Being Stupid in the Endless War on Terrorism
The West is at war with Muslim terrorists, not Muslims, let alone Islam. That has been the mantra of the states waging war on terrorism. But much of the Muslim world doesn't buy that, believing instead that the war on terrorism is part of a broader war to control oil and geo-political interests.
The West is at war with Muslim terrorists, not Muslims, let alone Islam. That has been the mantra of the states waging war on terrorism. But much of the Muslim world doesn't buy that, believing instead that the war on terrorism is part of a broader war to control oil and geo-political interests.
A related assertion is that terrorism by some Muslims does not mean that all or even most Muslims are terrorists. But a growing number of Europeans and North Americans don't buy that. Equating terrorism with Islam, they are suspicious of Muslims, including fellow-citizens, whom they hound and whose faith they denigrate on a scale not seen since past shameful episodes of bigotry against Jews, Japanese, blacks and others.
But our leaders must stick to their mantras, as part of the propaganda to rationalize wars and unholy alliances with autocratic Muslim client states.
Barack Obama may, in fact, believe what he says in separating faith from terrorism. But his Western allies, Prime Minister Stephen Harper included, let it slip once in a while that they have doubts about what they are parroting.
On Monday, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, said in a speech on security: "I've often heard Western leaders describe Islam as a 'religion of peace.' I wish more Muslim leaders would say that more often, and mean it."
He is skeptical of fellow Western leaders as well as Muslims. The latter don't assert the ostensibly peaceful nature of Islam enough and what little they do say is insincere.
Harper and his MPs have learned to say that Muslim terrorists have perverted peaceful Islam. Last fall in New York, he even acknowledged that those "who become radicalized and go off to fight in foreign places or sit around plotting attacks in Canada or the United States" have only an "extremely tangential connection" to Muslims and mosques. Many "have no background in Islam whatsoever . . . Our Muslim community has actually really helped to identify a lot of these threats . . . because they are anything but aligned with this kind of thinking." Yet last month, when he made jihad on jihadists his re-election platform, he changed his tune. Canadian mosques may, in fact, be incubators of terrorism -- he would crack down on terrorist ideas hatched "in a basement or a mosque."
Last month German Chancellor Angela Merkel unexpectedly reached out to Muslims ("I am chancellor of all Germans"), yet she added this: "Most people in Germany are not enemies of Islam -- they are uncertain in their verdict, even perplexed." They want to know "how we can still follow the often-repeated sentence that murderers who cite Islam for their deeds have nothing to do with Islam. I think it's important and urgent for these questions to be cleared up by Islamic clergy."
British Prime Minister David Cameron wants British Muslims to prove that Islam belongs in Britain. Last month he agreed with Eric Pickles, minister for local government, who wrote to more than 1,000 Muslim religious leaders: "You have an important responsibility in explaining and demonstrating how faith in Islam can be part of British identity."
So, terrorism is not Islamic. Muslims and mosques know little about Western wanna-be jihadists. Yet Muslims -- clergy, in particular -- must prove their patriotism by condemning the terrorism they already have, and help in ferreting out the jihadists they don't know.
This strange combination of treating a community as a fifth column, yet pleading for its help speaks to the confusing, contradictory and at times stupid approaches to the war on terror.
Terrorists hate us for our values, including free speech. So we curtail it -- as in Harper's Anti-Terrorism Act; as in cutting off Parliamentary debate on it; as in prohibiting the media from interviewing the jailed Omar Khadr; and as in turning Ottawa into a walled fortress from where little information can seep out.
Terrorists hate us because of our freedoms. So Montreal blocks the opening of a new community centre by a controversial imam; Outremont cancels an Islamic graduation ceremony; Shawinigan rejects a mosque application; and Quebec's third party, Coalition Avenir Quebec, proposes a new body to vet all new Muslim institutions that may violate Quebec values, whose definition we do not know.
And Ottawa refuses the right of a woman to wear the niqab at a citizenship ceremony, and will spend millions of dollars appealing a court ruling in her favour.
There's misogyny in the Muslim world. So we emulate it here by assuming that niqabi women are incapable of independent judgment and must be ordered, mostly by men in authority, what to wear or not and when.
We dread the sharia. So we copy it -- Marine Le Pen, leader of the French far-right, calls for the return of the death penalty, and Harper gets tougher and tougher on crime.
The best antidote to terrorism is democracy. So we crush it in Muslim lands, by cozying up to autocrats there.
