January, 20 2011, 05:56pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Sarah Harrington at INTERIGHTS
sharrington@interights.org +44 (0)20 7843 0472, or
Katherine O’Shea at Reprieve’s Press Office, Katherine.Oshea@reprieve.org.uk +44(0)20 7427 1099.
Polish Prosecutor Officially Recognises Guantanamo Prisoner Abu Zubaydah as a Victim in Poland's CIA Secret Prison Investigation
Guantanamo prisoner Abu Zubaydah has
been granted all-important 'victim' status in the pending criminal
investigation into a CIA black site in Poland, following a complaint
brought by Polish lawyer Bartlomiej Jankowski working with INTERIGHTS,
Reprieve and Joe Margulies.
LONDON
Guantanamo prisoner Abu Zubaydah has
been granted all-important 'victim' status in the pending criminal
investigation into a CIA black site in Poland, following a complaint
brought by Polish lawyer Bartlomiej Jankowski working with INTERIGHTS,
Reprieve and Joe Margulies.
The Polish Prosecutor is the
first state official to accept Abu Zubaydah's claims that he was a
victim of extraordinary rendition and secret detention in Poland. Until
now both the Polish and US governments have repeatedly denied that he
was illegally imprisoned and tortured in a secret prison near Szymany;
the Prosecutor's office has now accepted that Abu Zubaydah's claims are
not only credible but also extremely serious.
Poland's decision is
a crucial step towards uncovering the truth about the CIA's rendition
and torture programme in Europe. Victim status allows Abu Zubaydah's
lawyers to participate fully in the criminal investigation, which
includes introducing further evidence, calling witnesses and taking part
in the questioning of witnesses and suspects.Abu Zubaydah himself will
be able to testify against his US torturers and their allies.
The
Polish Prosecutor's leadership stands in contrast with the Lithuanian
Prosecutor General's bizarre decision, announced this week, to close his
investigation into the CIA black site in Lithuania in which Abu
Zubaydah was also held and tortured. Like many other European states,
Lithuania was instrumental in the operation of the CIA's illegal
rendition and torture programme, and has urgent legal obligations to
provide robust and transparent investigations in order to uncover the
facts.
Today's decision follows weeks of urgent litigation by Abu
Zubaydah's international legal team. On 16 December 2010, Bartlomiej
Jankowski filed applications with the Polish Prosecutor's office showing
his client was transferred from Thailand to Poland by the CIA on 5
December 2002, and held there for nine or ten months. The applications
included extensive evidence of the roles played by CIA agents and Polish
officials in the CIA programme in Poland, the rendition flights that
transported Abu Zubaydah into and out of Poland, the private companies
involved in those flights, and the operation of the CIA's secret prison
site at Stare Kiejkuty, near Szymany.
Joseph Margulies, a law professor at Northwestern University in Chicago and US counsel for Abu Zubaydah said: "To
recognize Abu Zubaydah as a victim is to accept his humanity, which is
the first essential step to recovering from the hysteria of 9/11. It is
not surprising, that this step should be taken by the Poles before the
Americans."
Bartlomiej Jankowski, Polish cousel for Abu Zubaydah said: "Following
the arrangements made with Mr Jerzy Mierzewski, the prosecutor in
charge of the investigation, who personally informed me that Abu
Zubaydah is recognized as a victim, I will now be able to review at
least some of the unclassified documents in the investigation file. We
also expect to be given access to the classified documents. Secrecy
should not be used to shield gross human rights abuses from disclosure
to the Polish public. The Polish criminal investigation should also
receive full cooperation from the US government, which should promptly
comply with Poland's legal aid request. It is impossible to speak about
justice in this case without hearing the victims as witnesses, whether
directly in Poland or at least by video conference."
INTERIGHTS Litigation Director Helen Duffy said: "The
Prosecutor's decision is a welcome first step, but the Polish
government must do much more to vindicate Abu Zubaydah's rights. As a
recognised victim, he should now be entitled to take part in the
investigation and to uncover information concerning his abuse. It
remains to be seen whether the cloak of 'state secrecy' currently
surrounding the investigation will be lifted and the Polish authorities
will show their commitment to justice. Justice cannot be secret."
Reprieve Director Clive Stafford Smith said: "We
cannot expect to learn from history, and avoid repeating our mistakes,
if we do not know what that history was. So it is vital that European
complicity in the CIA renditions programme is brought into the light,
and the prosecutor's decision is an important step towards that goal.
This investigation is not about the persecution of individual officials,
but rather about establishing a clear picture of exactly what happened
in order to ensure that it does not happen again. It is crucial that
those who created the programme and gave the orders are not permitted to
pretend it never happened."
For more information please contact Sarah Harrington at INTERIGHTS sharrington@interights.org +44 (0)20 7843 0472, or Katherine O'Shea at Reprieve's Press Office, Katherine.Oshea@reprieve.org.uk +44(0)20 7427 1099.
