

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

By 2017, the small New England state will launch the country's first single-payer plan, designed to recognize healthcare as a right, not a privilege, for all Vermont residents. As AP reports, the plan "combines universal coverage with new cost controls in an effort to move away from a system in which the more procedures doctors and hospitals perform, the more they get paid, to one in which providers have a set budget to care for a set number of patients."
AP writes:
The plan is especially ambitious in the current atmosphere surrounding health care in the United States. Republicans in Congress balk at the federal health overhaul years after it was signed into law. States are still negotiating their terms for implementing it. And some major employers have begun to drastically limit their offerings of employee health insurance, raising questions about the future of the industry altogether.
However, while Vermont's relatively small population makes it easier to execute a single-payer plan compared to larger states, the road to universal healthcare in the state will not be without its obstacles.
"Implementation of the law now waits for the clearance of a number of crucial hurdles," Ethan Parke at Solutions wrote recently, "among them a federal waiver of requirements in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act--Obamacare--and the passage of a financing plan that would raise enough new tax revenue to replace what is currently spent on private health insurance premiums."
The very existence of Obama's private-insurance-industry-based plan could still "derail the Vermont initiative," Parke warns.
Calling for a national single-payer national healthcare program, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders recently noted that while Obama's Affordable Care Act is a step in the right direction--a step Sanders himself voted for--it still falls short of helping millions of people who lack health insurance in the U.S.
As Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! recently wrote, "up to 8 million poor people, mostly African-Americans and single mothers, and mostly in the Deep South," will still be stranded without insurance after all is said and done.
If Vermont's plans are successful, however, none of those uninsured will be in the Green Mountain State--a model many are hoping will one day be applied country-wide.
_______________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

By 2017, the small New England state will launch the country's first single-payer plan, designed to recognize healthcare as a right, not a privilege, for all Vermont residents. As AP reports, the plan "combines universal coverage with new cost controls in an effort to move away from a system in which the more procedures doctors and hospitals perform, the more they get paid, to one in which providers have a set budget to care for a set number of patients."
AP writes:
The plan is especially ambitious in the current atmosphere surrounding health care in the United States. Republicans in Congress balk at the federal health overhaul years after it was signed into law. States are still negotiating their terms for implementing it. And some major employers have begun to drastically limit their offerings of employee health insurance, raising questions about the future of the industry altogether.
However, while Vermont's relatively small population makes it easier to execute a single-payer plan compared to larger states, the road to universal healthcare in the state will not be without its obstacles.
"Implementation of the law now waits for the clearance of a number of crucial hurdles," Ethan Parke at Solutions wrote recently, "among them a federal waiver of requirements in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act--Obamacare--and the passage of a financing plan that would raise enough new tax revenue to replace what is currently spent on private health insurance premiums."
The very existence of Obama's private-insurance-industry-based plan could still "derail the Vermont initiative," Parke warns.
Calling for a national single-payer national healthcare program, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders recently noted that while Obama's Affordable Care Act is a step in the right direction--a step Sanders himself voted for--it still falls short of helping millions of people who lack health insurance in the U.S.
As Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! recently wrote, "up to 8 million poor people, mostly African-Americans and single mothers, and mostly in the Deep South," will still be stranded without insurance after all is said and done.
If Vermont's plans are successful, however, none of those uninsured will be in the Green Mountain State--a model many are hoping will one day be applied country-wide.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

By 2017, the small New England state will launch the country's first single-payer plan, designed to recognize healthcare as a right, not a privilege, for all Vermont residents. As AP reports, the plan "combines universal coverage with new cost controls in an effort to move away from a system in which the more procedures doctors and hospitals perform, the more they get paid, to one in which providers have a set budget to care for a set number of patients."
AP writes:
The plan is especially ambitious in the current atmosphere surrounding health care in the United States. Republicans in Congress balk at the federal health overhaul years after it was signed into law. States are still negotiating their terms for implementing it. And some major employers have begun to drastically limit their offerings of employee health insurance, raising questions about the future of the industry altogether.
However, while Vermont's relatively small population makes it easier to execute a single-payer plan compared to larger states, the road to universal healthcare in the state will not be without its obstacles.
"Implementation of the law now waits for the clearance of a number of crucial hurdles," Ethan Parke at Solutions wrote recently, "among them a federal waiver of requirements in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act--Obamacare--and the passage of a financing plan that would raise enough new tax revenue to replace what is currently spent on private health insurance premiums."
The very existence of Obama's private-insurance-industry-based plan could still "derail the Vermont initiative," Parke warns.
Calling for a national single-payer national healthcare program, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders recently noted that while Obama's Affordable Care Act is a step in the right direction--a step Sanders himself voted for--it still falls short of helping millions of people who lack health insurance in the U.S.
As Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! recently wrote, "up to 8 million poor people, mostly African-Americans and single mothers, and mostly in the Deep South," will still be stranded without insurance after all is said and done.
If Vermont's plans are successful, however, none of those uninsured will be in the Green Mountain State--a model many are hoping will one day be applied country-wide.
_______________________