Native Americans Need Hillary to Actually Be An Ally Against the Dakota Access Pipeline
Ok, let's state the obvious: Trump is bad for Native Americans. He's bad for all people of color, really. He wants to stop Muslims from coming into this country, deport 11 million Mexicans, and put a wall between the United States and a nation of people who belong on this continent more than he does.
Ok, let's state the obvious: Trump is bad for Native Americans. He's bad for all people of color, really. He wants to stop Muslims from coming into this country, deport 11 million Mexicans, and put a wall between the United States and a nation of people who belong on this continent more than he does.
But for Native Americans specifically, he has spread racist lies with the intent of stunting Native economic development. While opposing a Native American casino that would compete with his own, he assumed the role of a white man deciding who counts as "Indian. He said the Mashantucket Pequot tribal members didn't "look like Indians" to him. He's also backed the Keystone XL Pipeline, which local tribal groups fought tooth and nail to stop. While in North Dakota, he said of KXL: "I want it built, but I want a piece of the profits,"
In this campaign though, I haven't heard him even mention Native people once.
There is no doubt in my mind: Donald Trump as President would be terrible for Native Americans.
Clinton, on the other hand, is supposed to be a Native ally. Supposed to be.
But over the course of the last month, Hillary has failed the allyship test. There are many Native people looking for a reason to support her zealously, yet she has not provided it.
280 tribal groups from across the country have joined forces to stop the Dakota Access Pipeline. But Hillary Clinton still has said not one word on the topic.
Look, I know most folks don't understand how rare it is for all Native people to agree on anything, but assume that it's as rare as all white people agreeing on anything or all black people agreeing on anything. It simply does not happen!
But on this particular topic, there is huge and unprecedented consensus. In fact, there is so much agreement amongst Native communities on stopping the Dakota Access Pipeline that if Clinton were listening to Native communities, this issue would top her website. She would have to insist the Dakota Access Pipeline and Treaty Rights be on the list of topics for the upcoming debates. She would talk about it during her rallies and her interviews.
We deserve to know her position.
So why isn't she doing it? Native people are working passionately to get some clarity. She has no excuse--she has great Native advisers who certainly apprised her of the issue many times over. Hillary Clinton should answer why she feels Native people do not deserve an answer on this topic.
We've seen her listen to the movement for black lives and #BlackLivesMatter -- reversing course on decades of pro-incarceration policies to meet voters where they are today. We've seen her listen to Latinos on immigration, and come out against deportations and in favor of a full pathway to citizenship. Good for her. These groups likewise deserve clarity and a strong ally.
Now, it's time for Hillary Clinton to listen to Native Americans.
There is a clear opening here -- I want Hillary Clinton to be our candidate, our ally.
Hillary has not given Native Americans many reasons to vote for her, but Trump has given us many reasons not to vote for him. Still, that will not be enough to bring Native people out in droves.
Just like any community, she needs to provide a reason to vote for her, not just against Trump. She has not provided that reason. Hillary Clinton can give Native Americans that opportunity -- she can reach out a hand of allyship to us. She can show that she won't follow in the footsteps of previous presidents who have broken hundreds of treaties and spilled the blood of so many of our brothers and sisters.
We are rising up. We are calling for change. The Dakota Access Pipeline is the biggest unity moment for Native Americans in 140 years.
Hillary's not Bernie or Barack; she's not someone Indian Country has gotten excited about. Yet. But she could be. With a firm stance on the Dakota Access Pipeline and treaty rights generally, she could win enthusiastic support.
Hillary Clinton has an opportunity to ally with Native Americans, to join us in a historic moment of unity, a stand for our very humanity. The question now is, will she?
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Ok, let's state the obvious: Trump is bad for Native Americans. He's bad for all people of color, really. He wants to stop Muslims from coming into this country, deport 11 million Mexicans, and put a wall between the United States and a nation of people who belong on this continent more than he does.
But for Native Americans specifically, he has spread racist lies with the intent of stunting Native economic development. While opposing a Native American casino that would compete with his own, he assumed the role of a white man deciding who counts as "Indian. He said the Mashantucket Pequot tribal members didn't "look like Indians" to him. He's also backed the Keystone XL Pipeline, which local tribal groups fought tooth and nail to stop. While in North Dakota, he said of KXL: "I want it built, but I want a piece of the profits,"
In this campaign though, I haven't heard him even mention Native people once.
There is no doubt in my mind: Donald Trump as President would be terrible for Native Americans.
Clinton, on the other hand, is supposed to be a Native ally. Supposed to be.
But over the course of the last month, Hillary has failed the allyship test. There are many Native people looking for a reason to support her zealously, yet she has not provided it.
280 tribal groups from across the country have joined forces to stop the Dakota Access Pipeline. But Hillary Clinton still has said not one word on the topic.
Look, I know most folks don't understand how rare it is for all Native people to agree on anything, but assume that it's as rare as all white people agreeing on anything or all black people agreeing on anything. It simply does not happen!