Background on Abu Zubaydah
Zayn
al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn, more commonly known as Abu Zubaydah, is a
stateless Palestinian born in Saudi Arabia. He was held in secret
detention by the CIA of the United States of America from the time of
his abduction from a house in Faisalbad, Pakistan on 28 March 2002 until
approximately 6 September 2006, when it was announced that he was
transferred to the custody of the U.S. Department of Defence ('DOD') at
Guantanamo Bay. He remains in indefinite detention in DOD custody at
Guantanamo Bay. However he has never been charged with any crime,
neither in proceedings before a military commission nor in a civilian
court.
Abu Zubaydah was the first so-called 'high value detainee'
to be captured, detained and interrogated by the CIA. For the purpose
of his interrogation, the CIA devised a set of 'enhanced interrogation
techniques' intended to create a state of learned helplessness through
the application of severe physical and psychological stress. According
to former CIA Director George Tenet, once Abu Zubaydah was in custody,
the CIA 'got into holding and interrogating high-value detainees . . .
in a serious way.' He is one of three detainees subjected to the
waterboard, and US government documents show that he was waterboarded at
least 83 times in one month.
Throughout the period of Abu
Zubaydah's secret detention, interrogation and torture by the CIA he was
falsely alleged to be a member of al Qaeda and a close associate and
senior lieutenant of Osama bin Laden. He was also falsely alleged to
have had a role in various al Qaeda terrorist acts - including the
attacks on 11 September 2001. After more than six years of incommunicado
detention, Abu Zubaydah obtained access to U.S. lawyers, who challenged
his detention in U.S. courts and forced the U.S. Department of Justice
to withdraw all such allegations. The United States no longer alleges
Abu Zubaydah was ever a member of al Qaeda or that he supported al
Qaeda's radical ideology. The United States no longer alleges that Abu
Zubaydah was an associate of Osama bin Laden or that he was his senior
lieutenant. The United States no longer alleges that Abu Zubaydah had
any role in any terrorist attack planned or perpetrated by al Qaeda,
including the attacks of 11 September 2001.
Background on INTERIGHTS and Reprieve
INTERIGHTS,
the International Centre for the Legal Protection of Human Rights,
promotes and protects human rights through the use of law. We do so by
providing legal expertise to lawyers, judges, human rights defenders and
other partners concerning international and comparative human rights
law.
INTERIGHTS focuses on strategic litigation -- bringing or
supporting cases in critical areas where human rights standards can be
developed and where existing standards are under threat.
Reprieve,
a legal action charity, uses the law to enforce the human rights of
prisoners, from death row to Guantanamo Bay. Reprieve investigates,
litigates and educates, working on the frontline, to provide legal
support to prisoners unable to pay for it themselves. Reprieve promotes
the rule of law around the world, securing each person's right to a fair
trial and saving lives. Clive Stafford Smith is the founder of
Reprieve and has spent 25 years working on behalf of people facing the
death penalty in the USA.
Reprieve has represented, and continues
to represent, a large number of prisoners who have been rendered and
abused around the world, and is conducting ongoing investigations into
the rendition and the secret detention of 'ghost prisoners' in the
so-called 'war on terror.'
To join our press mailing list please email katherine.oshea@reprieve.org.uk
LATEST NEWS
'You All Moved a Mountain': Tennessee Volkswagen Workers Vote to Join UAW
"We're poised to be the first domino of many to fall," one worker at the Chattanooga plant said.
Apr 20, 2024
Workers at a Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, became the first Southern autoworkers not employed by one of the Big Three car manufacturers to win a union Friday night when they voted to join the United Auto Workers by a "landslide" majority.
This is the first major victory for the UAW after it launched the biggest organizing drive in modern U.S. history on the heels of its "stand up strike" that secured historic contracts with the Big Three in fall 2023.
"Many of the talking heads and the pundits have said to me repeatedly before we announced this campaign, 'You can't win in the South,'" UAW president Shawn Fain told the victorious workers in a video shared by UAW. "They said Southern workers aren't ready for it. They said non-union autoworkers didn't have it in them. But you all said, 'Watch this!' And you all moved a mountain."
"This incredible victory for labor will transform Tennessee and the South!"
According to the UAW's real-time results, the vote tally now stands at 2,628—or 73%—yes to 985—or 27%—no. Voting at the around 4,300-worker plant began Wednesday.
The Chattanooga workers announced their current union drive in December 2023. Friday's victory follows two failed unionization attempts at the plant in 2014 and 2019.
"We saw the big contract that UAW workers won at the Big Three and that got everybody talking," Zachary Costello, a trainer in VW's proficiency room, said in a statement. "You see the pay, the benefits, the rights UAW members have on the job, and you see how that would change your life. That's why we voted overwhelmingly for the union. Once people see the difference a union makes, there's no way to stop them."
