SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Tax Cut Lies: The Day The News Died
Dec 05, 2010
The New York Times today jumped on board with a classic Frank Luntz "Big Lie."
Democrats in the House and Senate put forth a bill that would reduce taxes on the first quarter-million, and then, when that failed, the first million dollars of income for every single American.
Somebody earning $100,000 a year would get a tax cut on all of their income.
Somebody earning $250,000 a year would get a tax cut on all of their income with the Democrats first proposal.
Somebody earning $1,000,000 a year would get a tax cut on all of their income with the Democrats' second proposal.
And a billionaire who pulls down $5 million or $50 million a year would get a tax cut on the first $250,000 or $1,000,000 of that income. They just wouldn't get a tax cut on any income they earned OVER the first quarter-million or million (proposals one and two).
Now read the first paragraph of The New York Times' reporting (by David M. Herzenhorn) on this:
WASHINGTON - The Senate on Saturday rejected President Obama's proposal to end the Bush-era tax breaks on income above $250,000 for couples and $200,000 for individuals, a triumph for Republicans who have long called for continuing the income tax cuts for everyone.
What? "Republicans who have long called for continuing the income tax cuts for everyone"??
EVERYONE would have gotten a tax cut under the Democrats' proposal. Every single taxpayer in America, from the street-sweeper to Bill Gates. Everyone!
While it's egregious that The New York Times would adopt this sort of deceptive language, suggesting that Democrats don't want to give "everyone" a tax cut, it's even more disastrous that the President hasn't been pointing this out.
Or simply saying, "We just want to go back to the Clinton tax rates for everybody. Remember? The ones that produce 20 million jobs and a surplus budget? That's all we're asking for."
But the President isn't saying it - or offering much by way of leadership on anything these days - and the Democrats who are saying it are being systematically ignored by the media.
Michael Copps, the Commissioner of the FCC, recently told Katty Kay of the BBC that we're not producing "news" the way we were decades ago, but instead our media have a "substance abuse" problem, cranking out only infotainment designed to generate profits. Copps said it's putting our very democracy at risk.
There are no more in-your-face examples of the death of real news than the distorted coverage of the Democrats' attempt to give a tax break on the first million dollars of income earned to every single American, regardless of how much they earn.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Thom Hartmann
Thom Hartmann is a talk-show host and the author of "The Hidden History of Monopolies: How Big Business Destroyed the American Dream" (2020); "The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America" (2019); and more than 25 other books in print.
The New York Times today jumped on board with a classic Frank Luntz "Big Lie."
Democrats in the House and Senate put forth a bill that would reduce taxes on the first quarter-million, and then, when that failed, the first million dollars of income for every single American.
Somebody earning $100,000 a year would get a tax cut on all of their income.
Somebody earning $250,000 a year would get a tax cut on all of their income with the Democrats first proposal.
Somebody earning $1,000,000 a year would get a tax cut on all of their income with the Democrats' second proposal.
And a billionaire who pulls down $5 million or $50 million a year would get a tax cut on the first $250,000 or $1,000,000 of that income. They just wouldn't get a tax cut on any income they earned OVER the first quarter-million or million (proposals one and two).
Now read the first paragraph of The New York Times' reporting (by David M. Herzenhorn) on this:
WASHINGTON - The Senate on Saturday rejected President Obama's proposal to end the Bush-era tax breaks on income above $250,000 for couples and $200,000 for individuals, a triumph for Republicans who have long called for continuing the income tax cuts for everyone.
What? "Republicans who have long called for continuing the income tax cuts for everyone"??
EVERYONE would have gotten a tax cut under the Democrats' proposal. Every single taxpayer in America, from the street-sweeper to Bill Gates. Everyone!
While it's egregious that The New York Times would adopt this sort of deceptive language, suggesting that Democrats don't want to give "everyone" a tax cut, it's even more disastrous that the President hasn't been pointing this out.
Or simply saying, "We just want to go back to the Clinton tax rates for everybody. Remember? The ones that produce 20 million jobs and a surplus budget? That's all we're asking for."
But the President isn't saying it - or offering much by way of leadership on anything these days - and the Democrats who are saying it are being systematically ignored by the media.
Michael Copps, the Commissioner of the FCC, recently told Katty Kay of the BBC that we're not producing "news" the way we were decades ago, but instead our media have a "substance abuse" problem, cranking out only infotainment designed to generate profits. Copps said it's putting our very democracy at risk.
There are no more in-your-face examples of the death of real news than the distorted coverage of the Democrats' attempt to give a tax break on the first million dollars of income earned to every single American, regardless of how much they earn.
Thom Hartmann
Thom Hartmann is a talk-show host and the author of "The Hidden History of Monopolies: How Big Business Destroyed the American Dream" (2020); "The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America" (2019); and more than 25 other books in print.
The New York Times today jumped on board with a classic Frank Luntz "Big Lie."
Democrats in the House and Senate put forth a bill that would reduce taxes on the first quarter-million, and then, when that failed, the first million dollars of income for every single American.
Somebody earning $100,000 a year would get a tax cut on all of their income.
Somebody earning $250,000 a year would get a tax cut on all of their income with the Democrats first proposal.
Somebody earning $1,000,000 a year would get a tax cut on all of their income with the Democrats' second proposal.
And a billionaire who pulls down $5 million or $50 million a year would get a tax cut on the first $250,000 or $1,000,000 of that income. They just wouldn't get a tax cut on any income they earned OVER the first quarter-million or million (proposals one and two).
Now read the first paragraph of The New York Times' reporting (by David M. Herzenhorn) on this:
WASHINGTON - The Senate on Saturday rejected President Obama's proposal to end the Bush-era tax breaks on income above $250,000 for couples and $200,000 for individuals, a triumph for Republicans who have long called for continuing the income tax cuts for everyone.
What? "Republicans who have long called for continuing the income tax cuts for everyone"??
EVERYONE would have gotten a tax cut under the Democrats' proposal. Every single taxpayer in America, from the street-sweeper to Bill Gates. Everyone!
While it's egregious that The New York Times would adopt this sort of deceptive language, suggesting that Democrats don't want to give "everyone" a tax cut, it's even more disastrous that the President hasn't been pointing this out.
Or simply saying, "We just want to go back to the Clinton tax rates for everybody. Remember? The ones that produce 20 million jobs and a surplus budget? That's all we're asking for."
But the President isn't saying it - or offering much by way of leadership on anything these days - and the Democrats who are saying it are being systematically ignored by the media.
Michael Copps, the Commissioner of the FCC, recently told Katty Kay of the BBC that we're not producing "news" the way we were decades ago, but instead our media have a "substance abuse" problem, cranking out only infotainment designed to generate profits. Copps said it's putting our very democracy at risk.
There are no more in-your-face examples of the death of real news than the distorted coverage of the Democrats' attempt to give a tax break on the first million dollars of income earned to every single American, regardless of how much they earn.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.