SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Obama Appoints Dr. Drone to Head CIA
Pres. Obama just made a hideous appointment.
He replaced the disgraced David Petraeus at the CIA with John Brennan, Dr. Drone.
This is a hideous appointment.
Jan 07, 2013
Pres. Obama just made a hideous appointment.
One of the leading opposition figures in Pakistan, Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician, bases much of his campaign on opposition to drones.He replaced the disgraced David Petraeus at the CIA with John Brennan, Dr. Drone.
This is a hideous appointment.
Brennan, as Obama's counterterrorism czar, has overseen the massive proliferation of our drone warfare.
He's called it "ethical and just," and he even went so far as to say that the United States hadn't killed a single civilian in over almost a year's span of drone attacks.
That might be because he and the Administration claimed that any adult male killed by a drone was de facto a member of a terrorist group.
In any event, the drone attacks actually have killed hundreds and hundreds of innocent people - and not just men -- in Yemen, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, enflaming hatred against us. The next issue of The Progressive is carrying an article by a reporter who went to North Waziristan and actually talked to family members who lost loved ones to drones.
One man, Wakil Khan, lost his wife and three children. "May God curse the U.S.A. because they don't differentiate between the innocent and the guilty," he said.
One of the leading opposition figures in Pakistan, Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician, bases much of his campaign on opposition to drones.
In Yemen, the effect of drones is similarly counterproductive.
"Testimonies from Qaeda fighters and interviews I and local journalists have conducted across Yemen attest to the centrality of civilian casualties in explaining Al Qaeda's rapid growth there. The United States is killing women, children and members of key tribes," wrote Gregory D. Johnsen in an op-ed in The New York Times in November.
Johnsen, the author of "The Last Refuge: Yemen, Al-Qaeda, and America's War in Arabia," quoted one Yemeni as saying: "Each time they kill a tribesman, they create more fighters for Al Qaeda."
"Living Under Drones," a recent report by Stanford Law School and NYU Law School, "provides new and firsthand testimony about the negative impacts US policies are having on the civilians living under drones."
It cites one journalistic source as saying that U.S. drones have killed 176 children in Pakistan alone.
And the report concludes that drone attacks "undermine respect for the rule of law and international legal protections and may set dangerous precedents."
One dangerous precedent is the killing of U.S. citizens by our own government, which Brennan justifies. He saw nothing wrong with the killing of Anwar Al-Awlaki, the alleged Al Qaeda propagandist and conspirator, in a drone strike that also killed another U.S. citizen, Samir Khan, a young editor of an allegedly pro-Al Qaeda publication. But Brennan has no justification for the killing of Al-Awlaki's son, Abdulrahman, an American citizen who loved the Simpsons. A U.S. drone wiped out young Abdulrahman two weeks after his father and Khan were killed. The ACLU and the Center for Constitutional Rights have a case pending against the U.S. government simply to get an accounting of its actions in these three American deaths.
And as Glenn Greenwald pointed out shortly after Obama won the Presidency the first time,
Brennan "was an ardent supporter of torture and one of the most emphatic advocates of FISA expansions and telecom immunity."
John Brennan is a liar, and he's a dangerous man. And now he has only more power to be dangerous.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
barack obamacenter for constitutional rightsciadavid petraeusdronesglenn greenwaldimran khanjohn brennanpakistanyemen
Pres. Obama just made a hideous appointment.
One of the leading opposition figures in Pakistan, Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician, bases much of his campaign on opposition to drones.He replaced the disgraced David Petraeus at the CIA with John Brennan, Dr. Drone.
This is a hideous appointment.
Brennan, as Obama's counterterrorism czar, has overseen the massive proliferation of our drone warfare.
He's called it "ethical and just," and he even went so far as to say that the United States hadn't killed a single civilian in over almost a year's span of drone attacks.
That might be because he and the Administration claimed that any adult male killed by a drone was de facto a member of a terrorist group.
In any event, the drone attacks actually have killed hundreds and hundreds of innocent people - and not just men -- in Yemen, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, enflaming hatred against us. The next issue of The Progressive is carrying an article by a reporter who went to North Waziristan and actually talked to family members who lost loved ones to drones.
One man, Wakil Khan, lost his wife and three children. "May God curse the U.S.A. because they don't differentiate between the innocent and the guilty," he said.
One of the leading opposition figures in Pakistan, Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician, bases much of his campaign on opposition to drones.
In Yemen, the effect of drones is similarly counterproductive.
"Testimonies from Qaeda fighters and interviews I and local journalists have conducted across Yemen attest to the centrality of civilian casualties in explaining Al Qaeda's rapid growth there. The United States is killing women, children and members of key tribes," wrote Gregory D. Johnsen in an op-ed in The New York Times in November.