But on this particular topic, there is huge and unprecedented consensus. In fact, there is so much agreement amongst Native communities on stopping the Dakota Access Pipeline that if Clinton were listening to Native communities, this issue would top her website. She would have to insist the Dakota Access Pipeline and Treaty Rights be on the list of topics for the upcoming debates. She would talk about it during her rallies and her interviews.
We deserve to know her position.
So why isn't she doing it? Native people are working passionately to get some clarity. She has no excuse--she has great Native advisers who certainly apprised her of the issue many times over. Hillary Clinton should answer why she feels Native people do not deserve an answer on this topic.
We've seen her listen to the movement for black lives and #BlackLivesMatter -- reversing course on decades of pro-incarceration policies to meet voters where they are today. We've seen her listen to Latinos on immigration, and come out against deportations and in favor of a full pathway to citizenship. Good for her. These groups likewise deserve clarity and a strong ally.
Now, it's time for Hillary Clinton to listen to Native Americans.
There is a clear opening here -- I want Hillary Clinton to be our candidate, our ally.
Hillary has not given Native Americans many reasons to vote for her, but Trump has given us many reasons not to vote for him. Still, that will not be enough to bring Native people out in droves.
Just like any community, she needs to provide a reason to vote for her, not just against Trump. She has not provided that reason. Hillary Clinton can give Native Americans that opportunity -- she can reach out a hand of allyship to us. She can show that she won't follow in the footsteps of previous presidents who have broken hundreds of treaties and spilled the blood of so many of our brothers and sisters.
We are rising up. We are calling for change. The Dakota Access Pipeline is the biggest unity moment for Native Americans in 140 years.
Hillary's not Bernie or Barack; she's not someone Indian Country has gotten excited about. Yet. But she could be. With a firm stance on the Dakota Access Pipeline and treaty rights generally, she could win enthusiastic support.
Hillary Clinton has an opportunity to ally with Native Americans, to join us in a historic moment of unity, a stand for our very humanity. The question now is, will she?
Ok, let's state the obvious: Trump is bad for Native Americans. He's bad for all people of color, really. He wants to stop Muslims from coming into this country, deport 11 million Mexicans, and put a wall between the United States and a nation of people who belong on this continent more than he does.
But for Native Americans specifically, he has spread racist lies with the intent of stunting Native economic development. While opposing a Native American casino that would compete with his own, he assumed the role of a white man deciding who counts as "Indian. He said the Mashantucket Pequot tribal members didn't "look like Indians" to him. He's also backed the Keystone XL Pipeline, which local tribal groups fought tooth and nail to stop. While in North Dakota, he said of KXL: "I want it built, but I want a piece of the profits,"
In this campaign though, I haven't heard him even mention Native people once.
There is no doubt in my mind: Donald Trump as President would be terrible for Native Americans.
Clinton, on the other hand, is supposed to be a Native ally. Supposed to be.
But over the course of the last month, Hillary has failed the allyship test. There are many Native people looking for a reason to support her zealously, yet she has not provided it.
280 tribal groups from across the country have joined forces to stop the Dakota Access Pipeline. But Hillary Clinton still has said not one word on the topic.
Look, I know most folks don't understand how rare it is for all Native people to agree on anything, but assume that it's as rare as all white people agreeing on anything or all black people agreeing on anything. It simply does not happen!
But on this particular topic, there is huge and unprecedented consensus. In fact, there is so much agreement amongst Native communities on stopping the Dakota Access Pipeline that if Clinton were listening to Native communities, this issue would top her website. She would have to insist the Dakota Access Pipeline and Treaty Rights be on the list of topics for the upcoming debates. She would talk about it during her rallies and her interviews.
We deserve to know her position.
So why isn't she doing it? Native people are working passionately to get some clarity. She has no excuse--she has great Native advisers who certainly apprised her of the issue many times over. Hillary Clinton should answer why she feels Native people do not deserve an answer on this topic.
We've seen her listen to the movement for black lives and #BlackLivesMatter -- reversing course on decades of pro-incarceration policies to meet voters where they are today. We've seen her listen to Latinos on immigration, and come out against deportations and in favor of a full pathway to citizenship. Good for her. These groups likewise deserve clarity and a strong ally.
Now, it's time for Hillary Clinton to listen to Native Americans.
There is a clear opening here -- I want Hillary Clinton to be our candidate, our ally.
Hillary has not given Native Americans many reasons to vote for her, but Trump has given us many reasons not to vote for him. Still, that will not be enough to bring Native people out in droves.
Just like any community, she needs to provide a reason to vote for her, not just against Trump. She has not provided that reason. Hillary Clinton can give Native Americans that opportunity -- she can reach out a hand of allyship to us. She can show that she won't follow in the footsteps of previous presidents who have broken hundreds of treaties and spilled the blood of so many of our brothers and sisters.
We are rising up. We are calling for change. The Dakota Access Pipeline is the biggest unity moment for Native Americans in 140 years.
Hillary's not Bernie or Barack; she's not someone Indian Country has gotten excited about. Yet. But she could be. With a firm stance on the Dakota Access Pipeline and treaty rights generally, she could win enthusiastic support.
Hillary Clinton has an opportunity to ally with Native Americans, to join us in a historic moment of unity, a stand for our very humanity. The question now is, will she?