We have been losing the war on terror -- witness the expanding number of groups and the territory they control. Less understood is that we have also lost our capacity to think straight -- a grievous self-inflicted wound on democracies.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The West is at war with Muslim terrorists, not Muslims, let alone Islam. That has been the mantra of the states waging war on terrorism. But much of the Muslim world doesn't buy that, believing instead that the war on terrorism is part of a broader war to control oil and geo-political interests.
A related assertion is that terrorism by some Muslims does not mean that all or even most Muslims are terrorists. But a growing number of Europeans and North Americans don't buy that. Equating terrorism with Islam, they are suspicious of Muslims, including fellow-citizens, whom they hound and whose faith they denigrate on a scale not seen since past shameful episodes of bigotry against Jews, Japanese, blacks and others.
But our leaders must stick to their mantras, as part of the propaganda to rationalize wars and unholy alliances with autocratic Muslim client states.
Barack Obama may, in fact, believe what he says in separating faith from terrorism. But his Western allies, Prime Minister Stephen Harper included, let it slip once in a while that they have doubts about what they are parroting.
On Monday, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, said in a speech on security: "I've often heard Western leaders describe Islam as a 'religion of peace.' I wish more Muslim leaders would say that more often, and mean it."
He is skeptical of fellow Western leaders as well as Muslims. The latter don't assert the ostensibly peaceful nature of Islam enough and what little they do say is insincere.
Harper and his MPs have learned to say that Muslim terrorists have perverted peaceful Islam. Last fall in New York, he even acknowledged that those "who become radicalized and go off to fight in foreign places or sit around plotting attacks in Canada or the United States" have only an "extremely tangential connection" to Muslims and mosques. Many "have no background in Islam whatsoever . . . Our Muslim community has actually really helped to identify a lot of these threats . . . because they are anything but aligned with this kind of thinking." Yet last month, when he made jihad on jihadists his re-election platform, he changed his tune. Canadian mosques may, in fact, be incubators of terrorism -- he would crack down on terrorist ideas hatched "in a basement or a mosque."
Last month German Chancellor Angela Merkel unexpectedly reached out to Muslims ("I am chancellor of all Germans"), yet she added this: "Most people in Germany are not enemies of Islam -- they are uncertain in their verdict, even perplexed." They want to know "how we can still follow the often-repeated sentence that murderers who cite Islam for their deeds have nothing to do with Islam. I think it's important and urgent for these questions to be cleared up by Islamic clergy."
British Prime Minister David Cameron wants British Muslims to prove that Islam belongs in Britain. Last month he agreed with Eric Pickles, minister for local government, who wrote to more than 1,000 Muslim religious leaders: "You have an important responsibility in explaining and demonstrating how faith in Islam can be part of British identity."
So, terrorism is not Islamic. Muslims and mosques know little about Western wanna-be jihadists. Yet Muslims -- clergy, in particular -- must prove their patriotism by condemning the terrorism they already have, and help in ferreting out the jihadists they don't know.
This strange combination of treating a community as a fifth column, yet pleading for its help speaks to the confusing, contradictory and at times stupid approaches to the war on terror.
Terrorists hate us for our values, including free speech. So we curtail it -- as in Harper's Anti-Terrorism Act; as in cutting off Parliamentary debate on it; as in prohibiting the media from interviewing the jailed Omar Khadr; and as in turning Ottawa into a walled fortress from where little information can seep out.
Terrorists hate us because of our freedoms. So Montreal blocks the opening of a new community centre by a controversial imam; Outremont cancels an Islamic graduation ceremony; Shawinigan rejects a mosque application; and Quebec's third party, Coalition Avenir Quebec, proposes a new body to vet all new Muslim institutions that may violate Quebec values, whose definition we do not know.
And Ottawa refuses the right of a woman to wear the niqab at a citizenship ceremony, and will spend millions of dollars appealing a court ruling in her favour.
There's misogyny in the Muslim world. So we emulate it here by assuming that niqabi women are incapable of independent judgment and must be ordered, mostly by men in authority, what to wear or not and when.
We dread the sharia. So we copy it -- Marine Le Pen, leader of the French far-right, calls for the return of the death penalty, and Harper gets tougher and tougher on crime.
The best antidote to terrorism is democracy. So we crush it in Muslim lands, by cozying up to autocrats there.