Johnsen, the author of "The Last Refuge: Yemen, Al-Qaeda, and America's War in Arabia," quoted one Yemeni as saying: "Each time they kill a tribesman, they create more fighters for Al Qaeda."
"Living Under Drones," a recent report by Stanford Law School and NYU Law School, "provides new and firsthand testimony about the negative impacts US policies are having on the civilians living under drones."
It cites one journalistic source as saying that U.S. drones have killed 176 children in Pakistan alone.
And the report concludes that drone attacks "undermine respect for the rule of law and international legal protections and may set dangerous precedents."
One dangerous precedent is the killing of U.S. citizens by our own government, which Brennan justifies. He saw nothing wrong with the killing of Anwar Al-Awlaki, the alleged Al Qaeda propagandist and conspirator, in a drone strike that also killed another U.S. citizen, Samir Khan, a young editor of an allegedly pro-Al Qaeda publication. But Brennan has no justification for the killing of Al-Awlaki's son, Abdulrahman, an American citizen who loved the Simpsons. A U.S. drone wiped out young Abdulrahman two weeks after his father and Khan were killed. The ACLU and the Center for Constitutional Rights have a case pending against the U.S. government simply to get an accounting of its actions in these three American deaths.
And as Glenn Greenwald pointed out shortly after Obama won the Presidency the first time,
Brennan "was an ardent supporter of torture and one of the most emphatic advocates of FISA expansions and telecom immunity."
John Brennan is a liar, and he's a dangerous man. And now he has only more power to be dangerous.
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
Pres. Obama just made a hideous appointment.
One of the leading opposition figures in Pakistan, Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician, bases much of his campaign on opposition to drones.He replaced the disgraced David Petraeus at the CIA with John Brennan, Dr. Drone.
This is a hideous appointment.
Brennan, as Obama's counterterrorism czar, has overseen the massive proliferation of our drone warfare.
He's called it "ethical and just," and he even went so far as to say that the United States hadn't killed a single civilian in over almost a year's span of drone attacks.
That might be because he and the Administration claimed that any adult male killed by a drone was de facto a member of a terrorist group.
In any event, the drone attacks actually have killed hundreds and hundreds of innocent people - and not just men -- in Yemen, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, enflaming hatred against us. The next issue of The Progressive is carrying an article by a reporter who went to North Waziristan and actually talked to family members who lost loved ones to drones.
One man, Wakil Khan, lost his wife and three children. "May God curse the U.S.A. because they don't differentiate between the innocent and the guilty," he said.
One of the leading opposition figures in Pakistan, Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician, bases much of his campaign on opposition to drones.
In Yemen, the effect of drones is similarly counterproductive.
"Testimonies from Qaeda fighters and interviews I and local journalists have conducted across Yemen attest to the centrality of civilian casualties in explaining Al Qaeda's rapid growth there. The United States is killing women, children and members of key tribes," wrote Gregory D. Johnsen in an op-ed in The New York Times in November.
Johnsen, the author of "The Last Refuge: Yemen, Al-Qaeda, and America's War in Arabia," quoted one Yemeni as saying: "Each time they kill a tribesman, they create more fighters for Al Qaeda."
"Living Under Drones," a recent report by Stanford Law School and NYU Law School, "provides new and firsthand testimony about the negative impacts US policies are having on the civilians living under drones."
It cites one journalistic source as saying that U.S. drones have killed 176 children in Pakistan alone.
And the report concludes that drone attacks "undermine respect for the rule of law and international legal protections and may set dangerous precedents."
One dangerous precedent is the killing of U.S. citizens by our own government, which Brennan justifies. He saw nothing wrong with the killing of Anwar Al-Awlaki, the alleged Al Qaeda propagandist and conspirator, in a drone strike that also killed another U.S. citizen, Samir Khan, a young editor of an allegedly pro-Al Qaeda publication. But Brennan has no justification for the killing of Al-Awlaki's son, Abdulrahman, an American citizen who loved the Simpsons. A U.S. drone wiped out young Abdulrahman two weeks after his father and Khan were killed. The ACLU and the Center for Constitutional Rights have a case pending against the U.S. government simply to get an accounting of its actions in these three American deaths.
And as Glenn Greenwald pointed out shortly after Obama won the Presidency the first time,
Brennan "was an ardent supporter of torture and one of the most emphatic advocates of FISA expansions and telecom immunity."
John Brennan is a liar, and he's a dangerous man. And now he has only more power to be dangerous.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.