less safe.
Finally, in the two-tiered system where decorated war generals like David Petraeus get sweetheart plea deals and former lower-level CIA officers like John Kiriakou or Jeffrey Sterling face prison time for unauthorized disclosures, Cartwright will more than likely escape prosecution. If this happens, it is the appropriate outcome.
The Justice Department should not serve the global security state by selectively and vindictively pursuing prosecutions. Talking to a reporter is not espionage and should not be treated as a serious crime.