SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
We Still Have a Lot to Learn from Nelson Mandela
Feb 16, 2010
The 20th anniversary this week of Nelson Mandela's release from prison gives sufficient reason to ask if we will ever learn from his example.
This is not the easy story line about the man who was imprisoned under apartheid for 27 years, yet became president of South Africa without an embittered heart.
Nor is it the story in which the media are comparing his legacy to the current commotion under President Jacob Zuma, whether it be HIV, the disparity and crime in the townships, or Zuma's now legendary inability to keep his zipper up. Having been to South Africa twice in the last eight months, there is much degradation to be seen. But one must also still remark how amazing that country is, only 16 years out of apartheid. It is hard for the United States to throw stones since it took a full century after ending slavery to establish civil rights laws for African Americans.
No, the Mandela we should be thinking about here in the United States is the one whose prescience remains unanswered by us.
When Mandela came to Harvard University in 1998 to receive an honorary degree, he said, "The current world financial crisis also starkly reminds us that many of the concepts that guided our sense of how the world and its affairs are best ordered, have suddenly been shown to be wanting.'' He noted how economic theorists went "unchallenged in the day-to-day operations of a system that operated in the interests of the powerful.''
We sure learned a lot in the decade since, didn't we? Not only are we back to hearing about millions in cash and stock bonuses to the heads of taxpayer-bailed-out banks, it appears that someone got to President Obama to tone down his populist outrage.
As the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, Obama said, "It would be unacceptable for executives of these institutions to earn a windfall at a time when the US Treasury has taken unprecedented steps to rescue these companies with taxpayer resources.'' Just last month, he was using "fat cat'' rhetoric to criticize a system "that makes a few people obscene amounts of money but doesn't add value to the economy.''
But this week, Obama told Bloomberg Business Week that he does not "begrudge'' the $9 million in stock bonuses to Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein and the $17 million bonus to JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon. Obama said the bonuses indeed represented an "extraordinary amount of money'' to the average person but then brushed it off by adding "there are some baseball players who are making more than that and don't get to the World Series either, so I'm shocked by that as well . . . I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen.''
Obama needs to review the part of Mandela's Harvard speech that said the world financial crisis calls for a "fundamental rethinking and reconceptualization.'' The rest of us can revisit the part of the speech where Mandela said, "The greatest single challenge facing our globalized world is to combat and eradicate its disparities . . . we constantly need to remind ourselves that the freedoms which democracy brings will remain empty shells if they are not accompanied by real and tangible improvements in the material lives of the millions of ordinary citizens of those countries.''
We did not learn much from that, either. While the media feasts on the problems of South Africa, which has the second-highest income disparities in the world according to the CIA Factbook, we are not setting much of an example, despite our wealth and even after we put an African American in the White House. The income inequality of the United States is statistically worse than China, Nigeria, and Nicaragua.
It is the 20th anniversary of the freedom of Nelson Mandela. But the evidence remains scant that we are serious about his dream of economic freedom for all.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Boston Globe
Derrick Z. Jackson
Derrick Z. Jackson is a Pulitzer Prize finalist; a National Headliner and Scripps Howard winner; a 14-time winner from the National Association of Black Journalists; and co-author of The Puffin Plan (2020, Tumblehome), the 2021 winner in Teen Nonfiction from the Independent Book Publishers Association.
The 20th anniversary this week of Nelson Mandela's release from prison gives sufficient reason to ask if we will ever learn from his example.
This is not the easy story line about the man who was imprisoned under apartheid for 27 years, yet became president of South Africa without an embittered heart.
Nor is it the story in which the media are comparing his legacy to the current commotion under President Jacob Zuma, whether it be HIV, the disparity and crime in the townships, or Zuma's now legendary inability to keep his zipper up. Having been to South Africa twice in the last eight months, there is much degradation to be seen. But one must also still remark how amazing that country is, only 16 years out of apartheid. It is hard for the United States to throw stones since it took a full century after ending slavery to establish civil rights laws for African Americans.
No, the Mandela we should be thinking about here in the United States is the one whose prescience remains unanswered by us.
When Mandela came to Harvard University in 1998 to receive an honorary degree, he said, "The current world financial crisis also starkly reminds us that many of the concepts that guided our sense of how the world and its affairs are best ordered, have suddenly been shown to be wanting.'' He noted how economic theorists went "unchallenged in the day-to-day operations of a system that operated in the interests of the powerful.''
We sure learned a lot in the decade since, didn't we? Not only are we back to hearing about millions in cash and stock bonuses to the heads of taxpayer-bailed-out banks, it appears that someone got to President Obama to tone down his populist outrage.
