

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The broadcast news networks--ABC, CBS and NBC--have aired exactly one report on the Dakota Access Pipeline protests since the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe began an encampment against the project in April, according to a search of the Nexis news database. That report, read by Anne-Marie Green, aired on the CBS Morning News at 4 a.m. on September 5. Here it is in its entirety:
The broadcast news networks--ABC, CBS and NBC--have aired exactly one report on the Dakota Access Pipeline protests since the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe began an encampment against the project in April, according to a search of the Nexis news database. That report, read by Anne-Marie Green, aired on the CBS Morning News at 4 a.m. on September 5. Here it is in its entirety:
National Public Radio reports violence during demonstrations against a proposed oil pipeline in North Dakota. Protestors confronted workers Saturday at a construction site. Police say four private security guards and two guard dogs were hurt. Tribal officials say the construction destroyed an Indian burial ground and cultural sites.
Those 48 words are a one-sided retelling of an NPR report ("Dakota Access Pipeline Protests in North Dakota Turn Violent," 9/4/16), which in turn gets most of its information, as well as its anti-protester spin, from an AP story, "Oil Pipeline Protest Turns Violent in North Dakota" (9/4/16).
But the report on NPR's website also contains video footage from Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! (9/4/16), who--apparently unlike any of her colleagues from network TV--thought the largest mobilization of indigenous activists against environmental degradation was worth reporting on. Goodman's footage shows the construction project's security guards wielding pepper spray and deploying attack dogs to provoke and injure demonstrators--violence on the part of the pipeline authorities that got left out of CBS's rip-and-read on the protests.
Also missing from what is so far the entirety of broadcast TV news' coverage of the Dakota Access protest is any mention of the threat the pipeline poses to water resources--the pipeline crosses the Missouri River just half a mile north of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation--or the climate destruction facilitated by pipelines designed to ship fracked oil out to consumers.
But I suppose that if you're only going to give a story 48 words of coverage, at four o'clock on a single morning, there's only so much you can say.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The broadcast news networks--ABC, CBS and NBC--have aired exactly one report on the Dakota Access Pipeline protests since the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe began an encampment against the project in April, according to a search of the Nexis news database. That report, read by Anne-Marie Green, aired on the CBS Morning News at 4 a.m. on September 5. Here it is in its entirety:
National Public Radio reports violence during demonstrations against a proposed oil pipeline in North Dakota. Protestors confronted workers Saturday at a construction site. Police say four private security guards and two guard dogs were hurt. Tribal officials say the construction destroyed an Indian burial ground and cultural sites.
Those 48 words are a one-sided retelling of an NPR report ("Dakota Access Pipeline Protests in North Dakota Turn Violent," 9/4/16), which in turn gets most of its information, as well as its anti-protester spin, from an AP story, "Oil Pipeline Protest Turns Violent in North Dakota" (9/4/16).
But the report on NPR's website also contains video footage from Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! (9/4/16), who--apparently unlike any of her colleagues from network TV--thought the largest mobilization of indigenous activists against environmental degradation was worth reporting on. Goodman's footage shows the construction project's security guards wielding pepper spray and deploying attack dogs to provoke and injure demonstrators--violence on the part of the pipeline authorities that got left out of CBS's rip-and-read on the protests.
Also missing from what is so far the entirety of broadcast TV news' coverage of the Dakota Access protest is any mention of the threat the pipeline poses to water resources--the pipeline crosses the Missouri River just half a mile north of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation--or the climate destruction facilitated by pipelines designed to ship fracked oil out to consumers.
But I suppose that if you're only going to give a story 48 words of coverage, at four o'clock on a single morning, there's only so much you can say.
The broadcast news networks--ABC, CBS and NBC--have aired exactly one report on the Dakota Access Pipeline protests since the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe began an encampment against the project in April, according to a search of the Nexis news database. That report, read by Anne-Marie Green, aired on the CBS Morning News at 4 a.m. on September 5. Here it is in its entirety:
National Public Radio reports violence during demonstrations against a proposed oil pipeline in North Dakota. Protestors confronted workers Saturday at a construction site. Police say four private security guards and two guard dogs were hurt. Tribal officials say the construction destroyed an Indian burial ground and cultural sites.
Those 48 words are a one-sided retelling of an NPR report ("Dakota Access Pipeline Protests in North Dakota Turn Violent," 9/4/16), which in turn gets most of its information, as well as its anti-protester spin, from an AP story, "Oil Pipeline Protest Turns Violent in North Dakota" (9/4/16).
But the report on NPR's website also contains video footage from Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! (9/4/16), who--apparently unlike any of her colleagues from network TV--thought the largest mobilization of indigenous activists against environmental degradation was worth reporting on. Goodman's footage shows the construction project's security guards wielding pepper spray and deploying attack dogs to provoke and injure demonstrators--violence on the part of the pipeline authorities that got left out of CBS's rip-and-read on the protests.
Also missing from what is so far the entirety of broadcast TV news' coverage of the Dakota Access protest is any mention of the threat the pipeline poses to water resources--the pipeline crosses the Missouri River just half a mile north of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation--or the climate destruction facilitated by pipelines designed to ship fracked oil out to consumers.
But I suppose that if you're only going to give a story 48 words of coverage, at four o'clock on a single morning, there's only so much you can say.