The union's win comes despite the opposition of Republican Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee.
"Today, I joined fellow governors in opposing the UAW's unionization campaign," Lee said on social media Tuesday. "We want to keep good-paying jobs and continue to grow the American auto manufacturing sector. A successful unionization drive will stop this growth in its tracks, to the detriment of American workers."
However, Tennessee State Rep. Justin Jones (D-52) celebrated the win.
"Watching history tonight in Chattanooga, as Volkswagen workers voted in a landslide to join the UAW," he wrote on social media Friday night. "Despite pressure from Gov. Lee, this is the first auto plant in the South to unionize since the 1940s. This incredible victory for labor will transform Tennessee and the South!"
Other national labor leaders and progressive politicians also congratulated the Chattanooga workers.
Lee Saunders, president of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, said the win "shows what we already know—workers in every part of this country want the freedom to join a union, and when we stand together, we have tremendous power. Even though the deck is stacked against us, momentum is on our side, and we're winning."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said: "This is a huge victory not only for UAW workers at Volkswagen, but for every worker in America. The tide is turning. Workers all across the country, even in our most conservative states, are sick and tired of corporate greed and are demanding economic justice."
"I think it's a great push for the entire South, and people will follow suit."
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called the results "an utterly historic victory for the working class."
"Tennessee is shining bright tonight," she wrote on social media Friday. "We are in a new era. Congratulations to the courageous workers in Chattanooga and the entire UAW. Absolutely heroic. Solidarity IS the strategy—across the South, and all over the country."
More Perfect Union said the victory would "change the auto industry, and the future of American labor," and the campaign organizers themselves are aware of the importance of what they've accomplished.
"We understand that the world's watching us," worker Isaac Meadows, who has been at the plant for one year, told More Perfect Union. "You know there's a labor movement in this country, you know, we're poised to be the first domino of many to fall."
Worker Kelcey Smith, who has also been at the plant for one year, added, "I think it's a great push for the entire South, and people will follow suit."
The next domino to fall could be the Mercedes-Benz plant in Vance, Alabama, where a UAW election is scheduled from May 13-17. All told, more than 10,000 non-union car makers have signed union cards since the UAW launched its historic organizing drive.
For the Chattanooga workers, meanwhile, their next big fight will be to secure their first union-negotiated contract.
"The real fight begins now," Fain told cheering workers. "The real fight is getting your fair share. The real fight is the fight to get more time with your families. The real fight is the fight for our union contract."
"And I can guarantee you one thing," Fain continued, "this international unionist leadership, this membership all over this nation has your back in this fight."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders, Booker, and Welch Unveil Ban on Junk Food Ads Targeting Kids
"We cannot continue to allow large corporations in the food and beverage industry to put their profits over the health and wellbeing of our children," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Apr 19, 2024
A trio of U.S. senators on Friday introduced what's being billed as first-of-its-kind legislation sponsors say will "take on the greed of the food and beverage industry and address the growing diabetes and obesity epidemics" with a federal ban on junk food ads targeting children.
The Childhood Diabetes Reduction Act—introduced by Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Peter Welch (D-Vt.)—would also require warning labels "on sugar-sweetened foods and beverages; foods and beverages containing non-sugar sweeteners; ultra-processed foods; and foods high in nutrients of concern, such as added sugar, saturated fat, or sodium."
"Let's be clear: The twin crises of type 2 diabetes and obesity in America are being fueled by the food and beverage industry that, for decades, has been making massive profits by enticing children to consume unhealthy products purposely designed to be overeaten," Sanders—who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee—said in a statement. "We cannot continue to allow large corporations in the food and beverage industry to put their profits over the health and wellbeing of our children."
"Nearly 30 years ago, Congress had the courage to take on the tobacco industry, whose products killed more than 400,000 Americans every year," Sanders added. "Now is the time for Congress to act with the same sense of urgency to combat these diabetes and obesity epidemics. That means banning junk food ads targeted to kids and putting strong warning labels on food and beverages with unacceptably high levels of sugar, salt, and saturated fat."
Booker said that "the future of our nation depends on a continued investment in the health and wellbeing of our children," adding that "more and more of our children are developing diabetes and obesity primarily because a handful of corporate food giants push addictive, ultra-processed foods to drive up their profits."
"By banning junk food advertising to children, implementing front-of-package warning labels, and funding research on the dangers of ultra-processed foods, we can rein in the predatory behavior of big food companies and ensure a healthier future for generations to come," he added.