As the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, Obama said, "It would be unacceptable for executives of these institutions to earn a windfall at a time when the US Treasury has taken unprecedented steps to rescue these companies with taxpayer resources.'' Just last month, he was using "fat cat'' rhetoric to criticize a system "that makes a few people obscene amounts of money but doesn't add value to the economy.''
But this week, Obama told Bloomberg Business Week that he does not "begrudge'' the $9 million in stock bonuses to Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein and the $17 million bonus to JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon. Obama said the bonuses indeed represented an "extraordinary amount of money'' to the average person but then brushed it off by adding "there are some baseball players who are making more than that and don't get to the World Series either, so I'm shocked by that as well . . . I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen.''
Obama needs to review the part of Mandela's Harvard speech that said the world financial crisis calls for a "fundamental rethinking and reconceptualization.'' The rest of us can revisit the part of the speech where Mandela said, "The greatest single challenge facing our globalized world is to combat and eradicate its disparities . . . we constantly need to remind ourselves that the freedoms which democracy brings will remain empty shells if they are not accompanied by real and tangible improvements in the material lives of the millions of ordinary citizens of those countries.''
We did not learn much from that, either. While the media feasts on the problems of South Africa, which has the second-highest income disparities in the world according to the CIA Factbook, we are not setting much of an example, despite our wealth and even after we put an African American in the White House. The income inequality of the United States is statistically worse than China, Nigeria, and Nicaragua.
It is the 20th anniversary of the freedom of Nelson Mandela. But the evidence remains scant that we are serious about his dream of economic freedom for all.
Derrick Z. Jackson
Derrick Z. Jackson is a Pulitzer Prize finalist; a National Headliner and Scripps Howard winner; a 14-time winner from the National Association of Black Journalists; and co-author of The Puffin Plan (2020, Tumblehome), the 2021 winner in Teen Nonfiction from the Independent Book Publishers Association.
The 20th anniversary this week of Nelson Mandela's release from prison gives sufficient reason to ask if we will ever learn from his example.
This is not the easy story line about the man who was imprisoned under apartheid for 27 years, yet became president of South Africa without an embittered heart.
Nor is it the story in which the media are comparing his legacy to the current commotion under President Jacob Zuma, whether it be HIV, the disparity and crime in the townships, or Zuma's now legendary inability to keep his zipper up. Having been to South Africa twice in the last eight months, there is much degradation to be seen. But one must also still remark how amazing that country is, only 16 years out of apartheid. It is hard for the United States to throw stones since it took a full century after ending slavery to establish civil rights laws for African Americans.
No, the Mandela we should be thinking about here in the United States is the one whose prescience remains unanswered by us.
When Mandela came to Harvard University in 1998 to receive an honorary degree, he said, "The current world financial crisis also starkly reminds us that many of the concepts that guided our sense of how the world and its affairs are best ordered, have suddenly been shown to be wanting.'' He noted how economic theorists went "unchallenged in the day-to-day operations of a system that operated in the interests of the powerful.''
We sure learned a lot in the decade since, didn't we? Not only are we back to hearing about millions in cash and stock bonuses to the heads of taxpayer-bailed-out banks, it appears that someone got to President Obama to tone down his populist outrage.
As the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, Obama said, "It would be unacceptable for executives of these institutions to earn a windfall at a time when the US Treasury has taken unprecedented steps to rescue these companies with taxpayer resources.'' Just last month, he was using "fat cat'' rhetoric to criticize a system "that makes a few people obscene amounts of money but doesn't add value to the economy.''
But this week, Obama told Bloomberg Business Week that he does not "begrudge'' the $9 million in stock bonuses to Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein and the $17 million bonus to JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon. Obama said the bonuses indeed represented an "extraordinary amount of money'' to the average person but then brushed it off by adding "there are some baseball players who are making more than that and don't get to the World Series either, so I'm shocked by that as well . . . I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen.''
Obama needs to review the part of Mandela's Harvard speech that said the world financial crisis calls for a "fundamental rethinking and reconceptualization.'' The rest of us can revisit the part of the speech where Mandela said, "The greatest single challenge facing our globalized world is to combat and eradicate its disparities . . . we constantly need to remind ourselves that the freedoms which democracy brings will remain empty shells if they are not accompanied by real and tangible improvements in the material lives of the millions of ordinary citizens of those countries.''
We did not learn much from that, either. While the media feasts on the problems of South Africa, which has the second-highest income disparities in the world according to the CIA Factbook, we are not setting much of an example, despite our wealth and even after we put an African American in the White House. The income inequality of the United States is statistically worse than China, Nigeria, and Nicaragua.
It is the 20th anniversary of the freedom of Nelson Mandela. But the evidence remains scant that we are serious about his dream of economic freedom for all.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.