We have been losing the war on terror -- witness the expanding number of groups and the territory they control. Less understood is that we have also lost our capacity to think straight -- a grievous self-inflicted wound on democracies.
The West is at war with Muslim terrorists, not Muslims, let alone Islam. That has been the mantra of the states waging war on terrorism. But much of the Muslim world doesn't buy that, believing instead that the war on terrorism is part of a broader war to control oil and geo-political interests.
A related assertion is that terrorism by some Muslims does not mean that all or even most Muslims are terrorists. But a growing number of Europeans and North Americans don't buy that. Equating terrorism with Islam, they are suspicious of Muslims, including fellow-citizens, whom they hound and whose faith they denigrate on a scale not seen since past shameful episodes of bigotry against Jews, Japanese, blacks and others.
But our leaders must stick to their mantras, as part of the propaganda to rationalize wars and unholy alliances with autocratic Muslim client states.
Barack Obama may, in fact, believe what he says in separating faith from terrorism. But his Western allies, Prime Minister Stephen Harper included, let it slip once in a while that they have doubts about what they are parroting.
On Monday, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, said in a speech on security: "I've often heard Western leaders describe Islam as a 'religion of peace.' I wish more Muslim leaders would say that more often, and mean it."
He is skeptical of fellow Western leaders as well as Muslims. The latter don't assert the ostensibly peaceful nature of Islam enough and what little they do say is insincere.
Harper and his MPs have learned to say that Muslim terrorists have perverted peaceful Islam. Last fall in New York, he even acknowledged that those "who become radicalized and go off to fight in foreign places or sit around plotting attacks in Canada or the United States" have only an "extremely tangential connection" to Muslims and mosques. Many "have no background in Islam whatsoever . . . Our Muslim community has actually really helped to identify a lot of these threats . . . because they are anything but aligned with this kind of thinking." Yet last month, when he made jihad on jihadists his re-election platform, he changed his tune. Canadian mosques may, in fact, be incubators of terrorism -- he would crack down on terrorist ideas hatched "in a basement or a mosque."
Last month German Chancellor Angela Merkel unexpectedly reached out to Muslims ("I am chancellor of all Germans"), yet she added this: "Most people in Germany are not enemies of Islam -- they are uncertain in their verdict, even perplexed." They want to know "how we can still follow the often-repeated sentence that murderers who cite Islam for their deeds have nothing to do with Islam. I think it's important and urgent for these questions to be cleared up by Islamic clergy."
British Prime Minister David Cameron wants British Muslims to prove that Islam belongs in Britain. Last month he agreed with Eric Pickles, minister for local government, who wrote to more than 1,000 Muslim religious leaders: "You have an important responsibility in explaining and demonstrating how faith in Islam can be part of British identity."
So, terrorism is not Islamic. Muslims and mosques know little about Western wanna-be jihadists. Yet Muslims -- clergy, in particular -- must prove their patriotism by condemning the terrorism they already have, and help in ferreting out the jihadists they don't know.
This strange combination of treating a community as a fifth column, yet pleading for its help speaks to the confusing, contradictory and at times stupid approaches to the war on terror.
Terrorists hate us for our values, including free speech. So we curtail it -- as in Harper's Anti-Terrorism Act; as in cutting off Parliamentary debate on it; as in prohibiting the media from interviewing the jailed Omar Khadr; and as in turning Ottawa into a walled fortress from where little information can seep out.
Terrorists hate us because of our freedoms. So Montreal blocks the opening of a new community centre by a controversial imam; Outremont cancels an Islamic graduation ceremony; Shawinigan rejects a mosque application; and Quebec's third party, Coalition Avenir Quebec, proposes a new body to vet all new Muslim institutions that may violate Quebec values, whose definition we do not know.
And Ottawa refuses the right of a woman to wear the niqab at a citizenship ceremony, and will spend millions of dollars appealing a court ruling in her favour.
There's misogyny in the Muslim world. So we emulate it here by assuming that niqabi women are incapable of independent judgment and must be ordered, mostly by men in authority, what to wear or not and when.
We dread the sharia. So we copy it -- Marine Le Pen, leader of the French far-right, calls for the return of the death penalty, and Harper gets tougher and tougher on crime.
The best antidote to terrorism is democracy. So we crush it in Muslim lands, by cozying up to autocrats there.
We have been losing the war on terror -- witness the expanding number of groups and the territory they control. Less understood is that we have also lost our capacity to think straight -- a grievous self-inflicted wound on democracies.