As the senators noted:
Today, more than 35 million Americans are struggling with type 2 diabetes—90% of whom are overweight or obese. These crises go hand-in-hand and children are severely impacted. Today, 1 out of 5 five kids are living with obesity. A serious illness unto itself, diabetes is also a contributing factor to heart disease, stroke, amputations, blindness, and kidney failure. Unless the U.S. dramatically changes course, these numbers will continue to grow exponentially.
The impact on the economy is enormous: Last year, the total cost of diabetes exceeded $400 billion, approximately 10% of overall U.S. healthcare expenditures.
Meanwhile, the U.S. food and beverage industry spends about $14 billion annually on marketing unhealthy products, with $2 billion of that spent on advertising these products to children.
"Our food environment has become dominated by ultra-processed foods that have more in common with a cigarette than a fruit or vegetable," said Ashley Gearhardt, director of the Food and Addiction Science & Treatment Lab at the University of Michigan. "Many ultra-processed foods are hyperpalatable and trigger the core signs of addiction, like intense cravings and a loss of control over intake."
"The American public is not adequately warned about the risks associated with these products and children are a key marketing demographic for ultra-processed foods with unhealthy nutrient profiles," Gearhardt added. "The Childhood Diabetes Reduction Act is a courageous step towards promoting the physical and mental health of American children."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Complaints of Pregnant Patients Denied Emergency Care Surged After Dobbs
"MAGA abortion bans deny women lifesaving care," one critic said in response to reporting on patient stories.
Apr 19, 2024
New reporting from The Associated Press that complaints of pregnant patients turned away from emergency departments "spiked" after the reversal of Roe v. Wade sparked fresh condemnation of efforts to restrict abortion rights on Friday.
Since the right-wing U.S. Supreme Court ended nearly half a century of nationwide abortion rights with Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in June 2022, over 20 states have enacted new restrictions on reproductive healthcare, creating a culture of confusion and fear at many medical facilities.
Early last year, the AP submitted a public records request for 2022 complaints filed under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), a federal law that requires hospitals and emergency departments that accept Medicare to provide screenings to patients who request them and prohibits refusing to treat individuals with an emergency medical condition.
"This is the reality that extreme Republicans call 'pro-life.'"
"One year after submitting the request, the federal government agreed to release only some complaints and investigative documents filed across just 19 states," the AP's Amanda Seitz reported. "The names of patients, doctors, and medical staff were redacted from the documents."
"One woman miscarried in the lobby restroom of a Texas emergency room as front desk staff refused to admit her," the journalist detailed. "Another woman learned that her fetus had no heartbeat at a Florida hospital, the day after a security guard turned her away from the facility. And in North Carolina, a woman gave birth in a car after an emergency room couldn't offer an ultrasound. The baby later died."
According to Seitz:
Emergency rooms are subject to hefty fines when they turn away patients, fail to stabilize them, or transfer them to another hospital for treatment. Violations can also put hospitals' Medicare funding at risk.
But it's unclear what fines might be imposed on more than a dozen hospitals that the Biden administration says failed to properly treat pregnant patients in 2022.
It can take years for fines to be levied in these cases. The Health and Human Services agency, which enforces the law, declined to share if the hospitals have been referred to the agency's Office of Inspector General for penalties.
Responding to the reporting on social media, journalist Jane Mayer declared, "This is barbaric."
Texas Poor People's Campaign said that women in the state "are being left to die in ER waiting rooms. We cannot let this policy violence against women continue. Please join us as we mobilize voters for the '24 election."
Going into November, abortion has been a key issue at the state and federal level. Supporters of reproductive freedom are working to advance various ballot measures while Democratic President Joe Biden's campaign has highlighted his support for abortion rights and the presumptive Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump, has bragged about his role in reversing Roe—he appointed three of the six justices behind the majority opinion.
"MAGA abortion bans deny women lifesaving care," stressed Alex Wall, senior vice president for digital advocacy at the Center for American Progress. Citing examples from Texas and Florida in the AP report, he reiterated, "MAGA Republicans did this."
Congresswoman Becca Balint (D-Vt.) said that "this is the reality that extreme Republicans call 'pro-life'—pregnant women being turned away at hospitals and emergency centers. Absolutely disgraceful. No woman should ever be denied emergency care."
Slate's Mark Joseph Stern, who covers U.S. legal battles, noted that this "devastating and timely story" from Seitz comes "just days before the Supreme Court considers whether emergency rooms can legally force patients to the brink of death before terminating a failing pregnancy."
The high court is set to hear arguments in that case Wednesday. The Biden administration is challenging Idaho's near-total ban on abortion, which "would make it a criminal offense for doctors to comply with EMTALA's requirement to provide stabilizing treatment, even where a doctor determines that abortion is the medical treatment necessary to prevent a patient from suffering severe health risks or even death," as the U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit explains.
The Justice Department is seeking a judgment that Idaho's law is invalid under the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution and "is preempted by federal law to the extent that it conflicts with EMTALA."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular